не трать время на человека, который не стремится провести его с тобой

Channel
Mon ami
@mon1amii
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
75,950subscribers
-5,214 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001787372538 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mon1amii |
| Created | 6 April 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mon1amii |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:24 | 75,950 | -60 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 15:18 | 76,010 | +6 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 16:18 | 76,004 | -19 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:58 | 76,023 | -13 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:27 | 76,036 | -27 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 17:28 | 76,063 | -33 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:08 | 76,096 | -34 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 17:28 | 76,130 | -14 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:06 | 76,144 | -38 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 19:40 | 76,182 | -44 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 17:11 | 76,226 | +13 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:34 | 76,213 | +2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:00 | 76,211 | -12 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:48 | 76,223 | -6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:11 | 76,229 | -60 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 76,289 | -48 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:45 | 76,337 | -39 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 76,376 | -64 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:35 | 76,440 | -54 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:40 | 76,494 | first reading |
Engagement
342 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 214 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 17.3%
- avg views ÷ 75,950 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 13,100
- 101 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 101
- of 342 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 342 (1 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,326,323 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 03:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 13s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 101 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
обучение чтению Корана 📖📚
«и я хотел проснуться от твоего голоса, говорящего доброе утро»
я редко скучаю по людям, зато как часто скучаю по себе в каких-то периодах
вредные привычки? я могу не тратиться на еду, но новые вещи у меня точно будут
Video message, posted without a caption
я ночью надеялся на встречу с тобой во сне, а ты, оказывается, и глаз не сомкнула до утра, чтоб не явиться мне
Photo, posted without a caption
сглазьте кто-нибудь мои плохие дела, пускай они пойдут хорошо
обижаться? не в моем стиле. я либо зла, либо мне абсолютно без разницы
love language♥️
ночью вместо сна, я лежу и думаю, как же мне повезло быть мной
Showing the 12 most recent of 342 posts we hold for @mon1amii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 64 posts on @mon1amii as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 6 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 44 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 34
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@onIyeyss · 40,4544 posts𝒃 𝒓 𝒖 𝒏 𝒆 𝑻 𝒕 𝒆
@Babby_Telll · 3101 post@anassttiie
@anassttiiee · 1341 postRí
@armaniexchangeee · 9621 postأفكاري
@by_mmdva · 1,0421 postmu`minum
@huchsabii · 2081 post𝓴𝓪𝓻𝓸𝔀𝓺𝔁𝔁 🎀
@karowqxx · 1141 post224
@letitbekkk · 1261 postᴅᴇᴄᴇᴍʙᴇʀ
@madokino77 · 4731 postnuneli
@nunelik · 11 postМечтатель Лита
@sergeevnaa11 · 2121 post🐈⬛
@ssrn001 · 11 post💖...В сети...💖
@tifgxj · 921 post22:22🍃
@twentytwoportal · 211 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@ansogg · 11,2802 postsA’kessler 🤍
@babykessler · 7572 postsprivate.russ
@feelsru · 3482 postslife star lovmari
@LovMari3249 · 3871 postamish
@amiiiisshhh · 4391 postAM LUX
@amluxxxx · 2,0531 postcharmé
@charme_vld · 4,4011 post𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑆ℎ𝑜𝑝
@diaaaaalshooop · 4,2321 postДневник одной армянки
@dnevnikarmyanki · 341 postgirlboss values
@girlbossvalues · 28,3901 postBIJOU’KA
@ivelorott · 10,1341 post«âme de mon âme»
@lovecanchangetheworld · 3551 postmaressme’life
@maressme · 1471 postbrunette babe rules
@meboard · 20,0961 postonline career
@portfoliooo7 · 611 postROÉ Beauty
@roebeauty · 3461 postaya
@rsslllvvaaaa · 7941 postSaikaa
@saiiikaaaaa · 2121 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ansogg · 11,2807 postsemish
@emiisshhkaa · 1,7853 postsKusyyyya
@kusyyyaaa · 893 postsρ
@llpeta · 5,3143 postsBeauty Select by oysha
@luxebeautyselect · 1353 postsɐ̖sǝ
@Never_12_Tg · 1,0493 postsчувство верности
@wthlvan · 68,4913 postsALShop
@AlSshooop · 2,0842 postsamours mi
@amoursmi · 31,8232 postsA’kessler 🤍
@babykessler · 7572 postsBEAUTY GALLERY косметика оригинал
@beautygallery_us · 7,0072 postscharmé
@charme_vld · 4,4012 posts𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑆ℎ𝑜𝑝
@diaaaaalshooop · 4,2322 postsBIJOU’KA
@ivelorott · 10,1342 postsLarami Beauty
@laramibeauty · 1,0522 postsпсихоанализ 💛Лаура Лозан
@lauralovepsu · 8882 postsmood ami
@moodamiii · 3632 postsnensik
@nensik7 · 9232 postsПро английский с Маришей
@ohhmarisha · 20,4112 postsluv archive
@sosoorryy · 4,8442 postsStart Arabic
@startarabic_2 · 762 postsWayofbeauty
@wayofbeauty · 5,9912 postslife star lovmari
@LovMari3249 · 3871 postbrunette babe rules
@meboard · 20,0961 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@mon1amii named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 12 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@amoursmi · 31,823
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 6 September 2026
@slyubovyu_mayaa · 20,859
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 September 2026
@laviliya · 19,114
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 4 October 2026
@asssav · 20,138
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 26 September 2026
@evetvgg · 21,711
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 21 September 2026
@absoulluve · 138,848
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
@only2we · 18,630
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 October 2026
@tthenddd · 21,092
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 September 2026
@lumsmII · 20,606
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 September 2026
@etoam · 23,398
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 19 September 2026
@dofamin_tg · 31,371
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 5 September 2026
@motivation_psychoIogy · 99,095
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 August 2026
@evodays · 378,223
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 August 2026
@Lovestebe · 19,589
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 29 September 2026
@stikery_emodzi_memy · 1,159,414
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 8 August 2026
@arabskie_tsitaty27 · 32,044
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 19 September 2026
@ismoilovTHE · 30,674
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 5 September 2026
@arabskiyetsitatyyyyyyy · 24,271
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 21 September 2026
@sms_future · 107,216
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
@arabskiecitati · 23,624
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 20 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mon ami” (@mon1amii), 75,950 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mon1amii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.