Биткоин снова растет Биткоин продолжает набирать обороты, ожидается дальнейший рост к отметке $90,000. Хотя на этой неделе новостей немного, внимание сосредоточено на фундаментальных выступлениях. Больше ясности появится после публикации заявлений. 🪙 Egorov Trade | 🔥 Bitunix

Channel
Egorov Trade
@egorov_trade
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
33,928subscribers
-852 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001747188464 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @egorov_trade |
| Description | О крипте и трейдинге - простым языком. Личный блог трейдера с 8 летним стажем. Пригласить друга: @egorov_trade Получить VIP сигналы: @trade_VP Отзывы: @egorov_reviews По рекламе: @demaxcrypto По важным вопросам: @adsgenius |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/egorov_trade |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 33,928 | -49 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 33,977 | -33 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:22 | 34,010 | -40 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 34,050 | -46 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 34,096 | -41 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 34,137 | -55 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 34,192 | -29 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 34,221 | -31 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 34,252 | -38 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 34,290 | -29 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 34,319 | -21 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 34,340 | -19 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 34,359 | -19 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 34,378 | -19 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 34,397 | -22 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 34,419 | -18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 34,437 | -29 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:44 | 34,466 | -29 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:09 | 34,495 | -26 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 34,521 | first reading |
Engagement
265 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.01%
- avg views ÷ 33,928 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 680
- 139 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 139
- of 265 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 265 (3 August 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 94,559 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 05:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈8,190
- Videos
- ≈44
- Links
- ≈7,460
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 24s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🐂 Бычий рынок подтверждён BTC впервые с марта 2023 года закрылся выше своей 365-дневной скользящей средней — линии, которая сигнализировала о каждом бычьем рынке с 2019 года. Следующее сопротивление: $88k-$90k. Данные в сети предсказывали это ещё в середине августа. BTC преодолел свой барьер предложения. 🪙 Egorov Trade | 🔥 Bitunix
🤩 $BTC опустился ниже $84000 Зона $83000-$84000 ранее выступала сопротивлением, что делает повторное тестирование этого уровня нормальной частью структуры рынка. 🪙 Egorov Trade | 🔥 Bitunix
🔥 NASDAQ выбрал $PYTH для передачи рыночных данных в реальном времени Именно поэтому я остаюсь оптимистичным в отношении $PYTH 🪙 Egorov Trade | 🔥 Bitunix
🤩 $BTC всё ещё может протестировать более низкие уровни $78k-$81k - это ключевая зона ликвидности. Если мы увидим такое падение, это может стать лучшей возможностью для усреднения перед следующим рывком вверх. Сначала $90k, затем $95k-$100k. 🪙 Egorov Trade | 🔥 Bitunix
🤩 $ELSA рисует разворот Можно лонгануть после закрепа выше $0.059, с стопом за локальные лои. 🔥 Торгую на бирже Bitunix (низкие комиссии и бонусы до $1000 за депозит) 🪙 Egorov Trade | 🔥 Bitunix
🧐 Обратите внимание на $EIGEN Кажется, сформировалось «закругленное дно». Проект фундаментально силен: FDV составляет $440M, а TVL — $7.2B! 🪙 Egorov Trade | 🔥 Bitunix
🤩 $ZKP вышла из треугольника с сильным объемом Импульс набирает обороты, и этот прорыв может стать искрой для мощного бычьего роста. 🪙 Egorov Trade | 🔥 Bitunix
📊 Тестирование сопротивления крипторынком Общая рыночная капитализация криптовалют сейчас тестирует область сопротивления. Прорыв выше этого уровня может привести к хорошему росту на всем крипторынке, а отказ — вернет цену в консолидацию. 🪙 Egorov Trade | 🔥 Bitunix
🤩 Если ETH/BTC закроется выше этой трендовой в сентябре — буду ждать хорошего роста по альте 🪙 Egorov Trade | 🔥 Bitunix
💹 USDT.D достиг важной зоны поддержки USDT.D завершил движение в 5 волн. Ожидается, что в этой области произойдет отскок (коррекция на крипторынке), прежде чем продолжится снижение. 🪙 Egorov Trade | 🔥 Bitunix
🤩 $BTC начинает пробивать стену продавцов $88k-$90k - это уровень для переворота. Снять эту зону, и уровень $95k войдёт в игру. 🪙 Egorov Trade | 🔥 Bitunix
Showing the 12 most recent of 265 posts we hold for @egorov_trade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@egorov_trade edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 11 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 29 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@alexatamcrypto · 39,052#1
@cryptoin · 44,739#2
@whaletalks · 51,715#3
@crypto_Iemon · 75,063#4
@cryptospec · 19,584#5
@gemhuntru · 70,747#6
@invest_zonaa · 917,113#7
@svoicrypto · 29,890#8
@polunintrade7 · 525,189#9
@eeusd · 1,143,369#10
@crypadvis · 95,402#11
@EasyInvestCrypt · 105,745#12
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,191,483#13
@cryptoniumb · 19,215#14
@Crypta_Pashkevicha · 109,220#15
@cryptoera · 49,718#16
@trade_soul · 701#17
@crypta · 542,279#18
@profaltov · 27,740#19
@crypt_investing · 64,978#20
@Anton_cryptoo · 144,788#21
@vladimir_dzen_invest · 29,989#22
@ai_man0s · 26,298#23
@Kripto_Azbuk · 293,747#24
@crypto_vestnic · 209,230#25
@clickerhunters · 354,193#26
@stukach_trading · 311,096#27
@veniamin_stepanenko · 6,696#28
@beyond_cryptooo · 39,264#29
@zicelaqo · 165,921#30
@cryptodaily · 85,610#31
@cryptorun · 128,702#32
@eduardinvest · 1,368,255#33
@vincrypto · 7,330#34
@thetamaxxing · 36,779#35
@Coin_Post · 291,333#36
@rilcrypto · 75,425#37
@radan_blog · 33,369#38
@masterskay_mateshev · 22,387#39
@rich_dadcrypto · 10,039#40
@HanibalCrypto · 20,723#41
@crypto_jeman · 666,447#42
@crypto_hd · 132,434#43
@trade001k · 107,044#44
@Crypto_Clab_100F · 22,525#45
@notatraderrr · 139,638#46
@crypto_talk_channel · 9,914#47
@playweb4 · 144,162#48
@semenchuk · 1,242,429#49
@notcoin · 8,643,687#50
@Crypta_lyam · 33,155#51
@tu_airdrops_daily · 64,363#52
@chetamcrypto · 38,179#53
@catapult_extreme · 8,500,526#54
@catizenann · 3,581,173#55
@hotonnear · 4,675,152#56
@hamsterdropru · 57,537#57
@CryptoPayk · 155,238#58
@cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,128,418#59
@finansist_busines · 624,235#60
@RustonCrypto · 22,038#61
@ZoyaAlvaro777 · 19,851#62
@ath_crypto · 23,660#63
@truexanewsua · 3,127,306#64
@Cats_housewtf · 7,949,411#65
@vestirussia · 986,059#66
@freee_crypts · 13,597#67
@disbalans1 · 3,000#68
@trendingapps · 3,812,897#69
@pocketfi · 1,799,855#70
@dogs · 7,065,215#71
@blumcrypto · 14,360,001#72
@cultofnot · 1,027,411#73
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,531,077#74
@lostdogscoru · 215,203#75
@Sanek_Kharkiv · 150,926#76
@svoiua · 206,933#77
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@whaletalks · 51,715
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
@masterskay_mateshev · 22,387
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 September 2026
@cryptoin · 44,739
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
@vladimir_dzen_invest · 29,989
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 7 September 2026
@trade_soul · 701
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
@airobots_news · 44,560
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
@clickerhunters · 354,193
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
@radan_blog · 33,369
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 4 September 2026
@EasyInvestCrypt · 105,745
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
@svoicrypto · 29,890
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 7 September 2026
@alexatamcrypto · 39,052
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
@crypt_investing · 64,978
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
@Crypta_Pashkevicha · 109,220
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
@profaltov · 27,740
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
@crypto_Iemon · 75,063
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
@gemhuntru · 70,747
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
@chetamcrypto · 38,179
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
@Crypta_lyam · 33,155
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 September 2026
@shirinisara · 22,743
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Egorov Trade” (@egorov_trade), 33,928 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/egorov_trade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.