Мы перешли от 1 сентября к 24 сентября примерно за 5 минут. Думаю, через пару часов будет Новый год, а через день, может, и лето наступит.

Channel
ЭТО ЗНАК
@etoznakmag
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
636,947subscribers
-7,135 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001474454667 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @etoznakmag |
| Description | Если ты увидел нас, значит это знак ТОТ САМЫЙ ЗНАК: @totznak ЭТО ЗНАК STORE: @etoznak_store contact: @arslan_ibragimov Реестр: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67372e599d804a279bb2cba7 |
| Created | 15 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/etoznakmag |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:15 | 636,947 | -177 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 637,124 | -315 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 637,439 | -202 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 637,641 | -419 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 638,060 | -585 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 638,645 | -375 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 639,020 | -256 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:54 | 639,276 | -239 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:05 | 639,515 | +12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 639,503 | -90 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 639,593 | -249 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 639,842 | -213 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 640,055 | -246 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 640,301 | -132 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:11 | 640,433 | -169 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 640,602 | -213 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 640,815 | -300 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 641,115 | -224 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 641,339 | -240 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 641,579 | first reading |
Engagement
72 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 47.6%
- avg views ÷ 636,947 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 303,000
- 30 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 30
- of 72 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 72 (18 July 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 9,104,000 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 19:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 507
- Videos
- 14
- Links
- 160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
В конечном итоге всё будет хорошо.
Это маленькое, но важное напоминание тебе о том, что ты потрясающий человек, и я тобой очень дорожу.
Всё к лучшему.
Делай от сердца или не делай совсем.
Всё сложится даже лучше, чем ты мог себе представить.
Всё твоё к тебе придёт в самое нужное и верное время.
Боитесь что-то сделать? Сделайте по приколу. Не получится — будет прикол. Получится — будет ещё больший прикол. Если всё измерять в приколах, будет не так страшно. Кому всё равно, тот неуязвим.
Любите. Всё остальное нам навязали.
Сбыться может любая мечта, если тебе хватит смелости за ней погнаться.
Если тебе никто не говорил этого сегодня: я очень горжусь тобой, и я знаю, как ты стараешься.
Если теряя кого-то, ты находишь себя — ты победил.
Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @etoznakmag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 370 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
@karpova_mentor · 21317 posts𝓜𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓻𝔂 🎀
@memmoryyyyy · 23411 postsИстории одной песочницы
@kuzbasssand42 · 1237 postsМысли вслух..
@my_thoughts_now · 47 postsD
@mypage8 · 17 postsЕЛЕНА ПУТИНЦЕВА ❤️направление Биохакинг
@Elenaputintseva1vip · 535 postsНеугомонная мать-предприниматель 🐣❤️💰
@apotaapenko1 · 2295 postsMy mind🔒
@inspspace · 565 postsNe_Forza_17
@media_alko · 695 poststheatrical romance.
@oliride · 85 postsбез одного дня месяц
@solovelytomissyou · 1305 postsЛапки на шоколадке чокнутого лингвиста
@sweetschokolade · 45 postsNami_world💜
@tomorrowmeow · 325 posts🌑🌔🌕Астро🌕🌖🌑
@Astro_dimi2 · 1,1174 postsMy live
@K_Derr · 474 postsУтопленники. ~
@elizabethgauss · 5524 postsharassment of my soul
@harasmantofmysoul · 24 postsИрина Громыко - Путь Души
@putdushi77 · 674 postsRUKAVICHKA🤍
@rukavichka789 · 1964 postsSanika Kadieva
@SK_lifeee · 37,1653 posts19.06
@a91_06_19 · 13 postsЭльчи | Чудеса осознанности
@elcciworld · 1973 postsПлан "А"
@feerichno_pro · 1863 posts𝐺𝑜’𝑧𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑚🍂
@guzalolami · 13 postsМне только салат
@justsalateplease · 1253 postsI diko mne...
@kallabormi1 · 163 posts❤️ Карина Давлетянова | УДМУРТИЯ ❤️
@karinadavladimirovna · 4983 postsЧувствуй.🌄
@katerina_lupanova · 13 posts𝒌‘
@keepbelieving_k · 1183 postsKnittalina
@knittalina · 23 postsживая женщина
@lenalvovich · 2503 postsluwwiii
@luwwiii · 3,4123 postsn's 🫐🌊
@nsrkive · 73 postsWith_love N
@peraspera1adastra · 13 postsTanya TEYLA
@tanya_teyla · 18,8293 postsВИКИТРИН I Творец до мозга костей
@vikitrin · 213 postsТридцатка, давай
@yavahuedavait · 43 postsДиана Бабко| Путь к переменам
@BabkoDiana · 3042 postsБезумие Чешира
@Cheshir_o · 292 postsБудь кем захочешь •
@ab_light_inside · 412 postsAGISH
@agisshhhh · 422 postsАнна Забелина 🇷🇺
@anna_zabelina_shuvalova · 2682 postsСвоими словами | закулисье Алины Арти
@backstage_of_pm · 2562 postsБудь живым! Психолог Татьяна Никитина
@budzhivim · 4672 postsСветлана Шипилова коуч 🪑☕🫰
@comfortnomne · 3762 posts☀️🌤🌥
@cvd2020 · 72 postsДиана Тарасова | Про фитнес, походы и психологию
@dianatarasovafit · 1782 postsds.
@dschnll2 posts
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@sms_future · 108,090#1
@napomynanie · 71,073#2
@ruh_parcassi · 85,832#3
@fory7o · 79,774#4
@tyt_znaki · 100,310#5
@iaccept · 27,750#6
@test_dot · 519,044#7
@uvedomlu · 28,614#8
@evodays · 385,450#9
@kosti · 562,293#10
@evkasup13 · 103,801#11
@astro_juliaa · 213,489#12
@egorkreed · 743,409#13
@valentinablor · 125,928#14
@moscowmap · 2,674,200#15
@moscowtinderr · 740,982#16
@thegerberslive · 645,706#17
@rhymestg · 1,414,552#18
@femalememes · 408,921#19
@br1anm7ps · 1,089,215#20
@astrogiks · 308,765#21
@exilemusic13 · 1,445,976#22
@ekaterina_mizulina · 935,401#23
@adelveigelll · 231,432#24
@laktionovaaaaa · 53,703#25
@milanapetrovaqueen · 202,336#26
@evo_memy · 1,040,244#27
@msk_live · 1,808,438#28
@happiness00_0 · 121,695#29
@shastoonchannel · 234,676#30
@posnovaalexandra · 203,668#31
@withtonchi · 16,804#32
@mosguru · 3,180,311#33
@plsbetenderly · 225,418#34
@budaog · 358,953#35
@leoday · 5,518,691#36
@leylinurani · 46,300#37
@eto_bog · 59,034#38
@pravdadirty · 1,368,903#39
@moscowach · 4,111,005#40
@anyaischukkkk · 601,146#41
@maslennikovliga · 2,142,158#42
@petrovtel · 525,264#43
@mash · 3,096,804#44
@TgEmojis · 1,673,928#45
@akyulenokk · 257,227#46
@rutkismary · 333,278#47
@paradeevich · 1,059,396#48
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,622,630#49
@official_romanceclub · 737,665#50
@polyaam · 28,554#51
@strelets_molodec · 355,464#52
@enikeeva_aliya1 · 239,718#53
@everydayrain · 237,557#54
@SHTOLLNEWS · 513,956#55
@teslond1 · 96,283#56
@naebnet · 2,172,222#57
@litvintm · 1,569,936#58
@tarogks · 88,967#59
@GOSPOSHA_EVELIN · 101,292#60
@milashkina_nekrasova · 251,260#61
@theohdaily · 178,696#62
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@extravaganzathe · 27,038
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 11 September 2026
@uvedomlu · 28,614
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 9 September 2026
@alinasinspiration · 31,083
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026
@tsitaty · 34,431
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 3 September 2026
@egoyanofficial · 44,302
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
@znak_vika · 53,489
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 August 2026
@womenspsi · 58,547
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
@etoposlanie · 182,513
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
@napomynanie · 71,073
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
@sms_future · 108,090
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
@retrogrademercury · 162,931
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
@g_skorpion · 21,146
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 24 September 2026
@bratz_memes · 22,680
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 September 2026
@ulovkitg · 22,855
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 19 September 2026
@natalina_maller · 23,485
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 18 September 2026
@soffashion · 26,088
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 12 September 2026
@iaccept · 27,750
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 10 September 2026
@madgoroskop · 30,198
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 7 September 2026
@love_is_dp · 33,644
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 3 September 2026
@killme9O2 · 38,224
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 31 August 2026
@znak_polina · 42,814
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 28 August 2026
@mamavtelegrame · 47,215
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
@nechegotvetit · 54,737
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 26 August 2026
@cafe_citaty · 263,847
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 755 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЭТО ЗНАК” (@etoznakmag), 636,947 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/etoznakmag.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.