Как мало нужно для счастья: красивый закат и вкусный кофе ☕️❤️ #артисты #блогеры #контент #медиа #хайп #треки #блог

Channel
Медиа Россия
@mediarussia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,022,313subscribers
+750,412 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002195132204 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mediarussia |
| Description | Самый МОЩНЫЙ медиа канал про Хайп, Артистов, Блогеров, Контент и чутка новостей. 💸По рекламе - @vr777 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mediarussia |
Topic
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:56 | 2,022,313 | +10,918 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 21:17 | 2,011,395 | -2,697 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 23:55 | 2,014,092 | -7,118 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:51 | 2,021,210 | -15,555 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:07 | 2,036,765 | -4,926 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:16 | 2,041,691 | -5,853 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:08 | 2,047,544 | -2,688 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:30 | 2,050,232 | +12,004 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 18:41 | 2,038,228 | -15,264 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:05 | 2,053,492 | -30,227 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:36 | 2,083,719 | -593 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 11:38 | 2,084,312 | -6,278 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:35 | 2,090,590 | -33,217 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:19 | 2,123,807 | -4,615 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:27 | 2,128,422 | -6,931 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 04:50 | 2,135,353 | +514,910 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 22:26 | 1,620,443 | +22,927 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 1,597,516 | -133 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:55 | 1,597,649 | -4,408 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 1,602,057 | first reading |
Engagement
1,196 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 216 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.91%
- avg views ÷ 2,022,313 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 58,800
- 470 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 471
- of 1,196 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,196 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 27,629,792 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 05:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,980
- Videos
- ≈2,210
- Links
- ≈2,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3h 12m
- Average length
- 31s
Measured directly from 368 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 475 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (113 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 262 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 51 minutes of being posted; a typical post has already reached 86.7% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 99.7% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 62,722 views — 3.10% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 101,000).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /110767 Nov 2026, 04:06 UTC | 324 minutes – 85 minutes old | 27,300 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 27,219 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 24 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /110747 Nov 2026, 03:05 UTC | 520 minutes – 2.4 hours old | 28,700 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 28,387 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 20 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /110737 Nov 2026, 01:01 UTC | 1018 minutes – 4.5 hours old | 68,900 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 61,568 interp. → 3.0 hours: 68,800still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 26 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /110727 Nov 2026, 01:00 UTC | 1019 minutes – 4.5 hours old | 57,300 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 56,800 interp. → 3.0 hours: 57,200still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 19 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /110717 Nov 2026, 00:08 UTC | 123 minutes – 5.4 hours old | 80,500 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 73,269 interp. → 3.0 hours: 80,400 interp.views have flattened out | not yet at 24h | 23 minutes |
| /110706 Nov 2026, 21:28 UTC | 157 minutes – 8.0 hours old | 75,600 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 75,300 → 3.0 hours: 75,500 interp. → 6.0 hours: 75,600views have flattened out | not yet at 24h | 19 minutes |
| /110696 Nov 2026, 21:24 UTC | 1512 minutes – 8.1 hours old | 73,600 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 68,167 interp. → 3.0 hours: 73,539 interp. → 6.0 hours: 73,600views have flattened out | not yet at 24h | 22 minutes |
| /110666 Nov 2026, 19:40 UTC | 1815 minutes – 9.8 hours old | 27,800 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 27,300 interp. → 3.0 hours: 27,800 interp. → 6.0 hours: 27,800views have flattened out | not yet at 24h | 15 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 0.1%
- 1 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 108,000
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 72,700
- over 997 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFGq6oVB | 1 | 1 October 2026 | 1 October 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 29 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 471 posts held from the last 30 days (1.06%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Спорт - лучшая зависимость 💪🏻 #артисты #блогеры #контент #медиа #хайп #треки #блог
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Хоакин Феникс стал главным лицом рекламной кампании первой коллекции «умных» очков от Gentle Monster. В честь события бренд отснял короткометражку о гранях реальности и сна. Ее покажут в ноябре, а дроп коллекции планируют в декабре. Gentle Monster на кураже. #артисты #блогеры #контент #медиа #хайп #треки #блог
Как ощущается возвращаться в Россию из путешествия в 2026-м: #артисты #блогеры #контент #медиа #хайп #треки #блог
Теремок, ну когда уже?😃 #артисты #блогеры #контент #медиа #хайп #треки #блог
Это мы с Максимом играем в шахматы у него в комнате в окружение его семьи ♟️ Мне рассказали про классного парня Максима, у которого была мечта - со мной познакомиться и встретиться. У Максима редкое генетическое заболевание, поэтому ему непросто долго находиться в одном положении, а даже обычная поездка из дома становится испытанием( Но есть то, что он очень любит - это шахматы. Недавно Максим участвовал в соревнов…
«Профессиональный очиститель мандаринов». В Befree к сезону мандаринов подсуетились и выпустили идеальную футболку для обжорства цитрусовыми. Берём вместе с мандаринами🎧 #артисты #блогеры #контент #медиа #хайп #треки #блог
В Москве скоро откроется парк по «Гарри Поттеру» — в ЦДМ на Лубянке готовят целый комплекс с тематическими зонами. Первых посетителей обещают принять уже в ноябре, а в сети показали небольшой спойлер, как будет выглядеть пространство. В парке воссоздают Хогвартс, Запретный лес и Зал пророчеств, а также собирают узнаваемые предметы из волшебной вселенной, с которыми можно будет сфотографироваться. Магазин палочек, н…
Дурка-бум накрыл Россию. Девушка сняла влог с клиники неврозов, в котором показала, как проходит её день. Расписание реально заманчивое: завтрак, ванна с магнием, ЛФК, прогулки, витамины, ужин и сканворды перед сном. В комментариях тут же выстроилась очередь из желающих туда попасть. Как попасть? 2 раза там была. В первый раз боялась. Второй — хотела плакать... что выходить нужно оттуда Что за реклама Я раньше думал…
ANNA ASTI поделилась отрывком нового трека, который вы уже уже на следующей неделе 😎 Ждёте? #артисты #блогеры #контент #медиа #хайп #треки #блог
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,196 posts we hold for @mediarussia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mediarussia edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 15 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 31 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 32 posts on @mediarussia as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 20 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 5 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 5.9 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 5
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@hamster_kombat · 19,679,426#1
@blumcrypto · 12,887,019#2
@catapult_extreme · 7,656,702#3
@TimeFarmChannel · 4,726,331#4
@pigscrew · 1,943,966#5
@autoruss · 744,467#6
@TaskNChannel · 839,479#7
@combobestchannel · 199,879#8
@CryptoKingKeyur · 600,348#9
@Marsian_News · 229,853#10
@TheFootballCity · 244,283#11
@dogs · 6,466,181#12
@theyescoin · 5,179,250#13
@boomloudcoin · 1,557,297#14
@seedupdates · 7,311,494#15
@notcoin · 7,888,004#16
@the_signal_24 · 5,430,788#17
@theTapCoins · 2,682,382#18
@realgoats_channel · 4,211,424#19
@banana_update · 1,296,590#20
@hexnio · 1,846,467#21
@Cats_housewtf · 7,075,612#22
@trendingapps · 3,569,185#23
@gram · 6,249,316#24
@dotcoincommunity · 3,655,572#25
@hayzonn · 2,574,730#26
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,569,860#27
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,000,734#28
@walt_news · 3,304,502#29
@corn_battles · 976,549#30
@iamalexfalcon · 2,814,826#31
@AmioCommunity · 1,503,314#32
@token_1win · 2,794,632#33
@catgoldminerann · 836,655#34
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,008,808#35
@onus_globalchannel · 1,511,800#36
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,313,785#37
@EraOfExplorers · 659,883#38
@vestirussia · 911,401#39
@tonstationgames · 2,895,535#40
@nomis_protocol · 1,439,314#41
@builders · 3,247,841#42
@the_vertus · 1,985,371#43
@WILD_EC0SYSTEM · 1,003,297#44
@pixelverse_xyz · 2,906,494#45
@okx_campaign_announcements · 1,122,731#46
@metazoneofficial · 523,590#47
@keeper_en · 4,307,828#48
@watbird · 1,376,014#49
@gameechannel · 1,778,570#50
@babydogecoin · 948,814#51
@activitylauncher_offical · 4,046,185#52
@boopupdates · 1,211,826#53
@Birds_announcement · 1,416,655#54
@battle_games_com · 2,442,648#55
@smpl_app · 1,507,061#56
@Coin_Strategist · 947,793#57
@obixtoken · 488,332#58
@notboredpuppies_news · 1,066,538#59
@money · 2,628,257#60
@deckforge_official · 1,904,199#61
@Monkey_on_TON · 757,078#62
@eeusd · 1,065,518#63
@tons_base · 453,302#64
@crypto_jeman · 624,992#65
@drive369_dao · 585,122#66
@CloutCoinSol · 902,201#67
@ONEstore_Official · 2,738,809#68
@matchain_fam · 1,619,209#69
@CryptoAirdrop · 506,987#70
@fintopionews · 2,046,518#71
@tomarket_ai · 5,929,499#72
@rockyrabbitio · 3,264,619#73
@catizenann · 3,326,368#74
@tapswapai · 9,652,132#75
@hotonnear · 4,315,772#76
@monorixofficial · 1,224,891#77
@therealyescoin · 1,942,713#78
@diamoremarket · 317,068#79
@theYescoin_News · 307,095#80
@avagoldcoin · 1,606,201#81
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@pawsfamnews · 47,490
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
@prompts_veo3 · 21,552
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 September 2026
@Crypto_FDNEW · 60,538
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 7 September 2026
@hamsterianss · 55,375
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
@controverity · 42,030
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
@notSadHamsters · 64,859
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
@OmarCryptoAcademy · 69,099
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
@Marsian_News · 229,853
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@TaskNChannel · 839,479
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
@airdrop_sign_all · 18,993
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 September 2026
@IRAN_MuskEmpire · 22,511
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
@tapswap_code_daily · 111,153
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
@LIONA1RDROPS · 80,853
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
@autoruss · 744,467
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
@AirdropDybala · 19,014
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 27 September 2026
@airdrop_signa · 52,158
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 September 2026
@bums_daily_combo · 47,236
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 26 September 2026
@Tomarket_Combodaily · 59,103
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 August 2026
@daily_combo_gemz · 89,843
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 August 2026
@crypto_news_l · 89,890
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
@TimKellnerTim · 24,958
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 19 September 2026
@BillonarioCripto · 21,914
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 September 2026
@tonguardaml · 22,829
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 15 September 2026
@CentralChanel · 22,605
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 1,286 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Медиа Россия” (@mediarussia), 2,022,313 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mediarussia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.