секрет любви и счастья прост: выбирай всегда того, кто выбирает тебя точно также, как и ты его.

Channel
9O2
@killme9O2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
38,261subscribers
-124 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001346407039 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @killme9O2 |
| Description | ✉️ реклама: @evaaveev ✉️ писать сюда: @mortaparis ✨реклама (цена/ отзывы/ свободные даты): @reklama9O2 🩸глубокий порез на теле своей семьи: @mrtaprs 🫂 чат подписчиков: t.me/+3thKwP_p2OFiMGYy (если ссылка не функционирует, писать @evaaveev) |
| Created | 23 June 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/killme9O2 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 38,261 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 38,263 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 38,273 | +10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 38,263 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 38,267 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 38,270 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 38,280 | -20 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:59 | 38,300 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:49 | 38,307 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 38,310 | -28 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 38,338 | -17 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 38,355 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 38,352 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 38,357 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 38,361 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 38,367 | +10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 38,357 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 38,368 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 38,376 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 38,383 | first reading |
Engagement
118 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 13.4%
- avg views ÷ 38,261 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,120
- 118 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 118
- of 118 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 66 of 118 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 118 (3 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 604,450 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,070
- Videos
- ≈15
- Links
- ≈27
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 335
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 66
- of 118 we hold a reading for · 56%
- Most on one post
- 20
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @killme9O2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 118 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
я вопьюсь в тебя губами, перелью в тебя любовь.
актуальная информация по рекламе на канале 9O2: цена: 1400₽/репост записи на сутки свободные дневные даты (12:00 мск): с 30 августа свободные вечерние даты (20:00 мск): 29 августа/ 2 сентября ✉️ @evaaveev
я уже люблю в вас вашу красоту, но я начинаю только любить в вас то, что вечно и всегда драгоценно,— ваше сердце, вашу душу. красоту можно узнать и полюбить в час и разлюбить так же скоро, но душу надо узнать. поверьте, ничто в мире не дается без труда — даже любовь, самое прекрасное и естественное чувство. простите за глупое сравнение. любить, как любит глупый человек, это играть сонату без такту, без знаков, с пост…
soviet postcard, 1954
Выдох — и старая шкура соскальзывает отработанной гильзой. Ни грамма сожаления к тому, кто стоял здесь секунду назад. Внутри — раскалённая память каждой смерти, вся история за спиной и жгучий, точный интерес. Ты не реанимируешь труп вчерашней версии, а забираешь его вес, его боль и удар. Наступаешь на него, чтобы подняться выше, и смотришь, насколько далеко сможешь зайти в этом новом теле, зная, что все предыдущие —…
она целуется, как готовый расплавиться ядерный реактор.
ты — лишь плеяда своих решений, россыпь своих поступков, среднее своих выборов.
дело в голове
дерево не может достигнуть ветвями солнца, если корнями не достигнет ада.
оставь мне на память свой смех, а мой забери с собой.
умираю я от этой близости, от неразрывности ее со мной.
Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @killme9O2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
быть
- мечом68%
- раной32%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
.
- поменять человека59%
- поменять человека41%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 7,764 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@sejkxxx · 34 postsсвалка дурных воспоминаний.
@spendthewinter · 114 postsℎ𝑡𝑡𝑝𝑠://𝑎𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠.𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑖.🐙//
@doriancerise · 23 postsHobihorser
@jung_hoswag · 183 postsКофейный следователь🐺
@kofeyinyisledovatel · 113 posts𝚂𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚌
@seraphic06 · 1293 postsмёртвая псина!
@bffhjldy · 592 postsThe labyrinth of dreams
@Dreams_of_despair · 162 postsgreen land
@grnla · 472 postsCliché
@lescliches · 12 postsлитрома́нтия.
@litromancie · 2,4262 postsКриминальный авторитет.
@scjkxw · 92 postsᅠ
@sortoss · 162 postsА Л Ь Б А | стихи
@stalbas_2 · 4592 postsкитобойня
@thewhalingyard · 722 postsшов (closed)
@weathernur · 562 postsаокигахара
@akghr22 · 1961 postВетхий собор // alexxsirrr
@alexxsirrr · 101 postАнелька
@alimbeetovaas · 1311 postalvwvm
@alvwvn · 51 postдиссоциация
@an8_j · 241 postasullm
@asullm · 1791 post𝕭𝖊𝖙𝖊𝖑
@bettttell · 1201 postравновесие безудержной мелодии | архив
@cautivadorra · 71 postЮля Вишня (DEVILSS)
@CherryYuli · 911 postchse
@chsee1 · 371 posty’dxee
@chucaii · 61 postДарья Типчук / Большие девочки 2
@dashka_v_rashke · 5,1791 post!ELI88X.
@el188X · 81 postmptyspace
@elissgedd · 1,0811 postɜᴀᴋᴩыᴛиᴇ. 𝘿𝙚𝙖𝙙 𝙎𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙨.
@fawuoqn · 71 post𝐕𝐈𝐍𝐓𝐀𝐆𝐄
@gabri14_0 · 241 postНе Илья Муромец
@hamili_rus1 · 201 postрадостные события из моей жизни
@Hf8lyXkBVAJhZDg6 · 151 postпсихохикка.
@hkkssis · 1181 postdear hurt why him? ПЕРЕЕЗД.
@HWAWCK2 · 241 postKINO MURATOVA
@kinomuratova · 1731 post𝐤𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐭
@kkrost1 · 1391 postХedd. XD
@Lashistorias · 8881 postсен сұлу
@meagainnme · 751 postмонолог в 3:15.
@monologat · 171 postშთაგონების
@mysavedmessage · 311 postkiss
@perraspera3 · 6561 postErofoXxx
@photohdarm · 51 postпо касательной
@pokasatelnoi · 4841 postqqq. . .(!)h4nter
@qmwmmq · 231 post/закрыто/пристанище самаэ́ля.
@samaeltoki · 111 postнежно, трагически.
@shishiklk · 111 postzays
@sluuushaichhitai · 1231 postmyberi
@thesensess · 91 postопера на третьем авеню | закрыто
@thhirdav · 101 post𝗧𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘆 𝗜𝗻𝗻𝗶𝘁 :)
@tommy_DAWN · 171 post606 mine?
@trr11r · 1811 postMargo | 𝐕𝐚𝐧 𝐃𝐞𝐫 𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐞
@vanderphh · 321 postwith love, L.
@withloveL0405 · 1261 postS
@Xjefu · 31 postbête
@z1seev · 731 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@AphorismTG · 108,969
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
@memoryofpoets · 94,609
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“9O2” (@killme9O2), 38,261 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/killme9O2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.