🚩Подкасты канала "Копеечка в кошельке" на основе сторонней аналитики сделанное ИИ. 🚩Название: Золото "выглядит особенно интересным" для Goldman Sachs; устойчивость фондовых индексов скрывает плохую динамику рынка и ухудшение настроений. Графики в описании❗️❗️ #подкаст 🚩Заголовок ИИ: Почему хедж-фонды скупают акции вопреки панике Представленные материалы содержат комплексный анализ текущего состояния финансовых р…

Channel
Копеечка в кошельке
@kopeechkav
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
55,283subscribers
-408 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001132013128 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kopeechkav |
| Description | Тонны эксклюзивных графиков РЫНКИ S&P500 и другие, Биткоин, СОБЫТИЯ, мнения, прогнозы ( чужие :) НОВОСТИ! Конечно же мемы ! Беларусь! Вообщем Лучший канал по версии моей Мамы!!! Реклама телеграм: @yuliy_in По рекламе Ютуб @kopeecka_sviaz_bot |
| Created | 24 May 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kopeechkav |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 55,283 | -6 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 55,289 | -9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 55,298 | -21 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 55,319 | -7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 55,326 | -36 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 55,362 | -33 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 55,395 | -15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:08 | 55,410 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:54 | 55,421 | -43 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:59 | 55,464 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 55,475 | +10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 55,465 | +13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 55,452 | -20 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 55,472 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 55,477 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 55,485 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 55,496 | -12 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 55,508 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 55,512 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 55,517 | first reading |
Engagement
1,622 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.87%
- avg views ÷ 55,283 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,030
- 1,035 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.6%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 1,035
- of 1,622 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 874 of 1,035 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,622 (6 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,070,089 |
| Reactions total | 6,194 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 03:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈178,000
- Videos
- ≈5,890
- Links
- ≈40,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 17m
- Average length
- 2m 21s
Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,864 reactions across 829 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,436 | 24.5% | |
| 😁 | 1,249 | 21.3% | |
| ❤ | 980 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 925 | 15.8% | |
| 🤔 | 727 | 12.4% | |
| 😱 | 136 | 2.32% | |
| 👀 | 128 | 2.18% | |
| 👏 | 93 | 1.59% | |
| ⚡ | 52 | 0.887% | |
| 💯 | 50 | 0.853% | |
| 😢 | 49 | 0.836% | |
| 🐳 | 24 | 0.409% | |
| 🍾 | 14 | 0.239% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.017% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 839 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,864 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 52
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 42
- of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 4
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kopeechkav. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🔣 Артур Хейс: более медленный рост ИИ в США был бы бычьим для BTC Сооснователь BitMEX Артур Хейс утверждал, что замедление индустрии ИИ в США в итоге поддержало бы Bitcoin, расширив денежную массу. В блоге Хейс заявил, что более слабый спрос на вычисления ИИ мог бы раскрыть долговые риски, связанные с дата-центрами, повышая вероятность, что правительство США впрыснет ликвидность либо для поддержки индустрии ИИ, либо …
👍2❤1
По словам Алекса Торна из Galaxy, «белые хакеры» из COLDCARD перевели 52,37 BTC, возвращенных в результате устранения уязвимости, на адрес Crypto Recovery Trust, созданный для возврата средств пострадавшим| Копеечка в кошельке 🧮
🔥1
Сигнал цикла альткойнов переключился с «сезона биткоина» на «сезон альткойнов», поскольку сегодняшний рост охватывает более широкий рынок альткойнов, как сообщает glassnode| Копеечка в кошельке 🧮
В конце июля некоммерческие участники рынка фьючерсов на биткоин в совокупности занимали рекордную за всю историю чистую длинную позицию. В отличие от большинства фьючерсных рынков, «коммерческие» трейдеры не являются «умными деньгами» на рынке биткоина, где лишь немногие участники подпадают под это определение. Напротив, именно некоммерческие участники (например, крупные хедж-фонды) являются «умными деньгами». Когд…
❤1
Рост кредитования в Китае резко снижается: В августе объем кредитов в Китае вырос на 4,9 % в годовом исчислении, что является самым низким показателем за весь период наблюдений, начиная с 1990-х годов. Это произошло на фоне сокращения банковского кредитования до всего лишь ~9 млрд долларов, что значительно ниже ожидаемых ~60 млрд долларов. Кроме того, совокупное финансирование — широкий показатель кредитования — у…
С 2010 года биткоин проводил 46 % дней на уровне, по крайней мере, на 50 % ниже предыдущего максимума. Наиболее распространённый диапазон, охватывающий 40 % всех дней, составляет от 50 % до 80 % ниже максимума. Лишь 16 % дней приходились на период, когда курс находился в пределах 10 % от максимума — это менее трети от общего числа дней. | Копеечка в кошельке 🧮
🔥1
Вероятность того, что курс биткоина в этом году достигнет 100 тысяч долларов, удвоилась и сейчас составляет почти 50 %, после того как в связи с провалом закона «Clarity Act» она упала до 15 %. | Копеечка в кошельке 🧮
🔥2
Сантимент: 📊 Торговая активность резко возросла вместе с ценой. Биткоин и основные альткоины демонстрируют самый высокий суммарный недельный объем с начала марта, что неудивительно, поскольку интерес к рынкам снова возрос. 🥸 Внезапное увеличение объема обычно означает, что толпа перешла от нерешительности к уверенности. Все больше трейдеров стремятся к пробоям, переходят на альткоины и вновь открывают позиции с кред…
Уровень FOMO по биткоину достиг максимального значения с 2024 года, когда цена BTC приблизилась к отметке в 87 000 долларов, что привело к ликвидации медвежьих позиций на сумму 648 миллионов долларов, а объем торгов криптовалютами подскочил на 39 %. | Копеечка в кошельке 🧮
Объем чистых покупок на Binance взлетел до +618 млн долларов за один час. Покупательское давление, стоявшее за этим скачком цены, по своей величине было сопоставимо с прорывом 19 августа. | Копеечка в кошельке 🧮
👍1
Итак, стратегия «покупки при показателе MVRV < 1» оказалась успешной| Копеечка в кошельке 🧮
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,622 posts we hold for @kopeechkav. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@crypto_santiment · 46 postsCryptobros
@crypto_broru · 45 postsUA stream (Ukrainian Analytics) Crypto
@UAanalytics · 254 postsANARCHO CRYPTO NEWS
@AnarchoCryptoTrading · 913 postsCryptoDays S&A
@CryptoDaysSignals_22 · 403 postsCrypto ; 加密貨幣; क्रिप्टो ;Signals ; Analytics.
@putintelegramm · 5533 postsCHC | Crypto Holders Club
@chclubkg · 322 postsМажоры
@majory7 · 12 postsCrypto Dog
@moneyhabit24 · 1522 postspasta monster epiphany
@monster_pasta · 242 postsСигналы отправка
@sscvdsvwefd · 22 postsБанки.Крипто.Схематоз
@BCS_channel · 1,5941 postCcoin_news🐽
@Ccoin_news · 71 postКриптоКот
@Crypto_Kot · 1901 postТрейдинг (Криптовалюты: BTC, Альткоины)
@DeloTreidinga · 1361 postКриптаЗавод
@KriptaZavod · 3,2621 post⚠️ A-MEDIA
@MEDIA_Aggregator · 11 postMagic asic Майнинг l Канал
@MagiclAsic · 231 postЖаба изучает крипту
@Thetoadisstudyingthecrypto · 451 postTrade Сomment
@TradeComment · 161 posta1nve$t 〄
@a1InveSt · 151 postСообщество анонимных миллионеров
@anonymbillionairess · 221 postBTC_DADDY👨🏻💻 | DeFi | Crypto | News
@btc_daddy13 · 1101 post💸 КАПИТАЛ С УМОМ 💸
@capital_sumom · 281 postКрипта на пальцах
@cryptonfingers · 11 postКлуб цифровых экспертов
@digitalexpertiza · 611 postГоднота и не только 🌚
@godnota1337 · 411 postКанал
@keybear_blog · 1231 postKripTON(Боевой хомяк 3-го криптосезона)
@kripTONhoma · 161 postЗаметки Фонда 🌞
@mydroytro · 31 postequivalent of virtual money
@razgulisy · 31 postGT v potoke
@rgw_invest · 11 postSporTKappers
@sportkappers · 21 postО финансах и романсах
@voblnavsegda · 481 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@crypto_broru · 45 postsInsiderTrades
@InsiderTradesResearch · 14 postsANARCHO CRYPTO NEWS
@AnarchoCryptoTrading · 913 postsТест тестов
@test77a · 33 postsCHC | Crypto Holders Club
@chclubkg · 322 postsCRYPTO INSIDER👁
@crypto_insider_new · 1,0362 postspasta monster epiphany
@monster_pasta · 242 postsa1nve$t 〄
@a1InveSt · 151 postMonitoring ANON
@ANONMonitoring · 81 postBitcoin Крипто News
@bitconnewscrypto · 971 postBTC_DADDY👨🏻💻 | DeFi | Crypto | News
@btc_daddy13 · 1101 postКрипто €врей
@cryptohebreww · 81 postТрейдинг (Криптовалюты: BTC, Альткоины)
@DeloTreidinga · 1361 postКлуб цифровых экспертов
@digitalexpertiza · 611 postКанал
@keybear_blog · 1231 postКриптаЗавод
@KriptaZavod · 3,2621 postKripTON(Боевой хомяк 3-го криптосезона)
@kripTONhoma · 161 postЗаметки Фонда 🌞
@mydroytro · 31 postО финансах и романсах
@voblnavsegda · 481 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@crypto_hd · 132,434#1
@Coin_Post · 291,333#2
@markettwits · 336,496#3
@pifagortrade · 85,453#4
@RBCCrypto · 132,477#5
@otdyshiprocrypto · 22,760#6
@forklog · 92,345#7
@cryptodaily · 85,610#8
@BMonarch_official · 43,703#9
@ikigaimain · 98,290#10
@cryptoattack24 · 56,173#11
@gen_m · 66,926#12
@cryptotweet280 · 13,430#13
@satoshinews · 29,478#14
@evans_crypto · 54,369#15
@falconinvestors · 82,295#16
@richdi · 43,576#17
@richdeenews · 21,658#18
@incrypted · 108,728#19
@invest_zonaa · 917,113#20
@TMV_info · 4,736#21
@CryptoFamilyPublic · 29,315#22
@Defiscamcheck · 48,614#23
@nakamotonado · 5,935#24
@trade001k · 107,044#25
@DeCenter · 1,823,722#26
@prosto_kripto · 9,901#27
@cryptocommonz · 22,191#28
@piftwit · 25,606#29
@Age_of_Crypt · 15,401#30
@cryptostrategy2018 · 10,686#31
@toncoin_rus · 526,912#32
@BazaBitcoin · 15,122#33
@andryuninthelegend · 18,509#34
@mihaylets_pro · 11,576#35
@razinvestor · 41,766#36
@True_Market_Vision · 21,076#37
@Pro_Blockchain · 160,910#38
@cryptoantonyy · 8,485#39
@HodlerStrategy · 4,913#40
@CRYPTUS_MEDIA · 71,625#41
@drops_daily · 21,302#42
@bitcoinadept · 23,133#43
@GoTrade_Telegram · 1,012#44
@cryptonarnianews · 19,774#45
@mmrktmkr · 42,412#46
@crypto_solyanka · 50,506#47
@VasyaBTC · 6,341#48
@FrontManChannel · 14,964#49
@CoinMetrika · 35,139#50
@SANCHO_DT · 65,589#51
@mcoin4 · 11,601#52
@wellfedhamster · 88,802#53
@rippleweb · 10,326#54
@polunintrade7 · 525,189#55
@alexhodl · 9,661#56
@P4M_channel · 33,294#57
@mr_mozart · 129,572#58
@slezisatoshi · 124,064#59
@trend_gen · 55,259#60
@tradertrend · 60,704#61
@blumcrypto · 14,360,001#62
@maloletoffcrypto · 45,665#63
@cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,128,418#64
@banksta · 438,140#65
@web3ru · 12,085#66
@ateobreaking · 694,274#67
@bankrollo · 454,915#68
@Info4atlanin · 29,616#69
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 49,702#70
@KartavKanaLL · 18,612#71
@blockchaingerman · 32,945#72
@muhtovinvest · 17,584#73
@idoresearch · 57,589#74
@doubletop · 70,952#75
@Nat_Selection · 14,151#76
@exploitex · 2,041,128#77
@turtles_way · 30,685#78
@headlines_for_traders · 115,317#79
@dogs · 7,065,215#80
@notcoin · 8,643,687#81
@asupersharij · 1,700,527#82
@hotonnear · 4,675,152#83
@whale_alert_io · 300,889#84
@BinanceLiquidations · 180,620#85
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693#86
@truexanewsua · 3,127,306#87
@vanek_nikolaev · 2,636,316#88
@nevzorovtv · 1,019,614#89
@cultofnot · 1,027,411#90
@CryptoPrank · 5,426#91
@nexta_live · 767,216#92
@insiderukr · 2,183,396#93
@ejdailyru · 649,498#94
@voynareal · 1,522,485#95
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@CryptoChiefcom · 86,127
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
@otdyshiprocrypto · 22,760
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
@richdicrypto · 34,413
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
@gen_m · 66,926
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
@RBCCrypto · 132,477
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
@richdi · 43,576
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
@Coin_Post · 291,333
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
@cryptocommonz · 22,191
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 September 2026
@BMonarch_official · 43,703
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
@evans_crypto · 54,369
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
@bitcoinadept · 23,133
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 September 2026
@cryptopizza_news · 27,760
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
@forklog · 92,345
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
@cryptoc · 22,802
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 September 2026
@CryptoFamilyPublic · 29,315
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
@pifagortrade · 85,453
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
@satoshinews · 29,478
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
@piftwit · 25,606
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
@QPROtrading · 24,320
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
@ikigaimain · 98,290
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
@crypto_hd · 132,434
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
@whaleWS · 32,254
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
@buff_10 · 60,148
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
@yivashchenko · 28,926
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 63 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Копеечка в кошельке” (@kopeechkav), 55,283 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kopeechkav.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.