Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
48 measurements spanning 80 days, net +153. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,687–49,022 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Oct 2026, 16:56
48,983
+12
22 Oct 2026, 20:49
48,971
+10
21 Oct 2026, 16:41
48,961
-2
20 Oct 2026, 11:29
48,963
-13
19 Oct 2026, 11:06
48,976
-3
18 Oct 2026, 09:06
48,979
+7
17 Oct 2026, 11:41
48,972
+9
16 Oct 2026, 11:29
48,963
+40
15 Oct 2026, 10:16
48,923
+11
14 Oct 2026, 11:28
48,912
+13
12 Oct 2026, 19:37
48,899
+15
8 Oct 2026, 06:20
48,884
+38
3 Oct 2026, 15:21
48,846
+6
24 Sept 2026, 23:37
48,840
+109
17 Sept 2026, 04:40
48,731
-8
15 Sept 2026, 05:39
48,739
-10
13 Sept 2026, 14:21
48,749
+23
11 Sept 2026, 16:21
48,726
-17
9 Sept 2026, 00:01
48,743
+2
5 Sept 2026, 18:57
48,741
first reading
Engagement
546 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 161 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.4%
avg views ÷ 48,983 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,540
185 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
185
of 546 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026
Posts held
546 (4 August 2026 – 25 October 2026)
Views total
1,579,440
Reactions total
15,936
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Oct 2026, 11:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈21,400
Videos
≈3,180
Links
≈15,200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 01m
Average length
1m 20s
Measured directly from 91 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
45,384 reactions across 532 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
9,727
21.4%
🤣
7,123
15.7%
😁
4,665
10.3%
❤🔥
3,685
8.12%
😐
2,423
5.34%
🔥
2,326
5.13%
🗿
2,266
4.99%
👍
1,885
4.15%
💅
1,736
3.83%
💔
1,152
2.54%
😢
892
1.97%
😭
806
1.78%
🤯
732
1.61%
😡
468
1.03%
🌚
455
1.00%
👀
442
0.974%
🙏
391
0.862%
🤷♂
391
0.862%
🤷♀
353
0.778%
😱
332
0.732%
31 further kinds
3,134
6.91%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 546 of the 546 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46,338 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 546 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
36
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 546 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @superslowflow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 546 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 25 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Baza: Миша Маваши был ранен дома
Тг-канал Baza первый с инсайдами:
Миша Маваши скончался от огнестрельного ранения — медики госпитализировали его, но спасти не смогли.
По данным «Базы», рэпер получил ранение у себя дома, ему вызвали скорую и доставили в реанимацию, но он потерял слишком много крови.
Сообщение о смерти Миши Маваши появилось в телеграм-канале "Михаил Федорович Маваши"
Подробности не рассказывают, говорят: "Произошла трагедия, Михаил Федорович умер сегодня ночью ввиду несчастного случая"
Автор видео говорит: "Сейчас будет куча слухов, кто-то будет хайповать, но давайте проявим уважение".
Мише Маваши был 41 год
Metox выпустит альбом "Божия Корова" 13 ноября
А пока слушаем одноименный сингл — уже третий с альбома
Metox выпустил трек "Божия Корова" — а заодно анонсировал одноименный альбом, который выйдет 13 ноября.
Сингл продолжает стилистику "Экономики" и "Смотрю на Волгу" — двух предыдущих треков с альбома: это острый социальный рэп поверх электронных битов — кажется, у русского рэпа наконец появился свой Vince Staples.…
Ooes рассказала, почему Oxxxymiron удалил фит с ней
По ее словам, Мирон удалил трек "Журавли" в одностороннем порядке после того, как Ooes написала пост в поддержку девушек, рассказавших о насилии со стороны рэпера в подкасте "Дочь разбойника".
Об этом певица рассказала нам в новом интервью. Целиком его можно прочитать по ссылке. Ниже — отрывок о песне "Журавли" и Оксимироне:
"8 марта прошлого года я выложила в те…
Guf, Молодой Калуга "Дяхан"
Ранее Гуф говорил, что Калуга "сделал его день рождения незабываемым"
Guf и Молодой Калуга выпустили трек "Дяхан.
Совместка парадоксальная: с одной стороны — неожиданная, ведь Калуга еще пару лет назад был в жестком трэп-андере, а с другой — Гуф часто подтягивает новых геров уличного рэпа на фиты. Но, кажется, ни один из них не звучал настолько дерзко: "Я скретчу по ее пизде, как будто …
Объединение Omerta выпустило альбом "Omerta 2"
В его состав входят Truwer, Niman, трио Captown и Экси
Если вы слышали предыдущие релизы этого коллектива, зародившегося на съемках шоу "The Cult", то уже должны понимать, чего ждать: дерзкие качающие сайферы об улице, братьях и вере в свои силы.
СЛУШАТЬ:
Кион Музыка | VK Музыка | Яндекс Музыка | Звук | Spotify | Apple Music | YouTube Music
Ecco2k выпустил первый сольный трек за пять лет
А клип на него снимали в 12 странах на протяжении шести лет
Шведский музыкант Ecco2k из объединения Drain Gang выпустил песню "Aldehydes and Ketones". Это его первый сольный релиз после EP "PXE", вышедшего в 2021 году. Продюсером трека стал давний соратник артиста Gud.
Одновременно с песней вышел клип, который Ecco2k самостоятельно снял, срежиссировал и смонтировал. …
Nkeeei, ЛСП "В нашем стиле"
"Это в нашем стиле — тратить на чилле"
Nkeeei и ЛСП выпустили совместный трек "В нашем стиле".
Nkeeei исполняет тут привычную поп-браваду с обещаниями баловать возлюбленную, а ЛСП сравнивает пару лирического героя с Гензель и Гретель. Короче, каждый выдал своего стилька — название не обмануло.
Это уже не первая совместная работа артистов: в 2025 году ЛСП появился на треке "Походу она в…
Uglyhot, Boulevard Depo "Ачча"
"Неужели весь смысл песни в том, что "Ачча" это "Хорошо" на хинди?" — шутят в комментах
Uglyhot и Boulevard Depo выпустили трек "Ачча".
Название и обложка говорят сами за себя — внутри много абсурда. Оцените, например, начало куплета Депо:
Я дома табличка Экселя
Машина тупая, гвалагенератор
Снаружи я бежевый папа
С цветами в охапку
Uglyhot — молодой фрешмен из Минска, трек с Депо с…
Егора Крида раскритиковали из-за лонгслива с постером фильма "Иди и смотри"
На певца подали жалобу в СК, обвинили в неуважении к памяти жертв войны, а сам он заявил, что не знал, откуда взят принт, и извинился
Егор Крид оказался в центре скандала после выхода клипа "Милый ублюдок". В видео певец появился в лонгсливе с переработанным постером советского фильма Элема Климова "Иди и смотри" — картины о зверствах нацис…
John Legend и Pharrell выпустили альбом "Muse"
Идея релиза родилась во время работы над прошлогодним альбомом Clipse, который как раз открывала совместная песня с Леджендом. Его вокал настолько впечатлил Фаррелла, что тот захотел спродюсировать для него несколько треков. Эти несколько треков превратились в альбом.
По словам Ледженда, Фаррелл хотел выдержать релиз в кинематографичном пышном регистре, сделать что-то …
Obladaet выпустил клип "Stay Cold"
"В сердце осколок, я заморожен / Саб-Зиро флоу, я не метеоролог"
Премьера приурочена к дропу новой совместной коллекции Облы и бренда спортивной одежды Kappa. В клипе также можно увидеть сцену с ледяной скульптурой в форме логотипа Kappa.
Во время дропа коллекции Обла опубликовал ее манифест, также вращающийся вокруг темы холода.
"Я из Сибири - поэтому могу многое рассказать о хо…
😁51💅9👍5🤣5🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 546 posts we hold for @superslowflow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@superslowflow edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
23 October 2026
Most recent edit
23 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
WARHOL @warhol · 27,467 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
GAZ @gazlive · 35,522 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
ATL ACIDHOUZE OFFICIAL @ATL_IS_DEAD · 40,165 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 8 September 2026
Родной звук @rodzvuk · 36,798 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
НА ШУМЕ @nashume · 20,245 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 September 2026
Русский шаффл @rushuffle · 44,116 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
Oxxxymiron @norimyxxxo · 153,745 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Хаски @husky_spgs · 114,493 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 September 2026
PRNRP @trap_critics · 29,749 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
STUDIO 21 @studio21ru · 44,545 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
Тихое Место @thequietplace · 51,329 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
Skryptonite @skryp_tg · 66,218 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 8 September 2026
а можно потанцевальней? @bestdjchannel · 40,036 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
Ö News @omanko_news · 47,057 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
ПАПИНОМОЛОКО @papinomoloko · 19,378 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 3 October 2026
No Cap @nocap · 54,374 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
METOX @metoxmetox · 31,604 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 6 September 2026
TOASTER @toastermag · 25,271 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 September 2026
КИОН Музыка @kionmusic_on · 27,984 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
Daily Slime @dailyslime · 37,809 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 31 August 2026
дима бамберг @dimitribamberg · 23,838 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 17 September 2026
MARKULT @MARKULT · 53,263 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
Сломанные пляски @brokendance · 80,078 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
ИМИ @imi_live · 27,137 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 53 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Anacondaz(ru.wikipedia.org) “…«Мама, я люблю» с альбома «[[Байки инсайдера]]».{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/superslowflow/27449?single|title=The Flow|website=Telegram|access-date=2…” read 25 October 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Flow” (@superslowflow), 48,983 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/superslowflow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.