Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -773. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,132–34,137 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 07:40
33,248
-35
16 Sept 2026, 23:00
33,283
-10
15 Sept 2026, 03:58
33,293
-19
13 Sept 2026, 09:39
33,312
-22
11 Sept 2026, 10:16
33,334
-24
8 Sept 2026, 18:40
33,358
-132
5 Sept 2026, 08:57
33,490
-41
3 Sept 2026, 14:38
33,531
-84
2 Sept 2026, 05:05
33,615
-84
1 Sept 2026, 03:29
33,699
-71
31 Aug 2026, 06:07
33,770
-38
30 Aug 2026, 07:14
33,808
+27
29 Aug 2026, 04:13
33,781
-20
28 Aug 2026, 02:54
33,801
-8
26 Aug 2026, 23:53
33,809
-15
26 Aug 2026, 02:05
33,824
-16
25 Aug 2026, 04:04
33,840
-15
23 Aug 2026, 20:33
33,855
-14
22 Aug 2026, 07:57
33,869
-8
20 Aug 2026, 19:54
33,877
first reading
Engagement
55 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.2%
avg views ÷ 33,248 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,390
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.922%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 55 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
55 (22 July 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
92,170
Reactions total
850
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Sept 2026, 18:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,560
Videos
≈18
Links
≈2,040
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
2,009 reactions across 55 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
818
40.7%
😁
574
28.6%
🔥
394
19.6%
🥴
53
2.64%
👎
48
2.39%
😱
46
2.29%
😢
43
2.14%
🌚
17
0.846%
✍
16
0.796%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,009 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 55 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dnevniki_crypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Паоло Ардоино вместе с командой Utexo пишут, что USDT on Bitcoin уже скоро. Точной даты пока нет, но инфраструктура уже на финальной стадии.
Причем это реально возвращение домой - первый USDT ещё в 2014 году запускался именно поверх Bitcoin через Omni. Теперь новая попытка идёт уже через современную инфраструктуру RGB + Lightning.
И вот это уже интересно для всей Bitcoin-экосистемы👀
USDT принесёт туда то, чего ей …
TradFi vs Crypto
Чем больше торгуем оба рынка, тем заметнее разница.
На графике сетап может выглядеть одинаково: снятие ликвидности, уровень, импульс. Но отрабатывать его на EUR/USD и BTC одинаково - плохая идея.
В TradFi есть торговые сессии, огромная ликвидность и понятные часы основной активности.
Крипта работает 24/7, но это не значит, что ликвидность там одинаковая весь день. Ночью, на выходных или на отдель…
В твиттере нашли новый индикатор пика всего крипторынка - релиз «Дюны»😄
Dune: Part One - 22.10.2021
BTC тогда был около $61к, а сам рынок уже подходил к финальной фазе цикла.
Dune: Part Two - 01.03.2024
BTC был около $62к, аналогично у пика рынка.
Dune: Part Three - 18.12.2026
Совпадение не только по битку, но в целом по моментам, когда рынок подходит к важным вершинам.
Фундаментал фундаменталом, но декабрь тепе…
Возвращаясь к этому посту при цене битка 65к - уже не кажется такой фантастикой?🙂
На тот момент это было смелое заявление, так что и в дурку могли отправить админа.
В Alex & Friends сегодня поделился своим ожиданиями до конца года. Если они отработают, то будут довольны все - кроме шортистов.
Но у них была вся козырная половина 2026. А кто не успел переобуться - ну извините. Рынок дал, рынок забрал.
DНЕВНИКИ: Lin…
Clarity Act провалил голосование для перехода к дальнейшему рассмотрению.
Не забываем, что трагедии в этом нет.
Ещё не время - не те цены, не тот рынок. Вот на хаях принять - это по классике жанра🤝
Как писал выше, неделя по событиям очень плотная, особенно для TradFi:
16 сентября - данные по инфляции UK и розничным продажам в США
17 сентября - решение по ставке Банка Англии
18 сентября - решение Банка Японии. Рынок сейчас ждёт повышения ставки до 1,25%, поэтому по иене может быть особенно весело
Для TradFi такие недели - самое интересное: новости дают движение практически каждый день.
В MyForex уже подгото…
На этой неделе скучно не будет:
15 сентября - ключевое голосование по CLARITY Act
15-16 сентября - FOMC, решение ФРС в среду
Два потенциально сильных триггера для рынка почти подряд👀
DНЕВНИКИ: Link | BingX | Alex & Friends
Пора заканчивать битву за трендовую победой быков и телепортацией битка к $100к.
А потом заказываем пампы альты каждый день на х10-20 по типу старичка Lisk.
Многого не просим, как видите.
https://www.tradingview.com/x/bnX5Oojc
Вочлист по Forex - какие позиции будем отрабатывать?
Сейчас вместе с командой MyForex смотрим несколько активов:
#XAG - Будем открывать локальную лонг позицию по серебру. Подходим к поддержке, ждём выход ещё чуть ниже.
#GBPUSD - Рассматриваем также лонг по данному активу. Доллар смотрится очень плохо, поэтому лонги к нему актуальны
Вчера в открытом канале уже забрали почти $1000 профита.
В MyForex каждый день пу…
👍11👎5🔥3😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @dnevniki_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Текущая цена битка $75000. Что мы увидим раньше? Биток по:
$8500054%
$6500046%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Pursuit4Million|Андрей Соболев @P4M_channel · 33,294 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
Крипта деньги @Kriptamoney · 101 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 August 2026
CRYPTO | PERRY @cryptoperry · 23,012 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
Герман на блокчейне 🇪🇹 @blockchaingerman · 32,945 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
MMarketmaker @mmrktmkr · 42,412 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 August 2026
top traders desk @toptraders0x · 26,040 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Trade Soul (Зеркало) @trade_soul · 701 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Биржевой Монарх @BMonarch_official · 43,703 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
Mr Mozart @mr_mozart · 129,572 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Gennady M @gen_m · 66,926 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Trade by Booba @trade_by_booba · 50,429 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Профессор Альтов 🥸 @profaltov · 27,740 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
Tom Capital @tomcapital · 31,440 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
Трейдинг в благости - Игорь Павленко @blagotrading · 71,834 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
TTC | TimeToCrypto @nftTTC · 34,831 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
Newsmaker @nwsmkr · 21,233 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 24 September 2026
КИТ с Wall Street @whaleWS · 32,175 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
10 долларов Баффетта @buff_10 · 60,148 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
GENESIS @trend_gen · 55,259 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
SoloTrade — Команда Трейдеров @solotradingss · 25,666 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 September 2026
CryptoPizza News @cryptopizza_news · 27,760 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
Market Vision @True_Market_Vision · 21,076 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 September 2026
Мысли Вайкоффа @wyckoffcompany · 68,647 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
PIFAGOR TRADE @pifagortrade · 85,453 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DНЕВНИКИ Крипто” (@dnevniki_crypto), 33,248 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnevniki_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.