Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ксеня

Channel

Ксеня

@zhizks

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,044subscribers

-408 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001938999970
TypeChannel
Username@zhizks
Description🖇️
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/zhizks

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,0447,4527,2486 August 2026 — 7,452 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,451 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,437 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,426 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,410 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,393 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,380 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,373 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,328 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,318 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,299 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,268 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,269 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,259 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,230 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,176 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,142 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,133 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,117 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,109 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,101 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,089 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,082 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,056 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,044 subscribers6 August 20267 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 93 days, net -408. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,983–7,513 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 15:087,044-12
4 Nov 2026, 21:367,056-26
1 Nov 2026, 15:457,082-7
29 Oct 2026, 06:417,089-12
25 Oct 2026, 20:317,101-8
22 Oct 2026, 16:287,109-8
19 Oct 2026, 00:377,117-16
15 Oct 2026, 15:147,133-9
12 Oct 2026, 07:387,142-34
5 Oct 2026, 12:157,176-54
27 Sept 2026, 10:417,230-29
18 Sept 2026, 13:167,259-10
14 Sept 2026, 07:357,269+1
10 Sept 2026, 20:387,268-31
5 Sept 2026, 13:407,299-19
1 Sept 2026, 05:067,318-10
29 Aug 2026, 00:577,328-45
25 Aug 2026, 17:577,373-7
22 Aug 2026, 12:487,380-13
19 Aug 2026, 13:137,393first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.1%
avg views ÷ 7,044 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,600
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held20 (15 May 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total10,800
Reactions total704
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 17:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
511
Videos
75
Links
52

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,762 reactions across 20 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,23162.6%
❤‍🔥1,26318.7%
💋3324.91%
💘3064.53%
🔥2163.19%
🍓991.46%
🥰871.29%
👀410.606%
🤣300.444%
💊260.385%
😍230.34%
🌚180.266%
🤨140.207%
🐳120.177%
🍌70.104%
🤩70.104%
👏60.089%
👍50.074%
💩50.074%
💯50.074%
9 further kinds290.429%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,762 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zhizks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 May 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 16:31 UTC≈1,720 views210 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Не успела купить на авито такую красоту , вдруг кому-то попадется ! Напишите пожалуйста ♥️🤍😭

❤150💘36🔥17❤‍🔥3💋2🙏2

1 Nov 2026, 15:21 UTC≈3,730 views280 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Photo

Новая рекомендация !

❤203🔥34🌚17💘8❤‍🔥6😍6💋5🍓1

18 Oct 2026, 18:29 UTC≈5,350 views214 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

И так снова у друзей ! Случилось выпадение волос, сделали фотона лазер , очень приятные ощущения тепла. Напишу после курса , результат! Так же продолжаю удалять тату , очень радуюсь Всецело доверяю мастеру🩵

❤154💘25🍓21❤‍🔥10💋2💩2

6 Oct 2026, 19:06 UTC≈6,420 views632 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Вот так , люблю свой день рождения

❤415🔥116❤‍🔥75💋12💘11🎉3

4 Oct 2026, 09:51 UTC≈5,180 views242 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Сегодня ходили в бтк на «журавль и цапля» Всем идти ! И маленьким и большим 🩵 Очень хорош спектакль, артисты , костюмы - все прекрасно было в этих 45 минутах

❤160❤‍🔥46🥰19💘10🤩4💋3

29 Sept 2026, 12:50 UTC≈5,300 views323 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Вот такое утро ! На первом фото забавно нарисована люстра, обратите внимание ‼️

❤215❤‍🔥60🥰31💘10💋5😇2

12 Sept 2026, 11:49 UTC≈7,830 views389 reactions2 Starsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Есть у меня подруга , которая самая смелая ! Спортсменка, комсомолка , отличница ! Вот ей 10 числа исполнилось 28 , Помню ,как залетела она в мою жизнь , и я подумала : «как же красиво видит этот мир, наверное ,потому что она сама неприлично красива !» Тезка моя , друг мой , твори , люби , будь ! Ксеня Пунтус 🩵

❤273❤‍🔥72🍓30💘10💋2🔥2

8 Sept 2026, 09:11 UTC≈6,120 views222 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Охх когда-нибудь я обязательно сфотографирую лист со своими процедурами, которые мне делают друзья из Sanctum 🩵. Очень доверяю им ! Сейчас хожу к Лэйле Амировне, хотя пробовала многих специалистов, они 100% профи все !

❤149❤‍🔥45💘21💋5👍1🙏1

26 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC≈7,310 views198 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Друзья делюсь рецептом ! 300гр греческого йогурта 3яйца 1/2 ч. Л. Цедры лимона 4 ст. Л. Кукурузного крахмала 1 ст. Л. Сахара Щепотка соли 170’ 30-35 минут Брала рецепт у Маши

❤134❤‍🔥33💋24💘3🤩3👍1

26 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC≈6,060 views210 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Была у друзей, Господи , настал тот момент ,когда с большой радостью бежишь к косметологу ♥️ @sanctum_clinic заглядывайте и вы , друзья 💙

❤145❤‍🔥33💘27💋4😇1

26 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC≈2,530 views334 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤204❤‍🔥72🍓30😍17💘5💋4🔥2

28 Jul 2026, 07:40 UTC≈5,660 views295 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ходила к друзьям , на удаление тату ! Была давняя мечта на которую я не решалась . Спасибо @sanctum_clinic ♥️♥️♥️

❤203❤‍🔥50💘32💯5💋4🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zhizks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Тишь
@tihonZ · 31,790
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 4 September 2026
Любовь. Аксёнова
@ipushlove · 49,558
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 26 August 2026
улица балабанова
@ulizabalabanova · 23,247
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
Андрей Максимов
@andreymaksimof · 26,449
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 September 2026
Лепёшка (Сергей Горошко)
@lepeshkaskapustoi · 24,013
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 14 September 2026
CHEBOTAREV
@chebotarevlife · 28,817
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 7 September 2026
BUBBLE Studios
@grom_film · 50,330
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 24 August 2026
Семейное шоу
@familyshowchannel · 44,048
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 August 2026
Bikovic
@MilosBikovic · 24,769
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 September 2026
Филипп Бледный
@filippblednyy · 30,847
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 5 September 2026
ЕЛИЗАВЕТА БАЗЫКИНА aka Bazykina
@bazykinae · 65,492
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
Матвей Лыков
@lykovmatvey · 36,236
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 2 September 2026
Никита Кологривый
@nik_kologrivyy · 36,429
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 1 September 2026
Отец Русского Гуманизма
@skopeykin · 108,306
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 9 September 2026
Театр «Мастерская»
@vteatrekozlovnet · 19,672
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 October 2026
Комиксы BUBBLE
@bubble_comics · 41,171
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 28 August 2026
Aziza
@AMinekaeva · 34,464
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 6 September 2026
Wink
@WinkRussia · 71,167
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
Во власти кино • КАРО
@karocinema · 67,685
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 1 September 2026
Лев Зулькарнаев
@zullev · 51,301
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 25 August 2026
кино про тебя
@kinoprotebya · 39,777
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
Okko Кино
@okkomovies · 115,823
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ксеня” (@zhizks), 7,044 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhizks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.