Channel
@NENAVISTTWICH
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
21subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003307835919 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NENAVISTTWICH |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 26 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NENAVISTTWICH |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:43 | 21 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 22 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 23 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 23 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
12 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 3 | 25.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 16.7% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 16.7% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 16.7% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2026 to 2 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👎 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Итаикикикии, короче хз как вам, но лично меня ебать как бесит Пятерка🫶 Типо ну, внешность зуйня, поведение аналогично и все в том духе... Даже Влад Раговский лучше него блять, ну давайте все прищнаетм что пятерка на вид выглядит как скуфяра с пивным животом, с какой то отрыжкой и тд. 🐷 Типа нуу, по поведению свинка пепа🙂 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #тейк | @NENAVST_BOT | 🌟
🤬2
👎 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Меня заебала генсуха, а именно её блядское поведение. Взять ту же ситуацию на пхукете вроде, на концерте пм. К ней подошел Руслан и потом что-то спросил про твич запретки, потом когда она уже ушла оттуда начала рассказывать Каролине о том какой он плохой и что началь юзать запретки, хотя даже если это и было на стриме этого слышно не было. Руслан тем более ясно сказал что он не знает твич запретки, так к…
🔥2
👎 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ блять, когда у Мафани была оценка диссов пьяный хованский ебануто заруинил как будто бы, он орал дохуя, дохуя перебивал и ваще не завоз в итоге, как бы похуй норм моментами, но пиздец хуйню высирал конечно. прайм прошел лет шесть назад ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #тейк | @NENAVST_BOT | 🌟
💯3👏1💋1
#вп
👀, понравился музыкант или стример, но с ним нету стикеров? Сделаем. 🫅, не можешь найти нужный пнг или красивый арт и не можешь вырезать фон? Сделаем. По блату, только для вас, только 🌟 качественного контента. Забирай 🌟
#вп
✍️ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🌟-ОО ООО, МАМ, СМОТРИ, СЕТКА ПО ТЕМ САМЫМ АМЕРИКАНСКИМ ПОДРОСТКАМ!! 😁-Yeah goddammit tell ur mom to subscribe to us bitch 🦷🦷🏀🌟❤️⬛️ бы посмотреть на канал того самого лузера Уильяма, которого каждый чертов день вешают на шкафчик в коридоре? Или, может, за стервой Стефани, которая вместо уроков у миссис Джонсон красит губы в туалете?🤩 Да не вопрос, ты наткнулся на🥹 🆗🆒🆒🎵 🔜🆒🆗🎦🎦🆒 🆕🆕🎵 🦷🦷🥬…
🤡1
#вп
всем ➰➰ этот тгк посвящен Парадеевичу и Корешу здесь будет все, что вашей душе будет угодно, от каких-то фотографий, до оповещений стримов пацанов, выхода видео у них на каналах (или видео с их участием) аккаунты: Парадеевич: тгк: @paradeevich / твич: https://twitch.tv/paradeev1ch / тик ток: https://www.tiktok.com/@paradeevich_sigma / ютуб: https://youtube.com/@paradeevich Кореш: тгк: @koreshzy / твич: https://twi…
#вп
ᗯEᒪᑕ0ᗰE TO.... MEMES ·ࡇ· C O N F E SS I ON S КОНКУРС НА МАСКОТА в этом кф вы сможете найти самую тупую картинку, поделиться своим любимым мемом скинуть ИИкартинку или рандомн тик ток, гифку, стикерпак, что угодно ᶻ 𝘇 𐰁 предложка — @Memscff_bot ˏ˒˓ вп пост 50+ :: набор в адм :: правила :: адмсостав :: буст :: брак с - @caterpillarCF ㏒ набор в админы
#вп
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NENAVISTTWICH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@NENAVISTTWICH named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НЕНАВИЖУ Twitch cf” (@NENAVISTTWICH), 21 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NENAVISTTWICH.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.