🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 1,408 $BTC (106,913,178 USD) transferred from #OKX to unknown wallet Details

Channel
Whale Alert
@whale_alert_io
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
295,924subscribers
-9,472 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001309043988 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whale_alert_io |
| Description | The most advanced #blockchain tracker and analytics system reporting large and interesting transactions as they happen. All data available through our API. |
| Created | 4 April 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whale_alert_io |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Whale Alert Official” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 06:51 | 295,924 | -131 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 05:28 | 296,055 | -147 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:19 | 296,202 | -113 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:50 | 296,315 | -122 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:51 | 296,437 | -62 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:17 | 296,499 | -86 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:16 | 296,585 | -127 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:59 | 296,712 | -61 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 296,773 | +60 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:30 | 296,713 | -147 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:18 | 296,860 | -152 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 297,012 | -127 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:35 | 297,139 | -90 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 297,229 | -115 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:06 | 297,344 | -121 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:39 | 297,465 | -90 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:39 | 297,555 | -152 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 08:51 | 297,707 | -126 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 11:27 | 297,833 | -61 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:37 | 297,894 | first reading |
Engagement
2,096 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 189 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.11%
- avg views ÷ 295,924 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,250
- 702 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 703
- of 2,096 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,096 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 4,388,209 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 13:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6
- Links
- ≈104,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 703 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 100,000,000 $USDC (100,036,500 USD) transferred from unknown wallet to #MEXC Details
📉 📉 📉 Binance France to close all customer accounts by Dec. 31, 2026 after failing to secure a MiCA license Read Analysis
🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 309,864,597 $USDC (310,027,482 USD) transferred from unknown wallet to unknown wallet Details
🚨 🚨 323,440 $HYPE (25,396,555 USD) transferred from #HyperCore to #Kinetiq Details
💵 💵 💵 💵 💵 💵 💵 💵 💵 💵 250,000,000 $USDC (250,080,750 USD) minted at USDC Treasury Details
🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 3,543 $BTC (268,929,898 USD) transferred from unknown wallet to unknown wallet Details
🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 2,022 $BTC (153,275,905 USD) transferred from unknown wallet to unknown wallet Details
🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 107,500,000 $USDT (107,465,600 USD) transferred from unknown wallet to #Bitfinex Details
🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 108,000,000 $USDT (107,966,295 USD) transferred from unknown wallet to #Bitfinex Details
📉 📉 📉 U.S. Treasury sanctions 45 people and entities tied to alleged Prince Group crypto scam network Read Analysis
📉 📉 📉 Thailand SEC Files Criminal Complaint Against Bitget and Orders Access Block Starting Dec. 5 Read Analysis
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,096 posts we hold for @whale_alert_io. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@TOBTC · 42,9167 postsКриптач 🤡
@kripota4 · 645,7467 postsСЛЕЗЫ САТОШИ
@slezisatoshi · 121,8837 postsDapoer Outlook🍴🍲🔪
@bitcoinarchives · 1145 postsCrypto VIP CHANNEL
@Cryptovip_channel · 4424 postsGlobal Crypto Capital
@GCCteam · 814 postsWeb3 Bits
@theweb3explorer · 1383 postsWalk™
@walk_id · 43 postsDosen Crypto
@DosenCrypto · 8,3662 postsTHE CRYPT CABAL 💎
@THECRYPT38CABAL · 3022 postsChannel Giàu Chậm by Richard
@TPTrading_Channel · 8,1672 postsTrading for dummies
@Trading_for_Dummie_s · 312 postsElite Global Channel 🇮🇩
@beritacryptoupdate · 772 postsNMKAKDELA
@canfishseewater · 52 postsCrypto Whale Signals 🐋🐋🐋
@cryptowhalesignalschannel · 262 postsCryptoPulse
@kryptopulse · 142 postsBALANCE
@market_balance · 1,0082 postsپیشنهادات خرید
@pishnahadatekharid · 392 posts⟨ 𝑿 ⟩⟨ 𝟕𝟒𝟕 ⟩
@AK000747 · 1771 postCRYPTO ESSENTIAL
@CRYPTOESSENTIAL · 81 postFOREX CRYPTO
@CRYPTOMADI · 1,3261 postCatatan Crypto
@Catatan_Crypto · 301 post𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨𝐁𝐮𝐥𝐥 𝐎𝐆
@CryptoBull_OG · 5931 postCryptoSignal
@CryptoSignal_Indonesia · 1421 post다비드의 코인수첩 시즌2 🚀
@DAVIDISSOGOOD · 1,2981 postHalf Real Half Digital
@Half_Real_Half_Digital · 2,8501 postPalace's Gems 🏛️
@PalaceGems · 281 postCS Group | Trading
@TradingCSGroup · 4,7181 postAMADO'S CRYPTO GROUP
@amadoscryptogroup · 1,2201 postATR trading school
@atrtradingschool · 591 postCrypto Genius TA & Signal
@cryptogeniussignal · 381 postCrypto Mania 🌈
@cryptomanialifetime · 181 postEquity Market Exploits
@equityexploits · 991 postOmniriskIO
@omniriskio · 61 postCRYPTO KING🔥
@realcryptoking99 · 101 postSUPER CRYPTO CALLS 🐳
@supercryptowhales · 71 postAM03.call’s
@trxcloudbots · 61 postWhaleX 🐳
@whalextrading · 1,1081 postگله گرگ
@wolf_herd · 441 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@stable_coin_printer · 1,11720 postsByttc
@byttc1 · 519 posts📊 CryptoNews 24/7 Real-Time Updates
@kpbtcsignal · 6,90714 postscrypto alert
@Crypto_bot_alert · 1010 postsWizz 小时情报
@hourintel · 4,5187 postsBellum Acta - Intel, Urgent News and Archives ✝️ #FreeVenezuela
@BellumActaNews · 107,8724 postsСАТОШИ NEWS
@satoshinews · 29,5464 postsКРИПТОМАУЗ🇺🇦
@crypto_mouze · 6,4853 posts链求君精选分享
@lianqiujun · 12,8162 postsmoved
@BigComList · 631 postCrypto Club «Galaxy»
@gp_ru · 251 postHEXN.IO Channel
@hexnio · 1,843,9111 postПросто о крипте | блог криптоинвестора
@leonvest · 2,0001 postLUDOMAN.RW
@ludomaninform · 41 postВолодя летит на луну
@mwinvest · 6841 postPenerima AirDrop
@penerimaairdrop · 2671 postRebase
@rebase_ton · 111 postSignals Indicators
@signalsindicators · 2251 postLinkRadar | Discover Telegram Gems
@TheLinkRadar · 71 postтрейдинг с ебанцой
@trading_s_ebancoy · 2281 postWhale actions - Binance Spot Signal
@whales_action_binance · 2,3101 postXTREME Pump
@XtremePump · 3261 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@BinanceLiquidations · 176,297#1
@whalebotalerts · 142,037#2
@cryptoquant_alert · 69,927#3
@WhaleSniper · 59,302#4
@cointelegraph · 326,114#5
@CryptoCapoTG · 115,761#6
@unfolded · 116,700#7
@cointrendz_whalehunter · 23,749#8
@next10xgem1 · 321,650#9
@cryptoquant_official · 55,516#10
@BybitLiquidations · 14,304#11
@WhaleBotRektd · 22,072#12
@thecryptoexpress · 247,698#13
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 309,333#14
@binancekillers · 234,837#15
@cointrendz_marginsniper · 8,356#16
@whalescryptovip · 199,434#17
@cointrendz · 20,848#18
@FishTheWhales · 7,791#19
@WhaleTracker · 16,895#20
@WatcherGuru · 632,041#21
@dogs · 6,451,094#22
@blumcrypto · 12,859,271#23
@binance_announcements · 3,218,597#24
@notcoin · 7,885,777#25
@ThuanCapital · 88,463#26
@news_crypto · 99,678#27
@RoseSignalsPremium · 93,844#28
@thebull_crypto · 170,984#29
@BCUSAReal · 145,231#30
@REKTbinance · 19,575#31
@crypto_hd · 131,750#32
@rose · 85,010#33
@bitcoin_price · 56,442#34
@catizenann · 3,321,435#35
@Cats_housewtf · 7,063,323#36
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 315,199#37
@wublockchainenglish · 214,767#38
@Onchain52Hz · 10,294#39
@cryptobullet · 72,476#40
@airdropfind · 516,100#41
@plane_D · 29#42
@Richkidtradings · 111,602#43
@Coin_Signals · 71,695#44
@BitMEXSniper · 12,451#45
@cryptoattack24 · 55,183#46
@CryptoScanner100eyes · 30,787#47
@trade001k · 105,014#48
@CoinBureau · 114,581#49
@margintradingTCVN · 53,361#50
@CoinSonarV2 · 26,439#51
@HCGemAlerts · 33,978#52
@ico_analytic · 55,926#53
@glassnode · 43,595#54
@Fivemincryptoann · 56,802#55
@naghdexx · 70,576#56
@NewsCenterChannel · 36,385#57
@alirezamehrabi_com · 114,514#58
@invest_zonaa · 851,517#59
@yoyodexhaber · 39,160#60
@mobydick_crypto · 10,628#61
@ggshot · 94,747#62
@layergg · 19,313#63
@CryptoKlondike · 56,904#64
@Fin_Watch · 31,385#65
@icodrops · 41,955#66
@Whalesguide · 184,308#67
@wiseadvicebysumit · 163,323#68
@A1Aofficial · 34,599#69
@tomketloversreborn · 79,198#70
@Nobitexmag · 146,900#71
@WallMonitor · 7,136#72
@arzdigitalb · 54,354#73
@TCGFORYOU · 74,445#74
@HCCapital_Channel · 63,068#75
@markettwits · 340,857#76
@amir_ramzali · 119,026#77
@hctradecoin_channel · 33,934#78
@tradecoinundergroundchannel · 70,101#79
@indocukong · 40,359#80
@vnwallstreet · 29,422#81
@nobitexmarket · 315,555#82
@ramzali_eco · 69,297#83
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 48,410#84
@TradeCoinChienLuoc · 40,110#85
@cloobmali · 106,456#86
@yoyowla · 82,698#87
@cryptobyalireza · 36,693#88
@Coin_Post · 283,935#89
@bricsnews · 153,631#90
@kopeechkav · 54,762#91
@mr_mozart · 127,319#92
@Trading_Camp · 38,640#93
@saillytradinggroup · 42,106#94
@slezisatoshi · 121,883#95
@pifagortrade · 84,622#96
@ramzali_sc · 122,754#97
@FinancialStreetVN · 44,119#98
@jaryane_eghtesad · 49,134#99
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cointrendz · 20,848
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 September 2026
@cointrendz_whalehunter · 23,749
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
@Whale_Alerts_io · 28,353
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
@WhaleSniper · 59,302
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
@cryptoquant_alert · 69,927
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
@whalebotalerts · 142,037
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@BinanceLiquidations · 176,297
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
@WhaleDV · 27,797
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
@CryptoCapoTG · 115,761
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
@crypto_bobles · 47,324
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
@cryptoquant_official · 55,516
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
@cointelegraph · 326,114
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@AshCryptoTG · 58,449
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
@unfolded · 116,700
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
@CoinMarketCapAnnouncements · 235,560
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
@SonicAnnouncements · 20,377
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
@spotonchain · 21,012
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 September 2026
@EyesCryptoScanner · 21,545
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 17 September 2026
@drops_analytics · 571,961
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
@REKTbinance · 19,575
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 29 September 2026
@CryptoScanner100eyes · 30,787
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
@sniper · 135,040
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 13 August 2026
@bitcoin · 181,466
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
@binancekillers · 234,837
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 353 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Whale Alert” (@whale_alert_io), 295,924 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whale_alert_io.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.