Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
70,700 average views per post against 78,140 subscribers — an engagement rate of 90.4%. Across the 8,277 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,626–99,996 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.06% and 20.7%, with a median of 10.4%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (24 September 2026 – 24 October 2026)
Posts measured
65 of 65 published in the window (0 exact, 65 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
4,593,100
Mature posts only
90.4% over 65 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 24 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
49 measurements spanning 80 days, net +29,518. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,912–82,865 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Oct 2026, 21:16
78,140
+408
23 Oct 2026, 20:16
77,732
+135
22 Oct 2026, 18:09
77,597
+116
21 Oct 2026, 14:12
77,481
-51
20 Oct 2026, 10:51
77,532
+93
19 Oct 2026, 09:19
77,439
+263
18 Oct 2026, 09:09
77,176
+337
17 Oct 2026, 10:30
76,839
+193
16 Oct 2026, 13:16
76,646
+18
15 Oct 2026, 14:18
76,628
+127
14 Oct 2026, 16:28
76,501
-85
13 Oct 2026, 07:01
76,586
+792
8 Oct 2026, 22:40
75,794
-1,491
4 Oct 2026, 09:37
77,285
+1,389
25 Sept 2026, 23:16
75,896
+995
17 Sept 2026, 12:59
74,901
+16,907
15 Sept 2026, 12:58
57,994
+2,746
13 Sept 2026, 23:36
55,248
+1,383
12 Sept 2026, 08:57
53,865
+1,556
10 Sept 2026, 03:58
52,309
first reading
Engagement
215 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 160 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
90.4%
avg views ÷ 78,140 subscribers
Avg views / post
70,700
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.051%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 215 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026
Posts held
215 (1 August 2026 – 23 October 2026)
Views total
4,593,100
Reactions total
2,365
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Oct 2026, 20:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
38m 55s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 60 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,425 reactions across 213 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5371064046273463595
1,808
24.4%
🔥
1,549
20.9%
❤
1,419
19.1%
😎
572
7.70%
❤🔥
389
5.24%
👍
275
3.70%
😁
264
3.56%
💯
198
2.67%
👏
187
2.52%
custom 5260734398092849239
149
2.01%
🤩
138
1.86%
👀
110
1.48%
custom 5307857787127113428
107
1.44%
🎉
55
0.741%
custom 5309894112726525125
52
0.7%
custom 5289860001551135289
45
0.606%
custom 5310268350406896681
29
0.391%
custom 5292257254727266349
26
0.35%
custom 5370852394580083251
20
0.269%
😱
19
0.256%
1 further kind
14
0.189%
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 215 of the 215 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,483 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 215 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.465%
1 of 215 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,400
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,680
over 214 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqxUnsyN
1
8 September 2026
8 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 215 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 23 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Проверим, насколько у тебя осенняя осень? 🍂🌧
Сохраняй пак и отмечайся в комментариях стикерами того, что уже выполнил! Посмотрим, кто соберёт полное бинго 👀
Он — это ответ на все твои запросы... к ИИ 💛
beeGPT поможет создать контент, обработать фото, ответит на вопросы, сгенерит музыку и видео, сориентирует по тарифу и услугам — словом, поможет с любым твоим запросом. Даже голосовым 👍
Не нужно переключаться между разными нейронками и включать VPN, работает бесплатно и даже при ограничениях интернета. Всё удобно, понятно и в приложении Билайна.
А вы бы остановились?
В большом городе легко пройти мимо человека, которому нужна помощь.
Особенно если внешне он выглядит совершенно обычно.
Билайн, HONOR и «ЛизаАлерт» решили проверить, сколько людей заметят, остановятся и постараются узнать, что происходит, не нужна ли помощь? Каждое такое неравнодушие фиксировалось на стенде.
Рядом рассказывали о технологиях, которые помогают искать людей: «Геопоиск билайн», ч…
🎵 Какова реальная скорость вашего роутера?
🎵 Сколько Мбит/с «съедают» стены между ним и ноутбуком?
🎵 Чем Wi-Fi 4 отличается от Wi-Fi 6?
🎵 Выжил ли Гослинг в конце?
На все эти вопросы в нашем новом видео отвечает наш полосатый эксперт 💛
Ладно, шутка, на последний вопрос ты лучше сам ответь в комментах!
Каким было это лето с Билайном? Скейтерским, музыкальным, баскетбольным — по-настоящему разным ⚡
Не менялась только отличная атмосфера там, где мы встречались с тобой офлайн 💛
Вместе с ПРИВЕТ сделали сумку для тех, кто всегда в движении и хочет взять с собой в новый день всё необходимое ✨
Она не боится дождя и не заставляет выбирать между стилем и удобством. Компактная снаружи, но вместительная внутри.
Носи как хочешь, бери куда хочешь. По делам, на прогулку или куда глаза глядят 👀
Ты не одинок, когда есть, кому отправить СМС!
Прошлогодний рекорд в Билайне — 66 176 СМС от одного пользователя. Это примерно по 180 сообщений в день. Кажется, тот случай, когда отправляешь смешную картинку всем из списка контактов 💛
А ты когда последний раз отправлял СМС?
❤️– сегодня
😎– недавно
🤔– уже давно
Слышал про страх чистого листа? Говорят, самое сложное — начать то, что давно хотел сделать, а дальше всё пойдёт как по маслу. Особенно с beeGPT 😍
Мы добавили сервис с доступом к топовым нейросетям прямо в приложении Билайна, чтобы помочь тебе в творческих и рабочих порывах. Теперь у тебя всё по-настоящему получится 🤖
Вечеринка днём: звучит странно, ощущается отлично!
Билайн в потоке Outline прямо сейчас. Знакомая машина уже тут, а рядом мерч Outline × Билайн, который можно получить только за задания.
Ловим волну в DEX ✨
Showing the 12 most recent of 215 posts we hold for @Bizzy_Beeline. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Bizzy_Beeline edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 90 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 67 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“БИззи” (@Bizzy_Beeline), 78,140 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bizzy_Beeline.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
