Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
450,000 average views per post against 1,057,315 subscribers — an engagement rate of 42.6%. Across the 412 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,001,129–15,411,572 subscribers — the middle half sit between 0.89% and 8.42%, with a median of 2.95%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (21 July 2026 – 20 August 2026)
Posts measured
9 of 9 published in the window (0 exact, 9 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
4,053,000
Mature posts only
46.5% over 8 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Views and reactions moved apart
On 2 of the 5 posts we watched over 30days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.0884 reactions per view.
Each interval, as we read it — views and reactions before and after
Expectedis the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).
What this does and does not say.It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.
Recorded under the keys err_high · view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 22 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 15 days, net -3,455. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,056,733–1,061,767 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 02:05
1,057,404
+89
20 Aug 2026, 03:11
1,057,315
+1
19 Aug 2026, 00:22
1,057,314
-159
17 Aug 2026, 23:13
1,057,473
-183
16 Aug 2026, 21:25
1,057,656
-340
15 Aug 2026, 14:29
1,057,996
-603
13 Aug 2026, 23:25
1,058,599
-675
12 Aug 2026, 16:27
1,059,274
-504
11 Aug 2026, 18:43
1,059,778
-574
10 Aug 2026, 18:21
1,060,352
-148
9 Aug 2026, 19:51
1,060,500
-486
8 Aug 2026, 17:43
1,060,986
-200
7 Aug 2026, 19:13
1,061,186
+100
6 Aug 2026, 15:50
1,061,086
+227
6 Aug 2026, 00:53
1,060,859
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
43.4%
avg views ÷ 1,057,404 subscribers
Avg views / post
459,000
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held
22 (12 June 2026 – 19 August 2026)
Views total
4,129,000
Reactions total
263,507
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,240
Videos
≈969
Links
≈562
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 6 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 5of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 24 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 44.4% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 79.4% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 182,000 views — 17.2% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 239,800).
6 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
861,213 reactions across 22 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
807,540
93.8%
👎
53,673
6.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 861,213reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
4.55%
1 of 22 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
426,000
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
685,000
over 21 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 19 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
22 августа буду на BETBOOM Базе!
Встретимся на meet&greet с вами вместе с Exile, Корешем и Гориллой ❤️
Хочешь попасть на встречу – переходи в канал BETBOOM Базы и жми «ХОЧУ АВТОГРАФ»
Для участия нужен билет на 22 августа и соблюдение правил посещения мероприятия. Ты должен быть совершеннолетним.
Итоги – 20 августа!
📍 Москва, Большая Новодмитровская, 36
📅 22–23 августа
🎟 КУПИТЬ БИЛЕТ
🔗 КАНАЛ BETBOOM БАЗЫ
Мне кажется, этот роадтрип по США уже стал главным моментом нашего лета 🥹
Столько дорог, случайных остановок, красивых мест и наших с Каей фоток, которые теперь хочется пересматривать постоянно. Часть моментов сняли на лимитированную плёнку РИИЛ × ЛУЧ с красивыми засветами. Так всё выглядит ещё теплее, будто это уже воспоминания из какого-то фильма)
Такую плёнку можно выиграть в игре, а лучшие кадры ещё могут попас…
НОВОЕ ВИДЕО!
Мы встретили столько знаменитостей на ЧМ-2026, что сами не ожидали… Как прошла наша неделя в США?
Смотрите по ссылке:
https://youtu.be/b1-7yuuvL0U?is=mr9GgQAfoJUhExa4
Помимо футбола, мы конечно же снимали основной контент ЖРАЛИ!
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @paradeevich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 16,107 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Асфальт @asfalt222 · 84,848 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 18 August 2026
Кукояка @kukoyaka · 92,959 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 16 August 2026
Я Ириска @iriskalimei · 89,127 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 17 August 2026
ХАЗЯЕВА В МОМЕНТЕ @xazayeva · 367,215 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 August 2026
ФРАМЕ ТАМЕР @oieiei · 610,880 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 16 August 2026
ЧУГУНДА @chugunda · 94,606 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 16 August 2026
Вкусно — и точка @vit_russia · 291,117 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
ГОРИЛЬЯ БРОНЯ @gorilla_armor · 68,666 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 20 August 2026
🍒inst_rinna🍒 @inst_rinnaa · 270,557 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 17 August 2026
БетМены @betboom_3boys · 107,132 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
ГЛЕБАС @glebaseey · 172,292 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
MIKE SOTNIKOV 🃏- Михаил Сотников @mike_sotnikov · 65,986 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 21 August 2026
кристюшкина😋 @mskaramelka01 · 306,666 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 14 August 2026
ОЛЕГ КОФФИ ☕️ @coffiYT · 117,621 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 August 2026
Derzko69 @gigaderzko69 · 230,182 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 11 August 2026
Алексей Столяров блогер @Stolyaric · 273,184 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 August 2026
Влад Бумага A4 @A4omg · 448,777 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 August 2026
Веронисистый блог @vallletttik · 69,784 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 20 August 2026
айсберг @icceeeberg @icceeeberg · 81,636 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 18 August 2026
Мюсли Янчика @ynchq · 95,847 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 August 2026
ул.Графская️👑 @graphdg · 115,044 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 14 August 2026
Екатерина Мизулина @ekaterina_mizulina · 926,895 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 August 2026
Бустер 🍄 @bigpencil · 1,205,741 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 8 August 2026
Darkland @darklandpark · 137,310 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 528 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ” (@paradeevich), 1,057,404 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paradeevich.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
