Какой магазин?🤭
😁117❤37👍6custom 54206078856022346643

Channel
@remedia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
703,568subscribers
-35,864 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001177342537 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @remedia |
| Description | Наконец-то нормальный канал про технологии, игры и гаджеты, а не вот это все. Предложка: @rstrt_bot Сотрудничество: @todaycast РКН: https://clck.ru/3FjTtt |
| Created | 24 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/remedia |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 703,568 | -1,303 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 704,871 | -1,019 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 705,890 | -1,164 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 707,054 | -1,894 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 708,948 | -2,445 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 711,393 | -1,437 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 712,830 | -1,238 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 714,068 | -980 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 715,048 | -829 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 715,877 | -904 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 716,781 | -581 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 717,362 | -658 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 718,020 | -649 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 718,669 | -934 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 719,603 | -940 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 720,543 | -777 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 721,320 | -1,440 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 722,760 | -1,365 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 724,125 | -831 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 724,956 | first reading |
514 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 514 (4 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 8,386,150 |
| Reactions total | 90,228 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 06:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 254 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /225136 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC | 49 minutes – 1.7 hours old | 9,010 views ~137 reactions | 60 minutes: 7,455 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 22 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /225126 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC | 41.6 hours – 3.1 hours old | 15,500 views ~217 reactions | 3.0 hours: 15,500still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.6 hoursupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /225116 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC | 42.8 hours – 4.4 hours old | 18,600 views ~182 reactions | 3.0 hours: 16,604 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.8 hoursupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
145,267 reactions across 497 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 50,455 | 34.7% | |
| ❤ | 34,274 | 23.6% | |
| 😭 | 15,958 | 11.0% | |
| 👍 | 14,756 | 10.2% | |
| custom 5420607885602234664 | 14,014 | 9.65% | |
| 🫡 | 7,238 | 4.98% | |
| 👏 | 5,209 | 3.59% | |
| 🌭 | 3,363 | 2.32% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 514 of the 514 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 149,927 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 514 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjcDYEHZ | 1 | 10 September 2026 | 10 September 2026 |
| 2SDnjcEm4vF | 1 | 21 August 2026 | 21 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjcg8HZd | 1 | 3 September 2026 | 3 September 2026 |
| 2SDnjf3n2cK | 1 | 1 September 2026 | 1 September 2026 |
| 2VtzquckLHr | 1 | 18 September 2026 | 18 September 2026 |
| 2VtzqvGzo7S | 1 | 7 September 2026 | 7 September 2026 |
| 2VtzqvToJ3W | 1 | 15 September 2026 | 15 September 2026 |
| 2VtzqxXmKvz | 1 | 5 August 2026 | 5 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFHVkVey | 1 | 26 August 2026 | 26 August 2026 |
| CQH36pWzJqDDZccFrenBZfD1swVv8tz7sooybxDHu5Ebjo | 1 | 8 September 2026 | 8 September 2026 |
| CQH36pWzJqVHsFUEzDPq4QytbJCLGSFBLpJ8r44MJ9wKon | 1 | 21 September 2026 | 21 September 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 514 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Какой магазин?🤭
😁117❤37👍6custom 54206078856022346643
⚡️ Фильм «Обитель зла» выйдет в российских кинотеатрах 26 сентября — спустя 8 дней после мирового проката. 😏😏
❤115custom 542060788560223466438👍26😁12👏6😭4🌭3🫡2
⭐️Destiny ВОЗВРАЩАЕТСЯ — в Destiny 2 вернут весь контент игры. После финального обновления в июне игроки начали массово возвращаться в Destiny 2, и Bungie называет это одной из главных причин, почему решила продолжить развивать игру. Теперь студия хочет собрать в одной версии игры весь контент, который выходил за годы существования Destiny 2. И самое главное: Bungie заявила, что работает над новыми играми по Destin…
👍95😁35❤29custom 54206078856022346646👏3😭3🫡2
💜 Выкладываем в опенсорс большую языковую модель, которую с нуля обучили в Яндексе, используя собственную архитектуру и веса. Это AliceAI-Foundation-80B-A3B-Base. В карточках — подробности разработки. Модель опубликована на Hugging Face. Там же опубликованы датасеты с вопросами, эталонные ответы и протоколы оценки двух новых бенчмарков — WikiWebFacts и HardMultiQA. Подписывайтесь 〰️ @yandex
custom 542060788560223466435👍17😭6❤4🌭4👏4😁1
‼️Ценник PS5 Pro в России уже почти 150 ТЫСЯЧ рублей — консоль продолжает мощно дорожать перед релизом GTA 6. Это в два раза выше рекомендуемой цены. Поиграли в главную игру года😏
😭171custom 542060788560223466458😁46👍12❤6🌭2🫡1
До выхода GTA 6 осталось всего 2 смены трусов 👍
custom 5420607885602234664283❤82😁77🫡17👍13😭8🌭1👏1
В Сан-Франциско прошел первый официальный поединок между человеком и машиной — бой организовал стартап REK. Инженеры стилизовали своего андроида под культового Терминатора, добавив событию кинематографичности. Сенсации не произошло: победу в этой битве одержал робот, который нокаутировал соперника мощным и точным ударом ноги. Восстание машин началось немного раньше, чем мы ожидали😒😒😒
😁204🫡29👍21❤18custom 542060788560223466416😭9👏2
⭐️AMD показала технологию, которая снижает расход видеопамяти в 47 раз (!) — разработка под названием Tetrahedral Cages решает проблему с огромно нагрузкой на VRAM при анимации травы, деревьев, шерсти или толпы персонажей. Вместо того чтобы каждую миллисекунду просчитывать миллиарды движущихся треугольников, технология упаковывает их в легкую невидимую «клетку». Двигается только сама клетка, а тяжелая графика внутри…
❤413🫡72👏43👍16custom 54206078856022346647😁2
Самые обычные мысли в рабочий понедельник😒
🫡108😁62😭14❤7👍1
Бесплатная замена CapCut с такими же фичами — WolfCut🤙 Это простой видеоредактор с открытым исходным кодом: можно нарезать ролики, собрать несколько дорожек, добавить субтитры и обработать звук. Главное, что программа не требует аккаунта, не ставит водяные знаки и не прячет функции за подпиской. Работает на Windows, macOS и Linux, а скачать её можно бесплатно на GitHub.
❤108👍62custom 542060788560223466414😁7🌭4👏1
Проверка дружбы продолжается — We Were Here Tomorrow выйдет уже 20 октября. Это новая часть кооперативной серии головоломок, где двум игрокам придётся постоянно общаться и координировать действия. На этот раз героев отправят в космос, а у каждого будет собственный набор способностей. Так что без нормальной коммуникации снова далеко не уедете. 😏😏
❤56😁27👍6🫡3custom 54206078856022346643
⭐️Новая книга по «Ведьмаку» выйдет в 2027 году — Анджей Сапковский рассчитывает закончить роман к концу следующего года. Писатель пошутил, что книга будет стоить «как пол-литра водки» и окажется в несколько раз дешевле «Перекрёстка воронов». А ещё Сапковский заявил, что его книги о «Ведьмаке» всегда будут посвящены Геральту😏😏
❤209👍59😁33custom 542060788560223466411😭6🫡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 514 posts we hold for @remedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@remedia edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 277 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
8 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рестарт” (@remedia), 703,568 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/remedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.