♓︎ Рыбы, 6 ноября Счастье любит тишину, а у вас рот не закрывается. Наилучшее сочетание: Близнецы Наихудшее сочетание: Водолей

Channel
astro love | любовный гороскоп
@astroolove
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
59,016subscribers
-3,152 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001759293876 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @astroolove |
| Description | Реклама: @astromanage Канал зарегистрирован в официальном перечне Роскомнадзора: https://clck.ru/3GEux5 |
| Created | 28 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/astroolove |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:55 | 59,016 | -26 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:38 | 59,042 | -28 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:36 | 59,070 | -45 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:35 | 59,115 | -38 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:00 | 59,153 | -49 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:27 | 59,202 | -36 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:06 | 59,238 | -32 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 09:44 | 59,270 | -47 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:38 | 59,317 | -48 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:14 | 59,365 | -38 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:06 | 59,403 | -27 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 11:11 | 59,430 | -40 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:39 | 59,470 | -23 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:35 | 59,493 | -42 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:45 | 59,535 | -39 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:59 | 59,574 | -46 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 59,620 | -26 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 06:01 | 59,646 | -19 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 03:00 | 59,665 | -59 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 02:59 | 59,724 | first reading |
Engagement
931 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 202 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.8%
- avg views ÷ 59,016 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,360
- 319 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 319
- of 931 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 319 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 931 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,028,390 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 20:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,340
- Videos
- ≈4
- Links
- ≈4,740
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 39s
- Average length
- 39s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 48
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 34
- of 931 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 5
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @astroolove. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 931 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 0.537%
- 5 of 931 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 5
- posts carrying an erid · 5 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 6,020
- over 5 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 6,590
- over 926 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqxTNipu | 1 | 30 October 2026 | 30 October 2026 |
| 2W5zFG6KvEV | 1 | 23 September 2026 | 23 September 2026 |
| 2W5zFHQ9M3F | 1 | 17 August 2026 | 17 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFJhiNaD | 1 | 27 August 2026 | 27 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFK4ewUM | 1 | 19 August 2026 | 19 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 931 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 319 posts held from the last 30 days (0.313%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
♒︎ Водолей, 6 ноября Может и не стоит гневаться из-за пустяков, а можно просто попить чай и спокойно поговорить. Наилучшее сочетание: Весы Наихудшее сочетание: Рыбы
♑︎ Козерог, 6 ноября Вас уже ничем в этой жизни не удивить, кроме как вашей свадьбы. Наилучшее сочетание: Телец Наихудшее сочетание: Дева
♐︎ Стрелец, 6 ноября Пусть не обижаются за унижения, вы так флиртуете. Наилучшее сочетание: Дева Наихудшее сочетание: Телец
♏︎ Скорпион, 6 ноября Не стоит никому отдавать свои последние нервные клетки. Они же у вас последние. Наилучшее сочетание: Овен Наихудшее сочетание: Рак
♎︎ Весы, 6 ноября Единственный треугольник в который в хотели бы попасть, это: постель, любимая еда и крепкие объятия. Наилучшее сочетание: Водолей Наихудшее сочетание: Овен
♍︎ Дева, 6 ноября Не так страшен чёрт, как вы, когда ваши сообщения начали игнорировать. Наилучшее сочетание: Стрелец Наихудшее сочетание: Козерог
♌︎ Лев, 6 ноября Ближайшие сутки в голове вместо мыслей о работе будут только мысли о поцелуях. Наилучшее сочетание: Рак Наихудшее сочетание: Скорпион
♋︎ Рак, 6 ноября Как же круто проснуться утром и осознать, что вы не ловите бабочек в животе от банального: «доброе утро». Наилучшее сочетание: Лев Наихудшее сочетание: Близнецы
♊︎ Близнецы, 6 ноября Плюньте им в лицо, за их сухие ответы. Наилучшее сочетание: Рыбы Наихудшее сочетание: Рак
♉︎ Телец, 6 ноября Вы станете всемирным амбассадором возвращения к бывшим. И это пиздец. Наилучшее сочетание: Козерог Наихудшее сочетание: Стрелец
♈︎ Овен, 6 ноября Чтобы не грустить из-за мужика, их должно быть несколько. Наилучшее сочетание: Скорпион Наихудшее сочетание: Весы
Showing the 12 most recent of 931 posts we hold for @astroolove. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 22 posts on @astroolove as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 6 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 31 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 9
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@zstarsz · 584,5383 postsJoyti: твой ведический астролог ✨
@AstroJoyti_bot · 22,4741 postАвиаТревел — Туры, билеты, отели
@aviatravels · 24,9171 postJetTon Official
@jetton · 5121 postluxevili
@luxevili · 28,7621 postОПИУМНАЯ ВЕДЬМА
@opiumnaya_vedma · 6701 postПонятно
@ponyatnooo · 7441 post⚡️Быстрые скидки
@skidki_moskva_piter · 17,0721 postтаро | ритуалы | эзотерика
@taro111max · 3,6221 postTarot | Danil Belov
@tarotbelov · 371 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@astroolove named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 2 posts, 16 October 2026 – 17 October 2026 · confirmed gone 5 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@astrogiks · 302,430#1
@astro_juliaa · 205,412#2
@tarogks · 86,855#3
@goro_kirill · 167,983#4
@astronotesx · 23,385#5
@iaccept · 27,467#6
@tg_horoscope · 109,138#7
@tyt_znaki · 98,083#8
@ELFORDSKOP · 11,155#9
@sms_kaa · 36,876#10
@etoznakmag · 631,659#11
@test_dot · 509,529#12
@kosti · 552,170#13
@astrowox · 16,044#14
@rhymestg · 1,534,696#15
@official_romanceclub · 731,088#16
@valentinablor · 118,592#17
@femalememes · 399,819#18
@leoday · 5,542,702#19
@msk_live · 2,388#20
@pravdadirty · 1,392,195#21
@TgEmojis · 1,693,345#22
@exilemusic13 · 1,439,594#23
@ekaterina_mizulina · 924,385#24
@egorkreed · 732,691#25
@maslennikovliga · 2,106,024#26
@br1anm7ps · 1,094,121#27
@paradeevich · 1,045,706#28
@petrovtel · 542,485#29
@DKNASASAL · 385,169#30
@okbnews · 189,654#31
@koreshzy · 818,627#32
@strochki_tg · 11#33
@moscowach · 3,895,472#34
@SHTOLLNEWS · 515,141#35
@elenaraytman · 843,809#36
@anyaischukkkk · 606,183#37
@oieiei · 746,512#38
@officialannaperesild · 179,258#39
@stikery4 · 1,072,442#40
@mazellovvv · 414,844#41
@kishlak_family · 263,236#42
@danila_gorilla · 633,259#43
@milashkina_nekrasova · 241,662#44
@everydayrain · 234,326#45
@theohdaily · 171,872#46
@budaog · 359,661#47
@thegerberslive · 623,439#48
@gensyka · 272,925#49
@milanapetrovaqueen · 198,226#50
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@iaccept · 27,467
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 10 September 2026
@astro_juliaa · 205,412
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 11 August 2026
@g_strelec · 18,546
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 4 October 2026
@astrost1ftka · 48,847
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 24 August 2026
@tarogks · 86,855
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 17 August 2026
@tg_horoscope · 109,138
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 14 August 2026
@astrogiks · 302,430
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 August 2026
@g_skorpion · 20,559
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 24 September 2026
@g_riba · 21,724
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 21 September 2026
@goro_kirill · 167,983
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 12 August 2026
@g_aries · 20,138
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 26 September 2026
@g_vodolei · 20,708
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 24 September 2026
@g_vesi · 20,958
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 23 September 2026
@g_virgo · 22,155
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 20 September 2026
@g_rakk · 22,224
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 19 September 2026
@g_levv · 23,029
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 17 September 2026
@g_kozerog · 20,722
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 24 September 2026
@g_bliznec · 22,431
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 19 September 2026
@astro_my · 34,704
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 2 September 2026
@g_telec · 20,742
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 24 September 2026
@magiaezoterica · 55,750
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 23 August 2026
@tyt_znaki · 98,083
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 August 2026
@sms_kaa · 36,876
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 31 August 2026
@nudaznaki · 126,363
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“astro love | любовный гороскоп” (@astroolove), 59,016 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astroolove.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.