Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Просто о сложном

Channel

Просто о сложном

@prosto_kripto

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,938subscribers

+131 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001244865539
TypeChannel
Username@prosto_kripto
Created20 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/prosto_kripto

Growth

9,8069,9469,8766 August 2026 — 9,807 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,807 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,806 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,811 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,826 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,831 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,887 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,916 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,940 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,946 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,938 subscribers9,9386 August 20264 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 29 days, net +131. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,785–9,967 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 05:559,938-8
31 Aug 2026, 12:589,946+6
28 Aug 2026, 21:249,940+24
25 Aug 2026, 16:129,916+29
22 Aug 2026, 06:269,887+56
19 Aug 2026, 07:089,831+5
16 Aug 2026, 02:179,826+15
12 Aug 2026, 18:379,811+5
10 Aug 2026, 00:419,806-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:169,807no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:539,807first reading

Engagement

231 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 9,938 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,410
194 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
194
of 231 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 193 of 194 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held231 (4 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total273,918
Reactions total10,509
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

11,966 reactions across 227 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5,56346.5%
👍4,16434.8%
1,0929.13%
custom 52129322753767596084083.41%
custom 54679285596642423603342.79%
custom 52109563069527589102191.83%
custom 5373141891321699086880.735%
custom 5440660757194744323400.334%
custom 5206607081334906820380.318%
custom 5445284980978621387200.167%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 228 of the 231 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,966 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 231 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
46
across the posts below
Posts paid on
37
of 231 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prosto_kripto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 231 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC≈1,190 views86 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

Началось активное нисходящее движение. Думаю, оно продолжится до начала следующей недели. Лучше пока что, активно не лонговать. Сигналов на откуп пока что нет (лишь на тф ниже 15м) Если не видели вчерашнее видео, советую посмотреть (клац) *Кстати говоря, пост с вчерашним видеороликом был 14000 постом в моем канале 👀 #btc #eth 🔀 Торгую здесь ⚫️ Оформить подписку в CS

👍4026🔥19custom 52109563069527589101

28 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC≈1,310 views52 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

Началось движение по нашему основному сценарию. Пока что, SUI не смог пробить трендовую линию. Все же, наверняка мы увидим этот пробой в течении 4-6 недель. Как по мне, наиболее интересно рассматривать его для покупки в спекулятивных среднесрочных целях на пробое трендовой линии, учитывая потенциал роста в 200% *Не финансовая рекомендация #sui 🔀 Торгую здесь ⚫️ Оформить подписку в CS

🔥31👍13custom 521095630695275891053

28 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC≈1,340 views40 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

По графику COIN+MSTR (акции CoinBase и Strategy) наблюдаем пробой трендовой линии сопротивления, что является бычьим сигналом. Теперь, для начала активного пампа (фазы хайпа) нужно преодолеть последнее сопротивление в виде глобального VWAP (333 пункта на графике). Думаю, в ближайшие недели мы увидим откат (ритест) пробитой трендовой линии с затем пойдём выше VWAP. На пробое VWAP можно будет активно лонговать альту

🔥27👍13

28 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC≈1,360 views78 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

В Х сравнивают ETH с Netflix. Структура движения и время фазы накопления совпадает. Я достаточно скептически отношусь к подобным сравнениям, но не могу не согласиться - выглядит красиво А вы как думаете, есть шансы повторить паттерн? ✅ - да ❗️ - нет #eth 🔀 Торгую здесь ⚫️ Оформить подписку в CS

custom 521293227537675960845custom 546792855966424236021🔥111

28 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC≈1,370 views55 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

MACD на 2W тф дает сигнал на смену тренда. Это очень редкий бычий сигнал, который увеличивает вероятность роста крипты в ближайшие пол года #btc 🔀 Торгую здесь ⚫️ Оформить подписку в CS

👍35🔥155

28 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC≈1,340 views29 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Если закрытия будут +- такими же как недельные свечи выглядят сейчас, на следующей недели увидим следующую картину 👇 Gold 📉 Dxy 📈 SPX 📈📉📈 Рост DXY и флет SPX сигнал на коррекцию для крипты. Но снижение GOLD указывает на то, что падение BTC будет краткосрочной коррекцией, а не дампом. Соответственно, пока что наши сценарии остаются актуальными. График №1 - Gold График №2 - DXY График №3 - SPX #gold #dxy #spx 🔀 То

👍157🔥7

28 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC≈1,360 views57 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ По индикатору Supertrend на 1W тф впервые с января 2023 года появился сигнал смены тренда. Как видно на графике, статистически он работает очень хорошо. #btc 🔀 Торгую здесь ⚫️ Оформить подписку в CS

👍35🔥165custom 54679285596642423601

28 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC≈1,380 views55 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Немного обновил структуру коррекции волны (iv) of {c} or {iii} учитывая ночной вынос шортистов. Если мы действительно в плоскости, около 76 000$ должно появиться много покупок и цена может продолжить рост без снижения к 73 000$. В любов случае, пока что ждём коррекции. Может увидим её на выходных... #btc 🔀 Торгую здесь ⚫️ Оформить подписку в CS

👍32🔥174custom 52109563069527589102

28 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC≈1,410 views110 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Всем привет 👋 Как у вас настроение? Надеюсь хорошее Сегодня закрытие недели на фондовом рынке. Важно наблюдать за золотом. Поэтому, делаю кофе и иду смотреть метрики. По традиции попрошу поставить побольше 🔥 Хорошего дня ❤️

🔥1019

27 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC≈1,610 views37 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Пришли в ранее обозначенный блок покупателя и оттолкнулись от него. Думаю, в ближайшие недели мы ещё можем опустится в этот диапазон (138-200$). Сценарий с началом роста остается актуальным до пробоя и закрепления месячной свечой ниже 130$ #bch 🔀 Торгую здесь ⚫️ Оформить подписку в CS

🔥28custom 52109563069527589105👍3custom 53731418913216990861

27 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC≈1,600 views47 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

DASH так и не может вырваться с нисходящего треугольника и в ближайшие недели это может закончиться резким снижением цены. Сценарий на графике является основным пока цена не пробила уровень 58,84$ #dash 🔀 Торгую здесь ⚫️ Оформить подписку в CS

🔥27custom 53731418913216990867👍5custom 546792855966424236053

27 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC≈1,630 views51 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

ZEC пришел в блок продавца 877-1285$. Продажи усиливаются. Вероятность начала коррекции в ближайшие недели очень высокая. В случае снижения, можем увидеть резкий дамп с первой остановкой около 500$. Если этот уровень не выдержит, следующий блок покупателя находится в диапазоне 170-250$ #zec 🔀 Торгую здесь ⚫️ Оформить подписку в CS

🔥34👍124custom 52109563069527589101

Showing the 12 most recent of 231 posts we hold for @prosto_kripto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@prosto_kripto edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTCAnonymous Poll239 voters

Думаю сделать прямой эфир на следующей неделе. Что скажите?

  1. Отличная идея65%
  2. Видеороликов достаточно, можно без эфира35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTCAnonymous Poll391 voters

Последнее пол года вы?

  1. В основном покупал крипту38%
  2. В основном продавал крипту9%
  3. Ничего не делал54%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 231 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Биржевой Монарх
@BMonarch_official · 43,828
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
PIFAGOR TRADE
@pifagortrade · 85,577
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
IKIGAI
@ikigaimain · 98,583
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
GENESIS
@trend_gen · 55,464
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Pursuit4Million|Андрей Соболев
@P4M_channel · 34,465
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
Копеечка в кошельке
@kopeechkav · 55,362
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Эра Перемен — аналитическое агентство
@eraperemenfinans · 76,955
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
Разумный Инвестор
@razinvestor · 41,869
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
Mr Mozart
@mr_mozart · 130,070
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Богатейший ДИ / ИИ /
@richdi · 43,730
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
Crypto Falcon
@falconinvestors · 82,346
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
Сытый хомяк
@wellfedhamster · 89,254
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Профессор Клинков
@professorklinkov · 80,624
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Trader 80/20
@tradertrend · 60,887
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
Илья Соловей
@teamtrade618 · 46,051
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Просто о сложном” (@prosto_kripto), 9,938 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prosto_kripto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.