⚡️Лонги продовжують домінувати на ринку Bitcoin - Падіння $BTC на 10% від поточних рівнів призведе до ліквідації понад $13 млрд лонгів. - Водночас зростання на 10% ліквідує менше $4 млрд шортів. Beyond Crypto | Community
👍6🐳2❤1🍌1😁1

Channel
@beyond_cryptooo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
38,663subscribers
-2,764 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002020781798 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beyond_cryptooo |
| Description | 💰Beyond Crypto - крипта, торгівля, успіх – об'єднані в одному каналі! 💸 Адмін та співпраця ads - @beyond_manager ✔️Посилання для друзів: https://t.me/+3xVVn2cso_ZiYTli Менеджер по ads: @tocatcrypto, @killhpx, @pifagor_dao, @ostapsmm |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beyond_cryptooo |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 38,663 | -360 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 39,023 | -241 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 39,264 | -57 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 39,321 | -73 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 39,394 | -64 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 39,458 | -128 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 39,586 | -151 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:56 | 39,737 | -194 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 39,931 | -94 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 04:29 | 40,025 | -83 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:03 | 40,108 | -91 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 40,199 | -76 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 40,275 | -74 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 40,349 | -93 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 40,442 | -48 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 40,490 | -36 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 40,526 | -64 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 40,590 | -38 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 40,628 | -112 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 40,740 | first reading |
194 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 194 (31 July 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 121,204 |
| Reactions total | 1,539 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Oct 2026, 03:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,801 reactions across 192 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,016 | 26.7% | |
| 😁 | 886 | 23.3% | |
| ❤ | 474 | 12.5% | |
| 🤯 | 444 | 11.7% | |
| 🤡 | 323 | 8.50% | |
| 🔥 | 178 | 4.68% | |
| 🌚 | 143 | 3.76% | |
| 🐳 | 72 | 1.89% | |
| 😭 | 65 | 1.71% | |
| 🤬 | 53 | 1.39% | |
| 💯 | 49 | 1.29% | |
| 🍌 | 45 | 1.18% | |
| 👎 | 37 | 0.973% | |
| 🤷♂ | 16 | 0.421% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 192 of the 194 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,801 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 194 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @beyond_cryptooo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 194 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 6 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⚡️Лонги продовжують домінувати на ринку Bitcoin - Падіння $BTC на 10% від поточних рівнів призведе до ліквідації понад $13 млрд лонгів. - Водночас зростання на 10% ліквідує менше $4 млрд шортів. Beyond Crypto | Community
👍6🐳2❤1🍌1😁1
😳 17 років тому з’явився перший обмінний курс BTC до долара Цього дня, 6 жовтня 2009 року, $1 = 1130 BTC. За нинішнім курсом це приблизно $97,4 млн. Beyond Crypto | Community
👍10🌚5❤2😁2😭1
💰Ілон Маск знову подолав бідність — статки повернулися до $1 трлн. За оцінкою Forbes, статки Маска знову перевищили $1 трлн після того, як влітку вони опускалися нижче $700 млрд. Лише за один день його капітал зріс приблизно на $58,7 млрд завдяки зростанню оцінки SpaceX та акцій Tesla 🚀 У червні статки Маска на піку оцінювалися приблизно в $1,45 трлн. Beyond Crypto | Community
😁11👍3🍌1
👀 Схоже, один із найцікавіших таймінгових патернів Bitcoin зламався Раніше ми розбирали модель 1064/364: після 1064 днів росту ринок отримував приблизно 364 дні падіння, після чого формував глобальне дно. За цією логікою 5 жовтня 2026 року мав стати тією самою точкою, де варто було б шукати фінальний мінімум. Дата настала. Дна немає?!🌚 Якщо дивитись з іншої сторони, то що, якщо новий ATH буде в районі $300к? Тоді…
❤12🐳4👍4🤡1
🇺🇦 Офіційний курс долара вперше перевищив 45 грн НБУ встановив офіційний курс долара на 6 жовтня на рівні 45,0564 грн/$, вперше в історії перевищивши позначку 45 грн. Зростання пов’язане з високим попитом на валюту, дефіцитом пропозиції та значним торговельним дефіцитом: за січень–серпень Україна імпортувала товарів на $66,3 млрд, а експортувала — на $26,6 млрд. Beyond Crypto | Community
🤬8👍5😁2🔥1
🇺🇸🇮🇷 США посилюють військову присутність біля Ірану За інформацією ізраїльських джерел, до Ізраїлю прямує значна кількість американських військово-транспортних літаків C-17. Паралельно США перекидають у регіон третю авіаносну групу та тисячі військовослужбовців. Втім, це ще не свідчить про остаточне рішення щодо нових ударів по Ірану. Водночас американська військова логістика в регіоні продовжує активно посилюватис…
❤5💯2🔥1
🤡 Команда TRUMP зливає токенів на $249 млн За останні 8 місяців пов’язані з командою $TRUMP гаманці перевели на централізовані біржі близько 82 млн токенів. На момент переказів їхня вартість становила приблизно $249 млн. Це вже понад 10% від початкової алокації команди. На старті пов’язані з проєктом структури контролювали 800 млн $TRUMP — 80% від загальної пропозиції. Beyond Crypto | Community
🤡17👍3❤1🤬1
😂😭 І смішно, і сумно від цієї ситуації. Beyond Crypto | Community
😁43👍3💯1
🚀 Акції Nvidia — новий рекорд ➤ Слабкий звіт щодо ринку праці США посилив очікування м’якшої політики ФРС і знизив дохідності трежеріс — позитивний фактор для технологічного сектору. ➤ Банк Morgan Stanley знову назвав Nvidia головним вибором серед виробників чипів і зберіг таргет на рівні $300. ➤ Нещодавно Nvidia збільшила програму зворотного викупу акцій ще на $150 млрд. ➤ Попит на AI-інфраструктуру залишається …
👍9😁2❤1🔥1
🚨 Криптообмінникам — кінець? БЕБ та Офіс генпрокурора провели понад 30 обшуків у межах справи про масштабну мережу нелегальних обмінників, яку джерела пов’язують із Kit Group. Мережа роками проводила валютні операції, грошові перекази та операції з цифровими активами, а її щорічний оборот міг сягати десятків мільярдів гривень. Під час обшуків вилучили понад 630 млн грн у різних валютах, а також телефони, комп’ютери…
😁10👍6🤯4😭3🤡2💯1🤬1
👀 Криптоінфли майже одностайно чекають продовження росту BTC Після закріплення BTC вище $85к настрої серед топтрейдерів помітно покращилися: 🟢 Carl Moon: $86,5k, але втрата $83,8k → ризик руху до $71k 🟢 Michaël van de Poppe: вище $84,8k → ціль $90k 🟢 Crypto Rover: вважає бичачий сценарій підтвердженим, перша ціль — $89k 🟢 MMCrypto: структура бичача, але допускає відкат до $78,7k 🟢 Ash Crypto: очікує прискорення рал…
❤8👍6😁2
🤤 $ETH по $18000 ? Оптимісти в X (Twitter) чекають на пробій багаторічного трикутника на Ethereum із потенційним зростанням до ~$18 000. Трейдер із Твіттеру з іншої планети, чи це ми не ті? Beyond Crypto | Community
😁20🐳2❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 194 posts we hold for @beyond_cryptooo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 53 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Beyond Crypto” (@beyond_cryptooo), 38,663 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beyond_cryptooo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.