2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 67,864–68,000 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Sept 2026, 21:22
67,932
no change
29 Sept 2026, 20:47
67,932
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 26 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.35%
avg views ÷ 67,932 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,320
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held
22 (26 September 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total
94,960
Reactions total
2,294
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Sept 2026, 21:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,850
Videos
≈861
Links
≈2,420
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,294 reactions across 22 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5224689718284795513
1,506
65.6%
custom 5220103938753186713
352
15.3%
custom 5224603926313060418
273
11.9%
custom 5226874284680429312
95
4.14%
custom 5224226175349438668
68
2.96%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,294 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 26 September 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kriptodima1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 September 2026 to 30 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
На битке чисто тоже Памп/Дамп нарисовали и вернули в коридор 82-85к за считанные часы 😅
Хомяки ждут выход в обе стороны и продают квартиры: одни потому что бычку пропустят и BTC по 250к иначе не увидят, вторые потому что на скам битка не успеют и завтра он будет стоить 30к, классика для любого цикла, на которой 90% теряет деньги по понятным причинам.
Ну а пока можно работать от границ флета с короткими стопами и сп…
Жаль рано ark закрыл, сейчас бы мог не доширак , а стейк мощный кушать 😅
Всех кто додержал с профитом 🔥
➡️Грабим Форекс. Бесплатное торговое сообщество по золоту
Котов | #1 по шортам
Памп/дамп по эфиру
Сейчас можно аккуратно пробывать шортить с хаев, лонговать со стопами короткими
Есть четкие уровни от которых цена отбивается, берите на заметку
➡️Грабим Форекс. Бесплатное торговое сообщество по золоту
Котов | #1 по шортам
ВСЕ РАСТЕТ НА НОВОСТЯХ. ЧТО СЛУЧИЛОСЬ?
Только что в США вышли данные по инфляции, которые показали что Уоршу и компании пока рано действовать 👇🏻
Вместо ожидаемых +0.3% рост составил +0.2%, плюс к тому годовой показатель вырос на 3.0% вместо ожидаемых 3.3%. Это не ликвидирует давление на ФРС, но значительно снижает его, так как топ-1 по важности метрика говорит о том, что повышать ставку второй раз за осень пока ран…
Самую быструю отработку на диком западе заказывали?)
+230$ в депозит марафона
➡️Грабим Форекс. Бесплатное торговое сообщество по золоту
Котов | #1 по шортам
Наааааааааааааа. +1000$ в марафоне
Доброе утро, золото со вчерашнего сетапа решило ничего не придумывать и сделало все как я разрисовывал: подошло к уровню, откатилось, подошло еще раз с правильным ретестом и теперь стоит 4200$
По большому счету на старт этого движения ушел весь вечер но результат того стоил — итог видите на скрине выше))
Подтяну стопы и буду ждать дальнейшего движения, в последнее время на графи…
Пора шортить?
Небольшой совет 👇🏻
Кто ждет скам битка и пробует шортить, дождитесь хотя бы правильного пробоя нижней границы 82 600 с ретестом хотя бы на часовом тф. Локально дедуля биток сильнее всех американских индексов, всех металлов — сильнее только доходность американских госбумаг и возбуждение Трампа при слове "побеждать". Такие распилы это традиционная возможность потерять кучу денег, поэтому либо от границ …
+300$ по сигналу в марафоне
Вчера давал вам сигнал по HBAR в шорт от уровней — для отработки пришлось подождать, но результат есть результат
Вместе открывали ее в новом приложении с продвинутым копированием — над ним работаем уже полгода, я лично вливаю туда 90% своих сил каждый день.
Поэтому если кто-то не успевает заходить в сделки, но хочет торговать по нашей стратегии, готовьтесь: скоро мы запускаем закрытый…
Золото сетап в марафоне
Ну что, после вчерашних дампов золото встало в боковик между 4110 и 4160 — честно говоря это больше похоже на медвежку, которую мы ждали в на крипто-рынке 😁
Что могу сказать: прямо сейчас золото пытается выйти за уровень, и я думаю, что мы наконец-то можем ждать новую легендарную позицию по этому активу в марафоне))
План следующий: золото выходит за 4160 и закрывается выше на часе —> идет р…
+25000$ по позициям
Ну что, как вам ювелирный вход со дна в лонги? Качели конечно бывали страшные, но я держу позицию , частично зафиксировав
Всех с профитом 🔥
➡️Грабим Форекс. Бесплатное торговое сообщество по золоту
Котов | #1 по шортам
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @kriptodima1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Artur|ICT @ArturICT66 · 20,739 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 September 2026
Алиев Азиз | Трейдинг простым языком @alievtrade · 19,839 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КОТОВ | #1 ПО ШОРТАМ/ЛОНГАМ” (@kriptodima1), 67,932 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kriptodima1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
