Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cryptomannn | Academy

Channel

Cryptomannn | Academy

@cryptomannnacademy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,243subscribers

-95 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001697922252
TypeChannel
Username@cryptomannnacademy
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptomannnacademy

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,23312,33812,285.56 August 2026 — 12,338 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,337 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,334 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,333 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,328 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,325 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,320 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,318 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,313 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,314 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,311 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,304 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,302 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,296 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,294 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,292 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,288 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,284 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,277 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,276 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,273 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,271 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,257 subscribers6 September 2026 — 12,249 subscribers10 September 2026 — 12,245 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,233 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,264 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,255 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,243 subscribers12,2436 August 202617 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 42 days, net -95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,217–12,354 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 20:3812,243-12
15 Sept 2026, 20:5512,255-9
14 Sept 2026, 01:5712,264+31
12 Sept 2026, 07:3912,233-12
10 Sept 2026, 02:5712,245-4
6 Sept 2026, 16:3812,249-8
4 Sept 2026, 03:0112,257-14
2 Sept 2026, 15:2412,271-2
1 Sept 2026, 17:1412,273-3
31 Aug 2026, 17:2512,276-1
29 Aug 2026, 11:1212,277-7
28 Aug 2026, 08:0312,284-4
27 Aug 2026, 04:5712,288-4
26 Aug 2026, 05:2512,292-2
25 Aug 2026, 02:1612,294-2
23 Aug 2026, 15:0612,296-6
22 Aug 2026, 03:0312,302-2
19 Aug 2026, 22:2412,304-7
18 Aug 2026, 18:5512,311-3
17 Aug 2026, 19:5312,314first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.3%
avg views ÷ 12,243 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,510
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.651%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held36 (28 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total15,106
Reactions total80
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 22:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

250 reactions across 28 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53097550545703633308232.8%
custom 53213645229701443737630.4%
custom 52877701048246164375421.6%
custom 53212472746579325133815.2%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 250 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 36 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptomannnacademy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 36 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 16:31 UTC876 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53212472746579325136custom 53213645229701443734

28 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC≈1,710 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Новое видео от Дани по мотивам его презентации с OKX Summit. • Как режим рынка влияет на стратегию? • Какая самая конкурентная среда для формирования стратегий? • Что может улучшить даже самую плохую стратегию? • Что нас ждет в будущем? Это и многое другое в видео! https://youtu.be/dV5s-uuaCZo

custom 53212472746579325132custom 53097550545703633301

28 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC≈1,450 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Как важно иметь доп уверенность когда держишь позиции в таком рендже… Норм па возвращается?

custom 53213645229701443734

26 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC≈1,720 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

Держите.

custom 532136452297014437316

26 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC≈1,730 views23 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Хотите список отстающих тикеров по ИИ для OKX?

custom 530975505457036333019custom 52877701048246164372custom 53212472746579325132

26 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC≈1,810 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Как майнеры случайно построили инфраструктуру для AI Последние 10 лет майнеры думали, что строят инфраструктуру для добычи биткоина. Но сейчас оказалось, что они создали почти идеальную базу для AI-дата-центров. Промышленный майнинг требует сотен мегаватт мощности, земли, подстанций и систем охлаждения. Поэтому крупные майнеры годами искали площадки с дешевой электроэнергией, договаривались о подключении к сети и с

custom 528777010482461643711

25 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,480 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026

2 часа. https://www.youtube.com/live/PMLBh2wfd2g?si=yax_kskg59MlNcFi

custom 53097550545703633304

25 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC≈1,520 views9 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Каждый из этих кругов это результат отсутствия правильного отношения к рабочему процессу. Повторение вчерашнего паттерна приведёт только к повторению сценария. Как выйти с такого круга в рабочем процессе мы разбирали на прошлом стриме. Сегодня предлагаем выйти со всех кругов ада, непосредственно в практической составляющей трейдинга. СТРИМ СЕГОДНЯ 20:00

custom 52877701048246164378custom 53213645229701443731

20 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC≈1,820 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

За время Bootcamp участники начали менять то, что напрямую влияет на каждое торговое решение. По итоговому скорингу стартовые оценки в районе 1,3–2 баллов выросли до 3,5–4,3, а за цифрами стоят конкретные изменения: торговый план до открытия позиции, работа с журналом, контроль риска, заранее сформированные сценарии и меньше случайных входов. Но есть один нюанс: это результаты еще до практической работы в комьюнити

custom 53213645229701443736

20 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC≈1,540 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, напоминаем, что мы крипто комьюнтти.

custom 53213645229701443739

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @cryptomannnacademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTCAnonymous Poll235 voters

Настроение перед заседанием ФРС?

  1. Шорт.40%
  2. Лонг.44%
  3. Взял опцион на волатильность и сижу чилю.20%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

cryptomannn
@cryptomannnisnotacult · 38,442
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
KostyaKudo
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 49,702
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
DARKTRADER ©
@darktradereducation · 26,900
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
Mykola Udianskyi official Channel
@udianskyi · 93,529
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
Cryptology Key
@CryptologyKey · 48,418
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
a01k.traders
@trading_001k · 28,525
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
SANCHO D.T.
@SANCHO_DT · 65,589
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
a01k.Crypto
@a01k_crypto · 30,865
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
001k.Trade
@trade001k · 107,044
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
Incrypted
@incrypted · 108,728
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
hexdrunker reflections
@hexdrunker_reflections · 31,307
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
$PCORN |🍿| on $SOL
@popcornmemesol · 70,284
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
NEWS.GRP🇺🇦
@newsgrpua · 118,744
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cryptomannn | Academy” (@cryptomannnacademy), 12,243 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptomannnacademy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.