Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Lamer©

Channel

Crypto Lamer©

@CryptoLamer

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,853subscribers

-271 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001275381155
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoLamer
Created10 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 October 2026
Measurements held45
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoLamer

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,85317,12416,988.56 August 2026 — 17,124 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,124 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,119 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,114 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,104 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,102 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,097 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,096 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,092 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,088 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,085 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,074 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,067 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,063 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,056 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,057 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,054 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,055 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,047 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,046 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,044 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,040 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,035 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,025 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,021 subscribers7 September 2026 — 17,010 subscribers10 September 2026 — 16,992 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,013 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,015 subscribers16 September 2026 — 17,009 subscribers18 September 2026 — 17,001 subscribers1 October 2026 — 16,959 subscribers6 October 2026 — 16,930 subscribers10 October 2026 — 16,915 subscribers13 October 2026 — 16,898 subscribers15 October 2026 — 16,897 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,895 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,884 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,880 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,873 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,866 subscribers21 October 2026 — 16,859 subscribers22 October 2026 — 16,858 subscribers23 October 2026 — 16,856 subscribers24 October 2026 — 16,853 subscribers6 August 202624 October 2026
45 measurements spanning 79 days, net -271. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,812–17,165 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 45
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Oct 2026, 12:2716,853-3
23 Oct 2026, 08:5616,856-2
22 Oct 2026, 11:4816,858-1
21 Oct 2026, 02:4716,859-7
19 Oct 2026, 22:4516,866-7
19 Oct 2026, 00:1516,873-7
18 Oct 2026, 02:1616,880-4
17 Oct 2026, 02:1916,884-11
16 Oct 2026, 01:5116,895-2
15 Oct 2026, 02:3016,897-1
13 Oct 2026, 21:3916,898-17
10 Oct 2026, 10:2016,915-15
6 Oct 2026, 09:2216,930-29
1 Oct 2026, 10:0016,959-42
18 Sept 2026, 08:2017,001-8
16 Sept 2026, 03:5817,009-6
14 Sept 2026, 08:0117,015+2
12 Sept 2026, 15:3817,013+21
10 Sept 2026, 15:5716,992-18
7 Sept 2026, 12:1617,010first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

899 reactions across 22 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍48954.4%
❤17919.9%
🔥10411.6%
👎748.23%
🤔222.45%
🐳101.11%
🤬101.11%
👏80.89%
💔20.222%
🙏10.111%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 899 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 22 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CryptoLamer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 April 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTC≈2,190 views35 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Особую благодарность за помощь в создании данного ролика хочу выразить приглашенным экспертам и командам Chaos Labs и Barter. 🔹 X Рамиля из Chaos Labs 🔹 X Алекса из Barter Можно поддержать проекты и ребят подписавшись на их X аккаунты. И конечно же, спасибо команде канала! 🇫🇷 Команда проекта (также стоит подписаться) 🔹 Редактор: https://t.me/mecashek 🔹 Визуал: https://www.instagram.com/kuratagu/ @CryptoLamer

👍22❤9🔥2👏1🤔1

29 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC≈3,910 views138 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Я нашел, кто запер мои $8500. И легче не стало! Тебе скажут, что виноват только риск-куратор. Теб скажут, что твоими деньгами в DeFi-лендинге распоряжается человек с безграничными возможностями, которого ты никогда не видел. Но будут ли они правы? В первой части я плакался (по мнению уважаемых комментаров), что мои $8 500 застряли в пуле протокола Euler. И я нашёл того, кто принял судьбоностное для моих денег решен…

👍89❤32🔥11👏4👎1🤔1

5 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC≈4,230 views59 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Обзоры на TradFi инструменты, доступные в крипте! Я стараюсь не стоять на месте и развиваться вместе с рынком крипты. И раз уж токенизация всего идет полным ходом, то исключать из внимания эти новые возможности классических рынков, доступные теперь абсолютно свободно любому криптану, тоже не стоит. Поэтому мы совместно с Claude и ChatGPT разработали фреймворк базовой оценкаи TradFi-инструментов. Теперь по нему в со…

❤36👍21👎1🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 07:45 UTC≈5,480 views23 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026

Консенсуссные стоимости пойнтов в крипто твиттере (на текущий день) Посмотрел, порисерчил, почитал, что нынче пишут в CT по поводу пойнтов на PerpDEX, которые все нынче фармят. 🔹 Extended: разброс от $0.43 до $3 за пойнт. Реалистично полагаю: $0.5-$1.5. Polymarket оценивает вероятность 150kk FDV в 71%. Хайп падает у ребят. 🔹 Pacifica: $0.05-$0.50 per point. Но реалистично думаю вообще ближе к $0.05. Самый ликвидны…

👍18❤5

2 Jul 2026, 05:10 UTC≈6,280 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Был dYdX, стал Arcus Формула успеха по dYdX: не полетело в одном месте, полетит в другом dYdX Labs представили Arcus - новую платформу, которую они создают совместно с Robinhood Chain. По сути ещё одна площадка для он-чейн трейдинга с модными нынче RWA, только в связке с хайпом вокруг главного зумерского инвест приложения (Kraken + Ink + Nado как референс). Что обещают на старте: • 95 токенизированных акций с инст…

👍9❤3

23 Jun 2026, 18:10 UTC≈5,430 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Tori Finance Учитывая текущий вайб вокруг DeFi вообще удивительно, что какая-то активность внутри ещё существует. Так что даже респектую проекту за запуск предепозитов (в отличие от, например, Daylight, которые более полугода как залегли на дно). Каждый второй стейбл обещает «доходность институционального уровня». "Доходность институционального уровня" есть ровно до того момента, пока рынок не передумал, а прозрачно…

👍12🤔5❤3💔1

19 Jun 2026, 05:58 UTC≈5,120 views36 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Новое видео по всем аналитическим метрикам Лучшее на канале! Если ещё не успели посмотреть ▶️ https://youtu.be/iynuPJ4Djq0 Спасибо за активность и просмотры🫶 @CryptoLamer

👍30🔥6

18 Jun 2026, 10:43 UTC≈4,590 views35 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Выступление на Blockchain Community Day 2026 по RWAфикации в DeFi. Запись сессии уже опубликована на YouTube, можно посмотреть здесь: ▶️ https://youtu.be/BxQOMpn7d4c?si=uBqCBcEOO4Lmeodl (eng lang) @CryptoLamer

❤23👍10👎2

16 Jun 2026, 09:04 UTC≈5,730 views65 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026

Я положил $8 500 в DeFi-лендинг. И не могу их забрать! Да-да, можешь расчихлять мемные гифки. Но прежде чем напишешь в ЛС «эксперт, лол», дочитай! Меня не кинули на скаме лендинг-протокола. Никто не взламывал смарт-контрактов. Все работает вполне штатно. Так что же случилось? Вот об этом и будет новое видео на канале. Мои застрявшие $8 500 лишь повод развернуть широкий разговор о том, как DeFi-лендинги работают из…

👍52❤12👏1

12 Jun 2026, 14:02 UTC≈4,700 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @moni_talksPhoto

Три Дегена | LLC | EP 31 Стрим. Уже через час. Точнее 40 минут. Три Дегена feat. дядя Ламер. Будет альфа по рынку и точные сроки: когда отдыхать, а когда воркать. Еще обсудим рынок, новости недели, SpaceX, проекты и нарративы. > НЕ ЗАБУДЬ > ПОСТАВИТЬ > НАПОМИНАЛКУ Ждём тебя ❤️

❤8👎8👍4

6 Jun 2026, 06:41 UTC≈5,230 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Выступаю здесь в пн. 8 июня в 14:30 МСК/Киев https://wearecommunity.io/events/blockchain-community-day-2026 - присоединяйтесь! @CryptoLamer

👍18

1 Jun 2026, 08:37 UTC≈6,330 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

👍10🤬3🔥2🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @CryptoLamer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

RunToRam
@RunToRam · 25,068
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 September 2026
DEFI Scam Check
@Defiscamcheck · 48,222
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
IvanovInvest
@ivanovinvest_rus · 20,197
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 September 2026
Sergey (ICO Drops) заметки
@icodrops_sergey · 42,566
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Кэпитал News
@drops_daily · 21,012
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 September 2026
CryptoInside
@crypt0inside · 28,403
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
Крипто Нарния NEWS
@cryptonarnianews · 19,624
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 September 2026
CryptoEarn Important
@CryptoEarnImp · 27,624
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
IDO research
@idoresearch · 56,476
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
криптапиражок
@cryppi · 30,171
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
Coin Metrika
@CoinMetrika · 34,592
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
Герман на блокчейне 🇪🇹
@blockchaingerman · 32,508
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
DНЕВНИКИ Крипто
@dnevniki_crypto · 32,922
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
Defigen Capital | Столица дефигена
@defigencapital · 19,844
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 September 2026
ProMint
@ProMintChannel · 24,969
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Coin listing
@coin_listing · 35,364
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 2 September 2026
ForkLog
@forklog · 101,502
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
cryptocholy
@cryptocholy · 38,018
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 31 August 2026
FACK BLOCK RESEARCH
@fackblock · 25,118
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
SWIPER
@swiper_money · 27,812
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
DOUBLETOP
@doubletop · 70,477
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
AX1
@ax1vc · 20,295
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 September 2026
Max Zarev
@maxzarev · 24,679
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026
КриптоАтака 24 ⚡️
@cryptoattack24 · 55,347
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 48 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Lamer©” (@CryptoLamer), 16,853 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoLamer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.