Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
43 measurements spanning 75 days, net +1,101. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58,154–59,612 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
20 Oct 2026, 02:31
59,423
-15
19 Oct 2026, 03:37
59,438
-6
18 Oct 2026, 05:27
59,444
+18
17 Oct 2026, 03:39
59,426
+28
16 Oct 2026, 02:27
59,398
-11
15 Oct 2026, 00:19
59,409
+35
13 Oct 2026, 18:41
59,374
-27
10 Oct 2026, 06:01
59,401
+50
6 Oct 2026, 01:57
59,351
+115
30 Sept 2026, 17:01
59,236
+202
18 Sept 2026, 03:55
59,034
+36
15 Sept 2026, 22:01
58,998
+72
14 Sept 2026, 03:20
58,926
+49
12 Sept 2026, 11:19
58,877
+54
10 Sept 2026, 09:17
58,823
+96
7 Sept 2026, 02:36
58,727
+106
4 Sept 2026, 08:35
58,621
+51
2 Sept 2026, 18:49
58,570
-5
1 Sept 2026, 15:06
58,575
+16
31 Aug 2026, 13:54
58,559
first reading
Engagement
148 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 166 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
49.6%
avg views ÷ 59,423 subscribers
Avg views / post
29,500
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
52
of 148 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 October 2026
Posts held
148 (21 July 2026 – 19 October 2026)
Views total
1,533,470
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
19 Oct 2026, 20:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Advertising
Ad load
0.676%
1 of 148 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
9,670
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
32,200
over 147 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFJ4Ygyo
1
19 October 2026
19 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 148 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 19 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Здравствуй. Меня зовут Максим.
Это рекламный пост, но пишу его я сам, а не агентство.
Пять лет мы с командой делали приложение, где человека узнают через разговор, а не по фотографии. А однажды я увидел картину Андрея Бодько «Христос и подросток» и понял, для кого мы всё это время его строили.
Человек смотрит на внешность.
Бог смотрит на сердце.
1 Царств 16:7
Так появился b0, христианское приложение для знакомств…
Не путай одиночество с ненужностью.
То, что рядом пока нет твоего человека, ничего не говорит о твоей ценности.
Showing the 12 most recent of 148 posts we hold for @eto_bog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Дневник Пастора | Алексей Романов @romanovpastor · 22,771 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 September 2026
Молитва Православие Религия Православные @molitvys · 36,265 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
uzum em @uzumemm · 24,276 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 19 September 2026
ЭТО ЗНАК @etoznakmag · 633,762 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 August 2026
JANAGA @janaga_aa · 31,565 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 5 September 2026
Библейские факты 🕊 @biblefacts_org · 19,178 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 3 October 2026
Сестра во Христе 🕊️ @byankinastya · 18,971 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 October 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЭТО БОГ” (@eto_bog), 59,423 subscribers as measured 20 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eto_bog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
