₿ Хакеры Binance конвертировали альткоины в 2 300 BTC После взлома Binance на $6,3 млрд, в ходе которого было похищено 18 270 BTC, активы злоумышленников продолжают расти. По данным Elliptic, хакеры конвертировали $175 млн в украденных альткоинах ещё примерно в 2 300 BTC. Таким образом, общий объём похищенных средств в биткоине существенно увеличился. Elliptic отслеживает перемещение средств с помощью блокчейн-анал…

Channel
Крипто Вестник
@crypto_vestnic
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
201,077subscribers
-15,675 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001708938359 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_vestnic |
| Description | Ваш проводник в мире крипты. Новости рынка, инвестиционные идеи, аирдропы, перспективные проекты и понятная аналитика. Реклама в канале — @TGowner999, @topovik_999 Инфо о нашей сети: https://t.me/TGownerTOP |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_vestnic |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:37 | 201,077 | -109 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 11:20 | 201,186 | -190 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:17 | 201,376 | -123 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:15 | 201,499 | -21 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:25 | 201,520 | -68 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:46 | 201,588 | -111 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:55 | 201,699 | -124 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:50 | 201,823 | -162 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 09:30 | 201,985 | -101 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:10 | 202,086 | -426 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 10:30 | 202,512 | -171 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 10:46 | 202,683 | -107 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:38 | 202,790 | -116 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 12:45 | 202,906 | -90 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:00 | 202,996 | -127 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:36 | 203,123 | -187 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:28 | 203,310 | -237 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:57 | 203,547 | -168 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 06:10 | 203,715 | -120 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:48 | 203,835 | first reading |
Engagement
323 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.736%
- avg views ÷ 201,077 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,480
- 95 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.328%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 95
- of 323 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 83 of 95 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 323 (1 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 140,583 |
| Reactions total | 402 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 20:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,150
- Videos
- ≈149
- Links
- ≈2,630
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 8s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,663 reactions across 304 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 611 | 36.7% | |
| 👍 | 374 | 22.5% | |
| 🔥 | 184 | 11.1% | |
| 😱 | 159 | 9.56% | |
| 👏 | 92 | 5.53% | |
| 😁 | 76 | 4.57% | |
| 🤯 | 71 | 4.27% | |
| 🥰 | 26 | 1.56% | |
| 🤔 | 22 | 1.32% | |
| 👎 | 18 | 1.08% | |
| 🤩 | 14 | 0.842% | |
| 🎉 | 9 | 0.541% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 0.301% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.12% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 307 of the 323 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,663 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 323 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 95 posts held from the last 30 days (3.16%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🚨 Binance: хакеры из КНДР угрожают крипторынку на $6,34 млрд Binance опубликовала доклад, в котором оценила угрозу кибератак со стороны северокорейских хакеров в $6,34 млрд. Источник не раскрывает методологию расчёта или конкретные цели атак — доступна лишь итоговая цифра риска. Северокорейские группировки давно входят в число наиболее активных участников криптовалютных краж: по данным различных расследований, они …
❤1
₿ Bitcoin уходит в «Экстремальный страх» впервые за 3 месяца Индекс страха и жадности Bitcoin опустился до зоны «Экстремального страха» — впервые с ноября. За последние 20 дней BTC потерял около $10 000 в цене. Подобные показатели сентимента исторически фиксируются в периоды резкого снижения интереса розничных участников и усиления давления продавцов. Источник Trade on Binance
🚨 Эксплойт DarkSword похитил $4 млн через уязвимость в iPhone Хакеры использовали уязвимость нулевого клика в браузере iPhone для кражи криптовалюты на сумму $4 млн. Атака не требовала никаких действий со стороны жертвы — достаточно было открыть заражённую страницу. Целью эксплойта стали сохранённые сид-фразы на устройствах без актуальных обновлений безопасности. Уязвимость затрагивает неисправленные версии iOS. П…
🚨 Кражи с iPhone-кошельков: $4,06 млн в TRON утекло через уязвимости iOS Trust Wallet предупреждает о двух вредоносных инструментах — DarkSword и Coruna — которые используют уязвимости в устаревших версиях iOS для доступа к данным криптокошельков. Проблема не в самих приложениях-кошельках, а в операционной системе. В ходе расследования удалось отследить утечку на сумму $4,06 млн в токенах TRON. Пользователям рекоме…
❤4
🪙 Zcash запустил обновление NU7: быстрее блоки и приватные платежи Сеть Zcash активировала крупное обновление NU7, направленное на ускорение транзакций и упрощение работы с приватными платежами. Ключевые изменения: целевое время между блоками сокращено до 25 секунд, снижена вычислительная нагрузка на кошельки при поиске входящих приватных платежей, а часть комиссий теперь резервируется для будущих майнеров. Источн…
❤1
₿ Keel Infrastructure продала весь биткоин-резерв за $192 млн Бывшая майнинговая компания Bitfarms, переименованная в Keel Infrastructure, полностью распродала свой биткоин-резерв в третьем квартале. За 2 520 BTC компания выручила $192 млн. Теперь Keel заявила, что будет продавать добытые в Квебеке монеты ежедневно, а резерв доведён практически до нуля. Компания ускоряет переход в сферу ИИ-инфраструктуры и дата-цен…
😁3
₿ Bitcoin выше $81 000 и золото растут на фоне выборов в США Bitcoin восстановился с $75 600 (4 ноября) до отметки выше $81 000, а фьючерсы на золото прибавили 3,4% — до $4 061,10, показав лучший дневной результат за три месяца. Доллар ослаб после убедительной победы демократов, что возродило разговоры о «debasement trade» — стратегии защиты от обесценивания валюты. Однако рост омрачает важная деталь: короткие пози…
❤2😁2👎1
🚨 CZ предупредил о фишинговом сайте Trust Wallet Сооснователь Binance Чанпэн Чжао (CZ) предупредил криптосообщество о фишинговой схеме с поддельным сайтом Trust Wallet. Мошенники создали копию официального ресурса, чтобы заставить пользователей подключить кошельки и получить доступ к их средствам. CZ призвал всегда проверять адрес сайта перед подключением кошелька и использовать только официальные ресурсы. Пользова…
₿ Riot продал 79% биткоин-резервов ради сделки на $28 млрд Майнинговая компания Riot ликвидировала 10 599 BTC — 79% своих крипто-резервов — для финансирования крупной сделки в сфере AI-инфраструктуры. Сумма контракта составляет $28 млрд, срок — 15 лет. Это один из крупнейших подобных переходов в истории публичных биткоин-майнеров: компания фактически перенаправляет капитал из крипто-казначейства в долгосрочную инфр…
₿ Bitcoin отскочил от шестинедельного минимума выше $78 000 Bitcoin восстановился после падения до шестинедельного минимума, вернувшись выше отметки $78 000. Это произошло на фоне масштабного оттока средств из Bitcoin ETF — суммарный отток превысил $1,15 млрд. При этом темп институциональных продаж начал замедляться, что и поддержало отскок цены. Источник Trade on Binance
₿ Block Джека Дорси урегулирует дело с Минюстом за $764 млн Компания Block достигла принципиального соглашения с Министерством юстиции США на сумму $964 млн по делу о нарушениях законодательства по борьбе с отмыванием денег (AML). С учётом зачётов за предыдущие регуляторные урегулирования фактическая выплата составит около $764 млн. Одновременно Block отчиталась о падении валовой прибыли биткоин-экосистемы на 50% п…
😱3❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 323 posts we hold for @crypto_vestnic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@crypto_vestnic edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 3 November 2026
- Most recent edit
- 3 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 8 posts on @crypto_vestnic as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 14 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 28 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 2 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 3
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Anton_cryptoo · 138,095#1
@Kripto_Azbuk · 280,017#2
@stukach_trading · 300,120#3
@finansist_busines · 594,364#4
@eeusd · 1,064,223#5
@crypto_stukach · 534,574#6
@crypto_drop_stukach · 627,121 (as read 11 August 2026)#7
@invest_zonaa · 851,517#8
@crypto_gst · 539,386#9
@crypadvis · 90,816#10
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,006,059#11
@polunintrade7 · 488,472#12
@playweb4 · 137,426#13
@gemhuntru · 67,463#14
@belevskmove · 982,838#15
@zicelaqo · 158,703#16
@eduardinvest · 1,246,714#17
@crypto_jeman · 624,325#18
@beyond_cryptooo · 37,163#19
@tu_crypto_news · 47,772#20
@alexatamcrypto · 37,897#21
@hayzonn · 2,571,060#22
@cryptoera · 47,919#23
@toncoin_rus · 509,727#24
@thetamaxxing · 35,198#25
@notatraderrr · 133,990#26
@freee_crypts · 12,987#27
@tons_base · 453,091#28
@crypto_Iemon · 71,534#29
@crypto_solyanka · 48,228#30
@svoicrypto · 28,346#31
@investkingyru · 1,582,120#32
@bitochekvko · 40,596#33
@walt_news_cis · 1,087,288#34
@tu_airdrops_daily · 61,751#35
@crypto_tappok · 80,070#36
@hotonnear · 4,315,772#37
@lostdogscoru · 209,252#38
@CryptoPayk · 148,796#39
@hamsterdropru · 55,352#40
@keeper_cis · 437,699#41
@crypta · 502,276#42
@rilcrypto · 69,574#43
@vestirussia · 911,401#44
@crypt_income · 71,968#45
@CRYPTO_jokker · 1,891,899#46
@ToNmetasilense · 2,454,189#47
@dotcoincommunity · 3,648,851#48
@degen_Crypto_Hub · 947,643#49
@egocrypton · 407,539#50
@evgenahata · 95,244#51
@farmingweb · 26,524#52
@EasyInvestCrypt · 100,671#53
@Crypta_Pashkevicha · 104,416#54
@newcoinopss · 124,708#55
@roxman · 6,406,223#56
@shkilmaksym · 217,513#57
@dogs · 6,466,181#58
@blumcrypto · 12,859,271#59
@notcoin · 7,885,777#60
@hamster_kombat · 19,679,426#61
@tapswapai · 9,636,940#62
@catizenann · 3,321,435#63
@walt_news · 3,302,223#64
@trendingapps · 3,563,914#65
@gram · 6,239,698#66
@builders · 3,247,841#67
@catapult_extreme · 7,643,443#68
@Cats_housewtf · 7,063,323#69
@pocketfi · 1,651,874#70
@Sanek_Kharkiv · 145,412#71
@iamalexfalcon · 2,808,261#72
@theyescoin · 5,179,250#73
@Sport_HUB_football · 1,259,910#74
@tonstationgames · 2,889,064#75
@watersolmeme · 1,083,825#76
@seedupdates · 7,300,071#77
@pixelverse_xyz · 2,906,494#78
@boomloudcoin · 1,557,297#79
@num1_ch · 364,775#80
@the_vertus · 1,985,371#81
@the_signal_24 · 5,420,280#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Anton_cryptoo · 138,095
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
@Kripto_Azbuk · 280,017
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
@stukach_trading · 300,120
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
@chto_pro1shodit · 139,903
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 August 2026
@polunintrade7 · 488,472
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 August 2026
@kreslospodogrevom · 27,867
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 September 2026
@sergeisergienko · 60,492
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
@crypt_income · 71,968
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
@crypto_stukach · 534,574
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
@finansist_busines · 594,364
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
@tu_crypto_ideas · 21,767
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 September 2026
@tu_crypto_news · 47,772
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
@dummhamster · 27,300
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 9 September 2026
@tapsport_game · 87,056
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 August 2026
@gemhuntru · 67,463
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
@kaifffoviy · 24,525
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
@whaletalks · 50,432
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
@CryptoChiefcom · 82,753
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
@svoicrypto · 28,346
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 7 September 2026
@ArnoldCrypto · 50
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
@beyond_cryptooo · 37,163
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 30 August 2026
@degenovich · 104,291
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
@ath_crypto · 22,366
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 September 2026
@Crypta_Ai · 25,202
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 204 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Крипто Вестник” (@crypto_vestnic), 201,077 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_vestnic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.