#РФ #крипта В РФ предложили использовать криптовалюту в качестве залога Сенатор Артем Шейкин отметил, что проработка возможности использовать цифровую валюту, включая стейблкоины, в качестве залога "важна для дальнейшего развития оборота цифровых активов". Также он упомянул и о рисках блокировки стейблкоинов иностранными эмитентами. "При этом стейблкоины, которые предполагается использовать в таких операциях, должн…

Channel
САТОШИ NEWS
@satoshinews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
29,585subscribers
-183 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002021984947 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @satoshinews |
| Description | Главные новости криптовалютного рынка. Сайт - satoshi.ru MAX - max.ru/SatoshiNews VK - vk.com/SatoshiNews По рекламе - @SatoshiAds |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/satoshinews |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 29,585 | +107 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 29,478 | +21 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 29,457 | +3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:42 | 29,454 | -10 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:15 | 29,464 | -7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:15 | 29,471 | -20 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 29,491 | -22 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 29,513 | -26 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:54 | 29,539 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 29,546 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 29,556 | -17 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 29,573 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 29,580 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 29,585 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 29,591 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 29,599 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 29,607 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 29,612 | -9 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 29,621 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 29,626 | first reading |
Engagement
473 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.1%
- avg views ÷ 29,585 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,580
- 212 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.704%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 212
- of 473 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 178 of 212 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 473 (4 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 758,639 |
| Reactions total | 4,552 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 06:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,770
- Videos
- ≈544
- Links
- ≈9,570
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 02m
- Average length
- 1m 13s
Measured directly from 51 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,718 reactions across 422 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2,859 | 24.4% | |
| 👀 | 2,496 | 21.3% | |
| 😁 | 1,730 | 14.8% | |
| ❤ | 1,391 | 11.9% | |
| 🔥 | 1,037 | 8.85% | |
| 🤔 | 930 | 7.94% | |
| 🫡 | 601 | 5.13% | |
| 😱 | 355 | 3.03% | |
| 👏 | 123 | 1.05% | |
| 😭 | 102 | 0.87% | |
| 🎉 | 50 | 0.427% | |
| 💯 | 25 | 0.213% | |
| 🙏 | 16 | 0.137% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.026% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 439 of the 473 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,183 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 473 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#ликвидации За последние 24 часа ликвидировано позиций на $314.87 млн: 🐂 длинных на $213.24 млн 🐻 коротких на $101.63 млн @SatoshiNews - главное о крипте Криптокарта | eSIM | BingX
#aerodrome #rwa #акции Aerodrome достиг $1 млрд объема токенизированных акций Aero сообщил, что за первый месяц накопленный объем торгов токенизированными акциями на Aerodrome достиг $1 млрд. Платформа назвала результат стартом развития этого направления. Источник @SatoshiNews - главное о крипте Криптокарта | eSIM | 😍 BingX
#токенизация #регулирование #рынкикапитала Френч Хилл: токенизация ценных бумаг уже происходит Конгрессмен Френч Хилл на площадке CoinDesk говорит участникам крипторынка: токенизация ценных бумаг уже перешла из будущего в практику. Источник Цитата из видео: Всего два года назад, когда мы приняли FIT21, а затем CLARITY, журналисты спрашивали нас: можно ли говорить о таком футуристическом явлении, как токенизация? Не…
#твит 𝕏: Токенизация - это не замена традиционных финансов. Она делает рынки более доступными, более эффективными и всё более круглосуточными. Чёткие правила важны, потому что они дают компаниям уверенность инвестировать, строить и внедрять инновации в долгосрочной перспективе. @star_okx, Основатель и CEO OKX @SatoshiNews - главное о крипте
#Бутерин #ETH Виталик Бутерин: Ethereum превращается в «криптографический мировой компьютер» • Часть вычислений будет выполняться вне блокчейна, а их корректность — проверяться с помощью криптографических доказательств. • Для пользователей это должно означать более дешевые вычисления, более сильную защиту от цензуры и больше возможностей для приватности. • После обновления Hegota развитие Ethereum сосредоточится на …
#blockchain #chainlink #токенизация Банкам становится дешевле выходить в ончейн Сергей Назаров, сооснователь Chainlink, на отраслевой панели объясняет банкам и компаниям TradFi, почему блокчейны и CCIP могут удешевить ончейн-расчеты и токенизированные депозиты. Источник @SatoshiNews - главное о крипте Криптокарта | eSIM | 😍 BingX
#итогинедели 1️⃣ Биржа Bitget начнет возобновлять вывод средств с 28 сентября. 28 сентября откроют вывод BTC, 29 сентября - ETH в сетях Ethereum, BSC, Arbitrum, Base и Optimism. С 30 сентября будет доступен к выводу USDT в сетях Ethereum, BSC, Solana и Tron, а со 2 октября - другие токены. По данным GoPlus Security, атака на Bitget была связана не с утечкой приватных ключей, а с компрометацией цепочки доверия при по…
#bitcoin #инвестиции #токенизация Капитал продолжает идти в крипту Райан ВанГрак в ролике Coinbase обращается к институциональным участникам рынка: токенизация, работа регуляторов и притоки в биткоин-ETF формируют долгосрочную траекторию криптоиндустрии. Источник Цитата из видео: Меня в целом меньше интересуют краткосрочные движения, чем долгосрочные траектории. И с этой точки зрения история выглядит очень перспект…
#cftc #sec #регуляция CFTC готовит правила для крипторынка Каролин Фам, бывшая исполняющая обязанности председателя CFTC, рассказывает аудитории CNBC, как комиссия собирала данные для крипторегулирования и синхронизировала подходы с SEC. Источник Цитата из видео: Резервный сценарий на уровне ведомств был нужен из-за политической неопределенности. Он вошел в криптодорожную карту Белого дома, Project Crypto в SEC и к…
#ликвидации За последние 24 часа ликвидировано позиций на $118.23 млн: 🐂 длинных на $65.19 млн 🐻 коротких на $53.04 млн @SatoshiNews - главное о крипте Криптокарта | eSIM | 😍 BingX
#coinbase #grok #ии Grok лидирует в торговле через AI-агентов Coinbase Developer Platform сообщила, что Grok формирует 59,54% номинального объема торгов через Coinbase for Agents. Далее идут Custom CLI с 21,73% и Claude с 13,37%. Доля Perplexity составляет 3,48%, ChatGPT - 1,54%, Claude Code - 0,35%. Компания также отметила рост объемов на спотовом, фьючерсном и фондовом рынках. Источник @SatoshiNews - главное о к…
Showing the 12 most recent of 473 posts we hold for @satoshinews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@satoshinews edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 25 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 25 August 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@slezisatoshi · 123,780106 postsCrypto911🪞5Т. IPO
@cryp_to911 · 60212 postsCryptoRP
@btc1milliondollar · 343 posts@CryptoBank 🇰🇿
@CryptoBank_kz · 1073 postsФонд Будущего💰
@foundfuture · 533 postsAlex Crypto
@alex_trade_crypto · 9,2732 postsКотЯ Foundation
@kittyfoundtation · 3952 postsРЕЗЮМЕ АУДИО
@rezumeaudio · 32 postsAGGREGATOR
@WEB3_AGGREGATOR · 14,5692 postsAi-Crypto
@aixcrypto · 241 postcheapup
@cheapup · 21 postКрипто-Шляпа 🎩
@cryptohats · 221 postДневник КриптоХирурга
@cryptosurgeon_d · 461 postFreeTimeWatching (FTW)
@durbekkamalov · 11 postВХОД РЕЗЮМЕ РЫНКА
@fdgsghe · 31 postGravity Info
@gravity_info · 4571 postИван Шемелин | Крипта для начинающих 🚀
@ivanincrypto · 2641 postДВИЖ!
@L_iNKOLN · 301 postMotorship
@motorship · 21 postPropertyTour
@propertytour · 11 postUNIQUE. Криптовалюта для новичков
@unique_cryptoacademy · 211 postpiramiDOS
@VadosPiramiDOS · 61 postvAkulA
@vakulacapital · 261 postVillarribaVillabajo-канал
@VillarribaVillabajo_Channel · 1651 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@SatoshiFinance · 18,11831 postsBaza
@bazabazon · 1,565,2935 postsБанкста
@banksta · 438,3714 postsWhale Alert
@whale_alert_io · 300,1074 postsPavel Durov
@durov · 10,721,3993 postsРБК Крипто
@RBCCrypto · 132,3083 postsБанк России
@centralbank_russia · 244,1992 postsВиктор Першиков
@viktor_pershikov · 9,3882 postsBNB Chain
@bnbchain · 74,3851 postCrypto Headlines
@crypto_hd · 132,2361 post全国莞式全套会所
@SenLummis · 301 postSHOT
@shot_shot · 1,265,6571 postWalt News (ex. Wallet)
@walt_news · 3,494,9711 postГорелкин
@webstrangler · 28,6691 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@satoshinews named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 27 September 2026 – 28 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 27 September 2026 – 28 September 2026
named in 1 post, 28 September 2026 – 28 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@slezisatoshi · 123,780#1
@crypto_hd · 132,236#2
@CryptoFamilyPublic · 29,298#3
@BogdanGdeX · 25,977#4
@CRYPTUS_MEDIA · 71,232#5
@markettwits · 336,911#6
@ikigaimain · 98,186#7
@ZakonGary · 5,761#8
@andryuninthelegend · 18,729#9
@piftwit · 25,654#10
@CoinMetrika · 34,886#11
@falconinvestors · 82,379#12
@invest_zonaa · 909,960#13
@cryptodaily · 85,339#14
@razinvestor · 41,702#15
@web3ru · 12,071#16
@evans_crypto · 54,130#17
@cryptonskiemusli · 2,233#18
@profit_drive · 21,855#19
@trade001k · 106,947#20
@kopeechkav · 55,188#21
@profitcryptonews · 13,110#22
@incrypted · 108,513#23
@forklog · 92,233#24
@pshava7 · 14,893#25
@cryptoattack24 · 56,006#26
@cryptocholy · 38,600#27
@Defiscamcheck · 48,614#28
@mihaylets_pro · 11,471#29
@Slavik_investor_updates · 20,746#30
@DeCenter · 1,789,698#31
@mnewstweets · 946#32
@slivnetpost · 1,687#33
@toncoin_rus · 524,626#34
@richdi · 43,437#35
@ProfiT_Mafia · 35,469#36
@P4M_channel · 32,981#37
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 49,449#38
@icodrops_sergey · 42,868#39
@eraperemenfinans · 78,304#40
@polunintrade7 · 519,867#41
@cosmos_chiter_ru · 4,887#42
@AlexRich2018 · 43,724#43
@richdeenews · 21,658#44
@cryptonarnianews · 19,774#45
@Pro_Blockchain · 159,414#46
@lun_etern · 6,667#47
@cryptocommonz · 21,420#48
@okx_ru · 3,751,329#49
@professorklinkov · 79,484#50
@drop_guide_official · 5,609#51
@trend_gen · 55,169#52
@pifagortrade · 85,344#53
@Coin_Post · 291,333#54
@BMonarch_official · 43,524#55
@mr_mozart · 129,572#56
@tradertrend · 60,704#57
@muhtovinvest · 17,559#58
@blumcrypto · 14,188,780#59
@maloletoffcrypto · 45,526#60
@arsenamatuni · 12,281#61
@gen_m · 67,020#62
@hotonnear · 4,631,154#63
@cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,128,418#64
@Kripta_Ironbet · 13,942#65
@stop_scam · 54,046#66
@fackblock · 24,897#67
@slavik_investor · 24,702#68
@nainspire · 40,147#69
@catizenann · 3,550,802#70
@truexanewsua · 3,127,466#71
@ChiaPlanetNews · 2,116#72
@hamaha_cryptodaytrading · 34,678#73
@wellfedhamster · 88,607#74
@cryptor_tg · 4,349#75
@sgdemura · 32,104#76
@banksta · 438,371#77
@michaelchobanian · 6,496#78
@lostdogscoru · 215,203#79
@crypto_polls · 539#80
@dogs · 6,948,804#81
@notcoin · 8,552,225#82
@asupersharij · 1,712,089#83
@cultofnot · 1,020,011#84
@walt_news · 3,494,971#85
@alistarov_andrew · 9,297#86
@builders · 3,409,127#87
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@BogdanGdeX · 25,977
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
@slezisatoshi · 123,780
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@eraperemenfinans · 78,304
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
@CryptoFamilyPublic · 29,298
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
@stop_scam · 54,046
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
@richdicrypto · 34,333
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
@piftwit · 25,654
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
@ikigaimain · 98,186
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
@CRYPTUS_MEDIA · 71,232
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
@razinvestor · 41,702
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
@evans_crypto · 54,130
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
@ivanovinvest_rus · 20,365
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 September 2026
@P4M_channel · 32,981
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
@richdi · 43,437
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
@crypto_hd · 132,236
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
@whaleWS · 32,175
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
@kopeechkav · 55,188
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
@cryptozaycman · 21,448
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 September 2026
@cryptus_academy · 56,465
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
@professorklinkov · 79,484
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
@arutnews · 29,002
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
@coinnewsru · 25,132
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 September 2026
@falconinvestors · 82,379
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
@richdeenews · 21,658
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 100 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“САТОШИ NEWS” (@satoshinews), 29,585 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/satoshinews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.