Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Отец Русского Гуманизма

Channel

Отец Русского Гуманизма

@skopeykin

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

108,530subscribers

+2,628 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001541983671
TypeChannel
Username@skopeykin
Description4814133049 Слава Копейкин. По вопросам рекламы в канале: @guapabella
Created11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/skopeykin

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

105,781108,530107,155.55 August 20268 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 95 days, net +2,628. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 105,369–108,942 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 18:00108,530+224
7 Nov 2026, 10:08108,306+337
6 Nov 2026, 06:59107,969+215
5 Nov 2026, 08:36107,754+235
4 Nov 2026, 08:29107,519+153
3 Nov 2026, 11:10107,366+154
2 Nov 2026, 10:55107,212+113
1 Nov 2026, 13:30107,099+161
31 Oct 2026, 11:36106,938+38
30 Oct 2026, 13:30106,900+11
29 Oct 2026, 11:40106,889-31
28 Oct 2026, 11:27106,920-6
27 Oct 2026, 14:27106,926+29
26 Oct 2026, 17:39106,897+28
25 Oct 2026, 21:06106,869+35
25 Oct 2026, 00:27106,834+19
24 Oct 2026, 03:47106,815-27
23 Oct 2026, 06:00106,842-39
22 Oct 2026, 06:27106,881-101
21 Oct 2026, 02:25106,982first reading

Engagement

98 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 192 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.6%
avg views ÷ 108,530 subscribers
Avg views / post
22,400
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 98 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held98 (7 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total1,095,600
Reactions total150,574
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 04:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
569
Videos
42
Links
106

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 27s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

316,013 reactions across 98 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5271952264259448091203,19564.3%
❤72,10322.8%
💋22,1247.00%
🔥13,3804.23%
😎5,2111.65%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 98 of the 98 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 316,013 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 98 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,997
across the posts below
Posts paid on
97
of 98 we hold a reading for · 99%
Most on one post
102
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @skopeykin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 98 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 49 posts held from the last 30 days (6.12%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 13:31 UTC≈13,100 views3,403 reactions20 Starsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52719522642594480912,260❤697💋339🔥57😎50

6 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC≈17,900 views2,473 reactions6 Starsread 9 November 2026
Photo

знаете вот это ощущение, когда посыпало перед съемкой? я вот знаю, поэтому делюсь с вами своими мастхэвами для избежания подобной ситуации. как говорится, «предупрежден — значит вооружен»! уже давно в моем топе активная молекула с салицилкой от Etat Pur, а сейчас у бренда вышла новинка — молекула с янтарной кислотой. она очень мягко борется с высыпаниями, минимизируя и заживляя их, покраснения тоже убирает:) кстати,…

custom 52719522642594480911,730❤476🔥197💋49😎21

5 Nov 2026, 22:10 UTC≈18,600 views3,123 reactions4 Starsread 9 November 2026

и потом не говорите, что я не пилю контент

custom 52719522642594480912,190❤528😎297💋69🔥39

5 Nov 2026, 22:09 UTC≈18,700 views3,567 reactions14 Starsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52719522642594480912,490❤644💋349🔥42😎42

5 Nov 2026, 15:37 UTC≈20,100 views4,089 reactions13 Starsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52719522642594480912,840❤761🔥329💋96😎63

4 Nov 2026, 21:09 UTC≈23,400 views3,311 reactions18 Starsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52719522642594480912,340❤570💋280🔥61😎60

4 Nov 2026, 18:13 UTC≈23,000 views3,546 reactions19 Starsread 9 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52719522642594480912,420❤653💋385🔥48😎40

4 Nov 2026, 15:26 UTC≈22,700 views3,562 reactions25 Starsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52719522642594480912,400❤715💋348🔥62😎37

3 Nov 2026, 17:56 UTC≈23,400 views4,637 reactions21 Starsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Ties))))))))))))))))))))))

custom 52719522642594480913,100❤928💋447🔥88😎74

3 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC≈22,800 views4,182 reactions34 Starsread 8 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52719522642594480912,790❤807💋471🔥76😎38

2 Nov 2026, 16:57 UTC≈24,300 views4,244 reactions76 Starsread 8 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52719522642594480912,930❤785💋419🔥55😎55

2 Nov 2026, 15:55 UTC≈25,300 views4,160 reactions18 Starsread 8 November 2026
Photo

шопынг)))))))))))))))))))))

custom 52719522642594480912,850❤811🔥388💋71😎40

Showing the 12 most recent of 98 posts we hold for @skopeykin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Андрей Максимов
@andreymaksimof · 26,453
#1
Дети перемен
@detiperemen_start · 4,243
#2
ЛЕОН КЕМСТАЧ
@iminlovewleo · 143,796
#3
РУЗИЛЬ МИНЕКАЕВ
@real_ruzil · 159,044
#4
Лев Зулькарнаев
@zullev · 51,333
#5
ЕЛИЗАВЕТА БАЗЫКИНА aka Bazykina
@bazykinae · 65,504
#6
Ярослав Могильников
@yage_mudriy · 52,802
#7
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,391,950
#8
Exile
@exilemusic13 · 1,439,632
#9
Яна Андреевна Енжаева
@preklprekl · 11,245
#10
Wink
@WinkRussia · 71,153
#11
ФРАМЕ ТАМЕР
@oieiei · 740,113
#12
Aziza
@AMinekaeva · 35,867
#13
здесь живет броен
@br1anm7ps · 1,095,490
#14
дипинс 🤢
@deepinstv · 503,154
#15
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 923,335
#16
каечка
@bykae4ka · 212,920
#17
Никита Кологривый
@nik_kologrivyy · 36,543
#18
Ариадна Базыкина
@ariadnabazykina · 3,290
#19
KOSTI
@kosti · 551,420
#20
Комбинация | Сериал Wink
@kombinaciya_winkofficial · 2,543
#21
MIKE SOTNIKOV 🃏- Михаил Сотников
@mike_sotnikov · 60,037
#22
START онлайн-кинотеатр
@start_shows · 87,857
#23
Валерий Козлов 🎥
@kymys2_0 · 2,896
#24
Файлы Журавля Дима Журавлёв
@files_zhuravlya · 180,011
#25
Москвач • Новости Москвы
@moscowach · 3,886,245
#26
Pozov Live
@pozov · 250,685
#27
Ксеня
@zhizks · 7,044
#28
КК
@petrovtel · 542,071
#29
Никита Манец
@nikitamanec · 6,332
#30
Варвара Куприна
@varyacoola · 3,123
#31
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
@paradeevich · 1,045,651
#32
ЕГОР КРИД
@egorkreed · 731,367
#33
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,103,729
#34
Аня Ищук
@anyaischukkkk · 605,590
#35
ДАНИЛА ГОРИЛЛА 🦍
@danila_gorilla · 632,781
#36
OKB News / Новости от Ок блогера
@okbnews · 189,587
#37
Elena Raytman
@elenaraytman · 843,580
#38
ЭТО ЗНАК
@etoznakmag · 631,440
#39
Милашкина
@milashkina_nekrasova · 241,537
#40
Masha Peresild
@peresssild_manu · 9,523
#41
🎀Karna.val🎀
@karnava1l · 279,479
#42
tenderlybae💔
@plsbetenderly · 217,975
#43
люблю
@love_thxs · 436,207
#44
ШАСТУН
@shastoonchannel · 230,121
#45
Данила Кашен
@DKNASASAL · 385,061
#46
Бустер 🍄
@bigpencil · 1,221,926
#47
Глеб три дня дождя
@everydayrain · 234,771
#48
PLOHOY PAREN
@plohoypacan · 373,519
#49
Премиум эмодзи | стикеры | Premium Emoji
@TgEmojis · 1,693,766
#50
Юлия Пересильд
@juliaperesild_tg · 20,857
#51
BUDA +
@budaog · 359,845
#52
ivan yankovskiy today
@yankovskiyivan · 17,863
#53
ARTEM SHILOVETS
@artemshilovets · 27,927
#54
uniqe
@uniqe_ya · 26,052
#55
Клуб Романтики — Мои Истории
@official_romanceclub · 730,776
#56
INSTASAMKA
@instasamkacore · 69
#57
mzlff
@mazellovvv · 414,580
#58
Lovv66
@lovvdoublesix · 153,719
#59
ЕГОР ШКРЕД
@egorikvtg · 672,921
#60
Лепёшка (Сергей Горошко)
@lepeshkaskapustoi · 23,984
#61
Глеб Калюжный | KALYZHNYY
@glebkalyzhnyy · 29,885
#62
Арсений
@arsdvatri · 169,878
#63
Гаврилина зе бест :3
@Gavril1nna · 137,035
#64
SHTOLL NEWS💋
@SHTOLLNEWS · 514,735
#65
GARTSUNOV
@GARTSUNOV · 4,310
#66
MAYOT
@mayotofficialchannel · 204,899
#67
ГОРОСКОП АСТРОЛОГИЯ ASTROJULIA
@astro_juliaa · 205,099
#68
Мила Ершова
@milachez · 12,709
#69

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Андрей Максимов
@andreymaksimof · 26,453
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 September 2026
улица балабанова
@ulizabalabanova · 23,233
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
Bikovic
@MilosBikovic · 24,748
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 September 2026
Тимофей Кочнев
@timakochnev · 28,199
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 10 September 2026
Юлия Пересильд
@juliaperesild_tg · 20,857
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 24 September 2026
Gufee Medalin
@gufeemed · 48,300
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 10 September 2026
Никуша Жукова >>>
@nikazhukova_official · 27,965
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 19 September 2026
Akmal’
@akmaltgshkaaaa · 77,443
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 September 2026
Good Story Media | Сериалы | Фильмы
@good_story_media · 19,752
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 September 2026
Дневник мадам По❤️
@dnevnik_madamPo · 28,910
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 9 September 2026
xolidayboy
@xoxoliday · 56,839
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q130631906 on Wikidata, read 8 November 2026
LabelSlava Kopeykin
DescriptionRussian actor
YouTubeUCMMJich4cVqMrPngiXKK07A

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Копейкин, Слава (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…выход которого планируется в конце 2026 года.{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/skopeykin/1113|title=Отец Русского Гуманизма|website=Telegram|access-dat…”
read 1 November 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Отец Русского Гуманизма” (@skopeykin), 108,530 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skopeykin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.