Маша и Медведь идут разбираться с психологом ТВ Центра, видео с места событий 😃 #артисты #блогеры #контент #медиа #хайп #треки #блог

Channel
Медиа Россия
@mediarussia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,694,028subscribers
+422,127 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002195132204 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mediarussia |
| Description | Самый МОЩНЫЙ медиа канал про Хайп, Артистов, Блогеров, Контент и чутка новостей. Попасть в канал ПРОСТО, пиши👇🏻 💸По рекламе - @vr777 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mediarussia |
Topic
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 1,694,028 | +10,621 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 1,683,407 | -14,350 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 1,697,757 | -27,218 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:55 | 1,724,975 | +50,175 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 1,674,800 | +155,724 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 1,519,076 | -10,701 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 1,529,777 | -6,219 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:05 | 1,535,996 | -7,143 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:34 | 1,543,139 | +36,077 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 1,507,062 | -20,625 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 1,527,687 | +159 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 1,527,528 | -4,850 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 1,532,378 | -3,720 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 1,536,098 | +6,863 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 1,529,235 | +7,289 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 1,521,946 | -3,209 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 1,525,155 | -7,029 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 1,532,184 | -7,590 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 1,539,774 | +71,720 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 1,468,054 | first reading |
Engagement
513 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.38%
- avg views ÷ 1,694,028 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 74,100
- 392 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 392
- of 513 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 513 (5 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 29,057,100 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 16:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,020
- Videos
- ≈1,890
- Links
- ≈2,570
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 49m
- Average length
- 33s
Measured directly from 199 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 376 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (58 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 254 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 2.0 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 43.0% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 99.1% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 88,700 views — 5.24% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 115,000).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /957019 Sept 2026, 16:11 UTC | 319 minutes – 84 minutes old | 21,300 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 21,300 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 19 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /956919 Sept 2026, 15:21 UTC | 434 minutes – 2.2 hours old | 28,400 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 25,435 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 34 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /956819 Sept 2026, 14:41 UTC | 64 minutes – 2.9 hours old | 25,500 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 22,656 interp. → 3.0 hours: 25,500views have flattened out | not yet at 24h | 4 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /956719 Sept 2026, 14:31 UTC | 613 minutes – 3.1 hours old | 79,800 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 36,455 interp. → 3.0 hours: 79,800still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 64 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /956619 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC | 104 minutes – 4.6 hours old | 31,200 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 22,036 interp. → 3.0 hours: 22,400still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 4 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /956519 Sept 2026, 11:54 UTC | 125 minutes – 5.7 hours old | 71,600 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 22,389 interp. → 3.0 hours: 23,340 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 4.1 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /956319 Sept 2026, 11:40 UTC | 419 minutes – 84 minutes old | 34,300 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 34,021 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 19 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /956419 Sept 2026, 11:40 UTC | 1219 minutes – 5.9 hours old | 68,200 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 24,433 interp. → 3.0 hours: 25,500 → 6.0 hours: 68,200still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 4.4 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Recent posts
Мультфильм Маша и Медведь и сериал Игра престолов попали в антидемографический рейтинг фильмов. Его опубликовал ТВ Центр вместе с психологом, который связал снижение рождаемости с влиянием фильмов и сериалов на россиян. Чем выше балл — тем больше в сюжете сцен, подрывающих ценность брака и семьи. Полный список: • Титаник — 4,25 балла • Осенний марафон — 4,0 балла • Ирония судьбы, или С легким паром! — 4,0 балла • С…
Ролик со съёмок клипа на песню «КРУЖИТЬ»! Спасибо всей команде во главе с режиссером Олегом Червоняком за работу. Спасибо вам, дорогие слушатели, за обратную связь, за ваши комментарии и поддержку. Посмотреть клип можно тут: 🎥 VK Видео, YouTube, RuTube. #артисты #блогеры #контент #медиа #хайп #треки #блог
Вкусно — и точка дразнит коллабой с Molang. Жёлтым бургерам с лиловым сыром и милым игрушкам быть! 💛 #артисты #блогеры #контент #медиа #хайп #треки #блог
«Сумерки. Сага. Санкт-Петербург». Мощный туман превратил сегодня Питер в Форкс. Петербуржцы тут же пошли снимать тиктоки под хоа-хоа-хоа, представлять, что они в Сумерках, и, естественно, сравнивать город с Сайлент Хиллом. Передвигалась как Эдвард сегодня Это Сайлент Хилл Пхахаахха сегодня утром тоже выглядываю в окно и ничё не вижу кроме белого тумана Ехать в Форкс: 💀 Ехать в Питер: 🧛♂ #артисты #блогеры #контент …
Продолжаем день отличной новостью! 😉 Вторыми ведущими ежегодной музыкальной премии «Жара Медиа» станут Маш Милаш и Илья Куруч ☺️ Давайте поставим побольше реакций нашим ведущим ❤️ #артисты #блогеры #контент #медиа #хайп #треки #блог
Продолжаем день отличной новостью 😉 Второй парой ведущих ежегодной музыкальной премии ЖАРА МЕДИА станут Маш Милаш и Илья Куруч ☺️ #артисты #блогеры #контент #медиа #хайп #треки #блог
Джеки Чан снялся в мемной рекламе казахского банка Kaspi. В ролике он становится гражданином Казахстана Джакижано и получает золотую карточку. В конце — экстремальный трюк, как из фильма «Таксист». Казахи — гении, как обычно ❤️ #артисты #блогеры #контент #медиа #хайп #треки #блог
10 дней до моего шоу…✨ я тебя очень жду❤️ #артисты #блогеры #контент #медиа #хайп #треки #блог
Lay's со вкусом копчёного сыра чечил появится в России. Новинку уже зарегистрировали в Роспатенте, скоро пачки начнут развозить по магазинам. Под пиво пойдёт 🍺 #артисты #блогеры #контент #медиа #хайп #треки #блог
Сова Duolingo перешла к жестокому троллингу 😁 #артисты #блогеры #контент #медиа #хайп #треки #блог
Сегодня кое-что снимаем! Ждите, скоро ✌🏻 #артисты #блогеры #контент #медиа #хайп #треки #блог
Showing the 12 most recent of 513 posts we hold for @mediarussia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mediarussia edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 15 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 15 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@hamster_kombat · 20,982,519#1
@blumcrypto · 14,360,001#2
@catapult_extreme · 8,500,526#3
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,296,110#4
@pigscrew · 2,142,006#5
@autoruss · 833,622#6
@TaskNChannel · 912,667#7
@combobestchannel · 215,776#8
@CryptoKingKeyur · 669,389#9
@Marsian_News · 245,660#10
@TheFootballCity · 267,464#11
@dogs · 7,065,215#12
@theyescoin · 5,697,036#13
@boomloudcoin · 1,671,644#14
@seedupdates · 8,226,508#15
@notcoin · 8,643,687#16
@fx_holding_community · 6,083,788#17
@theTapCoins · 2,919,608#18
@realgoats_channel · 4,674,136#19
@banana_update · 1,401,181#20
@hexnio · 1,998,607#21
@Cats_housewtf · 7,949,411#22
@trendingapps · 3,812,897#23
@gram · 6,689,636#24
@dotcoincommunity · 3,977,366#25
@hayzonn · 2,830,164#26
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,968,612#27
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,182,616#28
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,531,077#29
@corn_battles · 1,045,929#30
@iamalexfalcon · 3,088,378#31
@AmioCommunity · 1,747,054#32
@token_1win · 2,980,801#33
@catgoldminerann · 904,797#34
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,191,483#35
@onus_globalchannel · 1,650,302#36
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,498,015#37
@EraOfExplorers · 715,471#38
@vestirussia · 986,059#39
@tonstationgames · 3,193,102#40
@nomis_protocol · 1,549,523#41
@builders · 3,431,951#42
@the_vertus · 2,149,775#43
@WILD_EC0SYSTEM · 1,084,828#44
@pixelverse_xyz · 3,136,037#45
@okx_campaign_announcements · 1,227,204#46
@metazoneofficial · 564,077#47
@keeper_en · 4,754,957#48
@watbird · 1,476,557#49
@gameechannel · 1,901,951#50
@babydogecoin · 1,019,704#51
@activitylauncher_offical · 4,519,917#52
@boopupdates · 1,309,924#53
@Birds_announcement · 1,542,772#54
@battle_games_com · 2,693,947#55
@smpl_app · 1,619,786#56
@Coin_Strategist · 1,038,334#57
@obixtoken · 529,626#58
@notboredpuppies_news · 1,147,341#59
@money · 2,974,351#60
@deckforge_official · 2,065,282#61
@Monkey_on_TON · 819,656#62
@eeusd · 1,143,369#63
@tons_base · 486,041#64
@crypto_jeman · 666,447#65
@drive369_dao · 627,258#66
@CloutCoinSol · 965,464#67
@ONE_Quest_sub · 3,026,567#68
@matchain_fam · 1,911,582#69
@CryptoAirdrop · 547,985#70
@fintopionews · 2,263,869#71
@tomarket_ai · 6,657,802#72
@rockyrabbitio · 3,502,824#73
@catizenann · 3,581,173#74
@tapswapai · 10,368,717#75
@hotonnear · 4,675,152#76
@monorixofficial · 1,336,669#77
@therealyescoin · 2,089,882#78
@diamoremarket · 334,895#79
@theYescoin_News · 328,519#80
@avagoldcoin · 1,753,173#81
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@pawsfamnews · 52,067
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
@prompts_veo3 · 22,006
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 September 2026
@Crypto_FDNEW · 34,809
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 7 September 2026
@hamsterianss · 58,571
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
@controverity · 45,745
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
@notSadHamsters · 68,691
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
@OmarCryptoAcademy · 73,697
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
@Marsian_News · 245,660
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@TaskNChannel · 912,667
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
@IRAN_MuskEmpire · 24,583
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
@tapswap_code_daily · 95,470
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
@LIONA1RDROPS · 88,522
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
@autoruss · 833,622
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
@Tomarket_Combodaily · 66,475
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 August 2026
@daily_combo_gemz · 98,439
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 August 2026
@crypto_news_l · 97,509
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
@TimKellnerTim · 27,403
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 19 September 2026
@BillonarioCripto · 23,049
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 September 2026
@tonguardaml · 24,548
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 15 September 2026
@CentralChanel · 30,037
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 September 2026
@combathamstercipher · 28,800
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 8 September 2026
@CryptoAirdropVNbao · 35,961
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 1 September 2026
@Everydaywealthupdate · 39,806
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
@AirdropsInsiderr · 58,749
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 1,212 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Медиа Россия” (@mediarussia), 1,694,028 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mediarussia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.