Channel
@sms_future
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
108,358subscribers
-437 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001386382764 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sms_future |
| Description | Авторский digital-журнал, чтобы вдохновить либо успокоить 😌 бесплатно о заработке на тг-каналах: https://t.me/nazavodsuka @chssk — для связи Страница в РКН: https://clck.ru/3FjXYj |
| Created | 22 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sms_future |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:26 | 108,358 | -27 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 108,385 | -46 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 108,431 | -74 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 108,505 | -53 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 108,558 | -27 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 108,585 | -32 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 108,617 | -13 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 108,630 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 108,633 | -35 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 108,668 | -18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 108,686 | -24 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 108,710 | -18 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 108,728 | -25 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 108,753 | -16 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 108,769 | -28 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 108,797 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 108,795 | first reading |
65 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 51 of 61 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 65 (22 July 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 982,550 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 01:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sms_future. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 65 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Редкий, но очень зелёный флаг: после общения с человеком вам снова хочется свернуть горы. Не потому, что он дал какой-то совет, а потому, что рядом с ним почему-то снова хочется жить, делать и пробовать.
Когда все думали, что ты всех игнорируешь и пропала, на самом деле ты тихо справлялась с самой тяжёлой битвой в своей жизни, и никто этого не заметил.
Самое главное в жизни — найти человека, который чувствует тебя душой и понимает без лишних слов и объяснений. Который рядом не потому, что должен, а потому, что сам от души хочет быть с тобой.
Рано или поздно у каждой пары наступает этап, когда вы начинаете ругаться из-за каждой мелочи. Но в такие моменты стоит больше разговаривать друг с другом и вместе решать, что делать дальше. А самое главное — помнить: вы вместе против проблемы, а не друг против друга.
Если сидеть и ждать, ничего прикольного так и не случится.
Лучшая дружба — это дружба с людьми, с которыми можно просто как не в себя смеяться, а спустя пять минут вести серьёзный разговор по душам.
Кто бы что ни говорил, но чтобы что-то в жизни изменить, нужно очень устать от своей усталости.
Разве это не странно? Ты знаешь себя лучше, чем кто-либо, и все равно расстраиваешься из-за слов кого-то, кто не прожил и секунды твоей жизни. Береги свое сердце.
Некоторые из твоих любимых дней ещё даже не случились, и в этом вся магия быть живым.
Ты не обязана прощать тех, кто причинил тебе боль. Тебе не обязательно прощать их, принимать их извинения, доверять им или позволять вернуться в твою жизнь по какой-либо причине. Это не является негативным или анти-выздоровлением. Ты все равно можешь стать лучше, даже не прощая своих обидчиков или других токсичных людей в своей жизни.
Ты отлично справляешься. Даже если тебе кажется, что это не так.
Разреши себе отдохнуть. Ты это заслужила.
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @sms_future. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 39,110 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Смс из будущего” (@sms_future), 108,358 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sms_future.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.