Ни любящий мужчина, ни любимые дети, ни интересная работа никогда не заменят полноценного отдыха от них

Channel
Напоминание
@napomynanie
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
71,073subscribers
-747 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001892831741 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @napomynanie |
| Description | Милая, иногда только такой жёсткий дневник с грубыми заметками сможет привести тебя в чувство. Подписывайся и становись сильнее. бесплатно о заработке на тг-каналах: https://t.me/nazavodsuka @chssk — для связи Страница в РКН: https://clck.ru/3Fj3ei |
| Created | 6 November 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/napomynanie |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:39 | 71,073 | -56 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 71,129 | -42 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 71,171 | -30 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:02 | 71,201 | -34 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 71,235 | -58 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 71,293 | -23 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 71,316 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 71,324 | -46 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 71,370 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 71,369 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 71,371 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 71,373 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 71,381 | -38 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 71,419 | -18 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 71,437 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:49 | 71,446 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 71,457 | -33 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:49 | 71,490 | -9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 71,499 | -14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 71,513 | first reading |
Engagement
132 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 21.5%
- avg views ÷ 71,073 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 15,300
- 64 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 64
- of 132 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 44 of 64 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 132 (24 July 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 976,570 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 14:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 65
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 23
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 404
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 92
- of 132 we hold a reading for · 70%
- Most on one post
- 30
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @napomynanie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 132 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Как же сука тяжело жить, когда порядочность и ответственность уживаются с неуёмной тягой к разврату
место для работяг 👇
Оказывается, чтобы быть счастливой, утром нужно вкусно завтракать и трахаться, а не магний.
Все мужики сделаны из одного теста. Просто в тесто иногда не добавляют яйца.
В последнее время максимально похуй, куда там человек перебрался, на Бали, в Штаты, в Париж, сколько человек зарабатывает, какие там бренды носит, на чём ездит и тд единственное, на что не похуй — это хороший и добрый человек перед тобой или нет. Всё.
Кто не рискует, тот не целует женатого.
Готовься к человеку, который будет дарить ювелирку просто за то, что у тебя сегодня хорошее настроение.
Если вы не нравитесь людям с дурным характером, это, как правило, дурной знак.
Желательно, чтобы жопа была загорелая, а не финансовая.
1. Появиться в жизни мужчины 2. Стереть эту блядскую улыбку с его лица
Если подруга пишет "привет" — это не подруга. Подруга не будет так унизительно тратить свое время. Поздоровались при знакомстве 10 лет назад и хватит.
Showing the 12 most recent of 132 posts we hold for @napomynanie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@irishka18msk · 404 postsBAD BITCHES💔
@manimnogo · 414 postsAnastasia...♡
@Anasstassi_ia · 431 postТим Тимыч 🫡
@TimTimy4 · 921 postЛюбовь. Деньги. Женская мудрость | Анастасия Карелова
@anastasiarazvitie · 7781 postТаксую для души
@beelich · 2451 post𝙁.𝙆𝙝
@firangiz_kh · 421 postЛера, какого хера⁉️
@kuznetsovacat_life · 511 postloveliness
@loveliness_n · 401 postалкаши
@lybovvinni · 11 post#1 SKZ STAN MITSUUU
@m1tsnya · 31 postQuotes✨
@quotesff · 1,6911 post🧚♀️ МНЕ ВСЁ МОЖНО
@yuliyacoaching · 661 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@etoznakmag · 636,947#1
@sms_future · 108,090#2
@femalememes · 408,921#3
@etoposlanie · 185,865#4
@girl_humor · 54,349#5
@from1993 · 8,940#6
@buvchiy · 40,020#7
@tyt_znaki · 100,310#8
@ruh_parcassi · 85,832#9
@lovergolubev · 112,886#10
@fory7o · 79,774#11
@iaccept · 27,750#12
@bratz_memes · 22,680#13
@xachmagaz · 848#14
@girl_notess · 26,380#15
@chitai_menya_polnostiu · 530#16
@moscowtinderr · 740,982#17
@pravdadirty · 1,368,903#18
@evodays · 385,450#19
@moscowmap · 2,674,200#20
@valentinablor · 125,928#21
@kosti · 562,293#22
@moscowach · 4,111,005#23
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693#24
@astrogiks · 308,765#25
@evo_memy · 1,040,244#26
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,620,141#27
@dateideasspp · 46,293#28
@TgEmojis · 1,673,928#29
@rhymestg · 1,414,552#30
@thegerberslive · 645,706#31
@petrovtel · 525,264#32
@uraspura · 15,617#33
@astro_juliaa · 213,489#34
@shot_shot · 1,264,301#35
@strelets_molodec · 355,464#36
@leoday · 5,518,691#37
@luka_ebkov · 431,305#38
@official_romanceclub · 737,665#39
@novosti_efir · 3,956,254#40
@msk_live · 1,808,438#41
@astroolove · 60,571#42
@ekaterina_mizulina · 935,690#43
@retrogrademercury · 162,931#44
@unpleasent · 492,735#45
@spbtoday · 349,761#46
@stikery4 · 1,076,984#47
@znak_nastya · 74,457#48
@loveinmyy · 13,293#49
@happiness00_0 · 121,742#50
@milanapetrovaqueen · 202,336#51
@karnava1l · 286,257#52
@eleganceflerey · 6,100#53
@briusvictoria · 201,674#54
@absoulluve · 141,315#55
@cafe_citaty · 263,847#56
@veronikastepanova20011 · 474,884#57
@sncmag · 301,518#58
@goro_kirill · 171,579#59
@mash · 3,096,804#60
@miss_oru · 63,958#61
@twitt_ota · 332,521#62
@twitt_chan · 5,815#63
@strochki_tg · 54,801#64
@maslennikovliga · 2,142,158#65
@bloodysx · 1,158,879#66
@tarogks · 88,967#67
@bazabazon · 1,535,150#68
@anyaischukkkk · 601,146#69
@egorkreed · 746,544#70
@mosguru · 3,180,311#71
@spletni_tg · 187,774#72
@everydayrain · 237,557#73
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@exboyfriend · 47,485
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 August 2026
@sms_future · 108,090
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
@etoznakmag · 636,947
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 August 2026
@girl_notess · 26,380
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 September 2026
@etoposlanie · 185,865
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
@iaccept · 27,750
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 10 September 2026
@usveex · 50,389
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
@bratz_memes · 22,680
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 September 2026
@extravaganzathe · 27,038
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 11 September 2026
@girl_humor · 54,349
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
@Ranevskaya_tsitaty_teatr · 30,607
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 September 2026
@babazoyka · 87,450
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
@oskolkiblok · 58,807
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
@buvchiy · 40,020
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
@femalememes · 408,921
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
@nechegotvetit · 54,737
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 26 August 2026
@GoTodayGo · 128,096
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 August 2026
@miss_oru · 63,958
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
@psychologiy_tg · 95,828
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 August 2026
@females · 538,293
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 August 2026
@womenspsi · 58,547
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
@lovergolubev · 112,886
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
@stikery_emodzi_memy · 1,214,578
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 8 August 2026
@sovvetgl · 26,053
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 49 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Напоминание” (@napomynanie), 71,073 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/napomynanie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.