Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 89 days, net -2,654. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,479–39,929 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 22:30
36,877
-29
3 Nov 2026, 20:47
36,906
-27
2 Nov 2026, 18:24
36,933
-30
1 Nov 2026, 20:55
36,963
-37
31 Oct 2026, 23:56
37,000
-21
30 Oct 2026, 20:35
37,021
-39
29 Oct 2026, 20:48
37,060
-26
28 Oct 2026, 17:08
37,086
-23
27 Oct 2026, 19:48
37,109
-21
26 Oct 2026, 22:16
37,130
-25
26 Oct 2026, 00:27
37,155
-18
25 Oct 2026, 01:27
37,173
-31
23 Oct 2026, 23:50
37,204
-27
22 Oct 2026, 23:58
37,231
-32
22 Oct 2026, 00:26
37,263
-27
20 Oct 2026, 18:07
37,290
-13
19 Oct 2026, 18:50
37,303
-33
18 Oct 2026, 19:26
37,336
-29
17 Oct 2026, 18:30
37,365
-24
16 Oct 2026, 17:48
37,389
first reading
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 170 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.34%
avg views ÷ 36,877 subscribers
Avg views / post
861
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.406%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
34 (12 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
5,167
Reactions total
21
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 12:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 23s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
192 reactions across 29 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
22
11.5%
⚡
21
10.9%
❤
19
9.90%
❤🔥
18
9.38%
🤣
18
9.38%
🔥
17
8.85%
💯
13
6.77%
😁
12
6.25%
🏆
10
5.21%
🤔
8
4.17%
🤩
8
4.17%
🍌
6
3.13%
🤯
5
2.60%
🙏
3
1.56%
👀
2
1.04%
💔
2
1.04%
😨
2
1.04%
😱
2
1.04%
👌
1
0.521%
😭
1
0.521%
2 further kinds
2
1.04%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🇺🇸 Демократы забрали Конгресс
Партия демократов получает большинство в обеих палатах: 53 места в Сенате и около 255 в Палате представителей. Республиканцы теряют контроль над Конгрессом и с этого момента Трампу придётся договариваться с оппозицией
Главные сюрпризы выборов: «синие» забрали даже традиционно республиканские штаты, включая Техас, где Джеймс Таларико обошёл Кена Пакстона. В Огайо возвращается Шеррод Бра…
👍 А вот это уже приятно
Вчера на Fragment убрали обязательную верификацию личности. Теперь покупать Telegram Stars, Premium и другие продукты за крипту снова можно без прохождения KYC, причём в некоторых случаях на 30–40% дешевле, чем через Apple Pay или Google Pay. Напомню, что обязательную проверку личности ввели ещё в ноябре 2024 года, а вчера раздел верификации полностью исчез с сайта.
❤️Теперь нет необходимост…
😦 Криптопохищения дошли до РФ
В Иваново похитили программиста, привлёкшего внимание преступников роскошной жизнью в соцсетях
🤩 Его схватили и пять часов в гараже пытками выбивали доступ к телефонам и кошелькам
🧤 Забрали 10,39 BTC, миллион рублей и технику, а мужчину бросили связанным в лесу. Ущерб превысил 84 млн рублей
Часть денег успели потратить на квартиры и автомобили, но всех пятерых подозреваемых уже задер…
🟠 Ожидаемого Uptober в этом году так и не случилось
Биткоин просел на 7,2%, сделав октябрь третьим убыточным месяцем за период с 2016 года, вторым подряд и худшим за последние десять лет.
👮 И до крипты доберутся
Цифровые активы теперь тоже могут изъять за долги. Приставы уже ведут 13 дел о их конфискации
Для списания крипты направляют постановление депозитарию. Тот переводит средства со счёта должника государству
Пора возвращаться к истокам и хранить деньги под матрасом? 🛏️
Почему ты еще не подписан на канал ВАЛЮТНЫЕ СЫНЫ
Копейка в плюс, лучше чем доллар в минус.
Канал по работе с валютным и крипто рынком. Без красивых слов сразу по делу: после подписки ты получаешь доступ в две приватки одна по форексу вторая по крипте с четкими и понятными сетапами.
ВСТУПИТЬ В КАНАЛ
ВСТУПИТЬ В КАНАЛ
ВСТУПИТЬ В КАНАЛ
Смотришь что в привате сразу, а не греешься как гой. Если не выдадут доступ в прив…
Кристина открыла второй канал.
В основном канале у нее уже слишком много людей, поэтому новые сделки она будет публиковать в своем VIP канале.
Статистика випки +400% за сентябрь
👇 Доступ по ссылке:
https://t.me/+QUmN_evIahpkMzA0
#промо
Даем каждому доступ в новый вип канал, но в отличии от других каналов, доступ в него будет полностью бесплатный.
С одним правилом, попасть в него можно будет только первым 250 человек.
Заходите: https://t.me/+NnfBryLemw45MzNi
В среднем 90% всей инсайдерской информации админы крупных каналов берут с этой випки. Думаем, что это идеально подойдет самым активным читателям и трейдерам.
Вступайте: https://t.me/+NnfBryLe…
😀 Че там у роботов? Они уже реально выходят на работу
У Agility Robotics роботы Digit уже накатали больше 65к часов на реальных объектах Amazon, Toyota, GXO и других компаний.
На одном складе GXO они перетаскали больше 100к контейнеров с точностью около 98%.
То есть роботы уже не просто красиво машут руками на выставках Илона Маска. Они реально воркают.
А как доказать, что робот действительно сделал то, за что ем…
🔉 Че там у Whale?
Whale запустили реферальный турнир с призовым фондом $7,777, и пока там почти пусто.
🔖 Че по фарму?
📏 Инвайтим друга по своей рефке
📏 За его первый депозит получаем 10 поинтов
📏 За второй депозит - еще 20 поинтов
📏 За каждый $1, который реферал заработает на платформе, дают 50 поинтов
⚠️ Важно: Считаются только рефералы, приглашенные после старта турнира.
Когда вы сами зарегистрировались на Wha…
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @chetamcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @chetamcrypto as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
26 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
23 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
8 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Криптониум @cryptoniumb · 18,585 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 3 October 2026
Качаем ИИ @vladimir_dzen_invest · 28,779 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 7 September 2026
Crypto Информатор @cryptoinform · 19,963 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 September 2026
КриптоСпекулянт @cryptospec · 18,859 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 October 2026
Там-Сям и Лям @Crypta_lyam · 31,750 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 September 2026
🤖Нейросети и роботы @airobots_news · 43,016 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
Ринат Садыков | Easy Invest @EasyInvestCrypt · 100,918 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
Руслан Пашкевич | Крипто-темы @Crypta_Pashkevicha · 104,607 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
Крипта с Александром @crypt_investing · 65,083 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
Telegram пиф-паф Hunters @clickerhunters · 324,976 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
Alexey Ataman | Crypto 🐋 @alexatamcrypto · 37,997 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
Ганнибал-крипто @HanibalCrypto · 19,703 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 September 2026
Мой путь к 1🍋$ в крипте @crypto_Iemon · 71,767 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Crypto Era | Криптовалюта | Новости @cryptoera · 47,982 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
theta maxxing @thetamaxxing · 35,292 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 1 September 2026
Gem Hunters @gemhuntru · 67,614 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
Что говорят киты? 🐋 @whaletalks · 50,503 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
Evgeniy Shevchenko CRYPTORUN @cryptorun · 122,256 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
Degen Degenovich @degenovich · 104,601 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
AI MAN | Нейросети и деньги @ai_man0s · 25,232 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 September 2026
Cryptoed @kryptoed · 21,050 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 September 2026
Не биткоином едины | Radan @radan_blog · 32,127 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 4 September 2026
Egorov Trade @egorov_trade · 33,144 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 September 2026
МАТЕШЕВ | Мастерская Трейдинга @masterskay_mateshev · 21,687 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЧЕ там в Крипте” (@chetamcrypto), 36,877 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chetamcrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.