Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CriptoNoticias

Channel

CriptoNoticias

@criptonoticias

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

40,335subscribers

-30 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001066508151
TypeChannel
Username@criptonoticias
Created9 June 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/criptonoticias

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

40,33540,48140,4085 August 2026 — 40,365 subscribers6 August 2026 — 40,365 subscribers6 August 2026 — 40,354 subscribers7 August 2026 — 40,341 subscribers8 August 2026 — 40,336 subscribers9 August 2026 — 40,481 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40,462 subscribers11 August 2026 — 40,446 subscribers12 August 2026 — 40,441 subscribers14 August 2026 — 40,435 subscribers15 August 2026 — 40,424 subscribers17 August 2026 — 40,403 subscribers18 August 2026 — 40,388 subscribers19 August 2026 — 40,384 subscribers20 August 2026 — 40,366 subscribers21 August 2026 — 40,352 subscribers22 August 2026 — 40,335 subscribers5 August 202622 August 2026
17 measurements spanning 17 days, net -30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,313–40,503 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 17:1340,335-17
21 Aug 2026, 04:1440,352-14
20 Aug 2026, 05:3540,366-18
19 Aug 2026, 08:3540,384-4
18 Aug 2026, 08:1640,388-15
17 Aug 2026, 09:4640,403-21
15 Aug 2026, 15:2440,424-11
14 Aug 2026, 03:2440,435-6
12 Aug 2026, 19:5440,441-5
11 Aug 2026, 17:1840,446-16
10 Aug 2026, 16:5740,462-19
9 Aug 2026, 14:1640,481+145
8 Aug 2026, 13:5640,336-5
7 Aug 2026, 17:1340,341-13
6 Aug 2026, 17:2040,354-11
6 Aug 2026, 01:4840,365no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:4240,365first reading

Engagement

224 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.02%
avg views ÷ 40,335 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,620
224 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.549%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
224
of 224 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 220 of 224 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held224 (4 August 202622 August 2026)
Views total363,608
Reactions total1,981
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,836 reactions across 200 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥49827.1%
31617.2%
🥰30516.6%
👍19410.6%
🤣1206.54%
👎1186.43%
😱603.27%
😭442.40%
👏321.74%
🤔261.42%
👀221.20%
🤨150.817%
🐳120.654%
🙈110.599%
🤯110.599%
🥴100.545%
🤬70.381%
😎50.272%
🤪50.272%
40.218%
10 further kinds211.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 220 of the 224 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,981reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 224 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC259 viewsread 22 August 2026

⚠️Ataque a The Sandbox. El equipo del proyecto confirmó una vulnerabilidad en sus contratos que permitió a atacantes acuñar tokens SAND de forma indiscriminada en las redes BSC y Base. El impacto fue contenido y es mínimo (menos del 0,01 % del suministro total). ✅Ethereum y Polygon no se vieron afectados y las wallets de usuarios están seguras. ✅Ya deshabilitaron los puentes hacia/desde BSC y Base y están preparan

22 Aug 2026, 00:51 UTC≈1,400 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🔐 Una campaña convirtió cerca de 2.000 webs legítimas en una red para distribuir malware y sustraer credenciales y criptomonedas. 🚨 Trump vuelve a la batalla electoral y las criptomonedas podrían quedar en el centro de la disputa por el Congreso de EE. UU. 💰 La CEO de Bitget, Gracy Chen, ve improbable que EE. UU. compre bitcoin para ampliar su reserva estratégica antes de 2029, a pesar de lo prometido por el Gobier

4👏1

21 Aug 2026, 22:26 UTC≈1,610 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

📈 Bitcoin se acerca a una prueba clave para confirmar el fondo del ciclo. Galaxy Research señala que un cierre semanal sobre la media de 50 semanas reforzaría una señal histórica de cambio de tendencia.

🔥4

21 Aug 2026, 22:26 UTC≈1,500 views7 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

📈 ETH superó los 2.000 dólares. Según analistas de Santiment, el pesimismo extremo que se vio días atrás sirvió como "señal contraria". La negatividad social récord suele preceder al despegue del precio, explican.

🔥7

21 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC≈1,460 views8 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🚨 James Butterfill, jefe de investigación de CoinShares proyecta que el precio de bitcoin se mantendrá dentro de un rango con un techo clave en USD 80.000. El mercado aguarda el discurso de la Reserva Federal en el simposio anual de Jackson Hole.

🔥62

21 Aug 2026, 22:15 UTC≈1,590 views8 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

💰BlackRock compró USD 500 millones en bitcoin en las últimas 24 horas. Esta adquisición es para reforzar las reservas de su fondo cotizado en bolsa (ETF), iShares Bitcoin Trust.

🔥62

21 Aug 2026, 22:10 UTC≈1,370 views7 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

⚙️Se lanza Payjoin dev kit 1.0 tras 3 años de desarrollo. Con esta implementación, los usuarios de bitcoin podrán realizar pagos Payjoin sin necesidad de que las wallets ejecuten un servidor propio.

🔥52

21 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC≈1,680 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026

⚠️ En la última semana, el ecosistema ha sido bombardeado por múltiples ataques a hardware wallets reconocidas. Estos sucesos dejan claro algo importante: la seguridad no es un estado permanente. 📽 En nuestro nuevo video analizamos las lecciones que podemos obtener de los fallos de seguridad de BitBox, Maya Protocol, Mostro y Decred. 📲 Ya disponible en YouTube.

🥰2

21 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC≈1,510 views16 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

📉 La subida de bitcoin enfrenta un riesgo clave por la crisis del crédito privado en EE. UU. tras alcanzar récords de morosidad en julio. En un escenario de colapso financiero y quiebras de empresas, el precio de bitcoin probablemente se vería arrastrado a la baja.

🔥11🥰41

21 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,570 views11 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🇦🇷 "El argentino compra en el pánico y vende en la euforia", dice un vocero del exchange Lemon basándose en el comportamiento de los usuarios de esa plataforma durante la reciente subida de precio de bitcoin.

🥰6🔥3🤣2

21 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC≈1,570 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🗣 «Bitcoin muestra su primera señal poderosa en este ciclo», dice el analista analista Crypto Dan, con base en el indicador MVRV.

🥰3🔥2

21 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC≈1,550 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

📈 XRP acumula una subida del 41% en la última semana. Este movimiento dividió a la comunidad de inversores en Reddit, donde conviven el entusiasmo por el repunte con alertas sobre una posible "trampa alcista".

🥰4👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 224 posts we hold for @criptonoticias. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTCAnonymous Poll141 voters

Para tí, ¿cuál es el mejor periódico de criptomonedas?

  1. CriptoNoticias80%
  2. CoinDesk1%
  3. Diario Bitcoin5%
  4. BeInCrypto1%
  5. Cointelegraph13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTCAnonymous Poll219 voters

¿Con qué frecuencia te gustaría recibir mensajes en este canal?

  1. 1 o 2 veces al día34%
  2. 3 a 5 veces al día31%
  3. Más de 5 veces al día21%
  4. Solo lo urgente14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTCAnonymous Poll162 voters

¿Qué contenido deseas recibir en este canal?

  1. Breaking news40%
  2. Resumen del día47%
  3. Contexto rápido27%
  4. Señales de mercado48%

The shares total 162%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTCAnonymous Poll70 voters

¿En qué horario prefieres leer noticias?

  1. 7:00 a.m. a 9:00 a.m.47%
  2. 9:00 a.m. a 12:00 p.m.30%
  3. 12:00 p.m. a 3:00 p.m.4%
  4. 3:00 p.m. a 7:00 p.m.4%
  5. Después de las 7:00 p.m.14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 224 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 70,076 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Telo News Español - Cripto | DeFi | Web3
@telonews_es · 72,293
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Radar de Noticias Venezuela
@RadarEconomicoVzla · 145,749
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
Gram 🇪🇸
@toncoin_es · 204,172
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Monitor Dolar Paralelo Venezuela
@MonitorDolarVeOFICIAL · 94,025
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
Vacantes Remotas | Trabajos Remotos
@vacantesremotas · 129,060
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
Noticias 24 horas
@Noticias24horasTelegram · 87,227
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
JAVIERHALAMADRID / Canal Oficial
@Javierhalamadridd · 180,997
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
ANONYMOUS VENEZUELA
@AnonymousVzla · 72,799
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
ENRIQUE MORIS - Noticias
@Enriquemorisoficial · 65,974
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
Noticia Viral Vzla
@noticiaviralvzla · 110,532
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Wall Street Wolverine
@wallstwolverine · 179,618
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
Waves 🌊
@wavesnews · 1,124,848
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Alvise Pérez
@Alviseperez · 618,217
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CriptoNoticias” (@criptonoticias), 40,335 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/criptonoticias.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.