♓︎ Рыбы, 22 сентября У вас есть шанс влюбиться. Не проморгайте его, пожалуйста. Наилучшее сочетание: Овен Наихудшее сочетание: Скорпион

Channel
astro love | любовный гороскоп
@astroolove
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
60,571subscribers
-1,597 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001759293876 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @astroolove |
| Description | Реклама: @astromanage Канал зарегистрирован в официальном перечне Роскомнадзора: https://clck.ru/3GEux5 |
| Created | 28 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/astroolove |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 60,571 | -93 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 60,664 | -82 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 60,746 | -54 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 60,800 | -71 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 60,871 | -78 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 60,949 | -77 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 61,026 | -98 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:29 | 61,124 | -27 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:26 | 61,151 | -40 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 61,191 | -99 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 61,290 | -30 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 61,320 | -40 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 61,360 | -40 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 61,400 | -50 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 61,450 | -52 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 61,502 | -43 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:39 | 61,545 | -42 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 61,587 | -39 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 61,626 | -33 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 61,659 | first reading |
Engagement
440 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.2%
- avg views ÷ 60,571 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,760
- 249 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 249
- of 440 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 249 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 440 (4 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,682,650 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 14:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,340
- Videos
- ≈4
- Links
- ≈4,740
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 32
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 25
- of 440 we hold a reading for · 6%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @astroolove. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 440 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 0.682%
- 3 of 440 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 3
- posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 6,020
- over 3 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 6,750
- over 437 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFHQ9M3F | 1 | 17 August 2026 | 17 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFJhiNaD | 1 | 27 August 2026 | 27 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFK4ewUM | 1 | 19 August 2026 | 19 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 440 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
♒︎ Водолей, 22 сентября Ещё чуть-чуть и вы с любимым человеком окончательно сойдёте с ума и уедете жить в тайгу. Наилучшее сочетание: Скорпион Наихудшее сочетание: Близнецы
♑︎ Козерог, 22 сентября Вы не в том возрасте, чтобы следить за трендами, поэтому следите за бывшими. Наилучшее сочетание: Близнецы Наихудшее сочетание: Дева
♐︎ Стрелец, 22 сентября Звёзды дарят вам пинок под зад в сторону романтичного вечера. Наилучшее сочетание: Лев Наихудшее сочетание: Рак
♏︎ Скорпион, 22 сентября На ваших выебонах далеко не уедешь, сворачивайтесь и побудьте милашками сегодня. Наилучшее сочетание: Водолей Наихудшее сочетание: Рыбы
♎︎ Весы, 22 сентября Вы могли бы быть счастливы, но выбираете отношения. Наилучшее сочетание: Телец Наихудшее сочетание: Овен
♍︎ Дева, 22 сентября Синоптики говорят, ясно, но вам сегодня ещё и понятно. Наилучшее сочетание: Рак Наихудшее сочетание: Козерог
♌︎ Лев, 22 сентября Следующая станция в ваших отношениях «похуй». Поругались? Похуй. Помиритесь. Наилучшее сочетание: Стрелец Наихудшее сочетание: Скорпион
♋︎ Рак, 22 сентября Вы не ищете лёгких путей, поэтому начинаете с самого сложного: с долбоёбов. Наилучшее сочетание: Дева Наихудшее сочетание: Стрелец
♊︎ Близнецы, 22 сентября Пора снимать лапшу с ушей и розовые очки и начинать уже думать о себе. Наилучшее сочетание: Козерог Наихудшее сочетание: Водолей
♉︎ Телец, 22 сентября Всё как-то слишком понятно, а хочется непонятные отношения с нотками депрессии. Наилучшее сочетание: Весы Наихудшее сочетание: Лев
♈︎ Овен, 22 сентября Пора уже найти того, кто оплатит вашу корзину на вб. Наилучшее сочетание: Рыбы Наихудшее сочетание: Весы
Showing the 12 most recent of 440 posts we hold for @astroolove. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@astrogiks · 308,765#1
@astro_juliaa · 213,489#2
@tarogks · 88,967#3
@goro_kirill · 171,579#4
@astronotesx · 23,986#5
@iaccept · 27,750#6
@tg_horoscope · 111,267#7
@tyt_znaki · 100,310#8
@ELFORDSKOP · 11,622#9
@sms_kaa · 37,980#10
@etoznakmag · 636,947#11
@test_dot · 519,044#12
@kosti · 562,293#13
@astrowox · 16,642#14
@rhymestg · 1,414,552#15
@official_romanceclub · 737,665#16
@valentinablor · 125,928#17
@femalememes · 408,921#18
@leoday · 5,518,691#19
@msk_live · 1,808,438#20
@pravdadirty · 1,368,903#21
@TgEmojis · 1,673,928#22
@exilemusic13 · 1,445,976#23
@ekaterina_mizulina · 935,690#24
@egorkreed · 746,544#25
@maslennikovliga · 2,142,158#26
@br1anm7ps · 1,089,215#27
@paradeevich · 1,059,475#28
@petrovtel · 525,264#29
@DKNASASAL · 391,493#30
@okbnews · 190,108#31
@koreshzy · 829,871#32
@strochki_tg · 54,801#33
@moscowach · 4,111,005#34
@SHTOLLNEWS · 513,956#35
@elenaraytman · 849,778#36
@anyaischukkkk · 601,146#37
@oieiei · 685,689#38
@officialannaperesild · 183,249#39
@stikery4 · 1,076,984#40
@mazellovvv · 421,504#41
@kishlak_family · 265,329#42
@danila_gorilla · 643,829#43
@milashkina_nekrasova · 251,260#44
@everydayrain · 237,557#45
@theohdaily · 178,696#46
@budaog · 358,953#47
@thegerberslive · 645,706#48
@gensyka · 271,047#49
@milanapetrovaqueen · 202,336#50
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@iaccept · 27,750
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 10 September 2026
@astro_juliaa · 213,489
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 11 August 2026
@astrost1ftka · 50,665
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 24 August 2026
@tarogks · 88,967
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 17 August 2026
@tg_horoscope · 111,267
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 14 August 2026
@astrogiks · 308,765
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 August 2026
@g_riba · 22,321
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 21 September 2026
@goro_kirill · 171,579
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 12 August 2026
@g_virgo · 22,688
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 20 September 2026
@g_rakk · 22,904
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 19 September 2026
@g_levv · 23,689
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 17 September 2026
@g_bliznec · 23,006
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 19 September 2026
@astro_my · 35,354
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 2 September 2026
@magiaezoterica · 57,031
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 23 August 2026
@tyt_znaki · 100,310
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 August 2026
@sms_kaa · 37,980
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 31 August 2026
@nudaznaki · 131,611
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 24 August 2026
@astrologyyours · 43,120
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 28 August 2026
@loves_go · 50,223
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 25 August 2026
@mercury_retro · 24,521
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 September 2026
@abdartartemka · 128,958
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
@eetozznak · 25,332
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 14 September 2026
@mercuryret · 21,800
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 22 September 2026
@lovescoptvoj · 39,591
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“astro love | любовный гороскоп” (@astroolove), 60,571 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astroolove.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.