Ты имеешь право жить в соответствии со своими ценностями.

Channel
Мама в Телеграме
@mamavtelegrame
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
46,629subscribers
-1,567 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001118023420 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mamavtelegrame |
| Description | Добрые послания☀️ Хорошая мама может быть внутри каждого из нас. ❌рекламы нет Автор: @Iryna_Tepalenko Insta: irynatepalenko Для 👩🏻 на укр: https://t.me/mamavtelegrami Для 👨 на рус: https://t.me/mamavtelegrameboy На укр: https://t.me/mamavtelegramiboy |
| Created | 28 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mamavtelegrame |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:46 | 46,629 | +19 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:18 | 46,610 | -41 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 08:46 | 46,651 | -9 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:06 | 46,660 | -15 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:34 | 46,675 | -2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 46,677 | -14 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:46 | 46,691 | -8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:27 | 46,699 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 04:45 | 46,708 | -12 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 01:07 | 46,720 | -12 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:39 | 46,732 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:09 | 46,737 | -11 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 46,748 | -5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 03:59 | 46,753 | -4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:35 | 46,757 | -5 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:37 | 46,762 | -2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:05 | 46,764 | -5 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 46,769 | -13 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 16:46 | 46,782 | -13 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 46,795 | first reading |
Engagement
114 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 182 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 41.1%
- avg views ÷ 46,629 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 19,200
- 24 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 24
- of 114 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 114 (21 July 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 459,980 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 16:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 53
- Videos
- 5
- Links
- 134
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
«Мої критики» – це справді мої критики? Усередині кожного з нас живе внутрішня дитина. Коли ми прагнемо змін, важливо зважати на те, як ми говоримо з цією частиною себе. А якщо прислухатися уважніше, можна почути критичні «голоси». Вони говорять голосно й упевнено, тож ми звикаємо їм вірити. Та чи справді вони наші? Часто це слова, які ми колись почули від інших і непомітно присвоїли. Тепер вони звучать нашим влас…
Горжусь твоими идеями.
Ты имеешь право чего-то не понимать.
Как хорошо, что ты есть.
Ты можешь с любовью заботиться о своём теле.
У тебя есть право на свои чувства и реакции.
У тебя есть право добиться успеха в своём стиле.
Ты имеешь право не прощать.
Ценю твой опыт.
Спасибо за твои добрые намерения.
Твоим ощущениям можно доверять.
Showing the 12 most recent of 114 posts we hold for @mamavtelegrame. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @mamavtelegrame as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 18 September 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 24 September 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 36 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@alenastalinavisual · 1982 posts#НаКрыло
@nakrblLo · 112 postsГермиона и 10 000 часов
@yourownvoice · 82 postsХз
@aleeoop · 11 postBhavAni Kay
@annakayyoga108 · 4441 postМожно чувствовать | С Альбиной Вахитовой 😌
@av_nebo · 401 postАнжелика - ежевика
@ezevi · 141 postкультура тела и ума
@le_yoga · 1391 post💎Лилия Крылова | Внутренняя опора
@lily_krylova · 2541 postsilence🤍
@moontana14 · 21 postПсихология Счастья
@psychernikovaa · 2601 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@vtelegramepapa · 15,861#1
@etoznakmag · 631,942#2
@notburningout · 43,583#3
@irena_ponaroshku · 279,663#4
@vintovkina_arina · 68,098#5
@dukaliti · 121,649#6
@yasno_live · 111,384#7
@moscowtinderr · 750,091#8
@pure_cognitions · 38,820#9
@Katerinalengold · 71,168#10
@lpetranovskaya · 166,810#11
@BurningHut · 26,716#12
@pure_cognitions_adhd · 28,353#13
@HealthyAdultLife · 10,610#14
@feminvestingtelegram · 20,558#15
@Matskevich · 25,020#16
@mmargosavchuk · 116,849#17
@vikadmitrieva_psiholog · 261,053#18
@re_uptake · 12,614#19
@dumik · 21,773#20
@green_reflection · 7,551#21
@holodmedia · 57,995#22
@napomynanie · 70,236#23
@zavtrak_s_Kilinoy · 62,118#24
@Le_kinzhal · 46,051#25
@neuralmachine · 48,698#26
@therapyreal · 12,959#27
@influentiamental · 9,559#28
@meduzalive · 1,118,319#29
@bbbreaking · 1,976,053#30
@eschulmann · 300,097#31
@retrogrademercury · 161,422#32
@moscowmap · 2,628,500#33
@varlamov_news · 1,060,017#34
@istominakarina · 156,589#35
@kontext_channel · 865,726#36
@yurydud · 851,593#37
@bloodysx · 1,173,719#38
@markesdaily · 27,656#39
@strelets_molodec · 349,728#40
@pophistory · 140,216#41
@pezduzalive · 369,345#42
@Kkkrem_daily · 64,417#43
@washed_hands · 39,101#44
@donttouchmyface · 54,791#45
@sale_caviar · 192,662#46
@muzhitskaya · 162,501#47
@twitt_ota · 422,260#48
@nastenkinapomoika · 37,300#49
@sashaonline · 86,148#50
@eto_krivo · 34,291#51
@sncmag · 300,063#52
@bloody_mashaa · 12,863#53
@fasolicus · 39,023#54
@lesbulki · 9,528#55
@lesbianlobby · 23,142#56
@alesiapetrovna · 139,265#57
@veronika14 · 62,225#58
@anthro_fun · 74,949#59
@varya_daily · 31,585#60
@yashin_russia · 133,951#61
@purecognitions_school · 8,351#62
@mist_russia · 6,183#63
@profinansy · 567,344#64
@minutavminutu · 167,187#65
@Seda_Kasparova_news · 255,089#66
@ACT_Russia · 16,095#67
@vrednayamoda · 201,636#68
@psymems · 2,969#69
@ryba_lotsman · 52,232#70
@lilia_kim_story · 23,144#71
@wonderzinemag · 16,145#72
@chesno_pro_sex · 16,044#73
@postmodernsoldier · 29,354#74
@marinagolomazdina · 119,118#75
@goldchihuahua · 91,281#76
@paperpaper_ru · 96,241#77
@goodnews_goodtimes · 45,921#78
@Juliacatcalo · 24,100#79
@vacanciesbest · 162,719#80
@aaamagazine · 78,930#81
@thenoisetier · 32,695#82
@etosashaaaa · 53,147#83
@devushkasdengami · 28,521#84
@ovdinfo · 120,616#85
@attachment_theory · 14,979#86
@femagainstwar · 24,730#87
@krrappiv_no · 2,844#88
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@inna_de_almeida · 60,264
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
@stop_toxic · 33,671
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
@yasno_live · 111,384
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
@vintovkina_arina · 68,098
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
@feminvestingtelegram · 20,558
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 September 2026
@notburningout · 43,583
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
@lpetranovskaya · 166,810
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
@mindspa_ru · 35,154
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
@mamaterapia · 60,902
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
@zavtrak_s_Kilinoy · 62,118
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
@dmitrykompaniets · 44,004
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
@od_tkh · 22,770
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 September 2026
@MBrazgovskaia · 55,873
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
@artemrepetskyi · 25,118
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
@yarapsy · 24,149
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
@washed_hands · 39,101
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
@psyalter_ru · 26,536
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
@devushkasdengami · 28,521
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
@muzhitskaya · 162,501
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
@belogaifedor · 38,672
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
@freethecurls · 45,862
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мама в Телеграме” (@mamavtelegrame), 46,629 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mamavtelegrame.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.