🟠 Биткоин резко упал до $76K, ликвидации достигли $600 млн в час Биткоин обвалился до $76 000, за час ликвидации на рынке приблизились к $600 млн. Одновременно рухнул и традиционный рынок — S&P 500 потерял $2,2 трлн капитализации за 40 минут. Источник Trade on Binance

Channel
Антон про крипту
@Anton_cryptoo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
138,204subscribers
-10,899 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001921021080 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Anton_cryptoo |
| Description | 🚀 В крипте с 2017 года. Начинал с нуля, без стартового капитала. Сегодня мой криптопортфель превышает $1,5 млн. Здесь делюсь опытом, ошибками, находками, аирдропами и возможностями, которые использую сам. Реклама в канале — @TGowner999, @topovik_999 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Anton_cryptoo |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:56 | 138,204 | -113 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:40 | 138,317 | -122 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:57 | 138,439 | -66 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:44 | 138,505 | -105 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 20:28 | 138,610 | -150 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 17:06 | 138,760 | -131 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:08 | 138,891 | -165 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 18:09 | 139,056 | -115 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:27 | 139,171 | -348 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 17:30 | 139,519 | -81 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:37 | 139,600 | -126 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:37 | 139,726 | -142 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:06 | 139,868 | -128 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 139,996 | -179 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:49 | 140,175 | -115 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:49 | 140,290 | -139 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:31 | 140,429 | -54 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 13:57 | 140,483 | -159 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 140,642 | -147 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:27 | 140,789 | first reading |
Engagement
314 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 195 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.85%
- avg views ÷ 138,204 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,170
- 94 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.334%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 94
- of 314 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 86 of 94 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 314 (1 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 110,397 |
| Reactions total | 340 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 22:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,110
- Videos
- ≈148
- Links
- ≈2,570
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,321 reactions across 298 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 457 | 34.6% | |
| 👍 | 317 | 24.0% | |
| 🔥 | 159 | 12.0% | |
| 😱 | 99 | 7.49% | |
| 👏 | 76 | 5.75% | |
| 🤯 | 45 | 3.41% | |
| 🤣 | 37 | 2.80% | |
| 😁 | 27 | 2.04% | |
| 🐳 | 24 | 1.82% | |
| 🥰 | 24 | 1.82% | |
| 🤔 | 11 | 0.833% | |
| 👀 | 10 | 0.757% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 0.454% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 0.379% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 0.303% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.227% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.151% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.151% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 0.151% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.076% | |
| 10 further kinds | 10 | 0.757% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 300 of the 314 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,321 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 314 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 94 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🟠 American Bitcoin: $126 млн прибыли, но майнинг просел Компания American Bitcoin, сооснованная Эриком Трампом, отчиталась за Q3: чистая прибыль составила $126 млн против убытка $57,2 млн кварталом ранее. Однако за цифрой скрывается важный нюанс. Весь разворот обеспечен бухгалтерской переоценкой биткоин-резервов на $197,3 млн. Без неё компания потеряла бы около $70 млн до налогов. Выручка упала до $63,4 млн — ниже …
❤1
🟠 Биткоин удерживает $80 000 на фоне восстановления рынка Биткоин держится выше $80 000, эфир прибавил 8%, Zcash вырос на 12% — рынок восстанавливается после выборов. Поддержку оказывают падение цен на нефть и ослабление доллара. При этом трейдеры оценивают перспективы крипторегулирования в США как более сложные, чем ожидалось ранее. Источник Trade on Binance
👍1
🧩 Aave лидирует на фоне притока $5,8 млрд USDT в DeFi В DeFi-протоколы поступило $5,8 млрд в USDT, и Aave занимает доминирующую позицию среди платформ, принимающих эти депозиты. Это говорит о сохраняющемся спросе на децентрализованное кредитование и доходность в стейблкоинах. Источник Trade on Binance
🌐 Morgan Stanley токенизировал акции и гособлигации США через DTCC Morgan Stanley стал одним из первых банков, запустивших токенизацию реальных активов через новый сервис DTCC — Tokenization Service (DTS), открывшийся 28 октября. Банк вошёл в число 20 участников на старте. Через DTS токенизированы американские акции и казначейские облигации. Сервис позволяет переводить токены 24/7, но только между зарегистрированны…
🔐 Хакер из взлома Binance отмывает SOL через THORChain Злоумышленник, стоящий за эксплойтом Binance на $6,3 млрд, начал конвертировать украденные SOL в BTC через кросс-чейн протокол THORChain. Источник Trade on Binance
🤯2😱2🤔1
🔐 Binance взломали на $6,34 млрд через фейковые собеседования Binance раскрыла детали крупнейшего взлома в истории биржи. 29 октября 2026 года хакеры, связанные с Северной Кореей, похитили $6,34 млрд — атака готовилась с сентября. Схема: злоумышленники проводили фиктивные job-интервью с сотрудниками, через которые устанавливали вредоносное ПО. Затем скомпрометировали внутренний AI-инструмент и через него получили д…
❤3🤔2😱1
🔐 Mercado Bitcoin взломали: $11 млн заблокировано Бразильская криптобиржа Mercado Bitcoin подверглась взлому 2 ноября. Сервисы площадки до сих пор приостановлены, доступ для клиентов закрыт. Биржа пообещала, что клиенты не потеряют активы, однако не уточнила ни источник финансирования для возмещения, ни конкретные сроки. По имеющимся данным, заблокировано $11 млн в активах. Источник Trade on Binance
🤯1😱1
🔐 Средства с взлома Binance прошли через 12 000 кошельков за 4 дня По данным аналитической компании Elliptic, похищенные с Binance криптоактивы были распределены примерно по 12 000 кошельков менее чем за четыре дня. Операция охватила 11 блокчейнов. При этом Elliptic оценивает объём уже обналиченных средств как незначительный — основная часть украденного по-прежнему отслеживается в сети. Источник Trade on Binance
🤯3👍1😱1
🌐 Standard Chartered запустил токенизированные депозиты в Гонконге Standard Chartered запустил сервис токенизированных депозитов для корпоративных клиентов в Гонконге. Переводы между банками работают круглосуточно через блокчейн-инфраструктуру EnsembleTX — платформу Гонконгского монетарного управления (HKMA). Расчёты проводятся в деньгах центрального банка. Первые живые транзакции уже выполнили China AMC, Finloop и…
❤2
💵 Polygon подключает банковские рельсы к стейблкоинам Solana Polygon расширяет свою систему OMS (Onchain Money System): теперь иностранные компании могут подключить стейблкоины на блокчейне Solana к банковской инфраструктуре США. Объём рынка стейблкоинов Solana оценивается в $15 млрд. Доступ открыт после верификации, в рамках раннего доступа и с учётом юрисдикционных ограничений. Источник Trade on Binance
❤2
📈 BlackRock, JPMorgan и Visa укрепляют позиции крипто в мейнстриме Grayscale опубликовала аналитический материал, в котором указывает на токенизированные фонды и стейблкоин-платежи как свидетельство того, что крипто всё глубже встраивается в традиционные финансы. BlackRock и JPMorgan расширяют доступ к токенизированным фондам, Visa использует стейблкоины в платёжной инфраструктуре. По мнению директора по исследован…
Showing the 12 most recent of 314 posts we hold for @Anton_cryptoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 10 posts on @Anton_cryptoo as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 14 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 28 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 2 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 4
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@crypto_vestnic · 201,376#1
@finansist_busines · 594,978#2
@eeusd · 1,066,599#3
@Kripto_Azbuk · 280,589#4
@stukach_trading · 300,278#5
@walt_news_cis · 1,087,973#6
@crypto_gst · 540,013#7
@crypadvis · 90,977#8
@invest_zonaa · 854,178#9
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,008,808#10
@CryptoPayk · 148,909#11
@crypto_stukach · 535,688#12
@playweb4 · 137,576#13
@hamsterdropru · 55,379#14
@crypto_drop_stukach · 632,388 (as read 12 August 2026)#15
@crypta · 503,036#16
@crypto_jeman · 624,992#17
@eduardinvest · 1,251,808#18
@polunintrade7 · 489,904#19
@alexatamcrypto · 37,919#20
@zicelaqo · 159,052#21
@tons_base · 453,772#22
@belevskmove · 984,366#23
@RustonCrypto · 21,268#24
@tu_crypto_news · 47,880#25
@thetamaxxing · 35,261#26
@toncoin_rus · 510,040#27
@gemhuntru · 67,512#28
@TimeFarmNewsCIS · 52,436#29
@beyond_cryptooo · 37,177#30
@notatraderrr · 134,192#31
@crypto_solyanka · 48,287#32
@blumcrypto · 12,887,019#33
@notcoin · 7,897,688#34
@catizenann · 3,332,744#35
@crypto_tappok · 80,226#36
@hotonnear · 4,321,024#37
@lostdogscoru · 209,476#38
@tu_airdrops_daily · 61,875#39
@pocketfi · 1,659,326#40
@gram · 6,258,010#41
@vestirussia · 913,177#42
@iamalexfalcon · 2,820,252#43
@keeper_cis · 438,122#44
@egocrypton · 408,278#45
@rilcrypto · 69,837#46
@evgenahata · 95,565#47
@mr_bitcoin_game · 32,617#48
@hayzonn · 2,574,730#49
@MKFOREX_VIP · 68,508#50
@freee_crypts · 13,000#51
@farmingweb · 26,567#52
@ToNmetasilense · 2,460,003#53
@combathamster · 61,035#54
@crypt_income · 72,033#55
@anon_club · 309,417#56
@Pepe_Drophanter · 48,451#57
@money · 2,632,775#58
@nomis_protocol · 1,441,195#59
@dogs · 6,475,477#60
@hamster_kombat · 19,704,370#61
@tapswapai · 9,666,156#62
@walt_news · 3,308,416#63
@builders · 3,251,701#64
@catapult_extreme · 7,656,702#65
@Cats_housewtf · 7,096,338#66
@trendingapps · 3,569,986#67
@durov · 10,123,870#68
@theyescoin · 5,189,314#69
@dotcoincommunity · 3,657,891#70
@Sanek_Kharkiv · 145,529#71
@tonstationgames · 2,900,251#72
@num1_ch · 365,825#73
@seedupdates · 7,335,051#74
@boomloudcoin · 1,559,250#75
@the_signal_24 · 5,430,788#76
@the_vertus · 1,988,873#77
@pixelverse_xyz · 2,910,162#78
@rockyrabbitio · 3,264,619#79
@uzummarket_global · 16,411#80
@TimeFarmChannel · 4,726,331#81
@token_1win · 2,794,632#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@crypto_vestnic · 201,376
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
@dummhamster · 27,319
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 9 September 2026
@kreslospodogrevom · 27,889
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 September 2026
@sergeisergienko · 60,637
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
@CryptoChiefcom · 82,825
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
@chto_pro1shodit · 140,057
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 August 2026
@tu_crypto_news · 47,880
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
@crypt_income · 72,033
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
@polunintrade7 · 489,904
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 August 2026
@trends_ok · 427,729
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 9 August 2026
@finansist_busines · 594,978
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
@mustfreeworkforall · 24,694
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 September 2026
@archer_crypto · 53,688
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
@TimeFarmNewsCIS · 52,436
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
@sergey1win · 1,491,843
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
@cryptanci · 78,662
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
@Kripto_Azbuk · 280,589
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
@cryptobotru · 2,168,148
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 August 2026
@tu_crypto_ideas · 21,864
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 September 2026
@noexit_t · 47,582
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 September 2026
@trust_empire · 103,211
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
@stukach_trading · 300,278
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
@crypto_lopata_off · 110,124
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
@crypto_stukach · 535,688
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 337 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Антон про крипту” (@Anton_cryptoo), 138,204 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Anton_cryptoo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.