🟠 Биток пробил боковик. Приток на локальных хаях ⠀ • На графике показано изменение чистого капитала за 30 дней по BTC, ETH и основным стейблам. Рост здесь не обязательно означает новые деньги в системе: покупки монет по более высоким ценам учитываются вместе с чеканкой стейблов за вычетом их сжигания (то есть ликвидность может быть как новой, так и просто перераспределяться по более высоким ценам). Зелёная область …

Channel
Mr Mozart
@mr_mozart
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
129,572subscribers
-1,621 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001290061428 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mr_mozart |
| Description | По всем вопросам писать сюда - @mozart_info |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mr_mozart |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 129,572 | -95 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 129,667 | -86 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 129,753 | -43 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 129,796 | -71 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 129,867 | -114 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 129,981 | -89 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:42 | 130,070 | -91 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 130,161 | -62 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:46 | 130,223 | -34 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:34 | 130,257 | -48 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 130,305 | -43 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 130,348 | -31 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 130,379 | -25 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 130,404 | -35 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 130,439 | -22 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 130,461 | -43 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 130,504 | -72 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 130,576 | -38 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 130,614 | -25 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 130,639 | first reading |
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 37.2%
- avg views ÷ 129,572 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 48,300
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (10 May 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 482,500 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 08:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,470
- Videos
- ≈61
- Links
- ≈2,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
🟢 Пример работы в Торговом Канале (ТК) • Достаточно долго сидели в ETH, но все же закрылись в полный профит сняв более +30% чистого роста за последние несколько недель. Точка входа была по 2123$. Объем здесь также был увеличен в три раза (3 СП), по отношению к объему наших стандартных лонгов
📌 ПРЕДУПРЕЖДАЮ, ПОКА НЕ НАЧАЛОСЬ • Смотреть Здесь - https://youtu.be/VGgy9pd2pzk
#btc_usdt - почти весь верхний разрыв закрыт, собственно там где и оказалось наибольшее скопление ликвидности (83-86к, как в цитируемом посте). Осталось добить 86к и можно раздать еще больше доминации альте. А если сопадет так, что и Трамп с Ираном договорятся, то бычий импульс в альте может быть достаточно сильным Видео сделаю попозже
🟠 45 базовых ончейн-индикаторов BTC вышли из медвежки ⠀ • На графике 45 циклических индикаторов Glassnode распределены по пяти зонам - от холодной до горячей. Цветные области показывают долю показателей в каждой зоне (например, если светло-синие и темно-синие зоны суммарно выше отметки 50, значит на рынке сейчас преобладают в основном медвежьи сигналы). Данная диаграмма не показывает вероятность роста или падения, …
По сути, вот самый значимый уровень по BTC на дневке. Вокруг него крутится весь текущий боковик Возьмем с запасом, и если цена "сдает" условные 75000$, такой расклад вполне себе может вернуть прайс на обратный тест пробитой ранее "двухсотки", т.е. белой 200-МА, которая проходит сейчас у отметки 70к Но пока этого (пробоя 75к вниз) не случилось, актуальным сценарием выглядит закрытие верхнего разрыва, в диапазоне 83-…
📌 BTC зажат между двумя стенами ликвидаций • На скрине показана тепловая карта потенциальных фьючерсных ликвидаций по всем биржам. Чем ярче область, тем больше позиций с плечами будет принудительно закрыто при достижении соответствующей цены. Сверху находятся шортисты, снизу - лонги ⠀ 1) Памп 19 августа вымыл значительную часть шортов по дороге вверх, но до крупнейшего скопления ликвидаций в диапазоне 83–86 тысяч …
🟢 А вот краткосрочники сформировали новую базу под BTC • На графике CBD-STH показано распределение монет краткосрочников по средней ТВХ. Чем ярче зона, тем больше BTC было набрано в этом ценовом диапазоне 1) В конце 2025 года крупнейший кластер находился в районе 84–90 тысяч $, но цена не смогла его удержать. После пробоя вниз значительная часть краткосрочников оказалась в убытке, а биток достаточно быстро провал…
📌 BTC выходит из вымытого состояния, но бычка ещё требует подтверждения По внутренней оценке Glassnode положение рынка в цикле поднялось с 17 до 40 пунктов за последний месяц и перешло в стадию раннего восстановления (Markup) Если посмотреть на прошлые циклы, выход индикатора из холодной зоны чаще происходил уже после формирования глобального дна. То есть сейчас рынок гораздо ближе к стадии формирования дна (либо…
🤯 Читаю сейчас расследование OpenAI касательно взлома сервиса Hugging Face собственными же агентами. В шоке, если честно. От того, насколько далеко мы уже зашли. Вдумайтесь только: 1) Агенты были помещены в закрытую, отключенную от интернета песочницу, отдельно друг от друга. Допустим, в обычных исследовательских целях (поиск багов, тесты новых возможностей и т.д.) 2) Один из них сталкивается с невозможностью вып…
И конечно, я никогда не угадаю где ещё может быть такой силы памп, особенно после многомесячной консолидации, т.к. могу оценивать только технически Так вот технически, рынок был узким и полумертвым. Все это дело так и смотрело вниз, но рынок решил по своему, ликвидировав в этот раз уже более 2 млрд $, только не лонговых (как в октябре), а шортовых позиций. Такие движения предсказать не сможет никто кроме тех, кто их…
📌 ЭТО НАЧАЛО БЫЧКИ ...? • Смотреть Здесь - https://youtu.be/8AUkFwomPmQ
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @mr_mozart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Торгуете, или ушли в "отпуск"?
- Торгую / инвестирую32%
- В отпуске41%
- Ушел из крипты навсегда27%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@cyptobrief · 74 postsInvest Chats | Каналы по инвестициям и трейдингу | Чаты по трейдингу
@investing_chats · 682 postsРЕЗЮМЕ ГОТОВОЕ
@audiovideopr · 31 postMNT
@MNT1618 · 311 postSlivCryptoTrade
@slivcryptotradeee · 331 postВсе курсы , приватки
@vsekursiprivatki · 131 postBTC prediction
@wwwbtcprediction · 41 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@crypto_hd · 132,434#1
@pifagortrade · 85,453#2
@trend_gen · 55,259#3
@markettwits · 336,496#4
@BMonarch_official · 43,703#5
@falconinvestors · 82,295#6
@piftwit · 25,606#7
@trade001k · 107,044#8
@cryptoattack24 · 56,173#9
@incrypted · 108,728#10
@razinvestor · 41,766#11
@cryptostrategy2018 · 10,686#12
@wellfedhamster · 88,802#13
@cryptodaily · 85,610#14
@cryptocommonz · 22,191#15
@mmrktmkr · 42,412#16
@RMNVtrade · 18,308#17
@bitcoinadept · 23,133#18
@BazaBitcoin · 15,122#19
@dnevniki_crypto · 33,248#20
@richdeenews · 21,658#21
@HodlerStrategy · 4,913#22
@trade_by_booba · 50,429#23
@drops_daily · 21,302#24
@fantastictraderru · 9,289#25
@FOMOHOMO · 27,192#26
@profaltov · 27,740#27
@cryptobull_club · 17,242#28
@don_invest · 38,443#29
@tradertrend · 60,704#30
@slezisatoshi · 124,064#31
@ikigaimain · 98,290#32
@Coin_Post · 291,333#33
@maloletoffcrypto · 45,665#34
@satoshinews · 29,478#35
@invest_zonaa · 917,113#36
@kopeechkav · 55,283#37
@CryptoFamilyPublic · 29,315#38
@Defiscamcheck · 48,614#39
@forklog · 92,345#40
@andryuninthelegend · 18,509#41
@gen_m · 66,926#42
@SANCHO_DT · 65,589#43
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 49,702#44
@evans_crypto · 54,369#45
@web3ru · 12,085#46
@muhtovinvest · 17,584#47
@cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,128,418#48
@prosto_kripto · 9,901#49
@blockchaingerman · 32,945#50
@P4M_channel · 33,294#51
@CRYPTUS_MEDIA · 71,625#52
@richdi · 43,576#53
@GoTrade_Telegram · 1,012#54
@BogdanGdeX · 25,977#55
@idoresearch · 57,589#56
@cryptonarnianews · 19,774#57
@invsignals · 527#58
@CoinMetrika · 35,139#59
@FrontManChannel · 14,964#60
@DeCenter · 1,823,722#61
@AlexRich2018 · 43,821#62
@icodrops_sergey · 42,908#63
@doubletop · 70,952#64
@mihaylets_pro · 11,576#65
@polunintrade7 · 525,189#66
@professorklinkov · 80,037#67
@VasyaBTC · 6,341#68
@disbalans1 · 3,000#69
@coinnewsru · 25,240#70
@vectrumcrypto · 19,471#71
@bankrollo · 454,915#72
@mcoin4 · 11,601#73
@pshava7 · 14,893#74
@arsenamatuni · 12,284#75
@RBCCrypto · 132,477#76
@dakacrypto · 10,100#77
@cryptoantonyy · 8,485#78
@fackblock · 24,911#79
@crypto_solyanka · 50,506#80
@dogs · 7,065,215#81
@blumcrypto · 14,360,001#82
@notcoin · 8,643,687#83
@hotonnear · 4,675,152#84
@asupersharij · 1,700,527#85
@yurasumy · 2,672,095#86
@truexanewsua · 3,127,306#87
@vanek_nikolaev · 2,636,316#88
@BinanceLiquidations · 180,620#89
@banksta · 438,140#90
@teamtrade618 · 45,750#91
@nevzorovtv · 1,019,614#92
@insiderukr · 2,183,396#93
@hamaha_cryptodaytrading · 34,535#94
@toncoin_rus · 526,912#95
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@bitcoinadept · 23,133
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 September 2026
@QPROtrading · 24,320
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
@mmrktmkr · 42,412
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 August 2026
@trade_by_booba · 50,429
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@wellfedhamster · 88,802
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
@cryptocommonz · 22,191
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 September 2026
@yivashchenko · 28,926
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
@dnevniki_crypto · 33,248
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
@razinvestor · 41,766
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
@BMonarch_official · 43,703
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
@richdeenews · 21,658
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 September 2026
@pifagortrade · 85,453
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
@piftwit · 25,606
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
@profaltov · 27,740
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
@trend_gen · 55,259
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
@falconinvestors · 82,295
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
@crypto_hd · 132,434
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
@markettwits · 336,496
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
@turtles_way · 30,685
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
@trade_soul · 701
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
@igorcryptotrader · 30,090
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
@sanyaizdagestana · 31,747
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
@buff_10 · 60,148
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
@FOMOHOMO · 27,192
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 192 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mr Mozart” (@mr_mozart), 129,572 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mr_mozart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.