26 measurements spanning 29 days, net -292. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,734–12,114 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 07:17
11,778
-31
3 Sept 2026, 13:39
11,809
-49
2 Sept 2026, 04:44
11,858
-15
1 Sept 2026, 05:04
11,873
-32
31 Aug 2026, 03:07
11,905
-34
30 Aug 2026, 06:36
11,939
-20
29 Aug 2026, 04:03
11,959
-14
28 Aug 2026, 01:13
11,973
-8
26 Aug 2026, 23:03
11,981
-2
25 Aug 2026, 20:34
11,983
-10
24 Aug 2026, 18:24
11,993
-11
23 Aug 2026, 05:24
12,004
-4
21 Aug 2026, 13:56
12,008
-6
20 Aug 2026, 10:45
12,014
-12
18 Aug 2026, 06:31
12,026
-2
17 Aug 2026, 09:52
12,028
-5
15 Aug 2026, 20:26
12,033
-3
14 Aug 2026, 07:45
12,036
-7
13 Aug 2026, 01:03
12,043
-5
12 Aug 2026, 02:02
12,048
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.8%
avg views ÷ 11,778 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,510
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held
28 (15 June 2026 – 30 August 2026)
Views total
28,090
Reactions total
390
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 23:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,149 reactions across 28 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😭
240
20.9%
🔥
225
19.6%
👍
186
16.2%
❤
165
14.4%
😁
98
8.53%
💅
71
6.18%
👏
40
3.48%
😱
23
2.00%
🤔
12
1.04%
🤨
12
1.04%
✍
9
0.783%
🤝
9
0.783%
🤪
8
0.696%
🗿
7
0.609%
🥰
7
0.609%
👌
6
0.522%
😢
5
0.435%
🍾
4
0.348%
👨💻
4
0.348%
💊
4
0.348%
7 further kinds
14
1.22%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,149 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A diferencia de todo el mundo que está evitando las Altcoins y repudiendolas en estos momentos
Este video es el adecuado en el momento adecuado de mercado…
Disfrutadlo mucho, lo he hecho con especial cariño🙌
📌 https://youtu.be/yDcZk_9cZ8A?is=qG9FjRkBvylqn0m5
Tal y como está de fuerte Bitcoin, toca tomar la decisión de cuando comprar de nuevo, y os doy exactamente mi punto de vista y siguientes movimientos en el video de hoy 👀
📌 https://youtu.be/HnWw-RT-ZRE?is=byRvbIlw2SGv6J_z
Aprovecho en estos momentos para deciros que el 90% de lo que leáis/oigais en estos momentos de la gente, creeros la mitad
Nadie ha comprado todo lo que quería en estas caídas, yo incluido, y eso que tengo ya mucho dinero metido en el mercado cripto entre btc, eth, hype, coin etc
Nadie se esperaba esta subida a 78k
Por lo que, calma, intentad no volveros locos con tanta información, y sed precavidos
Después de una semana…
NO Comprarás NUNCA Bitcoin (a 40.000$) en OCTUBRE... *esto haré YO*
Disfrutadlo cracks💪
📌 https://youtu.be/L2BWyCDaju8?is=d3I14adZeNO5vbuS
Me la jugaré ALL IN este Agosto-Septiembre con Bitcoin y luego Altcoins
Os explico todo en este último video antes de irme unos días de “vacaciones”
Ya sabéis que es impossible para algunos desconectar de los mercados…
Espero que lo disfrutéis mucho y que me dejéis vuestra opinión en comentarios💪
📌 https://youtu.be/7y3R6KhHfM8?is=-AGsfnyiSOjMJeZY
Y si…
📌 https://youtu.be/0RCu6WmgIAs?si=Xs_flPUjfH1m2e_6
🔥20😭7💅5❤4🤪4⚡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @TuPrimerBitcoinTg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 30 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Invertir Desde Cero Oficial @invertirdesdecero_oficial · 53,534 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
Alex Ruiz | Canal Oficial @joinalexruiz · 34,747 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
ENRIQUE MORIS - Noticias @Enriquemorisoficial · 66,407 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
MARCIANOTECH BRAIN @marcianotechoficial · 36,472 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 September 2026
Adrián Sáenz - Canal de Telegram @adriansaenzc · 32,735 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
El Genio del Trading @El_Genio_del_Trading · 45,652 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
PabloGilTraderOficial @PabloGilTraderOficial · 48,284 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
BolsaZone Free 📈 @bolsazonefreezone · 45,376 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
CriptoNoticias @criptonoticias · 40,104 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
peaq @peaqnetwork · 43,257 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TuPrimerBitcoin🚀” (@TuPrimerBitcoinTg), 11,778 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TuPrimerBitcoinTg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.