Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐌𝟏𝐊𝐄 𝐌𝐎𝐍𝐄𝐘

Channel

𝐌𝟏𝐊𝐄 𝐌𝐎𝐍𝐄𝐘

@M1keMoney

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,779subscribers

-63 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001121999778
TypeChannel
Username@M1keMoney
Created10 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/M1keMoney

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,7545,9115,832.57 August 2026 — 5,842 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,869 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,907 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,911 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,899 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,889 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,882 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,869 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,865 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,861 subscribers6 September 2026 — 5,851 subscribers11 September 2026 — 5,845 subscribers14 September 2026 — 5,841 subscribers18 September 2026 — 5,837 subscribers27 September 2026 — 5,818 subscribers5 October 2026 — 5,795 subscribers12 October 2026 — 5,761 subscribers15 October 2026 — 5,754 subscribers18 October 2026 — 5,794 subscribers20 October 2026 — 5,793 subscribers23 October 2026 — 5,788 subscribers26 October 2026 — 5,782 subscribers29 October 2026 — 5,774 subscribers2 November 2026 — 5,784 subscribers5 November 2026 — 5,779 subscribers5,7797 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,730–5,935 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 11:475,779-5
2 Nov 2026, 01:195,784+10
29 Oct 2026, 16:095,774-8
26 Oct 2026, 09:455,782-6
23 Oct 2026, 15:045,788-5
20 Oct 2026, 15:365,793-1
18 Oct 2026, 00:445,794+40
15 Oct 2026, 09:505,754-7
12 Oct 2026, 07:015,761-34
5 Oct 2026, 07:175,795-23
27 Sept 2026, 08:015,818-19
18 Sept 2026, 04:375,837-4
14 Sept 2026, 09:395,841-4
11 Sept 2026, 03:415,845-6
6 Sept 2026, 09:175,851-10
1 Sept 2026, 15:335,861-4
29 Aug 2026, 22:325,865-4
27 Aug 2026, 01:245,869-13
24 Aug 2026, 08:145,882-7
20 Aug 2026, 18:035,889first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.3%
avg views ÷ 5,779 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,630
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026
Posts held33 (10 June 2026 – 30 October 2026)
Views total24,490
Reactions total326
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 19:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 00s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

888 reactions across 33 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁12614.2%
👍11012.4%
🤣9410.6%
custom 5280802194696710822829.23%
custom 5400044690290522089687.66%
💯657.32%
❤637.09%
🔥505.63%
🤯434.84%
custom 5318929916463424198283.15%
👀273.04%
🤔273.04%
💊161.80%
⚡121.35%
👻111.24%
🕊101.13%
✍91.01%
🏆60.676%
😱60.676%
🎉40.45%
16 further kinds313.49%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 888 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 33 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @M1keMoney. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2026 to 30 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

30 Oct 2026, 02:47 UTC≈1,710 views26 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

❗️Binance официально подтверждает взлом на $6,3 млрд. ⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐ ➤ ПО ОФИЦИАЛЬНОЙ ВЕРСИИ ➤ Binance предполагает, что инцидент с безопасностью может быть связан с скомпрометированным ноутбуком инженера DevOps. ➤ ПО НЕ ОФИЦИАЛЬНОЙ ВЕРСИИ ➤ в интернете ходят слухи что просто ключик утёк в онлайн казино на Филиппинах! ⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐ Хз насколько это правда, но вполне может быть что DevOps Binance пос…

🤣15⚡3❤3👀2🎃1👍1👏1

Signed 𝙼𝟷[ᴋ̲̅]𝚎

30 Oct 2026, 00:21 UTC≈1,450 views19 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

▶️ ➤ ПОЛНЫЙ СПИСОК ПОХИЩЕННЫХ КРИПТОАКТИВОВ ПРИ ВЗЛОМЕ BINANCE. Сегодня случился крупнейший криптовалютный взлом на $6 ярдов, а крипта просела всего на "пол процента" относительно такого масштаба. ПОЧЕМУ? К примеру год назад 10 октября 2025 альта рухнула на -90% и это было тоже из-за атаки на Binance, но гораздо меньшего масштаба, где биржа потом выплатила пострадавшим $283 млн. компенсации, хотя ликвидаций было на …

custom 54000446902905220897💯4❤2👀2🙏2custom 52808021946967108222

Signed 𝙼𝟷[ᴋ̲̅]𝚎

29 Oct 2026, 23:32 UTC≈1,350 views16 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

☄️Новый обновленный общий итог по хакерской атаке на Binance. 💻 ➤ $6,17 миллиарда украдено ❄ ➤ $2,68 миллиарда заморожено 💵 ➤ Профит хакеров ≈ $3,4 миллиарда Хакеры прямо сейчас очень активно свапают все жетоны в ETH для отмыва через торнадо кеш. Вывод Binance по прежнему не работает. ➤ 🥔

❤8custom 54000446902905220894😱3✍1

Signed 𝙼𝟷[ᴋ̲̅]𝚎

29 Oct 2026, 22:35 UTC≈1,330 views21 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

❗️CZ пишет что потери Binance могут быть выше $1 млрд. А на балансе у него $144 млрд активов что составляет всего 0,69% от их общих активов под хранением. В общем Binance взломан всего на пол процента ➤ 😆

😁11🤣3😎2custom 52808021946967108222custom 54000446902905220892🔥1

Signed 𝙼𝟷[ᴋ̲̅]𝚎

29 Oct 2026, 22:11 UTC≈1,380 views18 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

☄️Ончейн-аналитик сообщает, что один из горячих кошельков биржи, Binance 14, ДО СИХ ПОР НАХОДИТСЯ ПОД КОНТРОЛЕМ ХАКЕРОВ. По его данным, хакеры использовали механизм EIP-7702, позволяющий передать выполнение операций смарт-контракту. ❗️Причём контроль до сих пор сохраняется, а на скомпрометированный адрес продолжают поступать новые средства. Так, недавно на кошелёк поступило около $200 млн USDT, которые спустя всег…

👀8custom 54000446902905220896✍2🫡2

Signed 𝙼𝟷[ᴋ̲̅]𝚎

29 Oct 2026, 22:04 UTC≈1,240 views17 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

❗️Binance в Х сначала сообщили о проблемах с выводом криптовалют, однако вскоре публикация была удалена. «Средства пользователей в безопасности» (SAFU), — говорилось в публикации. Но уже походу дела не SAFU, всё гораздо серьёзнее.

custom 54000446902905220899custom 52808021946967108224🤣3🔥1

Signed 𝙼𝟷[ᴋ̲̅]𝚎

29 Oct 2026, 21:52 UTC≈1,480 views18 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

‼️ВЫВОДЫ C BINANCE НА КОШЕЛЬКИ ХАКЕРОВ ДО СИХ ПОР ПРОДОЛЖАЮТСЯ. Там походу дыра конкретная. Следить за кошельком ➤ binance-hacker

🤯10👀4custom 54000446902905220893👻1

Signed 𝙼𝟷[ᴋ̲̅]𝚎

29 Oct 2026, 21:34 UTC≈1,450 views18 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

💵❄️ CEO Tether сообщает что они уже заморозили более $1,5 миллиарда USDT Уже больше половины угнанного заморожено, так и хакерам ничего не останется))

😁10👍3🔥2custom 52808021946967108222❤1

Signed 𝙼𝟷[ᴋ̲̅]𝚎

29 Oct 2026, 21:18 UTC≈1,530 views35 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

❗️CZ подтвердил взлом и добавил что он больше не управляет Binance (.com) 😆

😁18🤣8custom 54000446902905220894❤2👻2🥰1

Signed 𝙼𝟷[ᴋ̲̅]𝚎

29 Oct 2026, 21:16 UTC≈1,640 views15 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

❗️Circle заморозила украденные $USDC на сумму $823 млн. У хакера теперь осталось только $ETH на пол ярда и жетоны всякие на других кошельках.

😁6👀3🤣3custom 52808021946967108223

Signed 𝙼𝟷[ᴋ̲̅]𝚎

29 Oct 2026, 21:10 UTC≈1,590 views13 reactionsread 4 November 2026

❗️Tether заморозила 971 миллион долларов. $USDT Вывод средств с Binance не работает.

😁6custom 54000446902905220893👀2custom 52808021946967108222

Signed 𝙼𝟷[ᴋ̲̅]𝚎

29 Oct 2026, 20:59 UTC≈1,560 views21 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

❗️💵 В сети пишут что 2.7 ярда утекло с Binance в неизвестном направлении. Кошельки хакеров: 0x5227f603c1ee34ce3c06efe6477003bdfccb2f8c 0x8532fa14acaf483729c449b8458aeddb900543d4

custom 52808021946967108227🤣6👀3🤯3✍2

Signed 𝙼𝟷[ᴋ̲̅]𝚎

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @M1keMoney. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

a01k.traders
@trading_001k · 28,109
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
AX1
@ax1vc · 20,023
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 September 2026
Bloomberg
@BIoomberg · 72,930
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
001k.Trade
@trade001k · 105,051
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
QuantPro⚡️Trading
@QPROtrading · 23,796
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
a01k.Crypto
@a01k_crypto · 30,329
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
top traders desk
@toptraders0x · 23,854
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
DНЕВНИКИ Крипто
@dnevniki_crypto · 32,694
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐌𝟏𝐊𝐄 𝐌𝐎𝐍𝐄𝐘” (@M1keMoney), 5,779 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/M1keMoney.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.