Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
48 measurements spanning 80 days, net -744. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,370–31,338 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Oct 2026, 15:27
30,482
-14
25 Oct 2026, 14:51
30,496
-4
24 Oct 2026, 18:07
30,500
-13
23 Oct 2026, 15:34
30,513
-11
22 Oct 2026, 17:06
30,524
-23
21 Oct 2026, 09:16
30,547
-28
20 Oct 2026, 05:37
30,575
+1
19 Oct 2026, 05:27
30,574
-17
18 Oct 2026, 03:47
30,591
-6
17 Oct 2026, 00:34
30,597
-23
15 Oct 2026, 21:44
30,620
-23
15 Oct 2026, 00:37
30,643
-19
13 Oct 2026, 16:19
30,662
-19
9 Oct 2026, 18:16
30,681
-56
5 Oct 2026, 09:59
30,737
-44
29 Sept 2026, 08:21
30,781
-84
17 Sept 2026, 20:55
30,865
-10
15 Sept 2026, 18:59
30,875
-31
12 Sept 2026, 16:21
30,906
-17
10 Sept 2026, 17:20
30,923
first reading
Engagement
82 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 138 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.85%
avg views ÷ 30,482 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,700
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.345%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 82 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026
Posts held
82 (8 July 2026 – 26 October 2026)
Views total
72,820
Reactions total
251
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Oct 2026, 05:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,900
Videos
≈38
Links
≈2,430
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
59s
Average length
59s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
825 reactions across 82 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🌚
297
36.0%
❤
281
34.1%
👍
135
16.4%
🔥
87
10.5%
🤔
25
3.03%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 825 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 82 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @a01k_crypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 82 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 26 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Не будем убеждать — дадим попробовать 🧠
На прошлой неделе мы писали про WEB3HUB: зачем делаем платформу, какие направления там будут и почему решили идти через мини-продукты под конкретные задачи.
Но говорить — это одно, а попробовать — совсем другое.
Поэтому мы создали отдельный Telegram-канал WEB3HUB, где будем выкладывать анонсы и всю актуальную информацию о платформе и продуктах.
Если вам интересны спекуляции…
Кредиторы закрывают кран для AI 🚬
Илон Маск "предупредил", что кредиторы почти полностью перекрыли финансирование компаниям, которые живут только с выручки AI датацентров. Параллельно разошёлся отчёт: по мнению его авторов, "круговое финансирование" показывает, что AI пузырь уже готов лопнуть.
🟠Под удар попадают компании, у которых вся выручка завязана на AI датацентры
🟠По словам Маска, финансирование им закрыли по…
Что под капотом WEB3HUB 😎
На данный момент на платформе уже можно найти четыре продукта:
⚪Main Course — большой продукт, который объединяет спекуляции, личный бренд, бизнес и работу в криптоиндустрии. Подробнее о нём поговорим отдельно.
⚪Крипта за 3 дня — для тех, кому хочется наконец разобраться в крипте без погружения в трейдинг и сложный ресерч.
⚪AI-автоматизация — практический разбор того, как использовать AI…
По графикам хочется докупать, но внешний фон пока заставляет быть осторожнее 📉
В новом видео Тёма разобрал три главных риска: что может произойти после выборов в США, как новая эскалация на Ближнем Востоке может ударить по рынку и что сейчас назревает в Европе.
А также показал, что уже продал, какие активы продолжает держать и при каких условиях готов снова докупать.
Смотрим:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUaiB…
Минфин США дожал правила для стейблов 🇺🇸
Минфин США утвердил финальные правила для стейблкоинов по закону GENIUS Act. В ведомстве заявили, что эти правила «закрепляют американское доминирование в цифровых активах».
Что известно:
🟠Правила финальные, этап черновиков закрыт
🟠Основа — закон GENIUS Act
🟠Документ касается именно стейблкоинов
Теперь правила игры есть, и эмитентам больше нечего ждать. Как по мне, самое и…
Не криптой едины 🔍
Вчера рассказали, почему закрыли Академию и с нуля строим свою EdTech платформу. Сегодня — о том, что будет внутри.
Ограничиваться криптой не собираемся. На платформе будет и про AI, Twitter, личный бренд, крипту и другие направления вокруг веб3.
И не только от нашей команды: мы привлекаем экспертов из разных ниш с реальным опытом, чтобы они давали качественный материал, в котором мы не на столь…
AI убил криптообучение ⚰️
Непопулярное мнение: классические курсы теряют смысл. Большую часть теории теперь за минуту объяснит AI, и 90% обучений просто перестали давать ту ценность, что раньше.
Это одна из причин, почему прошлой осенью мы закрыли Академию. Хотя продукт работал и за ним были сотни успешных кейсов.
Но и у AI есть потолок:
🟠Теорию он заменяет, а практику — нет
🟠Реальные кейсы с тобой не разберёт
🟠О…
Проиграй, чтобы заработать 🎰
Papertrade — биржа с плечом до 1000x на цены Hyperliquid. Все сделки идут против общего пула, проигрыши его пополняют, а проигравшим начисляют токен PAPER.
Застейкал — получаешь долю с пула: стейкерам уже раздали около 54M$. Люди сообразили быстро — сливай специально, фарми PAPER, продавай.
Через десять дней команда объявила:
🟠Продавать и переводить PAPER нельзя, и планов нет
🟠Новые …
За Strategy взялась? 🪙
MSCI приняла правила, по которым из её индексов будут исключать компании без реального бизнеса. В симуляции на данных за май 2026 года под исключение попали Strategy и японская Metaplanet. Обе держат BTC на балансе.
🟠Исключат тех, кто не пройдёт проверку на операционные активы и выполнит минимум 4 из 5 финансовых критериев
🟠SharpLink, которая копит ETH, попала в список наблюдения
🟠Финальный…
Инфляция бьёт. Крипта выдержит?
Новое видео Тёмы — на этот раз о том, почему на фоне роста инфляции и ситуации вокруг фонда он начал всерьёз задумываться о возможной коррекции и как готовится к ней в своём портфеле.
В видео разобрал:
— какие уровни по BTC рассматривает в случае снижения;
— какой фрактал на S&P 500 напоминает ситуацию перед падением в 2025 году;
— что собирается закрывать в портфеле, а что продолжи…
🌚6❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @a01k_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Україна Online: Новини | Політика @UaOnlii · 1,541,868#75
Mykola Udianskyi official Channel @udianskyi · 92,725#76
Повітряні Сили ЗС України / Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine @kpszsu · 914,487#77
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
a01k.traders @trading_001k · 28,257 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
Опять Крипта @okcrypta1 · 41,418 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
001k.Trade @trade001k · 105,538 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
DOUBLETOP @doubletop · 70,455 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
hexdrunker reflections @hexdrunker_reflections · 31,288 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
Udianskaya/Music 🎶 @musicud21 · 36,305 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 1 September 2026
Bitcoin UA — биткоин, инвестиции, деньги @bitcoin_ua_telegram · 31,725 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 September 2026
787s cooking @cooking787 · 21,086 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 September 2026
MEMEcrypted @MEMEcrypted · 18,826 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 October 2026
Ydudhd @artur_slon · 6 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 1 September 2026
Инсайдер Crypto @Insider_krypto · 54,304 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Incrypted Airdrops @incrypted_airdrops · 46,090 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
Cryptology Key @CryptologyKey · 47,248 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
cryptomannn @cryptomannnisnotacult · 38,009 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
TumoBog Crypto: Инвестиции Крипта @TumoBogCrypto · 35,798 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 1 September 2026
👁🗨Deki Gang💰 @DekiGang · 39,633 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
Incrypted @incrypted · 107,329 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
Crypto Selo @selo_crypto · 39,586 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 August 2026
IguVerse @Iguverse · 18,831 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 October 2026
Binance Новини @Binance_UA_official · 97,512 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
Mykola Udianskyi official Channel @udianskyi · 92,725 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
Evans Crypto @evans_crypto · 53,535 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
Crypto Bulka @bulka_crypto · 52,171 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
ARUT NEWS @arutnews · 27,925 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“a01k.Crypto” (@a01k_crypto), 30,482 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/a01k_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.