Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -1,785. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,781–25,102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 11:18
23,049
-53
16 Sept 2026, 00:39
23,102
-55
14 Sept 2026, 07:59
23,157
-84
12 Sept 2026, 13:16
23,241
-101
10 Sept 2026, 12:15
23,342
-186
7 Sept 2026, 06:59
23,528
-154
4 Sept 2026, 10:37
23,682
-52
2 Sept 2026, 22:18
23,734
-83
1 Sept 2026, 19:25
23,817
-77
31 Aug 2026, 20:44
23,894
-76
30 Aug 2026, 23:56
23,970
-33
30 Aug 2026, 03:28
24,003
-36
29 Aug 2026, 00:25
24,039
-52
28 Aug 2026, 02:54
24,091
-17
27 Aug 2026, 06:03
24,108
-32
26 Aug 2026, 06:33
24,140
-23
25 Aug 2026, 04:53
24,163
-77
24 Aug 2026, 00:04
24,240
-52
22 Aug 2026, 05:27
24,292
-50
20 Aug 2026, 18:36
24,342
first reading
Engagement
123 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.40%
avg views ÷ 23,049 subscribers
Avg views / post
784
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 123 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 37 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
123 (2 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
31,365
Reactions total
383
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
28m 08s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 67 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,435 reactions across 119 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
347
24.2%
🤔
242
16.9%
🔥
237
16.5%
❤
219
15.3%
😱
123
8.57%
👎
62
4.32%
😐
43
3.00%
🤣
33
2.30%
🐳
30
2.09%
👌
26
1.81%
😁
22
1.53%
💩
9
0.627%
😍
8
0.557%
🤮
8
0.557%
⚡
5
0.348%
💔
5
0.348%
🤪
3
0.209%
🤯
3
0.209%
🌚
2
0.139%
🤨
2
0.139%
6 further kinds
6
0.418%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 119 of the 123 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,435 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 123 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Nuevo Monedero Cripto en Telegram: Gram Wallet
💲Gram Wallet ha comenzado a ser probado por un grupo limitado de usuarios en Telegram. En las próximas semanas, se planea ampliar su acceso a más personas. Este es un paso significativo para Telegram hacia la integración de servicios financieros y cripto.
Con esta nueva funcionalidad, los usuarios podrán realizar transacciones de criptomonedas directamente a través de …
¡Lee Artículos de Medios Internacionales Sin Suscripción!
Ahora puedes acceder a artículos de grandes medios de comunicación sin tener que pagar una suscripción. Hemos encontrado un servicio que te permite ingresar el enlace de un artículo y, a cambio, te ofrece versiones accesibles de ese contenido. ¡Es muy fácil de usar!...
¿Cuál es la mejor manera de acceder a las noticias de los grandes medios?
🤔 Voy a usar est…
Kleenex revoluciona el papel higiénico
Kleenex ha transformado la compra de servilletas y papel en una experiencia de coleccionismo de cajas misteriosas. Al gastar más de $20 en productos de la marca, los compradores reciben una caja secreta con un llavero de peluche al azar. Esta estrategia busca hacer que la experiencia de compra sea más divertida y atraer a más consumidores.
Estas tácticas son clave para que las…
¡El Plan Espacial de Musk: Solución para 1 Mil Millón de Años!
Elon Musk planea lanzar una serie de satélites impulsados por inteligencia artificial (IA) entre la Tierra y el Sol a partir del 1 de septiembre. Estos satélites regularán la luz solar para evitar que el planeta se sobrecaliente o enfríe, con la meta de mantener la Tierra habitable durante 1 mil millones de años....
🌍 ¿Deberíamos invertir tanto en la ex…
¿Son seguros los autos autónomos?
Durante una demostración de un auto autónomo, un desarrollador de Pakistán se enorgulleció de los talentos locales, solo para que el vehículo chocara con policías segundos después. Este incidente plantea serias dudas sobre la seguridad de la tecnología autónoma. La afirmación de que hay suficientes expertos en el país no parece ser suficiente para evitar tales accidentes....
¿Qué o…
¡12 profesiones en peligro de extinción en EE. UU.!
Un estudio en EE. UU. reveló que 12 profesiones se reducirán considerablemente en la próxima década. La peor predicción es para los especialistas en redacción, que podrían disminuir en un 34% para 2035. Sus tareas están siendo asumidas cada vez más por la automatización y la inteligencia artificial....
¿Qué opinas sobre esta situación?
😱 ¡Es aterrador, encontrar t…
Drones para controlar el consumo de alcohol en Estambul
En Estambul, la policía está utilizando drones para identificar a las personas que consumen alcohol en lugares prohibidos. A través de altavoces, los drones piden a los infractores que abandonen la zona. Esta medida busca mejorar la seguridad pública y mantener el orden en la ciudad.
Sin embargo, esta estrategia ha generado críticas sobre la privacidad y el po…
¡Una nueva era con VoiceStudio!
VoiceStudio, la nueva red neuronal para la narración de videos y audiolibros, marca un hito en la inteligencia artificial aplicada al sonido. Funciona completamente en local en tu computadora, permitiendo clonar voces con solo una grabación corta y narrar cualquier texto. También puedes doblar videos o transcribir audio.
Compatible con 16 motores de síntesis de voz y 11 para reconoci…
Nueva IA que detecta momentos clave en videos 18+
Un entusiasta ha desarrollado una inteligencia artificial (IA) que identifica los momentos destacados en videos 18+. Basado en Qwen3.8 27B, el algoritmo se enfoca en patrones técnicos como cambios bruscos en el tono de voz, transiciones rápidas de montaje y cambios veloces de escena. Esto puede ofrecer una experiencia más atractiva para los espectadores.
El impacto …
GTA VI podría costarle a Rockstar más de $1.5 mil millones.
Según analistas, el desarrollo de la nueva entrega se ha vuelto tan costoso que el juego podría establecer un récord entre los proyectos de entretenimiento más caros de la historia. Aún no se han incluido los gastos de un modo online separado en esta cifra.
El riesgo es enorme, pero Rockstar tiene razones para no escatimar. El anterior GTA V generó alreded…
Facilita tu trabajo con bots de inteligencia artificial
Un recurso increíble ha aparecido para quienes desean reunir agentes de inteligencia artificial desde cero. BotDirectory ofrece cientos de bots listos para usar en tareas como creación de contenido, SEO, búsqueda de clientes, programación y análisis de datos. No necesitas construir tu propio bot; simplemente encuentra el que necesites, copia las instrucciones y…
❤5👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 123 posts we hold for @BillonarioCripto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Cripto Escena🇪🇸 @CriptoEscena · 90,574 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 27 August 2026
Billonario @ibillonario · 52,456 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
Gram 🇪🇸 @toncoin_es · 200,209 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Buzz 📚 Historia @buzzhistoria · 75,512 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
Buzz 👨🏫 Quiz @buzzquizzes · 22,972 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
Buzz 💬 Citas @buzzcitas · 63,217 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Trading Senales Cripto Bitcoin @senales_trading_cripto · 249,371 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 27 August 2026
Buzz💡 Datos interesantes @buzzdatos · 121,234 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
Telo News Español - Cripto | DeFi | Web3 @telonews_es · 70,465 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Buzz ⚽️ Fútbol @BuzzFutbol · 52,200 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
Blaugranes @BlaugranesNews · 27,668 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 September 2026
Adrián Sáenz - Canal de Telegram @adriansaenzc · 32,472 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
El Genio del Trading @El_Genio_del_Trading · 46,059 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Billonario | Cripto, Dinero, IA, Tech” (@BillonarioCripto), 23,049 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BillonarioCripto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.