Channel
@BlockchainProfs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
190subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001522652972 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BlockchainProfs |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BlockchainProfs |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 190 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 192 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:49 | 192 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
70 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 28 | 40.0% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 34.3% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 17.1% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 4.29% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 2.86% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 1.43% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
How Stablecoins Are Rewiring Payments and Challenging Traditional Banking Stablecoins are moving $28T annually and holding more US debt than entire countries. They aren't just crypto plumbing anymore — they are actively rewriting the rules of global money, and traditional banking is scrambling to keep up. Are stablecoins about to make legacy current accounts obsolete? Or will megabanks fight back with tokenised dep…
👍2❤1🫡1
AI agents are now the largest consumers of on-chain data – and you can't even track them 🤖 The fastest-growing user reading blockchain data isn't a human behind a screen. It's autonomous software querying, deciding, and acting on its own. Why tracking AI traffic on-chain is nearly impossible: ▫️ Stealth operation – AI agents don't declare themselves; they look like standard developer requests 🕵️♂️ ▫️ Invisible in …
👍2❤🔥1
85% of your lead generation data is pure waste 🗑️ Plugging into Apollo, Clay, or Web3-native tools gives massive volume – but raw data quality is dangerously low. Out of 1,000 pulled contacts, only 150 to 200 are actually relevant, current, and usable. Why volume-first B2B outreach fails: ▫️ The 15-20% usable reality – 80%+ of scraped leads are outdated or irrelevant 📉 ▫️ The volume trap – Thousands of contacts me…
👍2❤1🔥1
Cheap AI security audits will cost you millions 💀 A 10-minute, $5 AI scan on a 10,000-line protocol doesn't deliver security – it delivers a false sense of safety. Cheap AI tools fail because security depth can't be bootstrapped on zero budget: ▫️ Surface-level analysis – Basic tools miss complex, multi-contract logic vulnerabilities ⚠️ ▫️ Illusion of safety – A cheap scan isn't an audit; it's a Swiss cheese slice …
❤1👍1
Federated learning has a major trust problem — here’s how zero-knowledge fixes it 🛡️ Decentralized AI training breaks down when malicious actors compromise the network: ▫️ Corrupted local training — Rogue clients push malicious models to disrupt learning 🦠 ▫️ Malicious aggregation — Central aggregators manipulate global updates instead of combining honest data 🚨 Without verification, federated learning remains vuln…
👍2❤1
Tokenization is just mirroring TradFi — until regulation goes on-chain 🪞 RWAs don't win on yield; they win on instant settlement, split ownership, and access. The main bottleneck? Legacy off-chain KYC. The real shift happens when compliance moves on-chain: ▫️ Native on-chain compliance 🆔 ▫️ Legal validity by default ⚖️ ▫️ Full exit from legacy rails 🔗 Anatolii Manko (EPAM) on why RWA is the new financial oil. 📺 …
🔥2
Why tokenized deposits are about to unlock massive corporate liquidity 💸 Traditional finance traps billions in liquidity through delayed settlements and multi-tier intermediaries. Stablecoins already proved the blueprint for retail, salaries, and loyalty payouts. Tokenized deposits are the next evolution for B2B and corporate treasury: ▫️ Real-time settlement – Eliminates capital trapped in multi-day clearing cycl…
👏3🔥2❤1
Think blockchain will replace national payment rails? Think again 🛑 The biggest myth in Web3 is that traditional rails are dying. They already have what crypto desperately needs: trust, scale, and mass adoption. Blockchain isn’t replacing traditional finance — it’s just giving it superpowers: ▫️ Programmable payments ⚙️ ▫️ Tokenized assets 🏦 ▫️ Instant cross-border settlement 🌐 Stop calling it a revolution. It’s …
👍3❤1❤🔥1🔥1
Belgrade is quickly becoming CEE's main Web3 hub 🇷🇸 ETH Belgrade is back for its 4th edition on August 26–27 at the iconic Sava Congress Center, anchoring this year's Belgrade Blockchain Week ⚡️ What makes this edition special: ▫️ Free admission for everyone (registration required) 🎟️ ▫️ Co-located with Solana Summit Serbia & Rust Summit under one roof 🤝 ▫️ 1,500+ builders, OGs, and investors gathering in the heart…
👍5❤2🔥2
🚀Blockchain Life returns to Dubai with the debut of AI Future! / Blockchain Life returns to Dubai on December 1–2! On December 1–2, Blockchain Life 2026 will take place in Dubai – one of the world’s largest events dedicated to Web3, mining, cryptocurrencies, and AI. 15 000+ attendees from 130+ countries, 200+ speakers, AI Future Forum focused on the future of AI technologies, global networking, and Formula 1. Why a…
🔥1
In 2026, the premium for being on-chain is officially dead 💀 Smart contracts now pay less than US Treasuries. Artem CryptoLamer from Moni.ai breaks down the 3 yield engines left in Web3: ▫️ Tokenized T-Bills (3.5% base rate) 💵 ▫️ Cooling carry trades (down to ~2%) 📉 ▫️ Delta-neutral strategies with RWA collateral ⚖️ 📺 Watch the full session: https://youtu.be/BxQOMpn7d4c
🔥2👍1
Clients want Web3 freedom, but regulators hate it 🤯 When financial institutions tokenize assets, they expect the benefits of public markets without the compliance headaches. Anastasiia Sanina breaks down what clients actually demand: ▫️ 24/7 peer-to-peer trading ▫️ Zero intermediaries ▫️ Direct access to global liquidity 📺 Watch the full session: https://youtu.be/qBqohgusou0
👍3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BlockchainProfs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Blockchain Professionals Community” (@BlockchainProfs), 190 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BlockchainProfs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.