Cryptorg.exchange https://cryptorg.net/?ref=92225
Маркет шок @market_shock @market_shock_bybit
VISA Crypto CARD+обмен руб/usdt https://t.me/Ctg_money_bot?start=286444466
Идеи в канале не являются инвест рекомендацией
Связь,реклама @andrey_smcapital
Created
25 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -563. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,108–27,839 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 03:00
27,192
-27
16 Sept 2026, 15:39
27,219
-14
14 Sept 2026, 17:57
27,233
-21
13 Sept 2026, 02:41
27,254
-20
11 Sept 2026, 06:17
27,274
-22
8 Sept 2026, 12:56
27,296
-54
5 Sept 2026, 09:35
27,350
-22
3 Sept 2026, 10:19
27,372
-18
2 Sept 2026, 04:16
27,390
-12
1 Sept 2026, 07:25
27,402
-11
31 Aug 2026, 07:05
27,413
-17
30 Aug 2026, 10:04
27,430
-11
29 Aug 2026, 09:37
27,441
-17
28 Aug 2026, 06:13
27,458
-10
27 Aug 2026, 09:02
27,468
-19
26 Aug 2026, 10:07
27,487
-18
25 Aug 2026, 07:23
27,505
-5
24 Aug 2026, 04:14
27,510
-22
22 Aug 2026, 15:34
27,532
-20
21 Aug 2026, 06:06
27,552
first reading
Engagement
112 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.90%
avg views ÷ 27,192 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,690
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 112 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
112 (29 July 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
137,307
Reactions total
1,454
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Sept 2026, 05:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈11,200
Videos
≈784
Links
≈3,230
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
3,714 reactions across 112 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,673
45.0%
🔥
704
19.0%
❤
436
11.7%
custom 5231005931550030290
414
11.1%
🐳
411
11.1%
🤔
34
0.915%
🎄
20
0.539%
👻
16
0.431%
👏
6
0.162%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 112 of the 112 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,714 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 112 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 112 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FOMOHOMO. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 112 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Visa потребовала банки не начислять кэшбэк и бонусы за покупку мемкоинов
Платежная компания Visa потребовала от партнеров прекратить использовать код для цифрового контента при обработке операций по покупке мемкоинов с помощью банковских карт.
Ранее пользователи могли приобретать токены через карты Visa и Mastercard, подключенные к Apple Pay или Google Pay, без дополнительной проверки личности. При проведении плате…
BTC
Аномальные ФОМО зоны на сегодня. Шорт сигналы ещё не отработали, ещё и облако сменилось на бычье, а цена ушла выше. Пока что ждём дальнейшую реакцию цен вниз, с новым пробоем облака и сменой на медвежье. Конфликт на Ближнем Востоке никак не влияет на рынок, и он уходит дальше вверх, ждём другой неожиданной новости.
Академия, торговые системы fomotema.com
Майкл Сейлор назвал способ обойтись без законопроекта CLARITY
Глава совета директоров Strategy и крупнейший корпоративный держатель биткоинов Майкл Сейлор заявил, что отклонение криптовалютного законопроекта CLARITY в Сенате США не стоит расценивать как серьезную угрозу для индустрии цифровых активов.
По мнению предпринимателя, крипторынок сможет эффективнее развиваться в условиях регулирования со стороны Комиссии …
BTC
Аномальные ФОМО зоны на сегодня. Пошла отработка накопившихся шорт сигналов. Облако пробили вниз и теперь ожидаем смену облака на медвежье, а там уход в перепроданность и появления сигналов.
Академия, торговые системы fomotema.com
Глава Morgan Creek Capital назвал справедливую цену биткоина
Генеральный директор инвестиционной компании Morgan Creek Capital Марк Юско (Mark Yusko) оценил справедливую стоимость биткоина в $105 000. По его словам, такой уровень соответствует оценке криптовалюты на основе закона Меткалфа.
Закон Меткалфа, сформулированный интернет-предпринимателем Робертом Меткалфом (Robert Metcalfe), предполагает, что ценность сет…
BTC
Аномальные ФОМО зоны на сегодня. Лонг сигнал отработал четко. Шорт сигналов пока что нет. Биткоин может ещё зайти в перекупленность, где будем ждать шорт сигналов. И наблюдаем за облаком, пробой которого и затем смена на медвежье, даст возможность для ухода в перепроданность.
Академия, торговые системы fomotema.com
Биржевые биткоин-фонды испытали крупнейший с июня отток капитала
Американские спотовые биткоин-ETF во вторник, 15 сентября, зафиксировали рекордный с 24 июня отток средств — инвесторы вывели из фондов $450,4 млн. Об этом свидетельствуют данные трекера Bitcoin ETF издания Decrypt.
Наибольший объем средств потерял Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) компании Fidelity — отток составил $214,8 млн. Из iShares Bitco…
BTC
Аномальные ФОМО зоны на сегодня. Шорт сигналы отработали четко, после пробоя бычьего облака и смены на медвежье. Сейчас в перепроданности уже начали появляться сигналы на Лонг, поэтому можно присмотреться к лонгу до перекупленности, после пробоя медвежьего облака.
Академия, торговые системы fomotema.com
После провала законопроекта CLARITY американские регуляторы готовят свои правила для крипторынка
Финансовые регуляторы США намерены активизировать работу над новыми правилами для криптоиндустрии после того, как Сенат не поддержал законопроект CLARITY. По оценке аналитиков Bernstein, таким образом ведомства постараются компенсировать время, которое было потрачено на обсуждение и согласование документа.
Законопроект …
BTC
Аномальные ФОМО зоны на сегодня. Шорт сигналы появились и теперь ожидаем пробоя бычьего облака вниз и смены на медвежье облако, чтобы рынок ушел в перепроданность. Выходные могут быть без особой волатильности, поэтому можно ожидать движение не раньше вечера воскресенья.
Академия, торговые системы fomotema.com
Биткоин-рынок потерял главную причину расти — Winterminute
За последнюю неделю инвесторы вывели из биржевых фондов, ориентированных на биткоин, около $463 млн. Для сравнения, в конце июня, когда стоимость первой криптовалюты опускалась ниже $60 000, отток достигал примерно $1,8 млрд. На изменение динамики обратили внимание аналитики Wintermute.
По мнению экспертов компании, приток капитала в спотовые BTC-ETF остава…
BTC
Аномальные ФОМО зоны на сегодня. Хорошо отрабатывает Лонг сигнал, после смены облака на бычье. Сейчас следим за перекупленностью и появлением новых сигналов именно из этой зоны.
Академия, торговые системы fomotema.com
👍16🔥10custom 52310059315500302907❤3🐳2
Showing the 12 most recent of 112 posts we hold for @FOMOHOMO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@FOMOHOMO named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@maximvello named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
АНДРЕЙ ЯДРИНЦЕВ | TURTLE WAY 🐢 @turtles_way · 30,685 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
Crypto ЛОПАТА @crypto_lopata_off · 117,746 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
Миша Жуховицкий @juhovitskiy · 41,048 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
Мысли Вайкоффа @wyckoffcompany · 68,647 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
Менделеевщина! @mendeleevshina · 23,888 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
CRYPTO SEKTA | Биткоин и криптовалюта @crypto_sekta · 145,753 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
Павел Казанцев | О Крипте @cryptokazancev · 39,785 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
Инвестиции с Никитой Куценко @kutsenko_invest · 28,315 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 September 2026
Илья Соловей @teamtrade618 · 45,750 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
Трейдинг в благости - Игорь Павленко @blagotrading · 71,834 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
top traders desk @toptraders0x · 26,040 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Mr Mozart @mr_mozart · 129,572 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
РБК Крипто @RBCCrypto · 132,477 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
CryptoPizza News @cryptopizza_news · 27,760 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
Кошелек с Биткоинами | Алексей Чечукевич @wallet_with_bitcoins · 86,975 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 August 2026
Крипто сливы @otdyshiprocrypto · 22,760 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
SoloTrade — Команда Трейдеров @solotradingss · 25,666 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 September 2026
Trade by Booba @trade_by_booba · 50,429 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Музыка из рилс @MUSIC_RILS · 135,744 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
КИТЫ Инвестиций🐋 @kitinvest · 28,665 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
Maloletoff | Crypto-Angel @maloletoffcrypto · 45,665 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
🤯Что происходит? @chto_pro1shodit · 147,165 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 August 2026
Профессор Клинков @professorklinkov · 80,037 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
NEW TREND MELEGA TEAM 🇲🇽 LOVE @MELEGATEAM · 109,177 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FOMOHOMO” (@FOMOHOMO), 27,192 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FOMOHOMO.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.