Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ФРАМЕ ТАМЕР

Channel

ФРАМЕ ТАМЕР

@oieiei

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

685,689subscribers

+72,815 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001753427843
TypeChannel
Username@oieiei
DescriptionСотрудничество по рекламе: [email protected] "Включена Роскомнадзором в перечень персональных страниц: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/677fc2276aa9672b96844708"
Created10 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oieiei

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

547,000 average views per post against 685,689 subscribers — an engagement rate of 79.8%. Across the 480 registered channels in the same cohort — 316,564–997,960 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 2.75% and 18.3%, with a median of 7.46%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (26 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Posts measured23 of 24 published in the window (0 exact, 23 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled12,590,000
Mature posts only79.8% over 23 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers685,689 measured 18 September 2026
Cohortb316228:rus · 480 channels · p10 1.35% · p25 2.75% · p50 7.46% · p75 18.3% · p90 36.4%
Position in cohort99.791th percentile · 10.7× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.044% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 25 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

608,367685,689647,0286 August 2026 — 612,874 subscribers6 August 2026 — 612,807 subscribers7 August 2026 — 612,861 subscribers9 August 2026 — 612,629 subscribers9 August 2026 — 612,402 subscribers11 August 2026 — 612,262 subscribers12 August 2026 — 611,923 subscribers13 August 2026 — 611,614 subscribers14 August 2026 — 611,234 subscribers16 August 2026 — 610,993 subscribers17 August 2026 — 610,602 subscribers18 August 2026 — 610,536 subscribers19 August 2026 — 610,525 subscribers20 August 2026 — 610,669 subscribers21 August 2026 — 610,880 subscribers23 August 2026 — 610,877 subscribers24 August 2026 — 610,965 subscribers25 August 2026 — 610,587 subscribers27 August 2026 — 610,308 subscribers28 August 2026 — 609,847 subscribers29 August 2026 — 609,694 subscribers30 August 2026 — 609,463 subscribers31 August 2026 — 609,397 subscribers1 September 2026 — 609,093 subscribers2 September 2026 — 608,737 subscribers3 September 2026 — 608,477 subscribers4 September 2026 — 608,367 subscribers7 September 2026 — 610,027 subscribers10 September 2026 — 619,479 subscribers12 September 2026 — 675,099 subscribers14 September 2026 — 683,550 subscribers16 September 2026 — 684,994 subscribers18 September 2026 — 685,689 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +72,815. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 596,769–697,287 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 02:37685,689+695
16 Sept 2026, 00:20684,994+1,444
14 Sept 2026, 05:58683,550+8,451
12 Sept 2026, 16:59675,099+55,620
10 Sept 2026, 18:59619,479+9,452
7 Sept 2026, 17:54610,027+1,660
4 Sept 2026, 20:21608,367-110
3 Sept 2026, 07:47608,477-260
2 Sept 2026, 02:22608,737-356
1 Sept 2026, 04:29609,093-304
31 Aug 2026, 05:54609,397-66
30 Aug 2026, 06:34609,463-231
29 Aug 2026, 06:34609,694-153
28 Aug 2026, 05:05609,847-461
27 Aug 2026, 01:42610,308-279
25 Aug 2026, 22:12610,587-378
24 Aug 2026, 21:33610,965+88
23 Aug 2026, 06:22610,877-3
21 Aug 2026, 20:56610,880+211
20 Aug 2026, 15:48610,669first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
79.8%
avg views ÷ 685,689 subscribers
Avg views / post
547,000
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held45 (22 July 2026 – 20 September 2026)
Views total12,590,000
Reactions total1,129,831
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 22:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,780
Videos
≈780
Links
≈306

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 59s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,617,088 reactions across 44 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥1,094,26067.7%
😢210,65813.0%
💩127,1957.87%
😁77,1804.77%
🏆64,8644.01%
😐15,4690.957%
🤪13,1780.815%
🖕12,1510.751%
😡2,1330.132%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,617,088 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7,909
across the posts below
Posts paid on
44
of 44 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
1,630
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @oieiei. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2026, 10:44 UTC≈248,000 views29,202 reactions61 Starsread 24 September 2026
Photo

НА УЛИЦЕ ОСЕНЬ 🍂 СНИМАЮ СЕГОДНЯ, ЧТО-ТО ОЧЕНЬ СМЕШНОЕ ДЛЯ ВАС От каждого жду по осеннему треку в коменты, чтобы погрустить 🥲

❤‍🔥24,400🏆2,620😁1,570😢218🤪206🖕84💩57😐47

19 Sept 2026, 15:58 UTC≈301,000 views8,506 reactions11 Starsread 24 September 2026
Video

В начале сентября был в Казани, ввел линейку для онлайн-школы Умскул… Приятное ощущение оставило это событие, даже завидовать начал, что кто-то может учиться у молодых и заряженых, выкупающих мемы преподавателей, сам бы в свои годы хотел так же! Раньше не встречал столько тепла и заботы в обычной работе, в обычном общении с учениками. У каждого преподавателя свой канал под конкретный предмет - там разборы заданий, …

❤‍🔥7,060🏆729😐300😁180💩87🤪52🖕51😢47

18 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC≈370,000 views28,277 reactions81 Starsread 24 September 2026
Video

Сходил еще раз на ПЧК, для фанатов первой части, снова будет очень смешно ))) А еще сегодня будет стрим, отдохнул за это время, пора выходить из безмолвной тишины, заходите вечерком, все обсудим!

❤‍🔥23,200🏆2,460😁1,730💩343🖕232🤪149😐82😢81

14 Sept 2026, 14:08 UTC≈540,000 views38,858 reactions225 Starsread 24 September 2026
Video

«Помогая одному, ты помогаешь всем!» - эту фразу я увидел в последнем Человеке Пауке… И она меня сильно зацепила, видя сколько людей сейчас в этой истории высказываются, говорят про нормализацию букмекеров и на сколько общество перестало об этом молчать, я понимаю, что мы двигаемся в правильном направлении! А так же вижу кучу негатива в комментариях, много разных мнений возмущений и вопросов, когда нибудь я на них …

❤‍🔥28,900💩3,380😁2,730😢2,060🏆969🖕414😐233🤪172

12 Sept 2026, 13:01 UTC≈626,000 views103,588 reactions281 Starsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Так как решил более открыто тут делиться, тем что происходит в жизни, расскажу… Очень устал, эти два месяца каждодневных переживаний, метания от одной стороны к другой, конфликтов, бессонных ночей, нервов - все это выжало меня конечно страшным образом. И пока я был в процессе, я не обращал на это внимание, а когда я это отпустил и наконец-то все напряжение спало, я сразу почувствовал, что я буквально выгорел, сил н…

💩54,700❤‍🔥38,800😢5,860😁1,910🖕981🏆849😐381🤪107

12 Sept 2026, 00:12 UTC≈636,000 views54,928 reactions75 Starsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Смотрю ребята там в ночной смене в комментариях разбирают ситуацию, кто прав, кто виноват, с кем общаться, как дальше жить…

❤‍🔥40,900💩6,330😁4,720😢1,840🤪538🏆222🖕198😐180

11 Sept 2026, 23:12 UTC≈694,000 views55,356 reactions104 Starsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Кайфуем

❤‍🔥39,700💩7,290😁3,410😢2,120😐1,370🤪627🖕436🏆403

11 Sept 2026, 15:39 UTC≈665,000 views73,725 reactions867 Starsread 24 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥45,000💩13,500😢10,000😁1,980🏆1,210😐1,190🤪530😡315

11 Sept 2026, 15:35 UTC≈669,000 views88,627 reactions378 Starsread 24 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥46,400💩23,800😢8,660😁5,110😐1,870🖕1,310🏆1,230😡247

11 Sept 2026, 14:33 UTC≈681,000 views54,489 reactions219 Starsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😢41,500❤‍🔥7,410😐2,380💩1,490🖕1,220😁197😡184🤪108

11 Sept 2026, 14:32 UTC≈647,000 views45,500 reactions140 Starsread 24 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥31,300😢8,680💩2,400🖕1,040🏆909😐586😁474🤪111

11 Sept 2026, 14:32 UTC≈641,000 views38,453 reactions149 Starsread 24 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥26,500😢7,230💩1,980🖕903🏆794😐526😁384😡136

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @oieiei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@oieiei edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 September 2026
Most recent edit
19 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

STREAM INSIDE
@streaminside · 264,826
#1
РИМ 🕊
@rhymesrim · 294,808
#2
Exile
@exilemusic13 · 1,445,976
#3
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
@paradeevich · 1,059,396
#4
ДАНИЛА ГОРИЛЛА 🦍
@danila_gorilla · 643,829
#5
Кореш
@koreshzy · 829,871
#6
АКУЛИЧ
@akyulenokk · 257,227
#7
Бустер 🍄
@bigpencil · 1,204,470
#8
каечка
@bykae4ka · 206,629
#9
STOPBAN OFFICIAL
@stopbaba · 187,581
#10
Вишенка 🍒
@mamavisshenka · 117,615
#11
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,142,158
#12
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,368,903
#13
tenderlybae💔
@plsbetenderly · 225,418
#14
BUDA +
@budaog · 358,953
#15
ЕГОР КРИД
@egorkreed · 743,409
#16
Lovv66
@lovvdoublesix · 155,547
#17
DILARA
@dilalara753 · 272,768
#18
Рифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,414,552
#19
bushido zho
@bushidozho · 188,779
#20
здесь живет броен
@br1anm7ps · 1,089,215
#21
FrameStream
@blacknoyt · 78,619
#22
ванг ас фак
@wangasfuck · 124,019
#23
MAYOT
@mayotofficialchannel · 205,499
#24
дипинс 🤢
@deepinstv · 502,219
#25
ЛИТВИН
@litvintm · 1,569,936
#26
mzlff
@mazellovvv · 421,504
#27
Scallygram
@scallymilanogram · 202,267
#28
ЕГОР ШКРЕД
@egorikvtg · 704,353
#29
Асфальт
@asfalt222 · 82,434
#30
lielya💋💋
@lielyaa · 26,531
#31
Логово Внизу
@nebudetgg · 494,419
#32
Влад Раговский
@GABARITVLAD · 204,053
#33
ДЛЯ НАС
@dlyanxss · 99,432
#34
Молодой Платон
@givemebapestories · 50,760
#35
НМШ
@nmshhub · 727,604
#36
EVELONE 1️⃣9️⃣2️⃣
@evelone192gg · 1,103,372
#37
AARNE TEAM
@aarneteam · 86,072
#38
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 935,401
#39
elyaplugg_official !!!
@elyapluggviralmusicofficial · 68,513
#40
uniqe
@uniqe_ya · 27,309
#41
ПОТОК
@ptkstrm · 27,641
#42
Медийка
@mediyca · 724,217
#43
Moonkid Brothers 🌙
@mayotfamm · 40,381
#44
uglystephan
@uglystephan · 85,797
#45
ХАЗЯЕВА ТВИЧА
@xazayevatyt · 3
#46
БетМены
@betboom_3boys · 101,965
#47
V️️oskresenskii🧑‍🦼
@voskresenskiifreshman · 70,392
#48
ДЖЕТНАЙЗ / JETNIZE 👽
@jetnizestream · 12,876
#49
Anka Peresild
@officialannaperesild · 183,249
#50
Мюсли Янчика
@ynchq · 94,382
#51
бэйби гога [baby melo]
@babymelo_1 · 142,727
#52
PLOHOY PAREN
@plohoypacan · 381,759
#53
Данила Кашен
@DKNASASAL · 391,493
#54
OKB News / Новости от Ок блогера
@okbnews · 191,483
#55
Первый Московский
@mosguru · 3,180,311
#56
ARTEM SHILOVETS
@artemshilovets · 33,581
#57
TrendWatching
@trendwatching24 · 1,436,059
#58
SHTOLL NEWS💋
@SHTOLLNEWS · 513,956
#59
Pepel Nahudi
@pepelnahudiAB · 177,364
#60
9mice
@the9mice · 276,475
#61
Премиум эмодзи | стикеры | Premium Emoji
@TgEmojis · 1,673,928
#62

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ГОРИЛЬЯ БРОНЯ
@gorilla_armor · 71,843
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 20 August 2026
SODA LUV
@soda_luv_promo · 69,528
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 20 August 2026
sostoyaniedushi
@sostoyaniedushi_35mm · 22,506
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 20 September 2026
Ял
@yalexer · 21,814
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 September 2026
Ярослав Могильников
@yage_mudriy · 52,817
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 24 August 2026
Яна Зенина/Яяна
@yanazenina · 216,751
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 20 September 2026
Андрей Кокошка
@mister_kokoshka2 · 485,639
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 August 2026
🍒inst_rinna🍒
@inst_rinnaa · 275,871
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 17 August 2026
Анжик 🎀
@angikkkkkk · 39,331
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 6 September 2026
ваша Малина
@alinasevani · 80,397
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 18 August 2026
Юлия Пересильд
@juliaperesild_tg · 21,313
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 24 September 2026
Шайни
@shynegswaggatg · 66,266
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 19 September 2026
ave who
@avestanovaj · 29,334
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 8 September 2026
Отец Русского Гуманизма
@skopeykin · 106,258
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 9 September 2026
Никита Сударь ТГК
@sudarchnl · 63,642
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 August 2026
SLAVA MARLOW
@slavamarlow · 67,074
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 August 2026
планета Жопа
@planetapopa · 74,554
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 September 2026
pswet
@pswet_nowkiespet · 23,344
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 18 September 2026
Кино Фильмы Сериалы
@kinotik1 · 124,686
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 20 August 2026
Веронисистый блог
@vallletttik · 69,339
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 20 August 2026
apse
@appleipafile · 56,258
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 8 September 2026
MIKE SOTNIKOV 🃏- Михаил Сотников
@mike_sotnikov · 63,781
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 21 August 2026
Ксения Куприкова
@officialkuprikova · 69,073
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 20 August 2026
ЧЕРНЕЦ
@chernetsa · 206,608
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 180 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Domains linked from posts

One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

topitcollege.ru1 post · 30 July 2026 – 30 July 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ФРАМЕ ТАМЕР” (@oieiei), 685,689 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oieiei.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.