Про криптовалюту, биржи и заработок.
А также пишу про экосистему телеграма: мини-апы, подарки, TON.
youtube.com/@archercrypto
Второй канал про тапалки: @archer_games
Реклама: @ShinManad
Вопросы лично мне пишите в сообщения канала
Created
Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
28 measurements spanning 33 days, net -1,121. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,731–57,188 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 05:36
55,899
-71
6 Sept 2026, 00:40
55,970
-56
3 Sept 2026, 23:58
56,026
-24
2 Sept 2026, 13:47
56,050
-41
1 Sept 2026, 13:03
56,091
-32
31 Aug 2026, 15:04
56,123
-25
30 Aug 2026, 15:47
56,148
-67
29 Aug 2026, 16:08
56,215
-14
28 Aug 2026, 14:37
56,229
-25
27 Aug 2026, 11:33
56,254
-26
26 Aug 2026, 14:44
56,280
-21
25 Aug 2026, 14:43
56,301
-27
24 Aug 2026, 15:08
56,328
-76
22 Aug 2026, 22:37
56,404
-42
21 Aug 2026, 10:27
56,446
-55
20 Aug 2026, 09:34
56,501
-56
19 Aug 2026, 07:56
56,557
-35
18 Aug 2026, 10:53
56,592
-78
17 Aug 2026, 10:14
56,670
-39
15 Aug 2026, 15:37
56,709
first reading
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.64%
avg views ÷ 55,899 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,830
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.466%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held
43 (1 July 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Views total
96,620
Reactions total
450
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Sept 2026, 21:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,370
Videos
≈114
Links
≈2,710
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,084 reactions across 43 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
405
37.4%
👍
223
20.6%
❤
215
19.8%
🔥
73
6.73%
🤯
72
6.64%
custom 5447576547894517429
37
3.41%
🤬
16
1.48%
💯
9
0.83%
🤔
7
0.646%
😱
6
0.554%
👀
5
0.461%
😢
4
0.369%
🙈
4
0.369%
🎉
3
0.277%
⚡
2
0.185%
🫡
2
0.185%
👏
1
0.092%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,084 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 43 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @archer_crypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 9 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Байден итоги
Поднимите руки кого удивил такой результат? 👌
Мемкоин LAPTOP упал на 98% в течение получаса — и продолжает снижение 🔽
На пике достигал безумной капитализации в ~$100 млрд, при том что ликвидности было дай бог на $50к.
Как вы понимаете, все кто получил аирдроп, тут же наперегонки пытались долбануть по пустому стакану, чтобы вынести хоть что-то.
Конечно же, есть и дураки, которые купили на пике — один…
$1000 бонус + $15 за регистрацию на BingX
Биржа запустила раздачу для моих рефералов с максимально простыми условиями:
🟢 Регистрируемся на бирже
🟢Заходим на страницу акции и подтверждаем участие
🟢Проходим верификацию — получаем $500 бонус на позицию
🟢Делаем депозит от $50 — получаем ещё $500
🟢За первую сделку на фьючах от $100 дают реальные $5
🟢А за торговый объём на споте или фьючах от $50 000 можно получить ещё $…
Байден запускает мемкоин
Действительно в странные времена мы живём — следом за провальными мемами от Трампа решил навалить токенов и сын оппонента.
Если помните, лет 6 назад был скандал с ноутбуком Хантера Байдена — он его потерял, и там были всякие скандалы про бизнес и наркотики.
Теперь Хантер собирается запустить токен LAPTOP. Ага 👌
Детали кому интересно:
Общее предложение: 1 миллиард токенов.
Распределение: О…
Классное видео качелей Майкла Сейлора
Как менялся баланс Strategy за 6 лет.
Похоже на ваши результаты на фьючерсах? 👌
Можно подумать — какие же это нужны нервы, чтобы переживать рост и просадки на десятки миллиардов долларов.
Но на самом деле, Сейлор в засаде — продать на хаях он не может, потому что обрушит цену. Выйти из позиций на лоях тоже не может — сделает себе ещё хуже.
Так что просто наблюдает как циферк…
Рынок сделал почти два икса с момента легендарного твита Майкла Бьюрри «продавайте» 👌
Челик (из фильма «Игра на понижение») предсказал кризис 2008 года — и с тех пор предсказывает новый кризис каждые пару лет. Теперь он ждёт падения ИИ.
Но пока получается так себе. Сейчас всерьёз обсуждается стратегия торговли «реверс Бьюрри» — потому что всё, что он шортит в последнее время, улетает вверх.
Например, Nvidia сделал…
Дуров запустил кошелёк GRAM в телеграме 💵
Увидеть вы его не можете, так что придётся верить Дурову на слово.
Сказал до конца лета запустит — запустил. А то что он запустил его только для тестирования — это уже такое дело 👌
Обещает раскатать простым смертным в течение следующих нескольких недель.
👉 В кошельке первые 5 транзакций каждый день будут бесплатными.
На графике GRAM наблюдаем немного радости.
📌 Торгуем …
Сейлор откупил Биткоин 💵
Смешно будет, если Сейлор, который продал на $60к, сейчас объявит, что откупил обратно по $80к 😬
— пост недельной давности
Ну что, я прямо как в воду глядел — Сейлор сделал именно это: продал ниже, чтобы откупить по 80к 👌
Сегодня наш главный биткоин-хомяк объявил, что закупил 4603 BTC по средней цене $80,318. Как обычно — не разминается, берёт на самых хаях красавчик.
Напомню, что он за л…
😏Промок много не бывает
Поэтому ловите дайджест актуальных активностей от топ бирж:
🍏 MEXC:
🟢 Начался новый лаунчпад — вносим до $10 000 в пул и получаем токены SHEIN по фиксированной цене, которые в перспективе можно продать дороже после листинга. Я закинул, попробую. Для новичков там супер-пул второй.
⚫️ Bybit:
🟢 Напоминаю, что можно получить халявную позицию на $1000 за регистрацию. Старые рефералы тоже могут…
⚫️Торговля трендовыми токенами на Bybit
Биржа запускает торговые промки по выбранным токенам, где можно залутать немного USDT за торговый объём. Сейчас выбранный биржей токен — NVDA.
За $10к объёма сейчас дают $6 — чем выше объём, тем больше награда.
👉Страница акции
P.S. Крутить объёмы в TradFi стало легче: недавно на Bybit убрали комиссию на лимитные ордера, а на рыночные урезали вдвое (0,0275%)
⚫️ Регистрация …
Очередной около-трамповский скам
Скамеры взломали партнёрский аккаунт Трампа, который продаёт его физические монеты. И закинули туда скам-монетку GOLD.
Так как Трамп полностью размыл логику того, что «ну не будет же президент запускать мемкоин» — люди понесли туда деньги, разогнали капу до $60 млн и... поймали рагпул.
Хакеры за считанные минуты получили профит около $1 млн — хотя сами они утверждают, что заработал…
Дуров обещал новый кошелёк до конца лета
Появились скриншоты того, как будет выглядеть кошелёк Gram в телеграме. Пока только костяк, но общая идея понятна.
Скоро в каждом телефоне! 🎩
👉 Напомню, месяц назад он анонсировал релиз до конца августа — но сомнительно, что успеет до осени. 🤔
Какую информацию получилось узнать:
▫ Будут все базовые функции с Gram, жетонами и NFT
▫ Поддержка транзакций без комиссии, о котор…
👍14❤4😁4🤯2⚡1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @archer_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
MILLIARDOM @milliardom · 1,241,777 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
Crypto Bitch @cryptobitchfree · 40,660 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Лысые истории @sixeyde · 37,484 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 31 August 2026
Новости Тонкипера @tonkeeper_ru · 464,543 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
INVESTCOIN @investcoin_free · 47,507 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
КриптоБош @cryptobosh · 150,804 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Арчер про крипту” (@archer_crypto), 55,899 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/archer_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.