Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 9O2

Channel

9O2

@killme9O2

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

38,161subscribers

-224 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001346407039
TypeChannel
Username@killme9O2
Description✉️ реклама: @evaaveev ✉️ писать сюда: @mortaparis ✨реклама (цена/ отзывы/ свободные даты): @reklama9O2 🩸глубокий порез на теле своей семьи: @mrtaprs 🫂 чат подписчиков: t.me/+3thKwP_p2OFiMGYy (если ссылка не функционирует, писать @evaaveev)
Created23 June 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 October 2026
Measurements held38
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/killme9O2

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

38,16038,39638,2786 August 2026 — 38,385 subscribers6 August 2026 — 38,385 subscribers6 August 2026 — 38,396 subscribers7 August 2026 — 38,383 subscribers8 August 2026 — 38,376 subscribers9 August 2026 — 38,368 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38,357 subscribers11 August 2026 — 38,367 subscribers12 August 2026 — 38,361 subscribers14 August 2026 — 38,357 subscribers15 August 2026 — 38,352 subscribers16 August 2026 — 38,355 subscribers19 August 2026 — 38,338 subscribers20 August 2026 — 38,310 subscribers21 August 2026 — 38,307 subscribers22 August 2026 — 38,300 subscribers24 August 2026 — 38,280 subscribers25 August 2026 — 38,270 subscribers26 August 2026 — 38,267 subscribers27 August 2026 — 38,263 subscribers28 August 2026 — 38,273 subscribers29 August 2026 — 38,263 subscribers30 August 2026 — 38,261 subscribers31 August 2026 — 38,262 subscribers1 September 2026 — 38,268 subscribers2 September 2026 — 38,258 subscribers5 September 2026 — 38,252 subscribers9 September 2026 — 38,254 subscribers11 September 2026 — 38,239 subscribers13 September 2026 — 38,256 subscribers15 September 2026 — 38,241 subscribers17 September 2026 — 38,231 subscribers19 September 2026 — 38,224 subscribers26 September 2026 — 38,187 subscribers9 October 2026 — 38,178 subscribers13 October 2026 — 38,160 subscribers14 October 2026 — 38,163 subscribers15 October 2026 — 38,161 subscribers38,1616 August 202615 October 2026
38 measurements spanning 70 days, net -224. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,125–38,431 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 38
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Oct 2026, 20:3638,161-2
14 Oct 2026, 19:4038,163+3
13 Oct 2026, 09:2638,160-18
9 Oct 2026, 04:1838,178-9
26 Sept 2026, 17:0138,187-37
19 Sept 2026, 16:0238,224-7
17 Sept 2026, 04:3838,231-10
15 Sept 2026, 04:3738,241-15
13 Sept 2026, 16:0038,256+17
11 Sept 2026, 18:1538,239-15
9 Sept 2026, 03:1638,254+2
5 Sept 2026, 16:1538,252-6
2 Sept 2026, 09:0338,258-10
1 Sept 2026, 10:1438,268+6
31 Aug 2026, 08:3538,262+1
30 Aug 2026, 07:0338,261-2
29 Aug 2026, 06:5338,263-10
28 Aug 2026, 04:1338,273+10
27 Aug 2026, 07:2438,263-4
26 Aug 2026, 10:0438,267first reading

Engagement

331 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 163 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.3%
avg views ÷ 38,161 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,690
159 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
159
of 331 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 77 of 159 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 October 2026
Posts held331 (3 August 2026 – 15 October 2026)
Views total745,370
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Oct 2026, 05:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,090
Videos
≈15
Links
≈34

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,048
across the posts below
Posts paid on
181
of 331 we hold a reading for · 55%
Most on one post
60
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @killme9O2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 331 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 15 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Oct 2026, 18:28 UTC≈1,760 viewsread 16 October 2026

я — последний свидетель бога, а он как раз — в этих двух крошечных морщинках её смеющихся глаз.

15 Oct 2026, 16:46 UTC≈2,370 viewsread 16 October 2026

если вы избегаете конфликта, чтобы сохранить мир, вы начинаете войну внутри себя.

14 Oct 2026, 18:02 UTC≈3,610 viewsread 16 October 2026

было бы замечательно, если бы то, что ты защищаешь, не ранило тебя.

14 Oct 2026, 17:04 UTC≈3,260 viewsread 16 October 2026
Forwarded from @silbernerwinter

в своей иронии судьба зачастую награждает людей исключительно страданием: жаждущих жизни — смертью, жаждущих смерти — жизнью.

14 Oct 2026, 14:15 UTC≈4,170 views0 reactions1 Starread 16 October 2026

теплее, чем объятья, могут быть только короткие звонки, начинающиеся с искренних слов: «я просто хотел услышать твой голос».

14 Oct 2026, 12:06 UTC≈4,740 views0 reactions15 Starsread 16 October 2026

могу ли я скрыть себя от всех ?

14 Oct 2026, 12:06 UTC≈3,580 viewsread 16 October 2026
Forwarded from @mrtaprsPhoto

прячусь в деталях октября.

14 Oct 2026, 06:34 UTC≈3,890 views0 reactions1 Starread 16 October 2026

возможно, человек не столько хотел, чтобы его любили, сколько хотел, чтобы его понимали.

13 Oct 2026, 18:28 UTC≈4,130 viewsread 16 October 2026

и главное, не воображайте, что ваши друзья станут звонить вам по телефону каждый вечер (как бы это им следовало делать), чтобы узнать, не собираетесь ли вы покончить с собой или хотя бы не нуждаетесь ли вы в компании, не хочется ли вам пойти куда-нибудь. нет, успокойтесь, если они позвонят, то именно в тот вечер, когда вы не одни и когда жизнь улыбается вам.

13 Oct 2026, 18:03 UTC≈4,110 views0 reactions1 Starread 16 October 2026

перешагни, перескочи, перелети, пере- что хочешь — но вырвись: камнем из пращи, звездой, сорвавшейся в ночи.

13 Oct 2026, 17:01 UTC≈4,140 viewsread 16 October 2026
Forwarded from @yosovytvoryaet

Posted without readable text

13 Oct 2026, 16:33 UTC≈3,910 viewsread 16 October 2026

самые важные вещи мы начинаем говорить человеку, когда он уже не способен ответить.

Showing the 12 most recent of 331 posts we hold for @killme9O2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Oct 2026, 10:39 UTCAnonymous Poll821 voters

.

  1. безвольное27%
  2. волевое73%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Sept 2026, 10:25 UTCAnonymous Poll847 voters

.

  1. раним67%
  2. жажду ранить43%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Sept 2026, 14:33 UTCAnonymous Poll1,220 voters approx.

быть

  1. беспредельно близко65%
  2. неистово далеко41%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

25 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTCAnonymous Poll1,160 voters approx.

быть

  1. мечом68%
  2. раной32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTCAnonymous Poll1,270 voters approx.

.

  1. поменять человека59%
  2. поменять человека41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 331 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republished by 60 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

гаснет свет.
@sejkxxx · 3
4 posts
свалка дурных воспоминаний.
@spendthewinter · 13
4 posts
Причины жить
@TheEndOfTheFuckingW0rld · 55
3 posts
photodump
@delancymoth · 2
3 posts
ℎ𝑡𝑡𝑝𝑠://𝑎𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠.𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑖.🐙//
@doriancerise · 2
3 posts
Hobihorser
@jung_hoswag · 17
3 posts
𝚂𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚌
@seraphic06 · 126
3 posts
The labyrinth of dreams
@Dreams_of_despair · 16
2 posts
мёртвая псина!
@bffhjldy · 56
2 posts
green land
@grnla · 46
2 posts
klyu4enkovskii
@klyu4enkovskii · 132
2 posts
Cliché
@lescliches · 1
2 posts
литрома́нтия.
@litromancie · 2,350
2 posts
Криминальный авторитет.
@scjkxw · 9
2 posts
ᅠ
@sortoss · 17
2 posts
А Л Ь Б А | стихи
@stalbas_2 · 460
2 posts
китобойня
@thewhalingyard · 76
2 posts
О, это же Юля Вишня 🍒
@CherryYuli · 91
1 post
dear hurt why him? ПЕРЕЕЗД.
@HWAWCK2 · 24
1 post
радостные события из моей жизни
@Hf8lyXkBVAJhZDg6 · 16
1 post
Хedd. XD
@Lashistorias · 888
1 post
аокигахара
@akghr22 · 192
1 post
Ветхий собор // alexxsirrr
@alexxsirrr · 13
1 post
alvwvm
@alvwvn · 5
1 post
диссоциация
@an8_j · 24
1 post
asullm
@asullm · 176
1 post
𝕭𝖊𝖙𝖊𝖑
@bettttell · 127
1 post
равновесие безудержной мелодии | архив
@cautivadorra · 7
1 post
chse
@chsee1 · 43
1 post
y’dxee
@chucaii · 5
1 post
Дарья Типчук / Большие девочки 2
@dashka_v_rashke · 4,983
1 post
!ELI88X.
@el188X · 6
1 post
mptyspace
@elissgedd · 1,046
1 post
ɜᴀᴋᴩыᴛиᴇ. 𝘿𝙚𝙖𝙙 𝙎𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙨.
@fawuoqn · 7
1 post
𝐕𝐈𝐍𝐓𝐀𝐆𝐄
@gabri14_0 · 24
1 post
Не Илья Муромец
@hamili_rus1 · 20
1 post
психохикка.
@hkkssis · 117
1 post
KINO MURATOVA
@kinomuratova · 202
1 post
𝐤𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐭
@kkrost1 · 137
1 post
сен сұлу
@meagainnme · 79
1 post
монолог в 3:15.
@monologat · 17
1 post
՞߹ _ ߹՞
@muimtu · 41
1 post
შთაგონების
@mysavedmessage · 31
1 post
kiss
@perraspera3 · 664
1 post
ErofoXxx
@photohdarm · 5
1 post
по касательной
@pokasatelnoi · 500
1 post
qqq. . .(!)h4nter
@qmwmmq · 23
1 post
/закрыто/пристанище самаэ́ля.
@samaeltoki · 11
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

mort à paris
@mrtaprs · 4,297
#1
ЭТО ЗНАК
@etoznakmag · 634,091
#2
парижская оргия
@parisianorgy · 2,472
#3
no one.
@meta_morphosis · 1,189
#4
прошлой ночью я видел тебя в своих снах
@L9stNight · 7,364
#5
спокойно, я здесь
@spokoiinolove · 5,939
#6
demons in my brain
@demonsinmybrain · 693
#7
psy_storeez
@psy_storeez · 1,717
#8
Дьявольские пляски.
@lediables · 421
#9
poigraem
@poigrayemm · 7,690
#10
(un)stable.
@asttrsay · 7,213
#11
безутешными глазами измерять пустоту
@bezyteshnimi · 11,776
#12
911 2.0
@maybeyou14 · 362
#13
чайка фм
@chaikafm · 5,194
#14
Знаешь, Мэри🫀
@znaewmary · 656
#15
♦️ Переходник ♦️
@pmml_pozdn · 12
#16
my_soul
@sunglareofmysoul · 471
#17
soigné
@mmuae · 1,294
#18
amore,amore,amore
@ruh_parcassi · 85,698
#19
l o v e
@etoam · 23,325
#20
cherry cigarettes.
@cianneli · 4,687
#21
Tata.
@tatasifasi · 7,888
#22
тетрадь для плохих мыслей
@badnotebook · 2,887
#23
подслушано, но легально
@twiistt · 861
#24
hranimoe
@hranimoe · 7,234
#25
тишина
@silentkisses · 955
#26
интроспекция_а.и.
@introspection_vnutri · 357
#27
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,395,126
#28
Ulukbekova
@yourstion · 2,332
#29
васильев.txt
@vslv_txt · 2,304
#30
365 new days
@evodays · 381,341
#31
КК
@petrovtel · 546,341
#32
KOSTI
@kosti · 558,334
#33
камикадзе
@kamikazewx · 1,136
#34
hiramur
@hiraamur · 2,853
#35
5:00
@all500a · 3,892
#36
ГОРОСКОП АСТРОЛОГИЯ ASTROJULIA
@astro_juliaa · 208,454
#37
aweomes
@aweomees · 786 (as read 31 August 2026)
#38
as told by lina
@astoldbylina · 7,420
#39
FEMALE MEMES
@femalememes · 403,993
#40
Dobranebudet
@Dobranebudett · 5,924
#41
Ниоткуда с любовью | литература | стихи
@niotkuda_ss · 3,206
#42
rutkismary
@rutkismary · 331,727
#43
evkasup
@evkasup13 · 102,255
#44
москоутиндер
@moscowtinderr · 749,824
#45
Белое озеро | Литература
@white_lake_channel · 1,244
#46
puls
@pulsmoego · 206
#47
Hush
@hushhuh · 19,596
#48
тринадцатый апостол
@sanctasel · 3,464
#49
всмысле Саша?
@nalunetelegram · 78,005
#50
ᴄʜᴇʀʀʏ
@etelmo · 355
#51
Мари в большом городе
@naiznankumari · 20,447
#52
klyu4enkovskii
@klyu4enkovskii · 132
#53
П.П.В. | Поэты Пластмассового Века
@plastic_poets · 1,941
#54
astro geeks | гороскоп и таро
@astrogiks · 305,473
#55
гороскоп и кирилл
@goro_kirill · 169,527
#56
Розовый садик
@sadikroz · 1,036
#57
Литературный уголок📚
@poytac · 604
#58
Глеб три дня дождя
@everydayrain · 236,409
#59

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

поговорим о погоде и почему мы расстались
@poogood · 22,410
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 September 2026
так вышло. что
@nopity · 24,338
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 September 2026
Афоризмы | Литература | Книги | Стихи
@AphorismTG · 107,509
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
Стихи давно забытого поэта
@memoryofpoets · 93,788
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 August 2026
Эрих Мария Ремарк
@remark_tsitaty_aforizmy · 20,855
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“9O2” (@killme9O2), 38,161 subscribers as measured 15 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/killme9O2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.