Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pepel Nahudi

Channel

Pepel Nahudi

@pepelnahudiAB

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

177,364subscribers

-5,267 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001225461394
TypeChannel
Username@pepelnahudiAB
Descriptionmngt: @frudko www.gargonna.store
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pepelnahudiAB

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

149,000 average views per post against 177,364 subscribers — an engagement rate of 84.0%. Across the 2,445 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,085–316,163 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.31% and 21.3%, with a median of 9.90%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (26 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Posts measured12 of 14 published in the window (0 exact, 12 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,786,800
Mature posts only84.0% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers177,364 measured 19 September 2026
Cohortb100000:rus · 2,445 channels · p10 2.01% · p25 4.31% · p50 9.90% · p75 21.3% · p90 36.6%
Position in cohort99.345th percentile · 8.5× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.051% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 25 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

177,364182,631179,997.56 August 2026 — 182,631 subscribers7 August 2026 — 182,574 subscribers8 August 2026 — 182,491 subscribers9 August 2026 — 182,457 subscribers10 August 2026 — 182,409 subscribers11 August 2026 — 182,383 subscribers12 August 2026 — 182,367 subscribers13 August 2026 — 182,243 subscribers14 August 2026 — 182,130 subscribers15 August 2026 — 181,912 subscribers16 August 2026 — 181,789 subscribers17 August 2026 — 181,761 subscribers18 August 2026 — 181,566 subscribers19 August 2026 — 181,361 subscribers21 August 2026 — 181,184 subscribers22 August 2026 — 181,090 subscribers23 August 2026 — 180,926 subscribers25 August 2026 — 180,788 subscribers26 August 2026 — 180,664 subscribers27 August 2026 — 180,378 subscribers28 August 2026 — 180,325 subscribers29 August 2026 — 180,176 subscribers30 August 2026 — 180,074 subscribers31 August 2026 — 179,981 subscribers1 September 2026 — 179,870 subscribers2 September 2026 — 179,715 subscribers3 September 2026 — 179,596 subscribers5 September 2026 — 178,598 subscribers9 September 2026 — 178,184 subscribers11 September 2026 — 178,067 subscribers13 September 2026 — 177,843 subscribers15 September 2026 — 177,749 subscribers16 September 2026 — 177,684 subscribers19 September 2026 — 177,364 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -5,267. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 176,574–183,421 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 10:17177,364-320
16 Sept 2026, 20:37177,684-65
15 Sept 2026, 00:20177,749-94
13 Sept 2026, 11:36177,843-224
11 Sept 2026, 15:36178,067-117
9 Sept 2026, 01:21178,184-414
5 Sept 2026, 17:18178,598-998
3 Sept 2026, 17:42179,596-119
2 Sept 2026, 07:13179,715-155
1 Sept 2026, 08:28179,870-111
31 Aug 2026, 07:06179,981-93
30 Aug 2026, 08:37180,074-102
29 Aug 2026, 10:03180,176-149
28 Aug 2026, 11:24180,325-53
27 Aug 2026, 09:53180,378-286
26 Aug 2026, 07:02180,664-124
25 Aug 2026, 04:02180,788-138
23 Aug 2026, 23:46180,926-164
22 Aug 2026, 10:29181,090-94
21 Aug 2026, 00:58181,184first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 23 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
81.5%
avg views ÷ 177,364 subscribers
Avg views / post
145,000
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026
Posts held35 (23 May 2026 – 17 September 2026)
Views total1,589,800
Reactions total151,059
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Sept 2026, 10:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
826
Videos
250
Links
472

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

513,917 reactions across 33 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5411234463076096402199,32038.8%
custom 5354871401092260137152,05029.6%
custom 5382200024593633747118,45023.0%
custom 524907422330917403744,0978.58%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 513,917 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16,522
across the posts below
Posts paid on
33
of 33 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
11,200
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pepelnahudiAB. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 May 2026 to 17 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Sept 2026, 13:16 UTC≈62,600 views8,960 reactions57 Starsread 25 September 2026
Photo

Питер, увидимся на хэллоуин.. 🤩 Санкт-Петербург — 30.10 *вы первые услышите альбом)

custom 54112344630760964026,480custom 52490742233091740372,480

17 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC≈66,200 views11,210 reactions50 Starsread 25 September 2026

впервые на альбоме столько фитов..

custom 52490742233091740377,710custom 54112344630760964023,500

11 Sept 2026, 21:08 UTC≈118,000 views15,510 reactions200 Starsread 25 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 541123446307609640210,600custom 52490742233091740374,910

9 Sept 2026, 16:34 UTC≈151,000 views10,150 reactions80 Starsread 25 September 2026
Photo

BEYOND EMPIRE TOUR 2026–27. 🤩 PEPELNAHUDITOUR.RU *вступайте в чат своего города.

custom 54112344630760964027,000custom 52490742233091740373,150

6 Sept 2026, 13:48 UTC≈149,000 views18,120 reactions11,200 Starsread 25 September 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 524907422330917403712,600custom 54112344630760964025,520

4 Sept 2026, 18:42 UTC≈152,000 views15,770 reactions137 Starsread 25 September 2026

ты лох

custom 541123446307609640210,700custom 52490742233091740375,070

4 Sept 2026, 16:06 UTC≈155,000 views18,140 reactions133 Starsread 25 September 2026

давно не трахался. но скоро выебу..))

custom 541123446307609640213,700custom 52490742233091740374,440

1 Sept 2026, 11:46 UTC≈174,000 views14,246 reactions67 Starsread 25 September 2026

я устал выпускать хуйню для тиктока.. меня уже тошнит от этого. я покажу вам МУЗЫКУ этой осенью. это неизбежно.

custom 541123446307609640213,500custom 5249074223309174037746

1 Sept 2026, 11:30 UTC≈161,000 views11,705 reactions62 Starsread 25 September 2026

показать бы вписке пятерочку в которой работал и на кадилаке прокатить

custom 541123446307609640211,100custom 5249074223309174037605

31 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC≈212,000 views15,266 reactions189 Starsread 25 September 2026

шкела фу..(

custom 541123446307609640214,800custom 5249074223309174037466

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @pepelnahudiAB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@pepelnahudiAB edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republished by 49 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

molpi
@maashykaapepel · 12
13 posts
Pepliks_vika✨
@Viksivip7 · 71
12 posts
🐹фризка☀️
@nasta77790 · 20
6 posts
варилекс
@httpsvarilexx · 229
5 posts
Холдонсс
@holdonssss · 284
4 posts
риша
@Rishaawss · 83
3 posts
deplixx
@deplixx · 287
3 posts
Pepel Nahudi Life
@PepelNahudiLife · 1,202
2 posts
дикси ди💔
@dixxi_diii · 900
2 posts
ФЛАКА
@flaka_event · 3,587
2 posts
kii.svy
@kiianasvy · 210
2 posts
ПЕПЕЛ
@pepelhudan · 3,596
2 posts
𝐩𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐥.𝐧𝐚𝐡𝐮𝐝𝐢.𝐟𝐚𝐧
@pepelnahydifan_1 · 1
2 posts
scttrdash
@scttrdashdp_29 · 339
2 posts
sun angel
@sun_angeel · 191
2 posts
VIBE RUSSIA🐬
@viberussia · 55
2 posts
AlexMlad
@AlexMlad2008 · 48
1 post
612
@B612Castle · 48
1 post
GHOSTSWIZZY
@GHOSTSWIZZY · 194
1 post
Pepel Nahudi и Кифер
@Pepel_Nahudi_GARGONNA · 5
1 post
Premimum Giveaways | قرعه پرمیوم | پرمیوم رایگان
@PremimumGiveaways · 11
1 post
ksi_03_o
@Senya_kse · 48
1 post
STAR CITY MOSCOW
@StarCityMoscow · 80
1 post
aexisss
@aexissssss · 302
1 post
Aki
@akiiii_vi · 2,999
1 post
ALL
@allpartyyy · 9,328
1 post
bio's nutszzyu
@annsb1o · 15
1 post
ASH+
@ashtrayplus · 119
1 post
ATLANTA
@atlantaact · 47,710
1 post
глобальный контент
@ayyglobal · 1,403
1 post
bangtazzy_
@bangtazzyy · 1,914
1 post
convulsive/дарк бриллиант
@convulsive111 · 10,093
1 post
GARGONNA by Pepel Nahudi
@gargonnastore · 26,105
1 post
ILOV3SEXX
@ilov3sexx · 28
1 post
Jozeliee
@jozeliee · 104
1 post
maklinchik
@maklinchik · 455
1 post
nezby_owo
@nezby_owo · 65
1 post
PEPEL NAHYDI v̶
@pepel_nahudi_l · 17
1 post
pepelaxom
@pepelaxom · 457
1 post
pepelmaskins🩷
@pepelmaskins · 92
1 post
нуя риксви
@riixvyy1 · 3,145
1 post
prod. by rileksaik
@rileksaikprod · 15
1 post
se;wer room
@sewerroom · 1,311
1 post
Konkoor
@tamland1404 · 2
1 post
тайммм
@timel0v · 216
1 post
VIBE MOSCOW
@vibemoscow · 23
1 post
viksvi.me.
@viksvimee · 8
1 post
🕊WRITEALINE🦇
@writealine · 17
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Slattcrank
@slattcrank · 17,796
#1
mzlff
@mazellovvv · 421,504
#2
Exile
@exilemusic13 · 1,445,701
#3
майти
@mightymasona · 9,000
#4
Кореш
@koreshzy · 829,871
#5
Lovv66
@lovvdoublesix · 155,547
#6
bushido zho
@bushidozho · 188,779
#7
BUDA +
@budaog · 358,953
#8
Scallygram
@scallymilanogram · 202,267
#9
ЕГОР КРИД
@egorkreed · 743,409
#10
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,368,903
#11
MAYOT
@mayotofficialchannel · 205,499
#12
STOPBAN OFFICIAL
@stopbaba · 187,581
#13
Бустер 🍄
@bigpencil · 1,204,470
#14
9mice
@the9mice · 276,475
#15
AARNE TEAM
@aarneteam · 86,072
#16
Кишлак
@kishlak_family · 265,329
#17
uglystephan
@uglystephan · 85,797
#18
Рифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,414,552
#19
ARTEM SHILOVETS
@artemshilovets · 29,056
#20
uniqe
@uniqe_ya · 27,309
#21
каечка
@bykae4ka · 206,629
#22
V️️oskresenskii🧑‍🦼
@voskresenskiifreshman · 70,392
#23
Молодой Платон
@givemebapestories · 50,760
#24
tenderlybae💔
@plsbetenderly · 225,418
#25
Heronwater
@H3ronwat3r · 130,950
#26
unki🥀
@unkichat · 65,968
#27
xxxmanera’s hood 👁️💋
@xxxmanera · 38,747
#28
Moonkid Brothers 🌙
@mayotfamm · 40,381
#29
ДЛЯ НАС
@dlyanxss · 99,432
#30
Глеб три дня дождя
@everydayrain · 237,557
#31
Риса за Творчество / РЗТ
@risazatvorchestvo · 165,341
#32
дипинс 🤢
@deepinstv · 502,219
#33
LIL KRYSTALLL
@lilkrystalll · 91,443
#34
OBLADAET * PLAYERS
@oblagram · 99,663
#35
Lida
@mudotalida · 250,379
#36
здесь живет броен
@br1anm7ps · 1,090,016
#37
Леонардо Дайвинчик
@leoday · 5,518,691
#38
163ONMYNECK
@on1my6neck3 · 74,513
#39
Рифмы и Музыка
@rhymesmus · 378,676
#40
НМШ
@nmshhub · 727,604
#41
DILARA
@dilalara753 · 272,768
#42
sostoyaniedushi
@sostoyaniedushi_35mm · 22,506
#43
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
@paradeevich · 1,059,396
#44
Платина
@sosamuzik300 · 321,294
#45
ДАНИЛА ГОРИЛЛА 🦍
@danila_gorilla · 643,829
#46
PLOHOY PAREN
@plohoypacan · 381,759
#47
ХАЗЯЕВА В МОМЕНТЕ
@xazayeva · 370,552
#48
TRAP POSTING
@trap_posting_rap · 33,546
#49
РИМ 🕊
@rhymesrim · 294,808
#50
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 935,401
#51
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,142,158
#52
Данила Кашен
@DKNASASAL · 390,717
#53
Вишенка 🍒
@mamavisshenka · 117,615
#54
GB FAMILY
@GOSPOSHA_EVELIN · 101,292
#55
OKB News / Новости от Ок блогера
@okbnews · 191,483
#56
Премиум эмодзи | стикеры | Premium Emoji
@TgEmojis · 1,673,928
#57
SHTOLL NEWS💋
@SHTOLLNEWS · 513,956
#58
люблю
@love_thxs · 449,714
#59
ЛИТВИН
@litvintm · 1,569,936
#60
SODA LUV
@soda_luv_promo · 69,528
#61
Милашкина
@milashkina_nekrasova · 251,260
#62

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ATLANTA
@atlantaact · 47,710
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 27 August 2026
nkeeei 🏄‍♀️
@nkeeei · 98,222
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
ARTEM SHILOVETS
@artemshilovets · 29,056
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 3 September 2026
xxxmanera’s hood 👁️💋
@xxxmanera · 38,747
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 31 August 2026
Глеб Калюжный | KALYZHNYY
@glebkalyzhnyy · 30,849
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 6 September 2026
УБИВАЮ BPM
@bpmkiller · 82,420
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 August 2026
9mice
@the9mice · 276,475
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 10 August 2026
uniqe
@uniqe_ya · 27,309
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 September 2026
Родион Гриневич
@grinevichh · 50,970
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 3 September 2026
семечки от мартина
@semechkiotmartina · 60,116
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 11 September 2026
xolidayboy
@xoxoliday · 57,523
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
V️️oskresenskii🧑‍🦼
@voskresenskiifreshman · 70,392
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 20 August 2026
uglystephan
@uglystephan · 85,797
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 18 August 2026
SPOT
@spotdesk · 96,345
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 16 August 2026
bushido zho
@bushidozho · 188,779
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 August 2026
MAYOT
@mayotofficialchannel · 205,499
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 11 August 2026
Кишлак
@kishlak_family · 265,329
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 10 August 2026
цитаты рэперов
@citatarap · 46,370
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 26 August 2026
Heronwater
@H3ronwat3r · 130,950
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 August 2026
ЯКОРЪ 😳
@yakor_baza1 · 28,537
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 10 September 2026
Lovv66
@lovvdoublesix · 155,547
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026
Глеб три дня дождя
@everydayrain · 237,557
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
ARTЁM KOSHMAN
@artkoshman · 40,632
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 6 September 2026
Гомель. Главное!
@gomel · 57,103
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 99 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pepel Nahudi” (@pepelnahudiAB), 177,364 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pepelnahudiAB.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.