Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Goldy Folder🏂

Channel

Goldy Folder🏂

@GOLDY_FOLDER

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,331subscribers

-203 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001834172810
TypeChannel
Username@GOLDY_FOLDER
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GOLDY_FOLDER

Growth

8,3318,5348,432.56 August 2026 — 8,534 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,534 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,527 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,513 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,499 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,472 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,456 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,438 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,422 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,406 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,384 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,362 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,331 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 32 days, net -203. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,301–8,564 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 09:198,331-31
2 Sept 2026, 22:408,362-22
30 Aug 2026, 17:078,384-22
27 Aug 2026, 18:148,406-16
25 Aug 2026, 02:178,422-16
22 Aug 2026, 02:088,438-18
18 Aug 2026, 20:268,456-16
15 Aug 2026, 18:068,472-27
12 Aug 2026, 15:548,499-14
9 Aug 2026, 22:128,513-14
7 Aug 2026, 00:568,527-7
6 Aug 2026, 10:188,534no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:038,534first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 2 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.74%
avg views ÷ 8,331 subscribers
Avg views / post
561
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held23 (2 June 202626 August 2026)
Views total1,684
Reactions total20
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

124 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4032.3%
👍2621.0%
❤‍🔥1612.9%
1411.3%
😁86.45%
64.84%
🐳32.42%
👌32.42%
👏32.42%
💯32.42%
🫡21.61%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 23 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GOLDY_FOLDER. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 June 2026 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC529 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Полторы недели без спорта - началась ломка. Буквально не вылезаю из-за компа, гоняю рисерчи целыми днями. Надо бы исправить. В прошлый раз работал по груше без перчаток. Такие тренировки по-своему отрезвляют: после полутора часов руки дня три смахивают на руки Микки-Мауса. Но спорт дает второе дыхание - если раньше в сутках был один рабочий день, то теперь целых два. Что успел за это время: - Терминал под арбитраж

👍43💯2🔥2

Signed Daniel Nikulin

13 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC641 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Разобрал, как стадия жизни продукта и стадия рынка вместе определяют, какие каналы вообще имеет смысл трогать - от тёплых интро на старте до paid ads на масштабе, с реальными кейсами и цифрами из своего опыта. Если будет запрос - на днях могу опубликовать ру-версию. Полный текст — в Twitter 👇 https://x.com/Goldy_Miner/status/2087999740403494994?s=20 P.S. Многие из этих инструментов слабо работают на рынках с высо

🔥3💯1

Signed Daniel Nikulin

30 Jul 2026, 19:14 UTC≈1,200 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Давно меня не было в вашем интернет-пространстве. Расскажу, что происходит. Раньше на доставку апдейта уходило три недели. Теперь - два-три дня. Последние пару недель прошли в бешеном темпе: разработка, звонки, разработка, звонки, сон, тренировки. Но дело не в темпе, а в том, что сломался привычный рабочий режим - и это к лучшему. Мы с Денисом, нашим проджектом, начали сами формировать фичи и запускать их на уровн

64🐳3🔥2

Signed Daniel Nikulin

30 Jul 2026, 08:09 UTC≈1,060 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥2

Signed Daniel Nikulin

15 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Один из членов борта AURA - Тобиас - проводит сессию вместе с Hubble. Планирую зайти послушать. Сессии с Тобиасом - одни из продуктивных моментов в моей работе. С их командой мы многое пересобираем и переосмысляем, и это заметно помогает нам становиться сильнее. Начало через 15 минут https://luma.com/zt8no9n7

Signed Daniel Nikulin

13 Jul 2026, 11:32 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 28 August 2026

На прошлой неделе выкатил ресёрч по структуре рынка и открыл закрытую группу вокруг терминала. Эта неделя - про доводку: начинаю собирать фидбэк от первых, кто зашёл, и правлю то, что в реальном использовании оказалось неудобным. Всем, кто проявил интерес: сегодня-завтра напишу лично с инструкцией по доступу. Отдельное наблюдение: рынок сейчас скучный для направленной торговли. Но именно в такие периоды видно, кто

Signed Daniel Nikulin

10 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC≈1,110 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Почему в этом рынке я смотрю на фандинг, а не на «поймать дно». Рынок сейчас вязкий: волатильно, но без тренда. Позиционирование расслоено - толпа с плечами набивается то в лонг, то в шорт, настроение скачет. Направленная торговля в таком превращается в мясорубку: купил «дно» = получил второе и третье в подарок. Ложные развороты стоят дорого. Но у этой вязкости есть обратная сторона. Когда толпа мечется, фандинг раз

👍5👌3🔥3

Signed Daniel Nikulin

10 Jul 2026, 09:51 UTC≈1,010 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаем стричь фандинги Поделюсь реальными данными по фонду. Стратегия в live 4+ месяца. Результат: +14.7% за период (~4.2 месяца). В годовом выражении ~47% геометрически. Худшая неделя за всё время - −1.7%, отрицательных недель три из двадцати. Круто, что просадка ни разу не вышла за пару процентов. Поймать рост можно случайно. Держать риск на дистанции - нет. Прошлые результаты не гарантируют будущих. Это не

🔥5

Signed Daniel Nikulin

10 Jul 2026, 08:31 UTC978 views5 reactions8 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Расскажу, куда двигаюсь и почему. Что не отпускает: продукт сегодня собирается за неделю, а всё вокруг него - рейз, GTM, масштабирование - всё ещё ползёт кварталами (про финтех и крипту). Рынок вялый, все на паузе, сделки тянутся. А вместе с этим ожиданием приходится вливать свое время и деньги, каждый день стоит денег Вместо того чтобы ждать, хочу проверить обратную гипотезу: а если весь цикл после MVP тоже гнать

❤‍🔥5

Signed Daniel Nikulin

9 Jul 2026, 19:46 UTC935 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

На неделе писал про неэффективность рынка с двух сторон. Одна - LVR, её платишь как LP. Вторая - funding rate. Проблема с funding всегда была не в идее, а в инструментах. Ставки живут на десятке площадок, постоянно разъезжаются, а чтобы с этим работать - надо мониторить всё сразу и быстро исполнять. Разрозненно это неудобно до боли. Собрал под это терминал. В одном месте - мониторинг funding по площадкам и исполнени

🔥6

Signed Daniel Nikulin

8 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC940 viewsread 28 August 2026

Вчера выложили первый ресёрч - про то, вытеснят ли oracle-anchored PMM концентрированную ликвидность. Добавлю то, что в тред не влезло. APR у LP-позиции почти ничего не говорит сам по себе. Позиция может показывать красивый APR и при этом проигрывать простому холду двух токенов - потому что APR не учитывает LVR. А именно LVR решает, заработал ты реально или только красиво отчитался. Пассивный CLMM с этим не делает

Signed Daniel Nikulin

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @GOLDY_FOLDER. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Кошелек с Биткоинами | Алексей Чечукевич
@wallet_with_bitcoins · 87,328
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 August 2026
پزشک زناشویی
@doktor_zanashoi · 161,366
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Goldy Folder🏂” (@GOLDY_FOLDER), 8,331 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GOLDY_FOLDER.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.