❗️Выведите на всякий cash с MEXC Минфин США ввел санкции против MEXC 😨

Channel
001k.Trade
@trade001k
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
105,051subscribers
-3,812 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001277372114 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trade001k |
| Description | Крипта, трейдинг, фондовый рынок. ▶️ Сотрудничество: @manager_1k ℹ️ https://www.a01k.io/ Рекламу другим тг каналам не продаем. Готовы сотрудничать только с крипто проектами. |
| Created | 27 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trade001k |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:07 | 105,051 | -71 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:04 | 105,122 | -39 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:30 | 105,161 | -82 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 17:01 | 105,243 | -72 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:45 | 105,315 | -37 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:06 | 105,352 | -42 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 15:55 | 105,394 | -29 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 18:08 | 105,423 | +7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:15 | 105,416 | -20 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 105,436 | -47 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:19 | 105,483 | -55 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:37 | 105,538 | -30 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:10 | 105,568 | -31 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:58 | 105,599 | -34 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 00:34 | 105,633 | -55 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:20 | 105,688 | -55 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:26 | 105,743 | -64 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:27 | 105,807 | -70 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:31 | 105,877 | -66 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:00 | 105,943 | first reading |
Engagement
493 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 188 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.1%
- avg views ÷ 105,051 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 12,700
- 157 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 158
- of 493 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 493 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,988,990 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 04:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈11,100
- Videos
- ≈170
- Links
- ≈3,680
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 25s
- Average length
- 53s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 21 of 158 posts held from the last 30 days (13.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
1в1 не обещаем но технически пока всё отрабатывает 🧃
После вчерашнего пролива резко вырос OI по лонгам, которые продолжают налипать. поэтому осторожно: есть риск, что их ликвидации станут топливом для продолжения снижения.
👀 BTC < $75k — заодно прокололи нашу поддержку, которую держали с сентября. Фонда и AI-сектор после вчерашнего обвала открылись пока с отскоком.
Ищете, где припарковать холдерскую крипту под хороший %? Напоминаем: в 001k.bot есть Earn — до 8,1% годовых на USDT. BTC и ETH до 7,55% годовых — одни из лучших условий на рынке. Для примера закинули $5000 → через год $5405. С ETH и BTC принцип тот же. Плюс сам актив за год может неплохо добавить в цене. Дальше математику прикидывайте на вашу сумму. Но начать можно и с $50. Выбираете сумму и срок, заранее видите…
💰 Abraxas Capital сделали первые фиксы своего шорт-хеджа (20% от позы) на текущем проливе. фонд всё ещё держит крупный хедж на $1,2 млрд с PnL в $353 млн.
Черный лебедь на фонде. Почему? Давайте разбираться. Все знают, что проблемы AI-сектора копились не первый месяц, но финальным триггером стали мидтермы и полный контроль демократов над Конгрессом. 1. Демократы топят за моратории на новые дата-центры, отмену налоговых льгот и ужесточение требований к потреблению энергии и воды. Вчера они подтвердили, что готовят целый пакет законов по регулированию AI-индустрии. 2.…
Уорш намекал, но большинство даже не обратили внимание 🧠 ⚪️SP500: -5% ⚪️Nasdaq: -6% ⚪️фонда: -$3 трлн капы за сессию. намёков и предпосылок было много: мы о них писали и записывали кучу видео. То, что сегодня произошло — примерно такого и ждали, и скорее всего это ещё не конец. На самом деле для крипты сейчас лучший тайминг для коррекции фонды.
ЧТО ПОКУПАЕМ НА КОРРЕКЦИИ? P.S. Видео записали как раз за пару часов перед текущим проливом. 📱 В нём Тёма разобрал, чего ждать после выборов, почему начал откупать крипту и какие активы выбрал. Прошёлся по рынку, показал изменения в портфеле и поделился планами на случай, если пойдём ещё ниже (Спойлер: пошли). А также про кейс, ради которого пришлось срочно собирать весь свободный кэш 👇🏻 https://youtu.be/e54UZQq…
🤬 S&P500 -3% — сильнейшее дневное падение с апреля 2025 года.
$500 млн ликвидаций лонгов за час 😨 BTC уже < $77k
🩸👀 Как и говорили, проблемы никуда не делись. Фонда опять летит вниз, особенно AI-сектор. за час — минус $1 трлн капитализации. Крипта летит следом. ⚪️BTC < $78k ⚪️Micron -10% ⚪️NVIDIA -5.27% ⚪️AMD -12.81% ⚪️SanDisk -13.67%
Showing the 12 most recent of 493 posts we hold for @trade001k. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@divancriptoinvest · 74 postsChainOps🔗
@ChainOps · 2292 posts100KG
@I00kggem · 7582 postsХрам Холдеров
@UnitHX · 282 postsa01k.Crypto
@a01k_crypto · 30,3292 postsПредел риска
@profit_vsegda · 212 postsТема Ультра 🚸
@trade_ultra · 30,7022 postsCRYPTO GAMERS
@CoinlistMoreFun · 541 post🐳Cryga |Крипто Новини 🇺🇦
@Cryga_ua · 241 postCRYPTIKON
@Crypticon1 · 2481 postDeeCryptos
@DeeCryptos · 121 postHoldKeeper
@HoldKeeper · 3571 postLeon_crypto_channel
@Leonechannel · 131 postParadoxalnyi
@Paradoxalnyii · 511 postApachiCryptoHub
@TheCryptoHubUA · 81 postTime Of Crypto News
@TimeOfCryptoNews · 61 postADEL AGREGATOR
@adel_aggregator · 2,9631 postBinarius | Инвестиции
@binariusinv · 21 postCryptoFadure
@cryptofadure · 11 postСообщество хомяков
@cryptohamsters07 · 61 postCryptoidea
@cryptoidea17 · 11 postCrypto Идеи
@cryptoidea_013 · 11 postCryptoНострадамус
@cryptonostradamus1 · 15,2721 postCRYPTO 🐋
@cryptovaluata · 261 postКриптомат
@crypvo · 21 postDEPOSIT TOKEN
@deposit_community · 5161 postС 5$ до 1000$ на крипте 👀
@five_to1000real_quick · 91 postАкції та роздачі в крипті
@freecashintg · 71 postTelegram Premium ️
@freetgpremtg · 2031 post𝕂𝕒𝕫𝕒𝕙𝕋𝕆ℕ
@kazahTON · 61 post09k trade
@oooninek · 51 postржавая комната
@rzhaviyroom · 111 postСигналы отправка
@sscvdsvwefd · 21 postSybilys щитпост
@sybilys_crypto · 431 postvibe trading [intraday]
@vibe_intraday · 6,3851 postZAVOD FORWARD
@zavod_forward · 691 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Insider_krypto · 54,4488 postsКриптоТапок
@crypto_tappok · 80,1513 postsfree arty private by RND
@freeartybyrnd · 3553 postsMIRRORS by RND
@mirrorsbyrnd · 1,6753 postsКрипта скам?!
@cryptascam1 · 10,6932 postsCrypto GO 🚀🔥
@cryptogo2024 · 12 postsDivan Invest📈
@divancriptoinvest · 72 postsПрогаю крипту
@python_web3 · 3,7672 postsМирор 888
@amamama8b · 51 postChief meme office 👽
@chiefmemeoffice · 111 postCISmirror
@cismirror · 8081 postNo Worries! 🇺🇦
@crypto_noworries · 1,8791 postDoctorDividend
@DoctorDivivdend · 11 postMirrors 888
@jst_rmbr8888 · 1,1941 postOX!GEN ADS DAO
@oxigendao · 4241 postPENGU MIRROR — saving your money
@pengumirror · 6071 postShadowMirror
@shadowmirror · 211 postST AGGREGATOR
@st_aggregator · 2411 postTop Drops|Join
@topdrops1 · 121 postWenAltseason CIS
@wenmemeszn · 1,5741 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@trading_001k · 28,10981 postsГолос Альфы
@golos_alpha · 13,0814 postsFX Space [a01k]
@fxspacea01k · 3,3803 postsa01k.Crypto
@a01k_crypto · 30,3291 postКумцы
@cumshot14881488 · 26,9881 postSavelew
@saveleww · 751 postТюряга
@true_prison_bot · 189,5371 postНовости Walt (ранее Кошелёк)
@walt_news_cis · 1,087,5271 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@trade_ultra · 30,702#1
@a01k_crypto · 30,329#2
@trading_001k · 28,109#3
@cryptomannnisnotacult · 37,776#4
@crypto_rostik · 117,228#5
@crypto_hd · 131,697#6
@DnevnikCapitanika · 15,487#7
@incrypted · 106,978#8
@golos_alpha · 13,081#9
@doubletop · 70,123#10
@markettwits · 340,752#11
@okcrypta1 · 41,291#12
@Coin_Post · 284,071#13
@invest_zonaa · 853,003#14
@hexdrunker_reflections · 31,250#15
@cryptoattack24 · 55,203#16
@CryptologyKey · 46,963#17
@cryptodaily · 84,052#18
@maloletoffcrypto · 44,852#19
@Insider_krypto · 54,448#20
@niktoneznaetx · 15,002#21
@slezisatoshi · 121,921#22
@elrmcf_free · 11,654#23
@falconinvestors · 82,974#24
@TumoBogCrypto · 35,626#25
@Defiscamcheck · 48,170#26
@korolbtc · 17,729#27
@forklog · 101,468#28
@andryuninthelegend · 18,480#29
@TVS_TEAM · 37,345#30
@savagetraderrrvlc · 8,671#31
@dshwchkfxx · 17,456#32
@bulka_crypto · 51,793#33
@mr_mozart · 127,319#34
@cryptokitta · 33,482#35
@cryptomannnacademy · 11,998#36
@walt_news_cis · 1,087,527#37
@idoresearch · 56,000#38
@pifagortrade · 84,617#39
@viewoflazarus · 6,252#40
@s_sensy_channel · 2#41
@tradertrend · 60,102#42
@mirrorreflectionhub · 7,296#43
@bitcoin_ua_telegram · 31,640#44
@M1keMoney · 5,779#45
@slavik_investor · 24,359#46
@bondcryptotrade · 7,374#47
@evans_crypto · 53,305#48
@SANCHO_DT · 65,963#49
@kosmonavtuss · 8,189#50
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 48,435#51
@blumcrypto · 12,887,019#52
@truexanewsua · 3,168,865#53
@oko_ua · 670#54
@notcoin · 7,888,004#55
@insiderukr · 2,156,553#56
@sol_TOP · 40,033#57
@OGoMono · 637,091#58
@oko18_ukr · 315,666#59
@BinanceLiquidations · 176,387#60
@selo_crypto · 39,318#61
@tstamarkets_ua · 20,732#62
@vlad_gap · 7,306#63
@batalionmonako · 712#64
@jolybells · 357,458#65
@voynareal · 1,543,218#66
@u_now · 1,403,662#67
@nexta_live · 767,026#68
@mellstroybonus · 332,315#69
@cultofnot · 981,003#70
@UaOnlii · 1,541,010#71
@vert2026 · 114,092#72
@deepstateua · 752,467#73
@k_dvizh · 471,494#74
@superiorcryptoo · 14,495#75
@jolynews · 206,639#76
@victorr_2top · 8,200#77
@lachentyt · 1,581,031#78
@dogs · 6,466,181#79
@vanek_nikolaev · 2,582,395#80
@ukrbavovna · 802,668#81
@newsgrpua · 117,867#82
@war_monitor · 959,985#83
@kievreal1 · 1,554,416#84
@pandoras_box_ua · 157,918#85
@kievinfo_kyiv · 1,259,700#86
@xydessa · 945,523#87
@stanislav_osman · 287,191#88
@kpszsu · 940,735#89
@odessa_infonews · 992,061#90
@peregluppilovka · 4,726#91
@hyevuy_dnepr · 521,103#92
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@trading_001k · 28,109
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
@a01k_crypto · 30,329
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
@hexdrunker_reflections · 31,250
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
@bitcoin_ua_telegram · 31,640
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 September 2026
@TumoBogCrypto · 35,626
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 1 September 2026
@okcrypta1 · 41,291
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
@ccVlad_TAM · 56,432
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@DekiGang · 39,309
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
@maloletoffcrypto · 44,852
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
@cryptotruexa · 68,286
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
@trademansi0n · 21,951
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
@ua_invest · 28,075
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 September 2026
@Insider_krypto · 54,448
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
@incrypted · 106,978
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
@bulka_crypto · 51,793
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
@doubletop · 70,123
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
@crypto_azam · 126,191
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
@cooking787 · 21,043
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 September 2026
@nftup · 28,518
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
@musicud21 · 36,195
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 1 September 2026
@evans_crypto · 53,305
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
@cryptodaily · 84,052
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
@crypto_rostik · 117,228
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
@Coin_Post · 284,071
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 384 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“001k.Trade” (@trade001k), 105,051 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trade001k.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.