International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 26% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -283. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,616–21,983 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 19:58
21,658
-33
16 Sept 2026, 12:40
21,691
-13
14 Sept 2026, 17:39
21,704
-14
13 Sept 2026, 02:56
21,718
-21
11 Sept 2026, 04:19
21,739
-17
8 Sept 2026, 05:36
21,756
-14
5 Sept 2026, 00:57
21,770
-8
3 Sept 2026, 09:05
21,778
-5
2 Sept 2026, 00:14
21,783
-22
31 Aug 2026, 20:48
21,805
-9
30 Aug 2026, 22:34
21,814
-7
29 Aug 2026, 23:36
21,821
-6
29 Aug 2026, 00:56
21,827
-6
28 Aug 2026, 00:27
21,833
-6
27 Aug 2026, 02:18
21,839
-6
26 Aug 2026, 05:42
21,845
-4
25 Aug 2026, 06:46
21,849
-1
24 Aug 2026, 09:08
21,850
-6
22 Aug 2026, 18:25
21,856
-4
21 Aug 2026, 11:45
21,860
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.9%
avg views ÷ 21,658 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,740
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.793%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
27 (10 June 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
9,480
Reactions total
63
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 13:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,459 reactions across 26 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🕊
2,459
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,459 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 27 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @richdeenews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Инвестируете в американские акции (S&P 500 / Nasdaq)?
Да, держу портфель через классических брокеров15%
Торгую через крипту / токенизированные активы12%
Хочу начать, но сложный ввод средств и брокеры пугают22%
Покупаю только крипту, акции не интересны56%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Долговой кризис в США разгорается.
Ранее Минфин США заявил об удвоении объемов выкупа собственного долга, а уже сегодня Скотт Бессент (министр финансов США) заявил, что регулятор собирается выкупить облигаций на 1 триллион долларов.
Тем временем американский госдолг достиг 40 триллионов, а мировой долг стремится к 400 триллионам (!). Уже очевидно, что так долго продолжаться не может, но что делать? Все больше людей…
Минфин США экстренно удвоил выкуп долгосрочных гособлигаций, а госдолг США впервые пробил $40 триллионов. Что происходит на финансовом рынке, почему золото и Биткоин устремились в космос и почему все ждут 15 сентября? Рассказал в новом (внеплановом) видео:
https://youtu.be/nUZsX_45oLI?si=OsifsTfGlf29VbVW
Биткоин и криптовалюта резко взлетели. А доходность 30-летних гособлигаций США наоборот резко упала ниже 5.20%.
Почему?
Дело в том, что минфин США в два раза увеличил объём обратного выкупа своих собственных долгосрочных облигаций.
Что такое обратный выкуп?
Это когда Минфин США сам выходит на рынок и выкупает ранее выпущенные им же облигации.
Как это работает:
Минфин забирает часть облигаций из обращения \ и…
Эта идея пришла в голову Илона Маска еще в марте 1999. С тех прошло уже практически 27 лет и вот, наконец, этот проект реализован. Но сразу же после его запуска Маск получил письмо из Вашингтона... Разбираю в новом видео, что происходит и почему так сильно напряглись конгрессмены США и банковская система в целом.
Смотреть по ссылке: https://youtu.be/1SqlganlxDI?si=A4b2mLHMzOrJNFsb
Американские акции постепенно становятся похожи на крипторынок.
Обычно мы воспринимаем фондовый рынок как отдельную систему: торговые сессии, выходные, брокерский счёт, покупка целых или дробных акций.
Но интереснее смотреть не на название инструмента, а на то, как меняется сама инфраструктура.
Binance добавила bStocks — токенизированные инструменты, стоимость которых связана с американскими акциями.
За этим стои…
🎬 На рынке полупроводником и микрочипов (которые питают весь технологический прогресс человечества, включая ИИ) единственным монополистом в мире была компания ASML.
Но Китай сделал кое-что, что шокировало инвесторов и техногигантов по всему миру.
В новом видео разбираю, что произошло на самом деле.
Смотреть по ссылке: https://youtu.be/QpBU6QsgbNo
В 1971 году Япония капитулировала за 13 дней. С тех пор под ногами глобальной экономики спит вулкан. Сегодня, спустя 55 лет, он проснулся. Ситуация настолько серьезная, что США впервые за 15 лет вмешались в нее. Однако свои проблемы они решают не за свои деньги, а за твои...
Рассказываю в новом видео, что происходит. Смотреть по ссылке: https://youtu.be/xUYDcO1f7y8?si=fmnhKB5445D3B0IR
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
⛔️ Весь мир обсуждает прорыв в Испанию со стороны Марокко, который в Испании называют вторжением, в Европе - миграционным кризисом, но никто почему-то не говорит о самых глубоких корнях этого инцидента... А ведь все началось еще в 1963 году.
Рассказываю, что произошло на самом деле в новом видео. Смотреть по ссылке: https://youtu.be/bqdMwiWDgDM?si=RTmde4dorPA5No-e
В следующие 2-3 года (в теме криптовалют) ты собираешься:
Сфокусируюсь на Bitcoin32%
Сфокусируюсь на альткоинах (включая Ethereum)31%
Минимизирую присутствие в крипто21%
Полностью уйду из крипто16%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🕊35
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @richdeenews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Инвестируете в американские акции (S&P 500 / Nasdaq)?
Да, держу портфель через классических брокеров15%
Торгую через крипту / токенизированные активы12%
Хочу начать, но сложный ввод средств и брокеры пугают22%
Покупаю только крипту, акции не интересны56%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как ты считаешь: самые большие возможности для заработка и развития
Будут в следующие 10 лет19%
Были в прошлом33%
Сейчас отличное время32%
Не знаю17%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Богатейший ДИ / ИИ / @richdi · 43,576 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
Богатейший Ди | Crypto @richdicrypto · 34,413 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
Gennady M @gen_m · 66,926 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
CryptoCommons 💎 @cryptocommonz · 22,191 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 September 2026
Coin Post – Деньги, инвестиции, биткоин @Coin_Post · 291,333 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Копеечка в кошельке @kopeechkav · 55,283 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Mr Mozart @mr_mozart · 129,572 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Разумный Инвестор @razinvestor · 41,766 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
БИТКОИН Адепт @bitcoinadept · 23,133 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 September 2026
Crypto Family Public @CryptoFamilyPublic · 29,315 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
Trader 80/20 @tradertrend · 60,704 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
IKIGAI @ikigaimain · 98,290 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
Артём Звёздин - обучение трейдингу @uiartemzvezdin · 75,931 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
САТОШИ NEWS @satoshinews · 29,478 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
КриптоЗайцман @cryptozaycman · 21,516 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 September 2026
SerCrypto @SerCryptoSC · 23,317 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 September 2026
Эра Перемен — аналитическое агентство @eraperemenfinans · 77,762 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
Крипто сливы @otdyshiprocrypto · 22,760 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
Evans Crypto @evans_crypto · 54,369 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
КИТ с Wall Street @whaleWS · 32,254 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
СЛЕЗЫ САТОШИ @slezisatoshi · 124,064 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Crypto Daily – биткоин, криптовалюта @cryptodaily · 85,610 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
10 долларов Баффетта @buff_10 · 60,148 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
PIF TWIT @piftwit · 25,606 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Богатейший Ди⚡️NEWS” (@richdeenews), 21,658 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/richdeenews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.