Ну вот, почему я и говорил вчера про 82000$, т.к. все что ниже этой отметки пока яыляется просто зоной продолжения локально-нисходящего боковика. И до тех пор, пока BTC не преодолеет 82 тысячи, прямо сильно залезать в лонги я бы не стал (только аккуратно, на хороших коррекциях и опорных точках) Причина вчерашнего пампа и сегодняшнего слива доподлинно неизвестна, и либо просто связана с прошедшими выборами (что они п…

Channel
Mr Mozart
@mr_mozart
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
127,319subscribers
-3,874 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001290061428 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mr_mozart |
| Description | По всем вопросам писать сюда - @mozart_info |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mr_mozart |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 03:17 | 127,319 | -33 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:59 | 127,352 | -68 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:41 | 127,420 | -76 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:01 | 127,496 | -60 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:00 | 127,556 | -22 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:59 | 127,578 | -34 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 02:21 | 127,612 | -31 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 04:00 | 127,643 | -47 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:55 | 127,690 | -30 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:47 | 127,720 | -35 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:57 | 127,755 | -23 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:40 | 127,778 | -56 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:49 | 127,834 | -28 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:47 | 127,862 | -22 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:11 | 127,884 | -33 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:39 | 127,917 | -27 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:19 | 127,944 | -44 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 06:30 | 127,988 | -52 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:21 | 128,040 | -29 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 03:46 | 128,069 | first reading |
Engagement
58 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 189 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 45.0%
- avg views ÷ 127,319 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 57,300
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 58 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 58 (10 May 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 458,600 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 15:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,440
- Videos
- ≈58
- Links
- ≈2,350
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Хороший отскок, выборы и ноябрь делают свое дело, плюс победа демократов как в ПП, так и в Сенате (то есть, весь Конгресс), да еще и с таким разгромом. Демократы, как известно, крайне недовольны политикой Трампа в отношении Ирана (нефть тоже корректируется по этой причине). Демократы "заступают" на должность 3 января 2027, поэтому у Трампа появляется ровно 2 месяца, чтобы хоть как-то исправить ситуацию, и действовать…
По крипте снова ничего интересного, - тухлый, сползающий вниз боковик. В середине прошлой недели спотовые биды были установлены в районе 78-79к (см. скрин), но после истории со взломом упали к 75000$ Технически это коррекция внутри боковика (в совокупности с "гулянием" между 50-ым и 100-ым МА на неделе), что в целом нормально (мы видели точно такую же картину весной 2023) и соответствует с недавней сменой месячног…
По взлому Binance ничего нового не могу сказать, все уже написано Отмечу лишь, что как такового обвала не было, косвенно это говорит о стойкости крипты и хороших бидах снизу
79500$ из этого поста по прежнему актуальны, сегодня было тестовое касание - налили по бидам, но ниже пойдет каскад ликвидаций, тысяч до 76 долларов (плохой вариант - до 72 тысяч, но это просто держим в уме, т.к. менее вероятно) Иран там о чем то пытается договориться и если Трамп вдруг (прямо перед выборами, что логично) поддержит идею "территориального союза" на Востоке, тогда 79500$ могут и удержать Узнаем на эт…
• Рынок тухлый уже практически месяц. Скучно, неинтересно, но ожидаемо. В начале любого бычьего цикла после сильных импульсов идут долгие боковики, и даже сильные коррекции (вспомните 2023 год), да и я в последних выпусках неоднократно приводил сходство текущего восстановления с началом прошлой бычки • Притоки в спотовые ETF сменились оттоками, но не критично, в среднем за день выводят эквивалент 60-100 млн $, но эт…
Позиционирование фьючей немного сместилось и теперь основные "точки боли" находятся около 79500$ и 88000$. Касание любого из этих уровней в ближайшей перспективе запустит достаточно сильный каскад ликвидаций и принудительное закрытие лонгов (снизу) и шорт-сквиз (в случае пробоя 88000$) Основным драйвером, скорее всего, будет поведение индекса доллара и доходности USA-трежерей, потому что нефть не падает, несмотря на…
🟠 Биткоин не удержал 85000$ ⠀ • На верхней части графика показана тепловая карта спотового стакана Binance по BTC/USDT: чем ярче полоса, тем плотнее на этой цене стоят лимитные заявки (именно выставленные ордера, а не совершенные сделки). Свечи 4-часовые, а внизу объем заявок в самой «стене» в млн $: красный - продажи, зеленый - покупки ⠀ Еще недавно над ценой висела плотная стена продаж в районе 85-85.5к. В конце …
⚠️ Плечи в ТОП-альте начинают перегружаться ⠀ • Уточнение по графику: для каждой монеты здесь сравнивают стоимость незакрытых фьючерсных контрактов с ее капитализацией. Затем смотрят, у какой доли монет это соотношение попало в 10% самых высоких значений за собственный последний год (линии сглажены за 7 дней) ⠀ Сейчас среди крупных альтов таких почти половина, а среди средней капы - около 28%. Подчеркну, что это не б…
⚠️ Набор в Торговый Канал закрыт. Всем спасибо • Этот канал продолжает работу в обычном режиме. — Сегодня до конца дня добавлю всех в ТК. Пока все участники не будут добавлены, никаких сделок там не будет, не переживайте, вы ничего не пропустите. Для всех, кто просил отсрочку - все в силе, время еще есть до конца дня.
⚠️ Набор в Торговый Канал будет закрыт через 10 часов • Завтра начинаем — 1) Основные моменты по торговле и моих ожиданиях относительно ближайшего будущего на рынке, а также о причинах запуска нового потока, кратко описаны в двух постах - КЛАЦ и КЛАЦ 2) Точных сроков проведения одного потока нет. Минимум - 1 месяц, но на практике потоки идут дольше и могут растягиваться даже на несколько месяцев. По этой причине …
⚠️ Завтра набор в Торговый Канал (ТК) будет ЗАКРЫТ • Начинаем - 8 октября (послезавтра) — В целом, спустя год (без 4 дней), в крипте впервые складывается благоприятная атмосфера для восстановления. Сходится много "зеленых" параметров воедино: притоки в ETF, аналог Clarity ACT от SEC, слабая залонгованность рынка даже на текущих уровнях. И пока сохраняется общий потенциал, мы сильно активизировали торговлю в ТК, чт…
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @mr_mozart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Торгуете, или ушли в "отпуск"?
- Торгую / инвестирую32%
- В отпуске41%
- Ушел из крипты навсегда27%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@cyptobrief · 84 postsInvest Chats | Каналы по инвестициям и трейдингу | Чаты по трейдингу
@investing_chats · 682 postsРЕЗЮМЕ ГОТОВОЕ
@audiovideopr · 31 postMNT
@MNT1618 · 271 postSlivCryptoTrade
@slivcryptotradeee · 321 postВсе курсы , приватки
@vsekursiprivatki · 131 postBTC prediction
@wwwbtcprediction · 41 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@crypto_hd · 131,750#1
@pifagortrade · 84,622#2
@trend_gen · 54,704#3
@markettwits · 340,857#4
@BMonarch_official · 42,973#5
@falconinvestors · 83,162#6
@piftwit · 25,479#7
@trade001k · 105,014#8
@cryptoattack24 · 55,183#9
@incrypted · 106,936#10
@razinvestor · 41,187#11
@cryptostrategy2018 · 10,641#12
@wellfedhamster · 87,108#13
@cryptodaily · 84,011#14
@cryptocommonz · 20,904#15
@mmrktmkr · 40,777#16
@RMNVtrade · 17,883#17
@bitcoinadept · 22,905#18
@BazaBitcoin · 14,910#19
@dnevniki_crypto · 32,674#20
@richdeenews · 21,320#21
@HodlerStrategy · 4,898#22
@trade_by_booba · 49,763#23
@drops_daily · 20,845#24
@fantastictraderru · 9,174#25
@FOMOHOMO · 26,591#26
@profaltov · 27,185#27
@cryptobull_club · 17,025#28
@don_invest · 37,479#29
@tradertrend · 60,113#30
@slezisatoshi · 121,883#31
@ikigaimain · 97,450#32
@Coin_Post · 283,935#33
@maloletoffcrypto · 44,852#34
@satoshinews · 29,546#35
@invest_zonaa · 853,003#36
@kopeechkav · 54,762#37
@CryptoFamilyPublic · 28,974#38
@Defiscamcheck · 48,150#39
@forklog · 101,445#40
@andryuninthelegend · 18,480#41
@gen_m · 67,111#42
@SANCHO_DT · 65,963#43
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 48,410#44
@evans_crypto · 53,291#45
@web3ru · 11,923#46
@muhtovinvest · 17,440#47
@walt_news_cis · 1,087,288#48
@prosto_kripto · 9,860#49
@blockchaingerman · 32,304#50
@P4M_channel · 31,721#51
@CRYPTUS_MEDIA · 69,772#52
@richdi · 43,013#53
@GoTrade_Telegram · 19,568#54
@BogdanGdeX · 25,502#55
@idoresearch · 55,972#56
@cryptonarnianews · 19,502#57
@invsignals · 644#58
@CoinMetrika · 34,383#59
@FrontManChannel · 14,827#60
@DeCenter · 1,653,695#61
@AlexRich2018 · 43,184#62
@icodrops_sergey · 42,362#63
@doubletop · 70,079#64
@mihaylets_pro · 11,046#65
@polunintrade7 · 488,472#66
@professorklinkov · 77,867#67
@VasyaBTC · 6,260#68
@disbalans1 · 2,964#69
@coinnewsru · 24,773#70
@vectrumcrypto · 18,959#71
@bankrollo · 461,756#72
@mcoin4 · 11,531#73
@pshava7 · 14,974#74
@arsenamatuni · 12,062#75
@RBCCrypto · 131,959#76
@dakacrypto · 9,987#77
@cryptoantonyy · 8,408#78
@fackblock · 25,073#79
@crypto_solyanka · 48,255#80
@dogs · 6,466,181#81
@blumcrypto · 12,859,271#82
@notcoin · 7,885,777#83
@hotonnear · 4,315,772#84
@asupersharij · 1,735,583#85
@yurasumy · 2,664,959#86
@truexanewsua · 3,168,865#87
@vanek_nikolaev · 2,581,695#88
@BinanceLiquidations · 176,297#89
@banksta · 439,713#90
@teamtrade618 · 44,705#91
@nevzorovtv · 1,002,766#92
@insiderukr · 2,154,560#93
@hamaha_cryptodaytrading · 33,510#94
@toncoin_rus · 509,727#95
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@alievtrade · 19,455
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 September 2026
@bitcoinadept · 22,905
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 September 2026
@QPROtrading · 23,788
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
@mmrktmkr · 40,777
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 August 2026
@trade_by_booba · 49,763
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@wellfedhamster · 87,108
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
@cryptocommonz · 20,904
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 September 2026
@yivashchenko · 28,258
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
@dnevniki_crypto · 32,674
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
@razinvestor · 41,187
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
@BMonarch_official · 42,973
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
@richdeenews · 21,320
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 September 2026
@pifagortrade · 84,622
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
@piftwit · 25,479
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
@profaltov · 27,185
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
@trend_gen · 54,704
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
@falconinvestors · 83,162
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
@crypto_hd · 131,750
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
@markettwits · 340,857
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
@turtles_way · 30,459
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
@trade_soul · 71,570
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
@igorcryptotrader · 30,110
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
@sanyaizdagestana · 31,264
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
@buff_10 · 59,380
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 224 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mr Mozart” (@mr_mozart), 127,319 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mr_mozart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.