Россиян не могут уволить только за распитие алкоголя на работе, потому что такого основания нет в Трудовом кодексе. Юристы объясняют, что увольнение возможно именно за появление на работе в состоянии опьянения, но этот факт нужно доказать. Одних подозрений руководителя недостаточно, однако подтвердить нарушение можно не только через медицинское освидетельствование.

Channel
Доставим вчера
@dostavim
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Declared links · Cite this entry
26,797subscribers
-1,177 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001538690468 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dostavim |
| Description | Честно и с юмором про ритейл, маркетплейсы и e-commerce. Сотрудничество: @alfapolo Помощник: @alivian Работаем с @Spiral_Yuri Предложить новость: @Dostavim33_bot РКН: https://clck.ru/3FXiS8 TELEGA |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 47 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dostavim |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:58 | 26,797 | -13 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:00 | 26,810 | -15 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:19 | 26,825 | -17 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:46 | 26,842 | -20 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:51 | 26,862 | -7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:11 | 26,869 | -24 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 17:00 | 26,893 | -10 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 26,903 | -17 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 10:26 | 26,920 | -24 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 08:50 | 26,944 | -13 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 11:38 | 26,957 | -17 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 01:00 | 26,974 | -53 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 18:37 | 27,027 | -45 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 09:17 | 27,072 | -85 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 27,157 | -94 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 27,251 | -28 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 27,279 | -36 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 27,315 | -38 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 27,353 | -33 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 27,386 | first reading |
Engagement
495 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.52%
- avg views ÷ 26,797 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 675
- 302 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.72%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 302
- of 495 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 198 of 302 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 495 (5 August 2026 – 25 October 2026) |
| Views total | 203,980 |
| Reactions total | 978 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Oct 2026, 08:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,740
- Videos
- ≈1,910
- Links
- ≈51
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 46m 54s
- Average length
- 24s
Measured directly from 118 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,985 reactions across 319 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 434 | 21.9% | |
| 🤣 | 362 | 18.2% | |
| 🤡 | 260 | 13.1% | |
| 🔥 | 209 | 10.5% | |
| 👍 | 202 | 10.2% | |
| 🤬 | 138 | 6.95% | |
| 💩 | 112 | 5.64% | |
| 👎 | 101 | 5.09% | |
| 😱 | 41 | 2.07% | |
| 🙈 | 33 | 1.66% | |
| 🤔 | 29 | 1.46% | |
| 😍 | 22 | 1.11% | |
| 😨 | 20 | 1.01% | |
| 🤷♂ | 12 | 0.605% | |
| 🙏 | 10 | 0.504% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 345 of the 495 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,985 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 495 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
В «Дикси» появились светящиеся в темноте лимитированные банки Pringles с призраками. Упаковка светится в темноте зелёным цветом, на полках заметили два вкуса: сыр и сметана с зеленью.
На Wildberries продают шторку для ванной за 980 рублей, которую продавец предлагает слегка безбашенным хозяевам. Кто-то просто вешает шторку, кто-то делает из неё изюминку ванной.
В офисе Sela проводят дни домашних животных: сотрудники приводят питомцев на работу. Так хозяева проводят день в офисе вместе с животными, а питомцы видят, где они пропадают целыми днями.
❤1
В «Магните» появились японские Lay's со вкусом курицы терияки по цене 129 рублей. Это азиатская лимитированная версия, сейчас её продают по 129 рублей за упаковку.
Покупатель Ozon Select вместо заказанных очков сначала получил футляр другого бренда, а затем рыболовный крючок. Во время первого заказа очки приехали в футляре другого бренда. При повторной попытке в посылке вовсе не оказалось очков — внутри лежал рыболовный крючок, которого нет в ассортименте модного маркетплейса.
🤣6
В сети обсуждают видео мужчины в платье, который заснул прямо на детской карусели. Пользователи пишут, что очень понимают этого мужчину и примерно так же чувствуют себя в пятницу вечером, когда выбираются с работы в выходные.
В гипермаркетах «Лента» появились наборы для самостоятельного приготовления популярных алкогольных напитков, включая Jägermeister, Baileys, лимончелло и пряный ром. Цена таких наборов — от 200 до 280 рублей за штуку, при этом в исходнике утверждается, что так можно получить привычные напитки примерно в десять раз дешевле оригинальной бутылки.
Wildberries добавил в отчёт «Сравнение карточек» рекомендации по поисковым запросам с выборкой до 50 лидирующих карточек по кликам, корзинам и заказам. Продавец выбирает нужный запрос и получает подборку карточек, которые показывают наилучшие результаты по переходам, добавлениям в корзину или заказам. Функция доступна на тарифах «Продвинутый» и выше и позволяет сравнивать товар не со случайной группой конкурентов, а…
❤1
Сотрудник пункта выдачи закрылся на 15 минут раньше под предлогом перерыва, чтобы сократить рабочий день.
Представитель Wildberries выступил против передачи маркетплейсам эксклюзивной функции налогового контроля и удержания налогов с селлеров после продажи. Директор направления налоговых рисков группы РВБ Елена Назарова заявила, что компания «категорически против» того, чтобы государство передавало ей свою функцию налогового контроля. По её словам, «налогоплательщик ни в коем случае не должен контролировать работу друго…
В «Самокате» появился чай в пакетиках со вкусом вишнёвой колы: 20 штук за 115 рублей.
❤1💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 495 posts we hold for @dostavim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@dostavim edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 15 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 22 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@retail_kitchen · 65,320#1
@klientvsprav · 1,034,839#2
@notypicmarketing · 662,170#3
@ryanrun · 1,201,156#4
@russian_ecom · 82,106#5
@ca11_you · 139,567#6
@leoday · 5,537,806#7
@b_retail · 138,478#8
@collegi · 135,896#9
@ru2ch · 712,410#10
@mosnews · 2,608,830#11
@oplata_skoro_budet · 592,286#12
@trends · 1,097,710#13
@vsedlyamp · 55,769#14
@lider · 177,198#15
@mavacado · 42,444#16
@bIoodsiker · 211,656#17
@retailife · 95,869#18
@marketingold · 123,387#19
@pravdadirty · 1,393,982#20
@mash · 3,150,184#21
@petrovtel · 544,936#22
@why4ch · 1,027,949#23
@kosti · 555,814#24
@moscowach · 3,948,110#25
@femalememes · 402,213#26
@dvachannel · 971,654#27
@rhymestg · 1,459,151#28
@msk_live · 1,811#29
@novosti_efir · 3,912,942#30
@milanapetrovaqueen · 199,327#31
@moscowmap · 2,638,082#32
@pekagame · 1,121,155#33
@bazabazon · 1,560,134#34
@ekaterina_mizulina · 925,705#35
@mosguru · 3,394,036#36
@lyubimyivpsh · 142,611#37
@bbbreaking · 1,976,451#38
@shot_shot · 1,269,828#39
@kollegi · 192,301#40
@moscowtinderr · 751,544#41
@exploitex · 2,013,394#42
@topor · 1,293,188#43
@moscowplus · 1,204,021#44
@creoch · 88,418#45
@sosicka · 158,779#46
@nmshhub · 683,881#47
@live_piter · 538,701#48
@wylsared · 1,097,672#49
@naebnet · 2,189,808#50
@fanforfans · 50,425#51
@moscow · 2,662,970#52
@pvzhelp · 14,321#53
@sale_caviar · 192,567#54
@cbpub · 669,611#55
@luka_ebkov · 430,649#56
@whackdoor · 1,558,078#57
@voina_belgorod_novosti · 1,102,413#58
@trendsetter · 1,489,649#59
@bloodysx · 1,174,982#60
@mashmoyka · 342,841#61
@buvchiy · 39,891#62
@Lepragram · 341,448#63
@kdrabotnikov · 71,173#64
@temalebedev · 970,517#65
@smi_rf_moskva · 2,437,625#66
@Romancev768 · 783,319#67
@rozetked · 653,436#68
@meow_meow_cute · 113,709#69
@creative · 133,768#70
@media1337 · 1,117,171#71
@twitt_ota · 329,437#72
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,624,498#73
@TgEmojis · 1,686,023#74
@apvzozonlearning · 93,964#75
@maslennikovliga · 2,102,314#76
@Kuplinov_Telegram · 908,170#77
@SHTOLLNEWS · 516,653#78
@yobajur · 186,257#79
@unpleasent · 486,478#80
@letisprivetom · 6,194#81
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@retailife · 95,869
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 September 2026
@retail_kitchen · 65,320
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
@kommerc · 232,734
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
@okolokass · 19,322
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 October 2026
@mp_week · 20,558
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 25 September 2026
@vsedlyamp · 55,769
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
@ryanrun · 1,201,156
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
@apvzozonlearning · 93,964
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 21 August 2026
@wbpvzlearning · 97,386
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 16 August 2026
@ozonapvz · 67,094
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Declared links
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
https://clck.ru/3FXiS8
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Доставим вчера” (@dostavim), 26,797 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dostavim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.