Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for канал для работников 5/2

Channel

канал для работников 5/2

@kdrabotnikov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

71,718subscribers

-605 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001777186853
TypeChannel
Username@kdrabotnikov
DescriptionГотовимся, предвкушаем, страдаем! Сотрудничество: @lurialex Предложка: @avansanebudet_bot РКН: https://clck.ru/3FiFpU
Created15 August 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kdrabotnikov

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

71,71872,32372,020.56 August 2026 — 72,323 subscribers7 August 2026 — 72,310 subscribers7 August 2026 — 72,301 subscribers8 August 2026 — 72,293 subscribers9 August 2026 — 72,289 subscribers10 August 2026 — 72,281 subscribers11 August 2026 — 72,258 subscribers12 August 2026 — 72,246 subscribers13 August 2026 — 72,230 subscribers14 August 2026 — 72,237 subscribers16 August 2026 — 72,231 subscribers17 August 2026 — 72,198 subscribers18 August 2026 — 72,170 subscribers19 August 2026 — 72,155 subscribers20 August 2026 — 72,128 subscribers21 August 2026 — 72,113 subscribers22 August 2026 — 72,101 subscribers24 August 2026 — 72,082 subscribers25 August 2026 — 72,072 subscribers26 August 2026 — 72,058 subscribers27 August 2026 — 72,045 subscribers28 August 2026 — 72,027 subscribers29 August 2026 — 72,016 subscribers30 August 2026 — 72,001 subscribers31 August 2026 — 71,986 subscribers1 September 2026 — 71,964 subscribers2 September 2026 — 71,947 subscribers3 September 2026 — 71,922 subscribers5 September 2026 — 71,892 subscribers8 September 2026 — 71,838 subscribers11 September 2026 — 71,797 subscribers13 September 2026 — 71,766 subscribers15 September 2026 — 71,740 subscribers17 September 2026 — 71,718 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net -605. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71,627–72,414 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 03:3971,718-22
15 Sept 2026, 05:2071,740-26
13 Sept 2026, 13:1671,766-31
11 Sept 2026, 14:3671,797-41
8 Sept 2026, 22:0271,838-54
5 Sept 2026, 14:1971,892-30
3 Sept 2026, 14:1671,922-25
2 Sept 2026, 06:5871,947-17
1 Sept 2026, 10:1871,964-22
31 Aug 2026, 11:0371,986-15
30 Aug 2026, 11:3472,001-15
29 Aug 2026, 09:4272,016-11
28 Aug 2026, 11:4272,027-18
27 Aug 2026, 11:2472,045-13
26 Aug 2026, 10:5672,058-14
25 Aug 2026, 13:1372,072-10
24 Aug 2026, 15:3472,082-19
22 Aug 2026, 21:5372,101-12
21 Aug 2026, 14:5972,113-15
20 Aug 2026, 11:5872,128first reading

Engagement

113 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.1%
avg views ÷ 71,718 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,000
61 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
61
of 113 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held113 (25 July 202622 September 2026)
Views total792,120
Reactions total17,292
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 13:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,450
Videos
295
Links
102

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 02s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

32,693 reactions across 109 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁11,12534.0%
🤣8,41925.8%
8,31625.4%
😢2,0366.23%
💔1,4454.42%
👍5871.80%
😐4231.29%
😱1740.532%
🤯1680.514%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 113 of the 113 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34,093 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 113 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 113 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kdrabotnikov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 113 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.885%
1 of 113 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
10,600
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
14,600
over 112 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjdo5yUF117 September 202617 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 113 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC≈2,830 views88 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

далее следует работа на этом месте от нескольких лет до десятилетий.

😁7013😢5

22 Sept 2026, 07:00 UTC≈4,890 views180 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

никакой спорт здесь не поможет.

110😁58👍11😢1

21 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC≈6,990 views197 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video

больше такой опыт повторять не хотелось бы.

😁156😢1514🤣9👍3

21 Sept 2026, 07:01 UTC≈7,180 views178 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

но по факту на троне всегда сидит бухгалтерия.

😁143😢19👍97

20 Sept 2026, 07:00 UTC≈8,370 views288 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

двигается на уверенном.

🤣234😁2925

19 Sept 2026, 07:05 UTC≈8,760 views238 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

столько планов: лежать, лежать и лежать.

182😢25😁24👍5🤣2

18 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC≈10,100 views332 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

знать об этом всем необязательно.

179🤣126😐13😁9👍3😢2

18 Sept 2026, 07:00 UTC≈10,900 views263 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

ура-ура, наконец-то такая вот планерочка.

161😁78👍16🤣8

17 Sept 2026, 15:24 UTC≈11,100 views309 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

pov: твой босс — математик.

🤣251😁3223👍3

17 Sept 2026, 14:24 UTC≈10,600 views34 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjdo5yUFVideo

Сколько на самом деле оставляют на чай курьеру и что происходит в первый день на линии 🚲 ВкусВилл записал подкаст «Делу ВВремя» с двумя курьерами: один пришёл недавно, второй курьерит давно. Без пафоса поговорили про первые заказы, самые большие чаевые, выгорание и то, о чём обычно спрашивают новички. Внутри выпуска разыгрывают мерч, условия под видео. Смотреть целиком можно на YouTube, Rutube, VK на канале «Мы из

🤣16👍7😐63😱2

17 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC≈10,600 views283 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

к сожалению.

🤣24929😁5

17 Sept 2026, 07:04 UTC≈10,600 views201 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

и я не Ди Каприо.

😁15424😢16👍4💔2🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 113 posts we hold for @kdrabotnikov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ТупичокДеграданта
@tupi4ek_degradanta · 75,406
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
Клиент всегда прав
@klientvsprav · 1,063,862
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
Ритейл заказывали?
@retailife · 84,407
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 September 2026
Доставим вчера
@dostavim · 27,251
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 September 2026
Programmer memes
@programmer_memes · 51,307
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
Бегущий по рынку
@ryanrun · 1,015,264
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Я другое заказывал
@russian_ecom · 83,465
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“канал для работников 5/2” (@kdrabotnikov), 71,718 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kdrabotnikov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.