🪙 Ethereum впервые провёл атомарную транзакцию между L1 и L2 в основной сети. Теперь связанные действия на двух уровнях могут выполняться как единое целое — либо оба проходят, либо отменяются вместе, что заметно упрощает кроссчейн-операции. 💸Опять Крипта

Channel
Опять Крипта
@okcrypta1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
41,681subscribers
-785 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001560962709 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @okcrypta1 |
| Description | Опять крипта? Да, Опять Крипта! ⚡️Все самое важное из мира криптовалют ⚡️Новости, факты, мнения ⚡️Эксклюзивы и плюшки ⚡️24/7 только свежий контент ▪️По вопросам рекламы: @okcrypta_admin |
| Created | 10 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/okcrypta1 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 06:38 | 41,681 | -98 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 41,779 | -82 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 41,861 | -23 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 41,884 | -29 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 41,913 | -46 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 41,959 | -40 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 41,999 | -10 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 42,009 | -11 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:16 | 42,020 | -15 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 42,035 | -24 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:03 | 42,059 | -20 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:27 | 42,079 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 42,087 | -21 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 42,108 | -16 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 42,124 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 42,136 | -16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 42,152 | -30 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 42,182 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 42,190 | -28 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 42,218 | first reading |
Engagement
200 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 119 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.90%
- avg views ÷ 41,681 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,880
- 96 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 96
- of 200 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 200 (1 August 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 276,178 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 16:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈9,320
- Videos
- ≈1,170
- Links
- ≈8,630
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 6m 59s
- Average length
- 19s
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
⛏ Fortitude вложит $100 млн в майнеры Zcash от Bitmain Fortitude подписала с Bitmain необязывающее соглашение о покупке майнеров нового поколения для добычи Zcash (ZEC) на сумму до $100 млн. Компания получит приоритетный доступ к оборудованию, которое еще не вышло на коммерческий рынок, а поставки ожидаются во II квартале 2027 года. 💸Опять Крипта
🪙 Ровно 17 лет назад появился первый известный обменный курс Bitcoin к доллару — тогда за $1 давали 1 309 BTC. 💸Опять Крипта
🇰🇷 Южная Корея стала крупнейшим крипторынком Восточной Азии с оборотом около $449 млрд за год, почти вдвое обогнав Японию. Рост в основном обеспечила розница, а самыми популярными тематическими токенами стали активы, связанные с ИИ. 💸Опять Крипта
Вот за этим сейчас интересно наблюдать🧞♂️ GPT, AI-агенты, автоматизация, on-chain инструменты — вокруг этого уже начинает формироваться отдельный рынок. Зашёл к ребятам в папку по этим направлениям, за эту не стыдно — куча альфы там🫡 🔺 https://t.me/addlist/SaiJIGfkXVcxODY6 🔻
☠️ZachXBT внедрился в китайский преступный синдикат, который отмыл более $1 млрд для Lazarus Group. Он выдал себя за клиента и провёл сделки на $349k, чтобы войти в доверие. В итоге получил данные о движении украденных средств, обнаружил кластер на $12 млн+, а Tether заморозил 442k USDT. 💸Опять Крипта
🍂 Октябрь давно считается одним из лучших месяцев для биткоина — за всю историю BTC лишь трижды закрывал его в минус. LookOnChain отмечает, что именно с октября нередко начинались самые сильные ралли рынка, поэтому сезонность снова играет на стороне быков. 💸Опять Крипта
🐋 Проснулся Bitcoin-кит, молчавший с 2013 года — он отправил тестовые переводы всего по $43 с двух старых кошельков (1, 2). На них лежит 1346 BTC примерно на $115 млн — когда-то эти монеты обошлись всего в $240 000, то есть выросли почти в 480 раз. 💸Опять Крипта
☠️ Пользователь подарил мошенникам $305 000 в DAI, скопировав адрес кошелька злоумышленника из истории переводов. Другой криптан потерял 12 041 LINK ($170 000), подписав фишинговое разрешение еще в августе 2025 года. 💸Опять Крипта
🇬🇷 В Греции накрыли криптопирамиду, которая обещала удваивать деньги за 50 дней якобы с помощью ИИ. По версии следствия, через FXO прошло более $8 000 000 от как минимум 10 000 человек, а выплаты старым участникам шли за счёт новых — среди 17 задержанных оказались даже девять военнослужащих. 💸Опять Крипта
🕑Илон Маск выиграл в суде право раздевать людей в Grok — апелляция в федеральном суде позволила вернуть функционал для редактирования фото. 💸Опять Крипта
❌ Blast закрывается — когда-то хайповая Ethereum L2 с $20 млн инвестиций и огромным TVL больше не окупает собственную инфраструктуру. После эирдропа интерес к сети быстро угас, токен потерял почти всю стоимость. 💸Опять Крипта
Showing the 12 most recent of 200 posts we hold for @okcrypta1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@okcrypta1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 14 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 14 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что случится с ВТС быстрее:
- Затрудняюсь сказать15%
- $60 00042%
- $90 00044%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 200 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@CryptoUP_TradingNews · 163 postsINSIDE CRYPTO
@invest_we_trust · 3,2513 postsАРБИТРАЖ КРИПТЫ КРИПТОВАЛЮТЫ
@p2p_svyazka · 14,8023 postsCrypto Papa
@crypt0papa · 41 postКрипто Лабиринт 🌀
@crypto_labirinth · 21 postКрипто Риск ⚖️
@crypto_risky · 41 postКРИПТОМАНЬЯК
@CRYPTOMANIACCC1 post📈Криптовалюты
@cryptovaluty_channel · 11 postCrypto you know?🇺🇦
@cryptoyouknow · 1161 postКрипто-Сигналы🔔💵
@cryptto_signaly · 11 postДвижение Трейда
@dvizheniye_treyda · 21 post🇺🇦🌍🇺🇦Сучасні цифрові технології🇺🇦🌍🇺🇦
@Kryptofreeman31 · 181 postCRYPTO/Мой путь к успеху
@kryptouspeh · 11 postСкальпер 📊
@scalper_crypto · 31 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@trade001k · 106,595#1
@a01k_crypto · 30,737#2
@trading_001k · 28,483#3
@incrypted · 108,272#4
@Insider_krypto · 54,047#5
@Coin_Post · 288,763#6
@crypto_hd · 132,043#7
@TumoBogCrypto · 36,200#8
@cryptotruexa · 66,333#9
@invest_zonaa · 897,616#10
@cryptomannnisnotacult · 38,262#11
@DnevnikCapitanika · 15,803#12
@CryptologyKey · 47,971#13
@cryptodaily · 85,218#14
@bitcoin_ua_telegram · 32,058#15
@niktoneznaetx · 14,972#16
@slezisatoshi · 123,435#17
@markettwits · 337,483#18
@golos_alpha · 13,113#19
@falconinvestors · 82,437#20
@elrmcf_free · 11,973#21
@selo_crypto · 39,983#22
@cryptobosh · 152,051#23
@evans_crypto · 53,966#24
@INSTARDING · 95,591#25
@forklog · 92,088#26
@savagetraderrrvlc · 8,769#27
@Binance_UA_official · 94,434#28
@lvivcriptan22 · 39,868#29
@crypto_azam · 130,576#30
@bulka_crypto · 52,670#31
@cryptoattack24 · 55,810#32
@korolbtc · 18,016#33
@andryuninthelegend · 18,682#34
@trend_gen · 55,098#35
@kosmonavtuss · 8,336#36
@eeusd · 1,117,642#37
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 49,270#38
@truexanewsua · 3,142,787#39
@notcoin · 8,425,744#40
@blumcrypto · 13,910,187#41
@insiderukr · 2,191,033#42
@voynareal · 1,506,772#43
@kievreal1 · 1,560,337#44
@hexdrunker_reflections · 31,294#45
@oko18_ukr · 313,332#46
@maloletoffcrypto · 45,414#47
@tstamarkets_ua · 20,811#48
@walt_news_cis · 1,110,581#49
@UaOnlii · 1,567,427#50
@asupersharij · 1,714,320#51
@vert2026 · 116,292#52
@qMall_Exchange · 9,035#53
@k_dvizh · 471,163#54
@s_sensy_channel · 2,918#55
@mirrorreflectionhub · 7,399#56
@ikigaimain · 98,089#57
@mr_mozart · 128,988#58
@imvanillaninja · 10,949#59
@dogs · 6,873,004#60
@lachentyt · 1,550,427#61
@ukrbavovna · 709,401#62
@newsgrpua · 118,569#63
@udianskyi · 93,222#64
@batalionmonako · 710,434#65
@war_monitor · 970,580#66
@ssternenko · 880,553#67
@u_now · 4,128#68
@kievinfo_kyiv · 1,251,531#69
@cultofnot · 1,012,122#70
@xydessa · 952,217#71
@dnipro_alerts · 809,607#72
@nexta_live · 772,659#73
@hyevuy_dnepr · 520,007#74
@kpszsu · 906,053#75
@huyovy_kharkiv · 464,989#76
@deepstateua · 758,969#77
@odessa_infonews · 990,295#78
@truexakyiv · 938,682#79
@musicud21 · 36,590#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cryptotruexa · 66,333
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
@trading_001k · 28,483
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
@a01k_crypto · 30,737
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
@musicud21 · 36,590
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 1 September 2026
@bitcoin_ua_telegram · 32,058
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 September 2026
@TumoBogCrypto · 36,200
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 1 September 2026
@ccVlad_TAM · 56,261
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@trade001k · 106,595
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
@Insider_krypto · 54,047
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
@rtfight_com · 80,269
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
@crypto_azam · 130,576
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
@crypto_telegramer · 21,029
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 September 2026
@cryptoc · 19,981
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 September 2026
@orlovskyi_ffa · 19,138
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 October 2026
@criptopatolog · 80,062
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
@Coin_Post · 288,763
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
@udianskyi · 93,222
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
@evans_crypto · 53,966
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
@DrMichael_Nehls_0 · 186,720
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 August 2026
@CryptologyKey · 47,971
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
@Proffit_crypto · 69,795
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
@TonGuysNFT · 26,953
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026
@seryy_krot99 · 28,559
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 29 August 2026
@dimatkachevv · 34,299
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Опять Крипта” (@okcrypta1), 41,681 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/okcrypta1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.