Этот канал читает айтишник из Сбера, удалёнщик с Кипра и маркетолог из Яндекса. Делаем русский маркетинг модным🇷🇺
Сотрудничество: @pokrovek
РКН: https://rkn.link/OaF
Created
14 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views and reactions moved apart
On 14 of the 358 posts we watched over 30 days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.0148 reactions per view.
Each interval, as we read it — views and reactions before and after
Expected is the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).
What this does and does not say. It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.
Recorded under the key view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 6 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
72 measurements spanning 60 days, net +222,438. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,185,178–1,474,348 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 72
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 19:19
1,440,982
+4,610
2 Oct 2026, 10:42
1,436,372
+3,523
27 Sept 2026, 05:38
1,432,849
+15,317
18 Sept 2026, 13:57
1,417,532
-866
17 Sept 2026, 15:41
1,418,398
+8,524
16 Sept 2026, 08:38
1,409,874
-159
15 Sept 2026, 16:38
1,410,033
-1,786
14 Sept 2026, 12:38
1,411,819
+359
14 Sept 2026, 01:58
1,411,460
+861
13 Sept 2026, 00:38
1,410,599
+1,120
12 Sept 2026, 09:14
1,409,479
-1,344
11 Sept 2026, 02:55
1,410,823
-181
10 Sept 2026, 02:15
1,411,004
-1,782
8 Sept 2026, 05:36
1,412,786
+190
6 Sept 2026, 20:02
1,412,596
+6,668
5 Sept 2026, 02:57
1,405,928
-439
4 Sept 2026, 05:37
1,406,367
-1,430
3 Sept 2026, 10:03
1,407,797
-1,166
2 Sept 2026, 17:14
1,408,963
-1,763
2 Sept 2026, 04:44
1,410,726
first reading
Engagement
850 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 131 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.76%
avg views ÷ 1,440,982 subscribers
Avg views / post
25,300
406 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
406
of 850 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held
850 (5 August 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total
10,289,590
Reactions total
171,542
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Oct 2026, 02:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈17,100
Videos
≈5,980
Links
≈1,340
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 51m
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 286 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 359 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (9 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 344 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 3.7 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 33.4% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 71.9% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 20,450 views — 1.42% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 25,300).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
61 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
392,095 reactions across 845 posts, in 70 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5269401899794176946
69,012
17.6%
custom 5298615902269373715
55,424
14.1%
custom 5379559607549068175
29,246
7.46%
custom 5298851090383535340
19,838
5.06%
custom 5217784068002843715
18,427
4.70%
custom 5296706205190739827
18,202
4.64%
custom 5194955393406640936
17,103
4.36%
custom 5278724740490497302
16,888
4.31%
custom 5336914954576497103
16,608
4.24%
custom 5436117781307237647
12,236
3.12%
custom 5445247030647619588
12,226
3.12%
custom 5429540013123609349
11,572
2.95%
custom 5298664362385369995
11,200
2.86%
custom 5452150567805693608
10,226
2.61%
custom 5319071212297561005
8,120
2.07%
custom 5195139737697947002
7,440
1.90%
custom 5194924181879296296
4,239
1.08%
custom 5426947996065510851
4,142
1.06%
custom 5366381544078342981
3,712
0.947%
custom 5339275979703493164
3,660
0.933%
50 further kinds
42,574
10.9%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 850 of the 850 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 394,591 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 850 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.824%
7 of 850 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
7
posts carrying an erid · 7 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
25,000
over 7 measured posts
Median views · rest
27,800
over 843 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjbzM2cB
1
12 August 2026
12 August 2026
2SDnjchGS4b
1
20 August 2026
20 August 2026
2SDnjdiizt3
1
14 August 2026
14 August 2026
2SDnjeP6db1
1
3 September 2026
3 September 2026
2VtzqvVCHY7
1
25 August 2026
25 August 2026
2Vtzqx9guMN
1
28 September 2026
28 September 2026
2W5zFGf7Pvy
1
1 October 2026
1 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 850 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Над Сочи взошёл чумной доктор. Этим вечером в Чёрном море загорелся танкер, и соцсети сразу же заполонили фотографии дыма в виде головы в маске. В реплаях облако дыма называют страшным предзнаменованием и шутят, что вот теперь точно пора брать костюм чумного доктора.
это чумной доктор или мне кажется?
ребята, это явно плохой знак
это что за дым в виде чумного доктора???
Лишь бы не знак от вселенной, лишь бы не знак…
Трек «На мне французский le parfum» стал настоящим хитом в тиктоках и рилсах. Под него с надменными лицами клепают мемы про Францию, превращаются во французских аристократов, едят багеты и круассаны. Кто-то умудряется шутить и про чуму. А в комментах жалуются, что хит Воскресенского невозможно выбросить из головы — больно уж он смешной.
На мне французский le parfum
Конкретно Jean Paul Gaultier
На ней французское дер…
Россияне могут раз в год бесплатно лечь отдохнуть в психдиспансер. Если слишком устали, записывайте: нужно взять направление у районного психиатра, выбрать клинику по ОМС и наслаждаться.
Отдых обещают как в санатории — будут психологи, бесплатный чекап, аромабассейны, кислородные коктейли и другие процедуры для раскайфовки разгрузки психики. И лечение можно совмещать с работой!
Летим в дурку 🫡
⚡️ ТРИ ДНЯ ДО КОНЦА РОЗЫГРЫША РАСКЛАДУШКИ ОТ APPLE! Подарим iPhone Duo в любом цвете тому, кто:
1️⃣. Подпишется на @trendsetter и @lider
2️⃣. Нажмёт на кнопку «Забираю раскладушку» под конкурсным постом
Не опустошайте кошелёк, участвуйте в конкурсе🌚
В каждом офисе есть коллега, который всегда готов к осени лучше остальных. И пока все уныло кутаются в старые ветровки и придумывают, как дотянуть до зарплаты, он спокойно приходит в стильном новом пальто и непромокаемых ботинках.
Про самую жизовую осеннюю историю Альфа-Деньги и Коллегция выпустили ироничный комикс, в котором во всех деталях показали секрет такой подготовленности. Подсказка: всё благодаря кредитному…
Рифлёные Lay’s с пряной креветкой за рубль раздаёт Пятёрочка прямо сейчас! Фанаты чипсов хвастаются уловом в интернете и сметают упаковки пачками. Акция действует в разных магазинах, но кое-где чипсы уже заканчиваются — так что лучше проверить свой Пятак.
Ты до новости про чипсы за рубль: 💀
Ты после новости про чипсы за рубль: 😍
Осеннее кленовое меню уже завезли в Rostic’s. С сегодняшнего дня во всех ресторанах можно взять латте, капучино и раф со вкусом пекана и кленового сиропа. Напитки стоят от 190 рублей, самый дорогой — раф за 290. Вместе с ними в меню появился бюджетный согревающий пунш малина-ежевика за 139 рублей.
За чашкой кофе бежим в Rostic’s 🧡
Лол, в России вышло реалити для OZONозависимых — «Богиня маркетплейса». В нем девушки собирают корзину нарядов на 15 тысяч рублей и выясняют на дефиле, кто лучше справился. Показывают по понедельникам на Субботе.
Такое мы смотрим! 🎧
Победа начала раздачу авиабилетов по 999 рублей. Акция продлится только один день, билеты можно найти за халявные 999, 1499 и 2499 рублей на рейсы вплоть до 27 марта 2027 года.
Причём распродажа распространяется как на билеты по России (они самые дешёвые), так и по миру. Среди направлений Москва, Сочи, Питер, Казань, Стамбул, Абу-Даби, Анталья, Самарканд и другие города.
Победа толкает нас на внеплановый отпуск, а …
Макан записал в армии новый трек про службу, строевую и подъёмы. Ролик с читающим армейский рэп Маканом завирусился в ТикТоке и теперь все ждут, когда он наконец отслужит и поедет по России с концертами. До дембеля осталось 53 дня, а уже 1 декабря Макан отправится в дембельский тур.
Это будет эпичный камбэк🫡
Showing the 12 most recent of 850 posts we hold for @trendsetter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@trendsetter edited 28 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
7 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 October 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 850 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 74 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Провод @provod · 1,481,604 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
украла авокадо с фотостоков @mavacado · 42,625 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Отцы Экономики @economicfathers · 89,914 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 17 August 2026
ок, согласовано @notypicmarketing · 385,886 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Маркетинг нефильтрованный @costperlead · 109,408 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
Движитал @dvizhitall · 466,079 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 9 August 2026
Ситилинк @citilink_official · 56,871 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
Передали коллегам @collegi · 136,822 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
лидер мнений среди удобрений @lider · 182,272 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
о чём говорят коллеги @kollegi · 199,312 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
бумеры смотрят телек @boomers_TV · 159,138 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Москоуавто @moscowauto · 199,028 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Русский ритейл и бизнес @retailrus · 288,606 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Не баг, а фича @bugnotfeature · 1,082,483 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
Сегодня в тренде @trends · 1,127,538 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
Бэкдор @whackdoor · 1,586,239 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
Креатив на сдачу @creoch · 89,177 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 August 2026
Алиса, что нового? @alice_yndx · 125,148 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Ритейл заказывали? @retailife · 94,258 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 September 2026
GamersHub @gamershubrus · 31,899 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 5 September 2026
КудаМосква @kudamsk24 · 229,392 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Оправдания для заказчика @olegizvini · 32,877 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 September 2026
Рестарт @remedia · 691,788 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
мы вам перезвоним @ca11_you · 140,762 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 246 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ты в тренде или уходи” (@trendsetter), 1,440,982 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trendsetter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.