Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ooes

Channel

ooes

@lizaooes

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

25,948subscribers

+213 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001403756309
TypeChannel
Username@lizaooes
CreatedBetween 1 February 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/lizaooes

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

25,59726,08925,84325,9486 August 20267 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 92 days, net +213. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,523–26,163 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 01:3725,948-32
5 Nov 2026, 23:2625,980-8
4 Nov 2026, 22:4625,988-19
4 Nov 2026, 01:1126,007-2
3 Nov 2026, 04:0926,009-9
2 Nov 2026, 07:1426,018+1
1 Nov 2026, 08:4026,017-3
31 Oct 2026, 09:0726,020-10
30 Oct 2026, 06:4026,030-18
29 Oct 2026, 08:2726,048-9
28 Oct 2026, 09:4426,057-1
27 Oct 2026, 10:2726,058-3
26 Oct 2026, 11:1626,061-21
25 Oct 2026, 07:4026,082-4
24 Oct 2026, 08:5026,086-1
23 Oct 2026, 05:2726,087-2
22 Oct 2026, 05:0026,089+4
20 Oct 2026, 21:3526,085+10
19 Oct 2026, 18:3126,075+4
18 Oct 2026, 18:3026,071first reading

Engagement

69 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 134 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.7%
avg views ÷ 25,948 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,100
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 69 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held69 (1 June 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total343,230
Reactions total27,395
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 19:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 40s
Average length
1m 20s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

79,763 reactions across 69 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 524676455740108423844,68756.0%
💔19,54324.5%
custom 528739317849474087615,53319.5%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 69 of the 69 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79,763 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,372
across the posts below
Posts paid on
63
of 69 we hold a reading for · 91%
Most on one post
172
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lizaooes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 69 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 June 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (3.23%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 21:26 UTC≈5,100 views731 reactions10 Starsread 6 November 2026

Краков <333333333333333

custom 5287393178494740876555💔176

3 Nov 2026, 20:58 UTC≈7,420 views907 reactions3 Starsread 6 November 2026

Будапешт спасибо!!!!!!!!! 🥺💋🩷🩷🩷🌹🦋😇

custom 5287393178494740876691💔216

31 Oct 2026, 14:25 UTC≈12,300 views947 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Братислава наряжайтесь!!! Upd: спасибо!!!! Обожаю вас 😊💕

custom 5287393178494740876728💔219

29 Oct 2026, 23:13 UTC≈14,600 views997 reactions15 Starsread 6 November 2026

Варшава спасибо 💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗 напрыгалась…

custom 5287393178494740876786💔211

28 Oct 2026, 21:06 UTC≈14,900 views956 reactions3 Starsread 6 November 2026

Гданьск спасибо, было очень очень уютно 😊💎🤍👸💗

custom 5287393178494740876742💔214

25 Oct 2026, 23:12 UTC≈17,000 views1,075 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

Спасибо Вильнюс!!!! Спасибо за цветы, за плакаты, за ваши сердца и голоса 🙏💔🥰🦋

custom 5287393178494740876848💔227

24 Oct 2026, 22:22 UTC≈17,600 views1,029 reactions2 Starsread 6 November 2026

Рига чмоки чмоки чмоки!!! 💋 Буду очень по вам скучать!!!!! 🐱💕✨✨

custom 5287393178494740876796💔233

24 Oct 2026, 09:30 UTC≈17,600 views880 reactions2 Starsread 6 November 2026

‼️ ВАРШАВА По техническим причинам мы вынуждены перенести концерт на 29.10 на другую площадку ‼️ Все билеты остаются действительными! Площадка будет объявлена вскоре, следите за анонсами. Приношу извинения за неудобства 🙏🙏🙏

custom 5287393178494740876655💔225

23 Oct 2026, 22:58 UTC≈14,500 views927 reactions10 Starsread 6 November 2026

Таллин моя любовная любовь Я вас целую обнимаю крепко при крепко До новой встречи 😾✨💕

custom 5287393178494740876720💔207

23 Oct 2026, 08:54 UTC≈14,100 views524 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @superslowflowPhoto

Ooes: "Сегодня ты ищешь квартиру, а завтра — смысл жизни". Большое интервью У Ooes странные отношения со славой: ее песни намного известнее, чем она сама. Треки собирают сотни миллионов прослушиваний, становятся саундтреками к чужим расставаниям и бессонным ночам, а сама Лиза остается почти за кадром — не ходит по скандальным шоу, не превращает личную жизнь в реалити и даже процесс создания музыки считает чем-то инт…

💔328custom 5287393178494740876196

20 Oct 2026, 17:05 UTC≈13,000 views901 reactions72 Starsread 6 November 2026
Photo

БИЛЕТЫ TICKETS: https://tix.to/when-the-world-ends

custom 5287393178494740876674💔227

18 Oct 2026, 20:28 UTC≈13,400 views1,514 reactions5 Starsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Лучшего начала тура я не могла и представить! Алматы я вас обожаю невероятно. Пели ВСЕ новые песни, старые понятно, но новые!!!!!!! Как же мне приятно, нет слов. Я вас очень люблю, я пишу для вас и пою для вас. Я обязательно к вам приеду еще 😭🤍

custom 52873931784947408761,170💔344

Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @lizaooes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

ooes music
@ooesmusic0 · 2,076 (as read 20 September 2026)
#1
ooesadness
@ooesadness · 447 (as read 20 September 2026)
#2
ailie
@ailie_ie · 746 (as read 20 September 2026)
#3
ЕГОР КРИД
@egorkreed · 732,691
#4
Клуб Романтики — Мои Истории
@official_romanceclub · 731,088
#5
здесь живет броен
@br1anm7ps · 1,094,121
#6
Exile
@exilemusic13 · 1,439,594
#7
АКУЛИЧ
@akyulenokk · 256,298
#8
mzlff
@mazellovvv · 414,722
#9
дед инсайд блонд
@deadblonde · 156,194
#10
Тусовка у Реми✨
@remirc · 102,653
#11
Глеб три дня дождя
@everydayrain · 234,326
#12
Кишлак
@kishlak_family · 263,236
#13
Рифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,534,696
#14
ЛСП
@lspof · 108,307
#15
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,104,945
#16
Спойлеры с нами!
@SpoilersAreWithUs · 77,057
#17
катя милтей
@kmilteyy · 5,723
#18
Премиум эмодзи | стикеры | Premium Emoji
@TgEmojis · 1,693,345
#19
ФРАМЕ ТАМЕР
@oieiei · 746,512
#20
BUDA +
@budaog · 359,661
#21
PETROVA
@milanapetrovaqueen · 198,226
#22
ACHE
@ache666rrgg · 2,236
#23
Риса за Творчество / РЗТ
@risazatvorchestvo · 167,213
#24
Сломанные пляски
@brokendance · 79,770
#25
STREAM INSIDE
@streaminside · 267,990
#26
МЭЙБИ БЭЙБИ
@maybebaby · 170,355
#27
tenderlybae💔
@plsbetenderly · 218,771
#28
каечка
@bykae4ka · 212,838
#29
ДАНИЛА ГОРИЛЛА 🦍
@danila_gorilla · 633,259
#30
Коротко о Клубе Романтики
@lediclubromance · 56,478
#31
Бустер 🍄
@bigpencil · 1,226,784
#32
НМШ
@nmshhub · 672,567
#33
ЭТО ЗНАК
@etoznakmag · 631,659
#34
Lovv66
@lovvdoublesix · 153,852
#35
so sad so sеху
@welcometomyisland · 249,798
#36
POLNALYUBVI
@polnalyubvitg · 28,492
#37
MIRÈLE
@mirmirele · 19,799
#38
ПОШЛАЯ МОЛЛИ
@poshlayamollyofficial · 194,917
#39
INSTASAMKA
@instasamkacore · 69
#40
плм
@polmamki · 109,683
#41
АНДРЕЙ ПИРОКИНЕЗИС И КОТЁНОК РА
@pyrokinesistg · 143,406
#42
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,392,195
#43
Данила Кашен
@DKNASASAL · 385,169
#44
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 924,385
#45
КК
@petrovtel · 542,485
#46
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
@paradeevich · 1,045,706
#47
SHTOLL NEWS💋
@SHTOLLNEWS · 515,141
#48
дрейк
@drakestudio · 324,963
#49
PLOHOY PAREN
@plohoypacan · 373,879
#50
Kuplinov ► Play
@Kuplinov_Telegram · 905,946
#51
KOSTI
@kosti · 552,170
#52
Москвач • Новости Москвы
@moscowach · 3,891,542
#53
bushido zho
@bushidozho · 184,616
#54
Алексей Шевцов
@jolybells · 357,458
#55
саша теслонд @teslond
@teslond1 · 89,353
#56
ох
@theohdaily · 171,872
#57
Логово Внизу
@nebudetgg · 487,980
#58
ХАЗЯЕВА В МОМЕНТЕ
@xazayeva · 372,821
#59
4ch
@why4ch · 1,022,748
#60
kai angel🤫🤫🤫
@sektakai · 349,931
#61

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

POLNALYUBVI
@polnalyubvitg · 28,492
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 20 September 2026
Green Apelsin
@greenapelsin_music · 28,140
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q110387666 on Wikidata, read 1 November 2026
LabelOoes
DescriptionRussian singer
YouTubeUCzcsKRXMe96AaCfO4oOdxzw

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Ooes (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…htm|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/lizaooes/247|title=ooes|website=Telegram|access-date=2024-08-09|archive-…”
read 1 November 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ooes” (@lizaooes), 25,948 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lizaooes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.