🧪Надеюсь вы не шортили: BTC пробил $79k и вернулся к $78k Новая пачка китовых ордеров на продажу стоит на $79,5k-$80k. 💸Опять Крипта

Channel
Опять Крипта
@okcrypta1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
42,230subscribers
-236 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001560962709 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @okcrypta1 |
| Description | Опять крипта? Да, Опять Крипта! ⚡️Все самое важное из мира криптовалют ⚡️Новости, факты, мнения ⚡️Эксклюзивы и плюшки ⚡️24/7 только свежий контент ▪️По вопросам рекламы: @okcrypta_admin |
| Created | 10 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/okcrypta1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 42,230 | -12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:41 | 42,242 | -27 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 42,269 | -17 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 42,286 | -14 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 42,300 | -11 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 42,311 | -26 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 42,337 | -16 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 42,353 | -15 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 42,368 | -15 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 42,383 | -29 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 42,412 | -17 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:40 | 42,429 | -17 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 42,446 | -20 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 42,466 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 42,466 | first reading |
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.98%
- avg views ÷ 42,230 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,950
- 65 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 65
- of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 65 (1 August 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 191,700 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈9,210
- Videos
- ≈1,150
- Links
- ≈8,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 46s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
😧 Текущий рыночный сантимент 💸Опять Крипта
💎 Рынок продолжает разгоняться — Bitcoin уже $75 000, Ethereum — $2 300, а капитализация крипторынка за сутки выросла почти на 7%. Индекс страха и жадности поднялся до 72 — максимума с июля 2025 года, а за сутки ликвидировало ещё $1.25 млрд позиций, из них $1.07 млрд пришлись на шорты. 💸Опять Крипта
🤣 Когда рынок насыпал 5% после 50%-ной просадки. 💸Опять Крипта
↗️ Биткоин в моменте > $75,000 За 4 часа ликвидировано SHORT-позиций на $400,000,000. 💸Опять Крипта
🔮 Bitcoin выдал движение на 5.8 сигмы относительно своей 30-дневной волатильности — это самый необычно сильный дневной рывок вверх с октября 2023 года. По данным Glassnode, настолько резкие движения для BTC встречаются крайне редко. 💸Опять Крипта
🤔 CEO CryptoQuant: Спрос на Биткоин (спот и фьючерсы) стал положительным впервые с октября 2025 года. Если эта тенденция сохранится в течение месяца, можно будет сказать о том, что медвежий рынок закончился и начинается новый цикл бычьего рынка. OG-киты все еще знают/решают, когда начинается бычий рынок – на прошлой неделе они набрали огромные лонги практически на самом дне. 💸Опять Крипта
🎲 Трейдер Loracle потерял на HYPE больше $60 000 000, трижды пытаясь угадать направление рынка. Сначала шорт принёс ему около -$46 млн, затем лонг ещё -$2.33 млн, а новая попытка снова шортить добавила примерно -$12.5 млн. 💸Опять Крипта
↗️ Биткоин > $71,000 💸Опять Крипта
🚀 Bitcoin и Ethereum обновили максимумы с июня — за последний час на крипторынке ликвидировало больше $1.2 млрд позиций, за сутки — около $1.6 млрд. Импульс пришёл после решения Минфина США вдвое увеличить выкуп долгосрочных гособлигаций — рынок воспринял это как смягчение финансовых условий и уже заговорил о «новом QE». 💸Опять Крипта
👀 HTX обвинили в массовой рассылке «токсичных» USDT на адреса пользователей других бирж — такие переводы могут запускать compliance-проверки — например, после получения 7.5 USDT пользователь Coinbase получил запрос о происхождении средств. В сообществе подозревают, что переводы могли отправляться намеренно, чтобы создавать проблемы чужим аккаунтам. HTX это отрицает и заявляет, что уже расследует происхождение транза…
☕️ DeFi-проект Maya Protocol взломан на $1 700 000. 💸Опять Крипта
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @okcrypta1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 95,464 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@CryptoUP_TradingNews · 163 postsINSIDE CRYPTO
@invest_we_trust · 3,3273 postsТОРГОВЛЯ ФЬЮЧЕРСЫ КРИПТА 💹💹💹
@p2p_svyazka · 7,1433 postsCrypto Papa
@crypt0papa · 41 postКрипто Лабиринт 🌀
@crypto_labirinth · 21 postКрипто Риск ⚖️
@crypto_risky · 41 post📈Криптовалюты
@cryptovaluty_channel · 11 postCrypto you know?🇺🇦
@cryptoyouknow · 1161 postКрипто-Сигналы🔔💵
@cryptto_signaly · 11 postДвижение Трейда
@dvizheniye_treyda · 21 post🇺🇦🌍🇺🇦Сучасні цифрові технології🇺🇦🌍🇺🇦
@Kryptofreeman31 · 181 postCRYPTO/Мой путь к успеху
@kryptouspeh · 11 postСкальпер 📊
@scalper_crypto · 31 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cryptotruexa · 65,945
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
@trade001k · 108,243
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
@crypto_azam · 137,035
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
@criptopatolog · 79,734
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
@Coin_Post · 293,956
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
@DrMichaelNehls · 1
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 August 2026
@Proffit_crypto · 59,452
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
@incrypted · 108,837
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
@investnetworkai1 · 60,087
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
@newsgrpua · 119,502
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Опять Крипта” (@okcrypta1), 42,230 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/okcrypta1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.