И не забудьте про наш завтрашний стрим по скальпингу! В 19:00 по Киеву — в открытом формате на YouTube. Просто заранее спланируйте своё время. Поговорим о том: —какие результаты сегодня даёт скальпинг —почему он пережил столько фаз рынка и до сих пор работает —где команда находит возможности сейчас —реальные кейсы и сделки наших трейдеров Также ответим на ваши вопросы и разыграем среди участников стрима 1 premium-…

Channel
001k.Trade
@trade001k
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
107,044subscribers
-1,819 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001277372114 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trade001k |
| Description | Крипта, трейдинг, фондовый рынок. ▶️ Сотрудничество: @crypto_a01k ℹ️ https://www.a01k.io/ Рекламу другим тг каналам не продаем. Готовы сотрудничать только с крипто проектами. |
| Created | 27 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trade001k |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 107,044 | -105 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 107,149 | -72 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 107,221 | -56 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:35 | 107,277 | -100 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 107,377 | -157 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 107,534 | -94 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 107,628 | -65 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:08 | 107,693 | -64 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:54 | 107,757 | -63 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 107,820 | -45 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 107,865 | -26 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 107,891 | -41 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 107,932 | -40 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 107,972 | -47 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 108,019 | -44 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 108,063 | -42 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 108,105 | -87 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 108,192 | -51 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 108,243 | -35 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 108,278 | first reading |
Engagement
259 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.1%
- avg views ÷ 107,044 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 11,800
- 160 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 163
- of 259 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 259 (4 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,893,970 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 21:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈10,900
- Videos
- ≈169
- Links
- ≈3,580
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3m 26s
- Average length
- 52s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
ну что, кто в кампус? последние 15 заявок, и закрываем. https://telegram.me/a01k_polls_bot/polls?startapp=988u8yz2
Покажи Еве Элфи свой PnL Арбитражники на месте? Да-да, те самые, кто льёт трафик. У вас тут есть возможность не только заработать на своих объёмах, но и побороться за BMW M3, M4 и M5. Партнерка aggent сейчас проводит M RACE — вы льёте трафик через них, набираете M-Points за свой revenue и можете выиграть тачку. А со своей стороны aggent помогут с запусками, офферами, масштабированием трафика и кучу других полезны…
👀 CME Group расширит линейку криптодеривативов, добавив фьючи на UNI и BCH
Стриму с легендой быть! 👍 В прошлый раз из-за личных причин стрим пришлось перенести, но сегодня в 18:00 по Киеву проведём его в канале «ГОЛОС АЛЬФЫ» Напомним, речь про участника Альфы, который вынес мету на Robinhood с PNL $1M+ на $CASHCAT и $INDEX. Будет реально эксклюзивный контент и много полезной инфы как для новичков, так и для опытных ребят — всех ждём!
🎩 Начало бычки? BTC = $86k — майский хай на $82.9k обновлён. И графически ситуация начинает меняться. С октября 2025 у нас был четкий нисходящий тренд: каждый отскок заканчивался формированием более низкого хая. Но сейчас мы впервые сломали эту структуру и обновили предыдущий хай. И самое интересное — именно такой слом структуры исторически и отмечал завершение медвежьих циклов. То есть чисто по графику сейчас мы…
001k.Trade pinned «А может, большой стрим в среду по скальпингу? 👀 Придём всей командой, разберём скальпинг, рынок, ваши вопросы, поторгуем/пообщаемся — короче, сделаем нормальный большой стрим. 🕹️ Ну и пользуясь моментом, напоминаем: сегодня последние сутки, когда открыта…»
А может, большой стрим в среду по скальпингу? 👀 Придём всей командой, разберём скальпинг, рынок, ваши вопросы, поторгуем/пообщаемся — короче, сделаем нормальный большой стрим. 🕹️ Ну и пользуясь моментом, напоминаем: сегодня последние сутки, когда открыта форма на новый поток Campus. Рынок снова нормально так ожил, настроение у всех явно стало получше. И если последние месяцы вы сидели в сомнениях из-за рынка — дум…
Бычка наступает тогда, когда ее никто не ждет?
Тут все актуально до 10 октября. VIP начисляется 24 часа после регистрации. Если нет еще аккаунта — смарт сделать. Рынок активный, с вип приятно торговать и легко сделать объем, за который вы уже можете получить free USDT на баланс (до 10к$ можно получить, не байт). И это не ваучер на комсу, а реальный деп, на который можно торговать. как будто на таком рынке это имба, такие условия мало кто дает
Во как 👀
🔥BTC > $84k + IPO Polymarket от Binance? По рынку, думаем, многие видят, что несется. Обещали осенний движ — получайте. Все выходные прошли в активном ворке, чего только стоят сетапы по AKE, а там еще пачка токенов стреляла. По битку как и говорили пришли к мейн таргету и сняли хаи на 83k, дальше наблюдаем. Ну и не можем пройти мимо кампании Pre-Access на Binance Wallet токена $pPOLY — по сути, pre-IPO токена Pol…
Showing the 12 most recent of 259 posts we hold for @trade001k. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@divancriptoinvest · 74 postsChainOps🔗
@ChainOps · 2332 posts100KG
@I00kggem · 7732 postsХрам Холдеров
@UnitHX · 302 postsПредел риска
@profit_vsegda · 212 postsCRYPTO GAMERS
@CoinlistMoreFun · 541 post🐳Cryga |Крипто Новини 🇺🇦
@Cryga_ua · 241 postCRYPTIKON
@Crypticon1 · 2511 postDeeCryptos
@DeeCryptos · 121 postHoldKeeper
@HoldKeeper · 3571 postLeon_crypto_channel
@Leonechannel · 131 postParadoxalnyi
@Paradoxalnyii · 361 postApachiCryptoHub
@TheCryptoHubUA · 81 postTime Of Crypto News
@TimeOfCryptoNews · 61 postADEL AGREGATOR
@adel_aggregator · 3,3161 postBinarius | Инвестиции
@binariusinv · 21 postCryptoFadure
@cryptofadure · 11 postСообщество хомяков
@cryptohamsters07 · 61 postCryptoidea
@cryptoidea17 · 11 postCrypto Идеи
@cryptoidea_013 · 11 postCryptoНострадамус
@cryptonostradamus1 · 16,0081 postCRYPTO 🐋
@cryptovaluata · 261 postКриптомат
@crypvo · 21 postDEPOSIT TOKEN
@deposit_community · 5301 postС 5$ до 1000$ на крипте 👀
@five_to1000real_quick · 91 postАкції та роздачі в крипті
@freecashintg · 81 postTelegram Premium ️
@freetgpremtg · 2071 post𝕂𝕒𝕫𝕒𝕙𝕋𝕆ℕ
@kazahTON · 61 post09k trade
@oooninek · 51 postржавая комната
@rzhaviyroom · 111 postСигналы отправка
@sscvdsvwefd · 21 postSybilys щитпост
@sybilys_crypto · 441 postZAVOD FORWARD
@zavod_forward · 701 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@freeartybyrnd · 3693 postsMIRRORS by RND
@mirrorsbyrnd · 1,6133 postsКрипта скам?!
@cryptascam1 · 11,0802 postsCrypto GO 🚀🔥
@cryptogo2024 · 12 postsDivan Invest📈
@divancriptoinvest · 72 postsПрогаю крипту
@python_web3 · 3,8652 postsМирор 888
@amamama8b · 51 postChief meme office 👽
@chiefmemeoffice · 111 postCISmirror
@cismirror · 7741 postNo Worries! 🇺🇦
@crypto_noworries · 1,9281 postDoctorDividend
@DoctorDivivdend · 11 postMirrors 888
@jst_rmbr8888 · 1,2651 postOX!GEN ADS DAO
@oxigendao · 4391 postPENGU MIRROR — saving your money
@pengumirror · 5871 postShadowMirror
@shadowmirror · 211 postST AGGREGATOR
@st_aggregator · 2411 postTop Drops|Join
@topdrops1 · 121 postWenAltseason CIS
@wenmemeszn · 1,6141 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@trade_ultra · 30,561#1
@a01k_crypto · 30,865#2
@trading_001k · 28,525#3
@cryptomannnisnotacult · 38,442#4
@crypto_rostik · 119,051#5
@crypto_hd · 132,434#6
@DnevnikCapitanika · 15,904#7
@incrypted · 108,728#8
@golos_alpha · 13,176#9
@doubletop · 70,952#10
@markettwits · 336,496#11
@okcrypta1 · 41,861#12
@Coin_Post · 291,333#13
@invest_zonaa · 917,113#14
@hexdrunker_reflections · 31,307#15
@cryptoattack24 · 56,173#16
@CryptologyKey · 48,418#17
@cryptodaily · 85,610#18
@maloletoffcrypto · 45,665#19
@Insider_krypto · 53,476#20
@niktoneznaetx · 15,011#21
@slezisatoshi · 124,064#22
@elrmcf_free · 12,046#23
@falconinvestors · 82,295#24
@TumoBogCrypto · 36,528#25
@Defiscamcheck · 48,614#26
@korolbtc · 18,172#27
@forklog · 92,345#28
@andryuninthelegend · 18,509#29
@TVS_TEAM · 37,944#30
@savagetraderrrvlc · 8,817#31
@dshwchkfxx · 18,264#32
@bulka_crypto · 52,844#33
@mr_mozart · 129,572#34
@cryptokitta · 34,231#35
@cryptomannnacademy · 12,243#36
@cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,128,418#37
@idoresearch · 57,589#38
@pifagortrade · 85,453#39
@viewoflazarus · 6,405#40
@s_sensy_channel · 2,939#41
@tradertrend · 60,704#42
@mirrorreflectionhub · 7,441#43
@bitcoin_ua_telegram · 32,223#44
@M1keMoney · 5,837#45
@slavik_investor · 24,783#46
@bondcryptotrade · 6,957#47
@evans_crypto · 54,369#48
@SANCHO_DT · 65,589#49
@kosmonavtuss · 8,384#50
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 49,702#51
@blumcrypto · 14,360,001#52
@truexanewsua · 3,127,306#53
@oko_ua · 1,178,797#54
@notcoin · 8,643,687#55
@insiderukr · 2,183,396#56
@sol_TOP · 39,965#57
@OGoMono · 651,038#58
@oko18_ukr · 309,469#59
@BinanceLiquidations · 180,620#60
@selo_crypto · 40,096#61
@tstamarkets_ua · 20,864#62
@vlad_gap · 7,486#63
@batalionmonako · 710,211#64
@jolybells · 358,951#65
@voynareal · 1,522,485#66
@u_now · 1,401,336#67
@nexta_live · 767,216#68
@mellstroybonus · 327,063#69
@cultofnot · 1,027,411#70
@UaOnlii · 1,575,421#71
@vert2026 · 117,714#72
@deepstateua · 761,011#73
@k_dvizh · 465,905#74
@superiorcryptoo · 14,292#75
@jolynews · 208,388#76
@victorr_2top · 8,206#77
@lachentyt · 1,554,565#78
@dogs · 7,065,215#79
@vanek_nikolaev · 2,636,316#80
@ukrbavovna · 701,096#81
@newsgrpua · 118,744#82
@war_monitor · 971,692#83
@kievreal1 · 1,554,012#84
@pandoras_box_ua · 158,995#85
@kievinfo_kyiv · 1,229,237#86
@xydessa · 953,526#87
@stanislav_osman · 289,232#88
@kpszsu · 905,765#89
@odessa_infonews · 990,649#90
@peregluppilovka · 4,862#91
@hyevuy_dnepr · 520,595#92
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@trading_001k · 28,525
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
@a01k_crypto · 30,865
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
@hexdrunker_reflections · 31,307
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
@bitcoin_ua_telegram · 32,223
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 September 2026
@TumoBogCrypto · 36,528
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 1 September 2026
@okcrypta1 · 41,861
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
@ccVlad_TAM · 56,624
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@DekiGang · 40,422
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
@maloletoffcrypto · 45,665
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
@cryptotruexa · 65,598
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
@trademansi0n · 22,490
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
@ua_invest · 27,778
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 September 2026
@Insider_krypto · 53,476
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
@incrypted · 108,728
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
@bulka_crypto · 52,844
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
@doubletop · 70,952
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
@crypto_azam · 133,063
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
@nftup · 29,041
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
@musicud21 · 36,730
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 1 September 2026
@evans_crypto · 54,369
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
@cryptodaily · 85,610
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
@crypto_rostik · 119,051
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
@Coin_Post · 291,333
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
@dimatkachevv · 34,361
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 338 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“001k.Trade” (@trade001k), 107,044 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trade001k.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.