29 measurements spanning 32 days, net -380. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,966–34,857 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 13:21
27,876
-21
5 Sept 2026, 04:18
27,897
-20
3 Sept 2026, 06:18
27,917
-17
2 Sept 2026, 03:46
27,934
-19
1 Sept 2026, 01:57
27,953
-13
30 Aug 2026, 23:34
27,966
-12
30 Aug 2026, 01:48
27,978
-7
28 Aug 2026, 23:37
27,985
-10
28 Aug 2026, 02:42
27,995
-9
27 Aug 2026, 03:53
28,004
-12
26 Aug 2026, 07:04
28,016
-14
25 Aug 2026, 05:39
28,030
-9
24 Aug 2026, 04:56
28,039
-11
22 Aug 2026, 09:24
28,050
-34
20 Aug 2026, 20:55
28,084
-14
19 Aug 2026, 19:07
28,098
-16
18 Aug 2026, 16:03
28,114
-12
17 Aug 2026, 15:35
28,126
-5,820
16 Aug 2026, 07:13
33,946
+5,810
14 Aug 2026, 16:35
28,136
first reading
Engagement
104 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 27,876 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,820
76 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
76
of 104 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held
104 (31 July 2026 – 4 September 2026)
Views total
214,504
Reactions total
2,553
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
3,480 reactions across 104 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,063
59.3%
🔥
1,045
30.0%
👏
197
5.66%
😁
122
3.51%
🫡
39
1.12%
😱
7
0.201%
🤩
5
0.144%
😍
2
0.057%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 104 of the 104 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,480 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 104 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 104 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @profaltov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 104 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 4 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#PENDLE Приблизились к отметке в 2$
Актив неоднократно пыталась реализовать пробой уровня поддержки по 1.25$, но полноценно уйти ниже него так и не получилось. Общерыночная динамика сменилась на положительную, что сказалось и на росте данной монеты.
За последние пару недель цена выросла на 56% и сейчас активно поджимает в область cопротивления по 2$, если динамика по рынку сохранится, то имеем все шансы на его проб…
Доброе утро ☀
Ежедневный обзор BTC
❌Ликвидации на рынке за последние сутки, CoinGlass: ~ За последние 24 часа было ликвидировано 97 560 трейдеров, общая сумма ликвидаций составила $539.68 million. ~16% лонг-позиций и ~84% шорт-позиций.
Актив не перестает удивлять, казалось бы шли на снижение и снова получили импульс в лонг до отметки в 82.000$, что привело к ликвидации достаточно большого количества шорт позиций…
#DYDX Как обстоят дела с монетой?
Актив показал снижение к поддержке по 0.11$, которую я как раз отмечал в прошлом обзоре и отработал мой сценарий с консолидацией выше нее.
Однако, ситуация остается печальной, активность покупателя низкая и предпосылок на то, что это изменится в ближайшее время у нас нет.
Поэтому я вполне допускаю в среднесрочной перспективе снижение еще на 30% в область прошлого лоя на отметке 0.…
#PYTH Получится закрепиться выше 0.05$?
Актив реализовал пробой данной отметки, но вот динамика довольно вялая по сравнению с другими альткоинами, поэтому я бы не ждал пробой сопротивления по 0.06147$.
Наиболее вероятный сценарий здесь это продолжение консолидации в диапазоне 0.03719$ - 0.06147$, так как шансы на выход из него с такой низкой активностью покупателя крайне малы.
После закола верхней границы можете …
Доброе утро ☀
Ежедневный обзор BTC
❌Ликвидации на рынке за последние сутки, CoinGlass: ~ За последние 24 часа было ликвидировано 103 463 трейдеров, общая сумма ликвидаций составила $276.97 million. ~52% лонг-позиций и ~48% шорт-позиций.
Актив продолжает торговаться ниже 78.000$ и на текущий момент смог уйти ниже облака, которое перевернулось на 4чTf, что указывает на потенциальное продолжение коррекции.
Пока ож…
Также просили рассмотреть #ATOM
Монета отработала мой сценарий с ретестом уровня по 1.5$ и отскоком в шорт. Закрепиться выше данной отметки у нас не получилось, так как текущей активности покупателя для этого не хватает.
Сейчас я бы ожидал снижение к поддержке по 1.2$, тем самым формирование боковика в данном диапазоне ( 1.2$ - 1.5$), пока этот сценарий вижу как основной.
Продолжение роста здесь маловероятно, учит…
Просили обзор на #EIGEN
По сути с момента прошлого обзора ситуация по активу никак не изменилась, мы продолжаем расторговывать боковик 0.1507$ - 0,25$ без каких либо изменений.
Пока предпосылок на выход в какую - то из сторон не наблюдается, отсутствует как сильное давление в продажу, так и активность покупателя.
При недавнем росте по битку, актив не смог пробить верхнюю границу диапазона, поэтому даже при его сни…
Доброе утро ☀
Ежедневный обзор BTC
❌Ликвидации на рынке за последние сутки, CoinGlass: ~ За последние 24 часа было ликвидировано 87 531 трейдеров, общая сумма ликвидаций составила $339.33 million. ~80% лонг-позиций и ~20% шорт-позиций.
Как я и предполагал актив пытается пробить нижнюю границу боковика, в моменте цена практически заколола отмеченную мной область в 76.000$ немного нам не хватило до нее.
Я думаю, …
#WIF Получится ли удержать восходящую динамику?
На недавнем росте рынка данный токен вырос в пике на 75%, но после чего пошел планомерный откат, который связан с низкой активностью покупателя.
Если обратить внимание на торговые объемы они хоть и подросли в моменте, но так и оставались на низком уровне, а в текущий момент и вовсе вернулись к прежнем значениям.
Пока ситуация складывается в пользу коррекции в ретесту…
Просили обзор на #TWT
Актив постепенно набирает обороты в лонг и по итогу смог реализовать пробой сопротивления по 0.4671$, которое я ранее отмечал. Но произошло это за счет роста биткоина по большей части.
Конечно активность покупателя здесь немного подросла, поэтому я допускаю закол сопротивления по 0.55$, но вот в его пробой сильно сомневаюсь.
К тому же у нас есть небольшая перекупленность по RSI, поэтому логич…
Доброе утро ☀
Ежедневный обзор BTC
❌Ликвидации на рынке за последние сутки, CoinGlass: ~ За последние 24 часа было ликвидировано 57 551 трейдеров, общая сумма ликвидаций составила $147.70 million. ~30% лонг-позиций и ~70% шорт-позиций.
C началом рабочей недели у нас особо не прибавилось динамики и по итогу мы продолжаем консолидироваться в диапазоне 77.500$ - 80.000$.
Cейчас у нас равнозначные шансы как на рет…
#POL Что там с активом?
Актив по итогу спустился ниже 0.07$ как я и предполагал ранее, хоть и не сразу, но данную цель мы выполнили. В текущий момент мы наблюдаем волну роста в +75%, которую уже практически откатили.
В целом ситуация, как и по остальным альта - выросли на фоне BTC, но удержать динамику без него не смогли, ввиду слабой активности покупателя.
Поэтому сейчас мы будем продолжать откатываться и вернемс…
👍18🔥7👏4
Showing the 12 most recent of 104 posts we hold for @profaltov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Будет медвежка до конца 2026, BTC сходит к 55 000$59%
Продолжится боковик до конца года21%
Начнётся бычий цикл и постепенный рост рынка21%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 104 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 4 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
КИТ с Wall Street @whaleWS · 32,394 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
Дмитрий Ткачев| Эксперт криптовалют @dimatkachevv · 34,432 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
Мысли Вайкоффа @wyckoffcompany · 69,357 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
Главный по Крипте @CryptoChiefcom · 86,743 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Крипта (деньги) @Kriptamoney · 39,076 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 August 2026
Сытый хомяк @wellfedhamster · 89,166 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Что говорят киты? 🐋 @whaletalks · 52,012 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
Egorov Trade @egorov_trade · 34,137 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 September 2026
Кошелек с Биткоинами | Алексей Чечукевич @wallet_with_bitcoins · 87,328 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 August 2026
Илья Соловей @teamtrade618 · 45,975 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
Trade Soul (Зеркало) @trade_soul · 691 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Павел Казанцев | О Крипте @cryptokazancev · 40,313 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
Дмитрий Кокорев | Инвестиции @kokorevinvest · 101,664 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Артём Звёздин - обучение трейдингу @uiartemzvezdin · 75,929 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
Mr Mozart @mr_mozart · 129,981 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Trade by Booba @trade_by_booba · 50,525 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
DНЕВНИКИ Крипто @dnevniki_crypto · 33,358 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
КриптоИнсайдер | CRYPTOIN @cryptoin · 45,011 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
IKIGAI @ikigaimain · 98,520 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
Pursuit4Million|Андрей Соболев @P4M_channel · 34,005 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
Биржевой Монарх @BMonarch_official · 43,828 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
Crypto-Крипта | Новости, прогнозы и аналитика @Proffit_crypto · 71,213 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
Крипта с Александром @crypt_investing · 65,394 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
Крипта на доступном @easymarketcrypto · 70,318 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Профессор Альтов 🥸” (@profaltov), 27,876 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/profaltov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.