Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ай!

Channel

Ай!

@shtukish

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12,752subscribers

+2,979 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002601206222
TypeChannel
Username@shtukish
Description[Ай!] — вещи, люди, ивенты Здесь мы собираем всё красивое и нужное: мода, уход, ивенты, вдохновение, находки, искусство и чуть волшебства. Редакторы: Зелим и Дима Курирует: @aaamagazine ✨ Медиа: aaa-magazine.com Реклама/Сотрудничество : @denischh
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held51
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/shtukish

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,74713,80211,774.57 August 2026 — 9,773 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,771 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,767 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,747 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,797 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,986 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,203 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,236 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,485 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,542 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,573 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,578 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,595 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,582 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,559 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,552 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,539 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,600 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,601 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,597 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,585 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,576 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,572 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,556 subscribers26 September 2026 — 11,753 subscribers4 October 2026 — 13,802 subscribers9 October 2026 — 13,537 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,144 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,093 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,070 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,061 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,059 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,046 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,030 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,018 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,003 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,979 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,959 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,941 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,932 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,907 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,889 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,871 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,863 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,849 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,838 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,824 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,807 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,797 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,769 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,752 subscribers12,7527 August 20266 November 2026
51 measurements spanning 91 days, net +2,979. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,139–14,410 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 51
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 05:5712,752-17
5 Nov 2026, 03:0012,769-28
4 Nov 2026, 05:2612,797-10
3 Nov 2026, 02:3912,807-17
2 Nov 2026, 03:3712,824-14
1 Nov 2026, 02:0712,838-11
31 Oct 2026, 00:5012,849-14
29 Oct 2026, 23:4712,863-8
28 Oct 2026, 22:4712,871-18
27 Oct 2026, 23:1012,889-18
26 Oct 2026, 19:3812,907-25
25 Oct 2026, 18:3612,932-9
24 Oct 2026, 19:2712,941-18
23 Oct 2026, 22:4412,959-20
22 Oct 2026, 19:3812,979-24
21 Oct 2026, 16:1913,003-15
20 Oct 2026, 12:2813,018-12
19 Oct 2026, 12:3613,030-16
18 Oct 2026, 14:5613,046-13
17 Oct 2026, 16:5513,059first reading

Engagement

79 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.9%
avg views ÷ 12,752 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,640
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 79 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held79 (6 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total26,286
Reactions total500
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 19:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,660
Videos
≈546
Links
≈584

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 10s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,506 reactions across 79 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,38055.1%
💔40316.1%
👀35814.3%
🔥2228.86%
🤡1194.75%
👎240.958%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 79 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,506 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (6.25%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 14:05 UTC554 views30 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

девочки, текстовые выделители превратили в помадки! мы просто не можем это игнорировать!!! STABILO и KIKO выпустили Lip Marker в пяти базовых оттенках, но хотелось бы ещё того ярко-желтого, эх… на учебе выделяли тексты в тетрадках, а теперь выделяем губки! Галина Сергеевна упала бы от такого и превратилась бы в Машу money: €12,99 #айтем@shtukish

❤17👀8💔5

6 Nov 2026, 11:05 UTC953 views29 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Бренд STUDIO 29 — закрывается 💔

💔27👀1🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 07:09 UTC≈1,130 views89 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

нас снова обманули. в якобы «нарисованном без нейронок» новогоднем ролике Dior нашли очень много дефектов – лишние пальцы, опечатки, поехавшие лица. непонятно, зачем один из ведущих модных домов соврал о том, что видео собиралось по технологиям 1940-х годов. считайте, что былое доверие уже утрачено никакого официального ответа пока что нет, зато комментарии уже чистят :) какой же позор…

👀43💔32❤10🤡4

5 Nov 2026, 16:20 UTC≈1,050 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

наши друзья из P.Y.E. дропнули коллекцию супер легких очков из титана! в России такие оправы делают ооочень редко ⚪️ титановые очки довольно трудно производить, и в основном на них специализируются в Японии! титан гораздо легче стали, из которой обычно делают оправы, так что такие пары почти не ощущаются на лице, не сползают на нос и не давят на уши – для тех, кто носит очки каждый день, это важный момент рассматри…

❤10👀3💔1

5 Nov 2026, 09:10 UTC≈1,150 views25 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👎8❤7👀5💔2🔥2🤡1

4 Nov 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,190 views32 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

насмотревшись на Prada, модный дом Dior тоже решил сделать сказочный новогодний кампейн без ИИ!!! только у них получился полноценный оригинальный мультик на семь минут, нарисованный Сильвеном Шоме и озвученный Рианной и Робертом Паттинсоном – праздник к нам приходит ❤

❤32

4 Nov 2026, 13:53 UTC≈6,490 views36 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Coperni, прощай! бренд, который напылил платье на Беллу Хадид, закрывается. причина не в креативе самого бренда , а в деньгах: затяжная война с дистрибьютором и главным акционером Tomorrow. основатели пытались отбить контроль над собственной маркой, но не договорились. вот так вот получается, что креатив и виральность может дать вам всё, кроме надежных перспектив и выживания в трудные времена.

💔29❤5🤡2

4 Nov 2026, 09:54 UTC≈1,010 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

представляете, Тимоти Шаламе реально думает, что в таком аутфите его не опознают… он уже тоже на теплом зимнем, кстати говоря

❤7👀2💔2🤡2

3 Nov 2026, 13:52 UTC≈1,100 views16 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

забыли рассказать! половинка редакции совсем недавно посетила dot days — мероприятие от агентства dot comms, закрытое для локальных fashion-брендов! это уже девятый раз, когда команда собрала на одной площадке дизайнеров, экспертов и представителей fashion-индустрии, чтобы познакомить локальные бренды и мир медиа. было невероятно интересно подружиться с новыми брендами, услышать о процессах производства и создания …

❤15👀1

3 Nov 2026, 12:09 UTC908 views33 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

сегодня ваш редактор вдохновляется вышивкой португальского бренда odisséia* всё вышивается вручную, у каждой рубашки есть номер и сертификат аутентичности. *Instagram принадлежит компании Meta, признанной экстремистской организацией и запрещённой в России.

❤25🔥8

3 Nov 2026, 10:09 UTC≈1,040 views65 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

ой, а помните uniqlo? бренд такой был... они отказались поднимать цены на базовые носки после критики в соцсетях! uniqlo хотели поднять цену на носки с 290 до 390 иен (около $2) и отменить скидку при покупке трёх пар и более. покупатели бросились скупать носки по старой цене и подняли шум. компания прислушалась и отступила, чтобы не потерять лояльность и образ доступного бренда! а мы можем их так же забуллить в воз…

❤48💔15🤡2

3 Nov 2026, 09:04 UTC920 views33 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

наконец-то не просто очередной концепт, а физическая вещь!!! фигуристку Алису Лью увековечили в куколку Bratz и в плюшевые мини-фигурки ⚪️ знаете, хочется, чтобы они собрались с силами и сделали большую линейку со спортсменами из разных видов спорта! ту же Арину Соболенко, например в продаже с 6 ноября, а вот цену пока что не знаем :( #айтем@shtukish

❤23👀6💔4

Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @shtukish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTCAnonymous Poll303 voters

на чьей стороне ты?

  1. Зои Кравиц + Гарри Стайлз56%
  2. Кендалл Дженнер + Джейкоб Элорди48%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ай!” (@shtukish), 12,752 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shtukish.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.